Skip to content

Ablative tReatment of Inoperable REnal Cell Carcinoma Using STereotactic Body Radiotherapy (ARREST-study)

Ablative tReatment of Inoperable REnal Cell Carcinoma Using STereotactic Body Radiotherapy (ARREST-study)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02853162
Acronym
ARREST
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-08-02
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

Stereotactic body radiotherapy, MRI, Renal cell carcinoma

Brief summary

Phase II study (n=30) to evaluate the safety and feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with fiducial markers in inoperable patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Detailed description

Rationale: The standard treatment of RCC is (partial-) nephrectomy. Alternatives to this treatment are less invasive techniques like radio frequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CA). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an alternative curative treatment modality, which has shown promising results in several North-American phase I-II studies over the last years. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SBRT for patients with inoperable RCC on a conventional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) linear accelerator. Objective: To evaluate safety and feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with fiducial markers in inoperable patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Study design: Single arm prospective study. Study population: Inoperable patients ≥ 18 years, with a pathology proven RCC fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Intervention: Prior to treatment, patients will undergo fiducial marker placement (in combination with a biopsy, if RCC has not been pathology proven), followed by a contrast enhanced planning computed tomography (CT)-scan and a contrast enhanced MRI-scan. Fiducial markers will be used as this increases visibility of the tumor and therefore the accuracy of radiotherapy, particularly the irradiated healthy kidney tissue will be diminished by using this approach. Baseline toxicity and quality of life will be assessed. SBRT using a VMAT technique will be delivered in five fractions of 7 Gy every other day. The target volume for treatment is defined on a 4D planningCT and MRI and the tumor is treated in the midposition of the breathing cycle. After treatment, follow-up will be at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months at the Radiotherapy department, followed by standard follow-up by the urologist. An additional contrast enhanced MRI scan will be performed after the 2nd treatment fraction, and after 6 and 12 months to assess treatment response to prepare for future MR-guided (MR-linac) radiotherapy. Toxicity and quality of life will be assessed during follow-up. Main study parameters/endpoints: Newly developed acute toxicity grade 3 or more according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE) version 4.0. The treatment is considered successful if all 5 treatments are completed and if in total \<15% of the patients (=5 patients) report a toxicity ≤ grade 3. Secondary endpoints will be treatment response, (late) toxicity assessment, local control rate and quality of life assessment.

Interventions

RADIATIONARREST-study

Radiotherapy will be delivered in five fractions of 7 Gy every other day. An additional contrast enhanced MRI scan will be performed after the 2nd treatment fraction, and after 6 and 12 months

Sponsors

UMC Utrecht
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inoperability, or when a patient refuses surgery (i.e. not eligible for (partial-) nephrectomy or RFA); * Kidney function allows for intervention, as evaluated by treating urologist (taking into account eGFR and renogram); * Age ≥ 18 years; * Written informed consent; * Diagnosis of RCC confirmed by pathology (in case determined after informed consent, patients who are not eligible anymore (no RCC) will be excluded).

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of metastatic disease; *

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with treatment related adverse events grade >2 as assessed by CTCAE v.4.0Within 90 days after radiotherapyThe treatment is considered successful if all 5 treatments are completed and if in total \<15% of the patients (=5 patients) report an acute toxicity ≤ grade 3

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with correlation of functional MRI (DCE and DWI) changes during treatment and radiological response after treatment12 months after radiotherapyResponse prediction (contrast enhanced MRI during treatment, after 2nd fraction)
Disease specific survival5 years after radiotherapyDisease specific survival
Radiological response5 years after radiotherapyRadiological treatment response of the tumor, measured according to the RECIST criteria, in combination with functional imaging parameters (multiparametric MRI).
Quality of life questionnaire12 months after radiotherapyEORTC-QLQ-C30
Overall survival5 years after radiotherapyOverall survival
Acute and late toxicity5 years after radiotherapyCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE) version 4.0

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026