Shoulder Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to characterize and compare the 3D shoulder kinematics bilaterally while performing functional movement patterns tests that hypothetically replicate the 5 main phases of the throwing cycle. The tests are based on diagonal D2 for flexion (early and late cocking of the arm) and D2 for extension (acceleration, deceleration and follow-through of the arm) of the upper extremity of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques.
Detailed description
The 3D shoulder kinematics (thorax, scapula and humerus) will be collected in different groups of subjects with specific characteristics. To load the upper extremity during PNF D2 for flexion and extension directions, elastic tubing (Thera-Band) will be used as resistance. Selection of the two resistances will be according to a self-perceived ability of the subjects to consistently move a maximal amount of resistance (color) during PNF D2 flexion and extension tests for 15s and 30s, respectively. Each subject will be permitted to sample various resistances in order to assist in selecting the most appropriate load, with no more than three practice repetitions permitted per each resistance sampled. To perform the tests, subjects will be sited in a standard chair without armrests, with their feet and lower legs placed on another standard chair, positioned just in front of their chair and the non-testing arm placed across the thoracic wall, to minimize the participation of the legs and trunk to upper extremity performance during testing. Elastic tubing will be anchored to a stable base to perform the diagonals (Thera-Band door anchor accessory or the opposite foot). Five repetitions of each test on both sides will be performed, in two different moments (5-10 minutes apart). A rate of 2 seconds per repetition will be employed during recordings using a metronome. A rest period will be given between trials to avoid fatigue. To perform the tests, subjects will begin/end with their hand on the contralateral hip and end/begin at head height and shoulder width. A marker will be placed in the latter position to standardize the start and end of hand position. The order of the tests (PNF D2 flexion and extension) and side (symptomatic/dominant and asymptomatic/non-dominant) will be randomized.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPNF D2 for flexion; low-to-moderate loading condition
Exposure to upper extremity PNF D2 for flexion during low-to-moderate loading condition
BEHAVIORALPNF D2 for flexion; moderate-to-high loading condition
Exposure to upper extremity PNF D2 for flexion during moderate-to-high loading condition
BEHAVIORALPNF D2 for extension; low-to-moderate loading condition
Exposure to upper extremity PNF D2 for extension during low-to-moderate loading condition
BEHAVIORALPNF D2 for extension; moderate-to-high loading condition
Exposure to upper extremity PNF D2 for extension during moderate-to-high loading condition
Sponsors
University of Lisbon
Instituto Politécnico de Leiria
Universidade do Porto
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* subjects who can perform at least 150 degrees of arm elevation
Exclusion criteria
* subjects rating pain ≥8/10 * score 5 on any of the items of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) * pain elicited by provocation maneuvers of the neighboring regions (e.g., cervical spine).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Side-to-side differences in 3-dimensional scapular angular displacement (in degrees) | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | The angular position and displacement of the scapula in the 3 planes of \[lateral/medial (upward/downward) rotation, protraction/retraction (internal/external rotation), anterior/posterior tilting\] at 4 key events of the simulated throwing motion during the two loading conditions (1, initiation of humeral motion; 2, maximum humeral horizontal abduction relative to the trunk; 3, maximum humeral external rotation; 4, maximum humeral internal rotation) |
| Side-to-side differences in 3-dimensional humerus angular displacement (in degrees) | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | The angular position and displacement of the humerus in the 3 planes of (plane of elevation, elevation/depression, axial rotation) at 4 key events of the simulated throwing motion during the two loading conditions (1, initiation of humeral motion; 2, maximum humeral horizontal abduction relative to the trunk; 3, maximum humeral external rotation; 4, maximum humeral internal rotation) |
| Side-to-side differences in 3-dimensional thoracic angular displacement (in degrees) | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | The angular position and displacement of the thorax in the 3 planes of \[flexion/extension, lateral rotation (inclination), axial rotation\] at 4 key events of the simulated throwing motion during the two loading conditions (1, initiation of humeral motion; 2, maximum humeral horizontal abduction relative to the trunk; 3, maximum humeral external rotation; 4, maximum humeral internal rotation) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Borg's Rate of Perceived Exertion scale | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale varies from 6 (no exertion) to 20 (very, very hard) |
| Visual Numeric Rating Scale score (0-10) | Through study completion, an average of 1 year | A 11-point scale to rate pain intensity |
Countries
Portugal
Outcome results
None listed