Skip to content

Acupuncture for Postoperative Pain After Abdominal Surgery for Gynecological Diseases

Combined Electroacupuncture and Auricular Acupuncture for Postoperative Pain After Abdominal Surgery for Gynecological Diseases: A Randomized Sham-controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02851186
Enrollment
72
Registered
2016-08-01
Start date
2016-10-12
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2019-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Brief summary

Objectives: To examine the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) combined with auricular acupuncture (AA) in reducing post-operative pain in patients following abdominal surgery for gynecological diseases. Hypothesis: Acupuncture is effective and safe to reduce postoperative pain during the first 5 days following surgery as compared to a sham control. Design and strategy: This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, subject- and assessor-blind trial. Seventy-two subjects will be recruited and randomized (in 1:1 ratio) to receive either acupuncture treatment or sham control. Subjects in both groups will undergo standard operation procedure and receive post-operative analgesics based on usual care. Study instrument: A 10-point pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be employed as a primary outcome assessment. Intervention: Subjects in the treatment group will receive EA combined with AA within two hours before operation, post-operation upon arrival to the ward and once a day for the subsequent 5 days. Subjects in the control group will receive non-invasive sham procedure in the same schedule. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: NRS pain scores will be measured upon recovery, hourly at 6 hours after surgery, then 4-hourly until day 2, 6-hourly until day 3 and once daily until discharge. Secondary outcome: Morphine consumption, post-operative syndromes, quality of recovery questionnaire, SF-6D, EQ-5D-5L and adverse events will be documented and compared between groups. Data analysis: Pain intensity during the first 5 days will be calculated by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of NRS pain scores. AUC between the two groups will be compared by Student's T-test. Expected outcome: AUC of the acupuncture group is expected to be significantly lower than sham acupuncture group.

Interventions

DEVICEAcupuncture
DEVICESham acupuncture

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III * Eligible for laparotomy with midline incision for gynaecological neoplasm including ovarian mass, uterine mass and cervical lesions * Age 18 years or above * Ability to understand the nature of the study and willing to give informed consent * Capable of providing responses during outcome measurement

Exclusion criteria

* Having chronic pain and using any medication in addition to the anaesthetic and analgesia prescribed prior to surgery that would be expected to affect the dosage of postoperative analgesia * History of or current alcohol or drug abuse * Impaired renal function, defined as preoperative serum creatinine level over 120µmol/L * Impaired hepatic function, defined as preoperative serum albumin level below 30g/L * Impaired or retarded mental state and not able to sign the consent * Not self-ambulatory before operation * Difficulties in using patient-controlled analgesia * BMI \> 35kg/m2 * Infection observed at the acupoint sites * History of acupuncture experience in the previous 12 months * History or clinical evidence of valvular heart defects, heart failure, atrial fibrillation or bleeding disorders or are fitted with cardiac pacemaker or taking anticoagulant drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Area under the curve of Pain intensity by numerical rating scale (NRS) from baseline to day 55 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cumulative morphine consumptionThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Frequency of rescues analgesic (IM morphine) useThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Time of recovery from postoperative syndromeThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Quality of recovery (QoR-9)Through study completion, an average of 7 days
SF-6DThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
EQ-5D-5LThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Pain intensity by numerical rating scale (NRS) at restThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Pain intensity by numerical rating scale (NRS) while coughingThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Dose of rescues analgesic (IM morphine) useThrough study completion, an average of 7 days

Other

MeasureTime frame
Number of subjects with adverse eventsThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Treatment Credibility by the Credibility of Treatment Rating Scale (CTRS)Through study completion, an average of 7 days
Blinding Success Assessment by questionnaireDay 5
Number of patients withdrawThrough study completion, an average of 7 days
Reasons of withdrawalThrough study completion, an average of 7 days

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026