Skip to content

The Evaluation of an Alternative Sizing Model in Comparison of a Conventional Sizing Model for Full Face Masks in the Treatment of OSA in Terms of Performance and Comfort

The Evaluation of an Alternative Sizing Model in Comparison of a Conventional Sizing Model for Full-face Masks in the Treatment of OSA in Terms of Performance and Comfort

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02851628
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-08-01
Start date
2017-09-11
Completion date
2017-12-20
Last updated
2018-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Sleep Disordered Breathing

Brief summary

The investigation is a prospective non-blinded and semi-randomized clinical investigation. The investigation is designed to assess the alternative sizing model which the trial mask concept is based on and how it compares to a conventional sizing present in the Prototype Full Face Mask (PFFM) mask.

Detailed description

The investigation is a prospective non-blinded and semi-randomized investigation. The investigation is designed to assess the alternative sizing model which the trial mask concept is based on and how it compares to a conventional sizing present in the Prototype Full Face Mask (PFFM) mask. A cohort of up to 38 pre-determined current nasal and full face mask users will be recruited by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare in Auckland New Zealand, Waikato DHB in Hamilton New Zealand, Hawkes Bay DHB in Hastings New Zealand and WellSleep Centre in Wellington New Zealand. The study will involve baseline (visit one) gathering the participants' prescribed PAP therapy pressure and their usual mask (to have up-to-date records). The next visit (visit 2) 7 ± 4 days after visit 1, the participants will be fit the Prototype Full Face Mask (PFFM) mask or the alternative sizing based trial mask. At visit 3, which will be after 7 ± 4 days from visit 2, the participants will be crossed over to the mask. At visit 4, 7 ± 4 days after visit 3, all masks and devices will be collected from the participants.

Interventions

DEVICEAlternative sizing model based trial mask

A trial full face mask to be used for this trial for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea using CPAP therapy.

DEVICEPrototype Full Face Mask

A prototype full face mask with previous clinical trial experience used for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea using CPAP therapy.

Sponsors

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (18+ years of age) * Able to give consent * Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 5 on diagnostic night * Prescribed a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device after successful OSA diagnosis * Existing nasal or full face mask user.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give consent * Patients who are in a coma or a decreased level of consciousness. * Anatomical or physiological conditions making APAP therapy inappropriate (e.g. unconsolidated facial structure) * Commercial drivers who are investigated by New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) * Current diagnosis of CO2 retention * Pregnant or may think they are pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seal ComfortUp to 3 weeks in-homeObtained from subjective questionnaire
Subjective Seal LeakUp to 3 weeks in-homeObtained from subjective questionnaire
Objective Seal LeakUp to 3 weeks in-homeMeasured by device data

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective correct mask selectionUp to 3 weeks in-homeMeasured by device leak data
Subjective correct mask selectionUp to 3 weeks in-homeMeasured by subjective questionnaire

Countries

New Zealand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026