Skip to content

The Effect of a Cash Transfer Program and Preventive Nutrition Packages on Household Welfare and Child Nutritional Status in Mali

The Effect of a Cash Transfer Program and Preventive Nutrition Packages on Household Welfare and Child Nutritional Status in Mali

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02858011
Acronym
Jigisemejiri
Enrollment
4320
Registered
2016-08-08
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2019-08-10
Last updated
2019-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Child Malnutrition, Poverty

Keywords

behavior change communication, cash transfer, household welfare, child nutrition status

Brief summary

In the last two decades, cash transfer (CT) programs have emerged as a popular approach to long-term poverty alleviation. While the main goal of cash transfer programs is to reduce poverty, they also have the potential to improve many development outcomes, such as health and education. While many studies, mainly in Latin America and Asia, have investigated the impacts of CTs on poverty and food security and have, for the most part, found positive impacts, less is known about the impacts of CTs in Africa south of the Sahara, and, in particular, West Africa. Moreover, despite the fact that cash transfers have been shown to lead to decreases in poverty, improvements in household food security, and increases in health service utilization, impacts on children's nutritional status (including anthropometric measures) are generally small (Manley, Gitter, and Slavchevska 2013). Consequently, policymakers and governments are left with the question of how to design social safety nets, such as cash transfers, to achieve greater impact on diet quality, health, and nutrition. The overall goal of this research is to generate evidence and knowledge on an integrated program implemented by the Government of Mali that includes a combination of cash transfers and targeted nutrition interventions. The information generated will inform program implementers and policymakers about best options to improve food security and nutrition among vulnerable groups and individuals in West Africa. Specifically, the main objectives of the research are 1. To provide evidence on the contribution of integrated social transfer programs to enhancing household welfare, food security, dietary diversity, and maternal and child nutrition in West Africa. 2. To test different features and combinations of cash transfers and targeted nutrition interventions, and assess their impact on food security and maternal and child nutrition and health outcomes in Mali. 3. To generate knowledge regarding the pathways of impact of these different program packages, identify the most effective and efficient modalities in the context of Mali, and derive lessons learned for other countries in the region.

Detailed description

The research entails two study designs: i) a repeated cross-sectional survey (baseline, midline and endline) in a sample of 1,440 children between 6 and 24 months of age, mainly to asses the program's impact on child nutrition and health outcomes; ii) a panel study following a cohort of 2,880 children over 3 years mainly focusing on the evaluation of household welfare outcomes. The study will be conducted in the 96 communes where the Jigisemejiri program is being implemented, situated in 5 regions of Mali: Sikasso, Koulikoro, Segou, Mopti and Kayes. Data will be collected at baseline (2014, T=0), midline (2016, T=\ 24 months) and endline (2018, T=\ 48 months). The program is implemented for 48 months. The experimental group receives the cash transfer and group counselling intervention for 36 months. During the last 12 months the experimental group does not receive any intervention. The control group receives no intervention during the first 36 months, but receives the cash transfer and group counselling during the last 12 months. In a subsample of communes from the experimental group, villages were randomized to either receive Preventive Nutrition Packages (PNP) or nothing. The impact of PNP is analyzed by comparing villages that received PNP and villages that did not receive PNP during the last 12 months of the program.

Interventions

OTHERCash distribution during first 36 months

Three-monthly distribution of Cash (30,000 FCFA/trimester) to households that are beneficiary of the Jigisemejiri program.

BEHAVIORALAccompanying information sessions on health, child nutrition, household economics and education during first 36 months

Large group gatherings of cash beneficiaries are organized in parallel to the cash distributions. During these meetings, local NGOs present and discuss a topic related to health, child nutrition, household economics or education.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPreventive Nutrition Packages during last 12 months

Fortified flour supplements for children (Supercereal Plus)and pregnant/lactating mothers (super Cereal)

OTHERCash distribution during the last 12 months

Three-monthly distribution of Cash (30,000 FCFA/trimester) to households that are beneficiary of the Jigisemejiri program.

BEHAVIORALAccompanying information sessions on health, child nutrition, household economics and education during the last 12 months

Large group gatherings of cash beneficiaries are organized in parallel to the cash distributions. During these meetings, local NGOs present and discuss a topic related to health, child nutrition, household economics or education.

Sponsors

Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Implementation management committee of the Jigisemejiri program (Ministry of Economics and Finance, Government of Mali)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
International Food Policy Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being a Household that is beneficiary of the Jigisemejiri program * Having a child between 6 and 24 months of age

Exclusion criteria

* Congenital malformations that hamper anthropometric measurements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Child Height-for-age Z-scoreAfter 24 months of program implementationTo calculate WHZ scores the 2006 WHO growth reference will be used
Value of household consumptionAfter 24 months of program implementationThe household consumption includes food and non-food related economic consumption
Household dietary diversityAfter 24 months of program implementationThe household dietary diversity is estimated by a dietary diversity score counting food groups
Child Weight-for-Height Z-scoreAfter 48 months of program implementation (only in cross-sectional survey)To calculate WHZ scores the 2006 WHO growth reference will be used (only in cross-sectional survey)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of child anemiaAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Body Mass Index of primary caregiver of index childAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Early child developmentAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Child morbidity (acute respiratory infections, fever, vomiting, diarrhea)After 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Caregiver's knowledge and practices related to Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF), child health and hygieneAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Household assets and savingsAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Educational level of Household membersAfter 24 months and 48 months of program implementation
Household food securityAfter 24 months and 48 months of program implementationMeasured by the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS)
Household compositionAfter 24 months and 48 months of program implementationThis entails the household size, the number of one parent households, monogamous and polygamous households, number of infants and children.
Child Weight-for-height Z-scoreAfter 24 months of program implementationTo calculate WHZ scores the 2006 WHO growth reference will be used
Cognitive function of the head of householdAfter 24 months of program implementationMeasured by spatial Stroop test and digit span test (forward and backward)
Well-being of household membersAfter 24 months and 48 months of program implementationWell-being is assessed by measuring stress, anxiety, psychological well-being, partner violence, marital quality, depression, occurrence of disputes and resource allocation.
Women's empowermentAfter 24 months and 48 months of program implementationMeasured by pro-WEAI instrument adapted to local context
Child dietary diversityAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementationChild dietary diversity is estimated by a dietary diversity score counting food groups consumed
Professional occupation of household membersAfter 24 months and 48 months of program implementationWe assess if household members have different formal and informal professional occupations or main revenue generating activities between intervention and control group
Child Mid-upper Arm CircumferenceAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Maternal hemoglobin concentrationAfter 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Maternal anemiaAfter 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation
Household agricultural productionAfter 24 months and 48 months of program implementationThe composition and quantity of all crops grown by the houshold over the last year is being recalled
Prevalence of child wastingAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementationTo calculate WHZ scores the 2006 WHO growth reference will be used
Prevalence of child stuntingAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementationTo calculate WHZ scores the 2006 WHO growth reference will be used
Child hemoglobin concentrationAfter 24 months and 48 months (only in cross-sectional survey) of program implementation

Countries

Mali

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026