Nicotine Dependence
Conditions
Keywords
Smoking cessation, Nicotine dependence, Organizational change, Mental Healthcare
Brief summary
Despite an overall reduction in US smoking rates from \>50% in the 1960s to about 20% by 2000, the rate of smoking among persons with a serious mental illness (SMI) remains 2-3 times greater than in the general population. Further, even the recent small decline in smoking rates that has been reported in the general population in the past decade has not occurred among smokers with an SMI. In fact, 44% of all the cigarettes consumed in the US are by individuals with a psychiatric disorder and the primary cause of death among Americans with an SMI is a tobacco-related disease. This cluster randomized trial will be conducted in 14 Philadelphia community mental health clinics (CMHCs). Clinics will be randomized to either Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change model (ATTOC) or Usual Care (UC) treatment groups. The investigators hypothesize that 1) at the end of the intervention and at a 3-month follow-up, rates of adherence to guidelines for treating TUD will be greater among clinic personnel that receive the ATTOC intervention vs. clinic personnel in usual care; 2) at the end of the intervention and at a 3-month follow-up, rates of client smoking cessation will be significantly greater in clinics that receive the ATTOC intervention than among clients treated with usual care; and 3) using non-inferiority testing, at the end of the intervention and at a 3-month follow-up, there will be no significant degradation in mental health functioning or QOL among clients who receive care at clinics that received the ATTOC intervention than among clients treated with usual care.
Detailed description
Despite an overall reduction in US smoking rates from \>50% in the 1960s to about 20% by 2000, the rate of smoking among persons with a serious mental illness (SMI) remains 2-3 times greater than in the general population. Transforming the mental healthcare system to integrate and adhere to evidence-based guidelines for the provision of tobacco use disorder (TUD) treatment is a priority of the National Institute of Mental Health and is a critical component of a national effort to meet Healthy People 2020 target goals for tobacco use (www.healthypeople.gov). The Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change (ATTOC) model is a systems-level intervention to address systemic and cultural barriers that undermine assessment and treatment of TUD. In this innovative way, ATTOC assumes that effective organizational change requires more than clinic personnel training; it also requires the application of organizational theory to address attitudinal and system barriers and promote a culture in which tobacco use is not accepted or supported and that TUD treatment is integrated into standard practice. Consistent with organizational theory, ATTOC is implemented in 3 phases: preparing for, implementing, and sustaining change. By addressing cultural barriers and strengthening the care system (e.g., integrated treatment), ATTOC intends to have sustained benefits beyond the intervention. This cluster-randomized trial will be conducted with 14 Philadelphia CMHCs, 7 randomized to ATTOC and 7 to usual care (UC). Following randomization, study staff will visit sites to recruit clinic personnel and clients over a 4 to 6 week period. Those eligible will complete informed consent and HIPAA forms and a baseline assessment to establish pre-intervention levels on all measures (baseline). After 4-6 weeks, the ATTOC intervention will be implemented over 9 months, from Week 1 to Week 36 (with UC at the control sites). Two mid-intervention assessments (Weeks 12 and 24) will allow for performance feedback and mediational analyses. Week 36 (end-of-treatment; EOT) and 52 (3-months post-EOT) assessments will allow for evaluation of changes on outcomes between groups over time. All measures will be conducted at the respective CMHC (or over the phone if necessary) and 7-day point prevalence smoking cessation will be verified using a breath carbon monoxide (CO) monitor (abstinence = \< 8ppm). This will be the first controlled, randomized trial to evaluate the effects of the ATTOC model on clinician adherence to treatment guidelines, client smoking, and client mental health and QOL. If this approach is shown to be effective and safe, it can serve as a model for the nation's community mental healthcare infrastructure, representing a powerful initiative to address tobacco use in an under-served sub-group of smokers, and support efforts to attain the Healthy People 2020 goals regarding tobacco use.
Interventions
ATTOC is implemented in a systematic 3-phase process with 10 steps to guide sites through cultural change and implementation of evidence-based practice.
Sites randomized to UC will not receive an organizational intervention to address TUD treatment. To ensure standardization across UC sites, study personnel will provide a 1-day training seminar that will include written materials describing recommended treatments for TUD to UC personnel consistent with established treatment guidelines.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
(clinic client participants): * Must be a client at a participating community mental health clinic * Must be 18 years of age or older * Must report daily average smoking of 5 cigarettes/day for the past 6 months * Must have a documented Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Axis I or II disorder * Must demonstrate the ability to communicate in English and provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
(clinic client participants): * Exclusive use of electronic cigarettes (dual use with standard cigarettes will not be exclusionary) Inclusion Criteria (Clinic personnel participants): * Must be 18 years of age or older * Must perform clinical care or supervisory duties * Must demonstrate the ability to communicate in English and provide written informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Client Reported Tobacco Medications | Week 36 & Week 52 | Client-reported use of tobacco treatment for nicotine dependence measured via self-report |
| Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHR | Week 36 & Week 52 | Frequency of provision of medications for nicotine dependence measured via electronic health record (EHR) data for clients. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Smoking Cessation Rate | Week 36 & Week 52 | Change in proportion of smoking from baseline to follow-up time-points for clients |
| Mental Health Functioning | Week 36 & Week 52 | Mental health functioning was measured using the Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R), a 24-item assessment of mental health functioning that yields a total score and subscale scores for: depression, interpersonal relationships, self-harm, emotional liability, psychosis, and substance abuse. The total overall score was used. The 24 questions are scored on a 5-pointscale (from 0 to 4) with higher numbers indicating greater symptom/problem frequency or severity. The overall score can range from a 0 to a 96. |
| Short-Form Health Survey Emotional | Week 36 & Week 52 | The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the emotional section of questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 8-30. |
| Short-Form Health Survey Physical | Week 36 and Week 52 | The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the physical functioning section of the questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 5-15. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat Tobacco | Week 36 and Week 52 | The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more barriers to tobacco treatment with the range of scores being 0-13. |
| S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From Staff | Week 36 and Week 52 | The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores mean more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 7-35. |
| S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat Tobacco | Week 36 and Week 52 | The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective).The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more skills and the range of scores is: 0-26. |
| S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and Policies | Week 36 and Week 52 | The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items Higher scores equal more tobacco services. The range of scores is: 1-14. |
| S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment | Week 36 and Week 52 | The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 0-26. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Usual Care Clients Usual Care is the typical guideline based smoking cessation intervention
UC Intervention: Sites randomized to UC will not receive an organizational intervention to address TUD treatment. To ensure standardization across UC sites, study personnel will provide a 1-day training seminar that will include written materials describing recommended treatments for TUD to UC personnel consistent with established treatment guidelines. | 266 |
| ATTOC Clients Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change is a multi-phase organizational intervention to promote the treatment of tobacco dependence
ATTOC Intervention: ATTOC is implemented in a systematic 3-phase process with 10 steps to guide sites through cultural change and implementation of evidence-based practice. | 344 |
| Usual Care Staff Usual Care is the typical guideline based smoking cessation intervention
UC Intervention: Sites randomized to UC will not receive an organizational intervention to address TUD treatment. To ensure standardization across UC sites, study personnel will provide a 1-day training seminar that will include written materials describing recommended treatments for TUD to UC personnel consistent with established treatment guidelines. | 91 |
| ATTOC Staff Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change is a multi-phase organizational intervention to promote the treatment of tobacco dependence
ATTOC Intervention: ATTOC is implemented in a systematic 3-phase process with 10 steps to guide sites through cultural change and implementation of evidence-based practice. | 131 |
| Total | 832 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 104 | 35 | 116 | 22 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 10 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Usual Care Clients | ATTOC Clients | Usual Care Staff | ATTOC Staff | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 266 Participants | 344 Participants | 91 Participants | 131 Participants | 832 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 45.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | 48.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | 38.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 | 45.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 | 44.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 36 Participants | 31 Participants | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 222 Participants | 306 Participants | 70 Participants | 93 Participants | 691 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 12 Participants | 30 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 1 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 152 Participants | 205 Participants | 33 Participants | 77 Participants | 467 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 6 Participants | 15 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 27 Participants | 16 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 54 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 78 Participants | 103 Participants | 41 Participants | 42 Participants | 264 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 266 participants | 344 participants | 91 participants | 131 participants | 832 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 131 Participants | 140 Participants | 75 Participants | 99 Participants | 445 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 135 Participants | 204 Participants | 16 Participants | 32 Participants | 387 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 8 / 344 | 6 / 266 | 2 / 131 | 0 / 91 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 344 | 0 / 266 | 0 / 131 | 0 / 91 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 34 / 344 | 15 / 266 | 0 / 131 | 0 / 91 |
Outcome results
Client Reported Tobacco Medications
Client-reported use of tobacco treatment for nicotine dependence measured via self-report
Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52
Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | Client Reported Tobacco Medications | Week 36 | 48 Participants |
| ATTOC | Client Reported Tobacco Medications | Week 52 | 62 Participants |
| Usual Care | Client Reported Tobacco Medications | Week 36 | 28 Participants |
| Usual Care | Client Reported Tobacco Medications | Week 52 | 24 Participants |
Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHR
Frequency of provision of medications for nicotine dependence measured via electronic health record (EHR) data for clients.
Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52
Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHR | Week 36 | 20 Participants |
| ATTOC | Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHR | Week 52 | 20 Participants |
| Usual Care | Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHR | Week 36 | 33 Participants |
| Usual Care | Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHR | Week 52 | 21 Participants |
Mental Health Functioning
Mental health functioning was measured using the Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R), a 24-item assessment of mental health functioning that yields a total score and subscale scores for: depression, interpersonal relationships, self-harm, emotional liability, psychosis, and substance abuse. The total overall score was used. The 24 questions are scored on a 5-pointscale (from 0 to 4) with higher numbers indicating greater symptom/problem frequency or severity. The overall score can range from a 0 to a 96.
Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52
Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | Mental Health Functioning | Week 36 | 27.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| ATTOC | Mental Health Functioning | Week 52 | 28.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.6 |
| Usual Care | Mental Health Functioning | Week 36 | 31.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
| Usual Care | Mental Health Functioning | Week 52 | 30.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25 |
Short-Form Health Survey Emotional
The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the emotional section of questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 8-30.
Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52
Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | Short-Form Health Survey Emotional | Week 36 | 18.6 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions) | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| ATTOC | Short-Form Health Survey Emotional | Week 52 | 17.9 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions) | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Usual Care | Short-Form Health Survey Emotional | Week 36 | 18.5 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions) | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Usual Care | Short-Form Health Survey Emotional | Week 52 | 18.8 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions) | Standard Deviation 4 |
Short-Form Health Survey Physical
The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the physical functioning section of the questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 5-15.
Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52
Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | Short-Form Health Survey Physical | Week 36 | 9.5 Score from SF-12 (physical questions) | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| ATTOC | Short-Form Health Survey Physical | Week 52 | 9.6 Score from SF-12 (physical questions) | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Usual Care | Short-Form Health Survey Physical | Week 36 | 9.8 Score from SF-12 (physical questions) | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Usual Care | Short-Form Health Survey Physical | Week 52 | 10.1 Score from SF-12 (physical questions) | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
Smoking Cessation Rate
Change in proportion of smoking from baseline to follow-up time-points for clients
Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52
Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | Smoking Cessation Rate | Week 36 | 11 Participants |
| ATTOC | Smoking Cessation Rate | Week 52 | 17 Participants |
| Usual Care | Smoking Cessation Rate | Week 52 | 9 Participants |
| Usual Care | Smoking Cessation Rate | Week 36 | 4 Participants |
S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat Tobacco
The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more barriers to tobacco treatment with the range of scores being 0-13.
Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52
Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat Tobacco | Week 36 | 11.5 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| ATTOC | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat Tobacco | Week 52 | 11.6 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
| Usual Care | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat Tobacco | Week 36 | 8.1 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Usual Care | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat Tobacco | Week 52 | 7.7 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat Tobacco
The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective).The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more skills and the range of scores is: 0-26.
Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52
Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat Tobacco | Week 36 | 14 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| ATTOC | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat Tobacco | Week 52 | 14 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Usual Care | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat Tobacco | Week 36 | 12.9 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Usual Care | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat Tobacco | Week 52 | 13.5 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment
The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 0-26.
Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52
Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment | Week 36 | 12.3 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| ATTOC | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment | Week 52 | 12.8 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Usual Care | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment | Week 36 | 10.2 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Usual Care | S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment | Week 52 | 11.6 Score from S-KAP | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and Policies
The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items Higher scores equal more tobacco services. The range of scores is: 1-14.
Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52
Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and Policies | Week 36 | 6.8 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| ATTOC | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and Policies | Week 52 | 6.5 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Usual Care | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and Policies | Week 36 | 5.5 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Usual Care | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and Policies | Week 52 | 5.6 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From Staff
The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores mean more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 7-35.
Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52
Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTOC | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From Staff | Week 36 | 16.7 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| ATTOC | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From Staff | Week 52 | 16.3 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Usual Care | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From Staff | Week 36 | 15.9 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Usual Care | S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From Staff | Week 52 | 15.5 Score from S-KAS | Standard Deviation 6 |