Attachment Image Data Set Validation in Adolescent

Validation of an Attachment Picture Set in School-adolescent

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02851836

Acronym

MONRADO1

Enrollment

133

Registered

2016-08-02

Start date

2012-10-31

Completion date

2013-11-30

Last updated

2016-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emotion Dysregulation

Keywords

attachment, adolescent, picture

Brief summary

this study aims to validate a picture data set that particularly activates the attachment process and that could be used in attachment studies.

Detailed description

Pictures have been chosen to represent several emotions: distress, comfort, complicity and neutral.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALimage visualization and quotation

two sets of 60 pictures are shown to the adolescents. we ask them to quote for their valence, hedonicity, arousal and to characterize the emotion elicited in each picture. This evaluation takes approximately 1hour.

Study design

Allocation

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

13 Years to 18 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* adolescent going to high school not hospitalized

Exclusion criteria

* mental retardation non comprehension of french visual deficit

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
mean score of valence in the SAM (self assessment manikin system)	at inclusion	the hedonicity is assessed for each picture. The characterization of the set is performed using the mean score of hedonicity for each type of picture (distress, comfort, complicity and neural)

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
mean score of arousal in the SAM (self assessment manikin system)	at inclusion	the hedonicity is assessed for each picture. The characterization of the set is performed using the mean score of arousal for each type of picture (distress, comfort, complicity and neural)
mean score of dominance in the SAM (self assessment manikin system)	at inclusion	the hedonicity is assessed for each picture. The characterization of the set is performed using the mean score of dominance for each type of picture (distress, comfort, complicity and neural)
emotional categorization of the picture	at inclusion	continuous scales for different emotions (distress, comfort, joy-complicity hate, horror) are presented. Subjects have to quote them for each picture.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026