Skip to content

Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer vs Durable-polymer in Diabetic Patients

Long-term Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-eluting Stents and Durable-polymer Everolimus-eluting Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02854423
Acronym
RUDI 2D
Enrollment
1347
Registered
2016-08-03
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2016-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Brief summary

Both biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) and durable polymer-based everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) have been shown to improve long-term clinical outcomes as compared with early generation DES. BP-BES with DP-EES have been directly compared in 2 randomized trials, showing no differences between the two devices in all-comer patients during long-term follow-up. It is unknown whether these results are consistent in real-world patients with diabetes mellitus during long-term follow-up. To evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of biodegradable polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) as compared to durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients with diabetes mellitus during long-term follow-up. Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with BP-BES or DP-EES implantation were included in a multicenter registry between January 2007 and May 2012. Long-term clinical outcomes between BP-BES and DP-EES will be compared using propensity score matching. The pre-specified primary endpoint is the occurrence of major cardiac adverse events (MACE) - a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints are the individual components of the primary endpoint as well as definite stent thrombosis (ST).

Interventions

Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with Biodegradable polymer Biolimus Eluting Stent or durable polymer Everolimus Eluting Stent implantation

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \> 18 years * diabetes mellitus * percutaneous coronary interventions with biolimus eluting stent or everolimus eluting stent implantation * signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* planned procedure requiring antiplatelet therapy withdrawal within 12 months from index coronary angioplasty * patients with contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus ticlopidine or clopidogrel) * known allergy to stent drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
major cardiac adverse events4 yearsa composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target-vessel revascularization (TVR)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
rate of definite stent thrombosis in revascularized patients according with ARC definition4 years
Rate of composite of all-cause death in all participants4 years
Rate of myocardial infarction according with definition of MI type 1in all participants4 years
Rate of target-vessel revascularization (TVR) in all participants4 years

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026