Skip to content

Oculomotor Markers and Attachment in Adolescents

Oculomotor and Neurophysiological Markers of Emotion Regulation and Attachment Styles in Adolescence

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02851810
Acronym
MONRADO2
Enrollment
124
Registered
2016-08-02
Start date
2013-12-19
Completion date
2017-06-08
Last updated
2018-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emotion Dysregulation

Keywords

attachment, oculomotor marker, emotion regulation

Brief summary

The study aims to identify specific visual scanning patterns of attachment pictures in adolescent with different attachment style.

Detailed description

Oculomotor parameters will be assessed during visualization of 2 sets of pictures. The first set presents a distress picture and is followed by a slide composed of 3 pictures (one representing comfort, one representing complicity and the last representing a neutral scene). Psychophysiological parameters (skin conductance reactivity-SCR) is also assess during this visualization.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALoculomotor parameter recording

visual scanning behavior is assessed during visualization of emotional pictures

BEHAVIORALattachment scale interview (ASI)

ASI is used to determine the attachment style of each participant

BEHAVIORALpsychophysiological recording

this consists of the measurement of the skin conductance reactivity (SCR) during the picture visualization

self administered questionnaires are used to assess anxiety, depression and alexithymia.

an interview of the adolescent parent is performed in order to assess the confusion of the parent-child role and the interaction between the child and its parent.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* non hospitalized child who is going to school

Exclusion criteria

* not french-speaker vision problem more than 20 cigarettes/day

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of entry in distress pictureswithin 1 year after inclusionthese parameters will be compared between the different types of attachment.
saccade duration in distress picturewithin 1 year after inclusiontime spent looking at the distress picture these parameters will be compared between the different types of attachment.
average of the number of entry in comfort picture vs neutral and complicity pictureswithin 1 year after inclusionthese parameters will be compared between the different types of attachment.
average of the saccade duration in comfort picture vs neutral and complicity pictureswithin 1 year after inclusionthese parameters will be compared between the different types of attachment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
interaction with the parent: score to the GPACS (goal-corrected partnership in adolescence coding system)within 1 year after inclusionthe quality of the interaction with the parent and the confusion of the parent-child role will be compared between the different attachment types.
Reaction time in SCRwithin 1 year after inclusionthis parameter will be compared between the different types of attachment.
Amplitude of SCRwithin 1 year after inclusionthis parameter will be compared between the different types of attachment.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026