Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Virtual Reality, Cognitive Rehabilitation, Motor Rehabilitation, Ecological validity, Personalisation
Brief summary
Virtual Reality allows the integration of both cognitive and motor rehabilitation in a more ecologically valid context. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this methodology has more impact on stroke rehabilitation than a paper and pencil personalised program and conventional therapy, which is motor-focused.
Detailed description
Cognitive impairments after stroke are not always given sufficient attention despite its limitations in activities-of-daily- living (ADL's). Current cognitive rehabilitation methods mostly rely on paper-and-pencil tasks targeting isolated domains, which is not consistent with everyday-life. Besides limited ecological-validity, paper-and-pencil tasks are not accessible for most stroke patients whose dominant arm is paretic. Virtual Reality (VR) has shown to be a solution for the development of accessible and ecologically valid systems, but, does it have more impact than a paper and pencil personalised intervention? Through a participatory design approach, with health professionals, the investigators have developed: * a motor-accessible and cognitive-personalized VR-based system, where conventional cognitive tasks were operationalized in meaningful simulations of ADL's (Reh@City) and; * a web tool which generates personalised paper and pencil tasks( Task Generator). The investigators objective is to have a sample of 60 stroke patients between 40 and 70 years old, randomly allocated in three groups: the experimental group 1 were participants will perform 30 minutes of the VR training with Reh@City; the experimental group 2 were participants will perform 30 minutes of the paper and pencil training with the Task Generator, and the control group were participants will perform 30 minutes of conventional therapy (occupational therapy).
Interventions
PROCEDUREVirtual Reality
Intervention of 30 minutes, 3 times a week until reaching 12 sessions.
PROCEDUREPaper and Pencil
Intervention of 30 minutes, 3 times a week until reaching 12 sessions.
PROCEDUREConventional Therapy
Intervention of 30 minutes, 3 times a week until reaching 12 sessions.
Sponsors
Serviço de Saúde da Região Autónoma da Madeira (SESARAM), E.P.E.
Universidade da Madeira
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ischemic stroke with more than 6 months post-stroke * cognitive deficit but with enough capacity to understand the task and follow instructions with a minimum score of 11 over 17 in the Token Test (6-item version, Portuguese population) * able to read and write
Exclusion criteria
* Neglect * Severe depressive symptoms as assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change from baseline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment | Baseline, End (4-6 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change from baseline in the Trail Making Test A and B | Baseline, End (4-6 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up |
| Change from baseline in the Verbal Paired Associates (WMS III) | Baseline, End (4-6 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up |
| Change from baseline in the Digit Span (WAIS III) | Baseline, End (4-6 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up |
| Change from baseline in the Symbol Search and Coding (WAIS III) | Baseline, End (4-6 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Crystallised Intelligence as assesed by Comprehension from the WAIS III | Baseline |
Countries
Portugal
Outcome results
None listed