Skip to content

Management of Palmar Hyperhidrosis With Hydrogel-based Iontophoresis

Management of Palmar Hyperhidrosis With Hydrogel-based Iontophoresis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02854540
Enrollment
13
Registered
2016-08-03
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2018-08-30
Last updated
2019-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperhidrosis, Hyperhidrosis Palmaris et Plantaris

Keywords

hyperhidrosis, palmar, sweating, iontophoresis, sweat gland diseases, skin diseases

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the use of hydrogel electrode pads (rather than tap water baths) to deliver iontophoresis treatment using a traditional iontophoresis device. Participants will treat one hand with the hydrogel-based iontophoresis device and leave the other hand untreated.

Detailed description

Palmar hyperhidrosis affects 4.3 million Americans and results in substantial quality of life impairment. Treatment options for palmar hyperhidrosis include antiperspirants, systemic anticholinergic agents, botulinum toxin injections, and iontophoresis. Standard iontophoresis involves submerging the hands in tap water through which current is applied to the palms for 30 minutes per day up to 3 times per week. While effective, treatment adherence rates are low. This study will evaluate the use of hydrogel electrode pads (rather than tap water baths) to deliver iontophoresis treatment using a traditional iontophoresis device. Hydrogel electrode pads permit improved mobility and hand functionality during iontophoresis treatment sessions.

Interventions

DEVICEHydrogel electrode-based iontophoresis

Hydrogel was administered through iontophoresis, a process of transdermal drug delivery by use of a voltage gradient on the skin.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 13 years of age or older * \>6 months self-reported history of primary palmar hyperhidrosis * Initial gravimetry test: \>20mg/min on each palm * No topical treatments for hyperhidrosis (antiperspirants) on the palms for 2 weeks prior to the start of the study * No systemic treatments for hyperhidrosis (anticholinergics) for 4 weeks prior to the start of the study * No tap water iontophoresis treatment for 6 weeks * No Botox injections on the palms for 6 months (if single treatment session) or 10 months (if \>1 previous sessions) prior to the start of the study * No history of cardiothoracic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis * Able to attend 3 office visits (Stanford Medical Outpatient Center located at 450 Broadway St, Redwood City, CA 94063; Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at 730 Welch Road, 1st Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94304) and one virtual visit in an 8 week time frame * Capable of performing sweat level testing and hydrogel-based iontophoresis treatment at home, after training * Hydrogel electrode pad fits on the hand (typically tip of middle finger to lower end of palm length of 6.5in (16.5cm) or greater)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with implanted electronic medical devices e.g. pacemaker, implantable cardioverter/defibrillator) * Patients with metal implants in the extremity that will be treated * Patients with larger skin defects (on the palm or arm of the extremity that will be treated) that cannot be covered by petroleum jelly * Pregnant or nursing women, or looking to become pregnant * Patients on medications that interfere with neuroglandular transmission * Patients with active infection locally or systemically * Patients with history of contact dermatitis to acrylates * Patients with history of contact or systemic allergy to iodine * Patients with a history of ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, epilepsy or thyroid disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Palmar Sweat ProductionBaseline to week 2Quantification of sweat production measured quantitatively using gravimetry, reported as milligrams of sweat per minute.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Reported Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)Baseline to week 2Patient-reported pain on the treated hand using an 11-point visual analogue scale. Scale range: 0-10, with zero representing no pain, and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants recorded pain scores in a daily diary, and the score reported here is the average of all scores reported over the 2-week treatment period.
Modified Minor's Sweat Testing as a Quantitative Measure of Palmar Sweat ProductionBaseline to week 2Modified Minor's starch iodine testing, done with iodine imprints on plain paper, performed in office and at home to quantitatively measure sweat production.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Hand A was treated with hydrogel electrode-based iontophoresis. Hand B did not receive treatment. Hydrogel electrode-based iontophoresis: During the treatment period, participants were asked to treat one hand with the hydrogel electrode-based iontophoresis device. Participants were also asked to leave the other hand untreated.
13
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 130 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Palmar Sweat Production

Quantification of sweat production measured quantitatively using gravimetry, reported as milligrams of sweat per minute.

Time frame: Baseline to week 2

Population: Two participants who were not able to tolerate the lower threshold dose were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hand A (Iontophoresis)Change From Baseline in Palmar Sweat ProductionBaseline44.8 mg/minStandard Deviation 25.34
Hand A (Iontophoresis)Change From Baseline in Palmar Sweat ProductionWeek 237.8 mg/minStandard Deviation 41.07
Hand B (no Treatment)Change From Baseline in Palmar Sweat ProductionBaseline43.2 mg/minStandard Deviation 24.77
Hand B (no Treatment)Change From Baseline in Palmar Sweat ProductionWeek 224.9 mg/minStandard Deviation 17.87
Secondary

Modified Minor's Sweat Testing as a Quantitative Measure of Palmar Sweat Production

Modified Minor's starch iodine testing, done with iodine imprints on plain paper, performed in office and at home to quantitatively measure sweat production.

Time frame: Baseline to week 2

Population: No data were collected for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Patient Reported Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)

Patient-reported pain on the treated hand using an 11-point visual analogue scale. Scale range: 0-10, with zero representing no pain, and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants recorded pain scores in a daily diary, and the score reported here is the average of all scores reported over the 2-week treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline to week 2

Population: Two participants who were not able to tolerate the lower threshold dose were excluded from the analysis. This outcome was prespecified for the treated hand only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hand A (Iontophoresis)Patient Reported Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026