Skip to content

Testing an Organizational Change Model to Address Smoking in Mental Healthcare

Testing an Organizational Change Model to Address Smoking in Mental Healthcare

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02849652
Enrollment
832
Registered
2016-07-29
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nicotine Dependence

Keywords

Smoking cessation, Nicotine dependence, Organizational change, Mental Healthcare

Brief summary

Despite an overall reduction in US smoking rates from \>50% in the 1960s to about 20% by 2000, the rate of smoking among persons with a serious mental illness (SMI) remains 2-3 times greater than in the general population. Further, even the recent small decline in smoking rates that has been reported in the general population in the past decade has not occurred among smokers with an SMI. In fact, 44% of all the cigarettes consumed in the US are by individuals with a psychiatric disorder and the primary cause of death among Americans with an SMI is a tobacco-related disease. This cluster randomized trial will be conducted in 14 Philadelphia community mental health clinics (CMHCs). Clinics will be randomized to either Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change model (ATTOC) or Usual Care (UC) treatment groups. The investigators hypothesize that 1) at the end of the intervention and at a 3-month follow-up, rates of adherence to guidelines for treating TUD will be greater among clinic personnel that receive the ATTOC intervention vs. clinic personnel in usual care; 2) at the end of the intervention and at a 3-month follow-up, rates of client smoking cessation will be significantly greater in clinics that receive the ATTOC intervention than among clients treated with usual care; and 3) using non-inferiority testing, at the end of the intervention and at a 3-month follow-up, there will be no significant degradation in mental health functioning or QOL among clients who receive care at clinics that received the ATTOC intervention than among clients treated with usual care.

Detailed description

Despite an overall reduction in US smoking rates from \>50% in the 1960s to about 20% by 2000, the rate of smoking among persons with a serious mental illness (SMI) remains 2-3 times greater than in the general population. Transforming the mental healthcare system to integrate and adhere to evidence-based guidelines for the provision of tobacco use disorder (TUD) treatment is a priority of the National Institute of Mental Health and is a critical component of a national effort to meet Healthy People 2020 target goals for tobacco use (www.healthypeople.gov). The Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change (ATTOC) model is a systems-level intervention to address systemic and cultural barriers that undermine assessment and treatment of TUD. In this innovative way, ATTOC assumes that effective organizational change requires more than clinic personnel training; it also requires the application of organizational theory to address attitudinal and system barriers and promote a culture in which tobacco use is not accepted or supported and that TUD treatment is integrated into standard practice. Consistent with organizational theory, ATTOC is implemented in 3 phases: preparing for, implementing, and sustaining change. By addressing cultural barriers and strengthening the care system (e.g., integrated treatment), ATTOC intends to have sustained benefits beyond the intervention. This cluster-randomized trial will be conducted with 14 Philadelphia CMHCs, 7 randomized to ATTOC and 7 to usual care (UC). Following randomization, study staff will visit sites to recruit clinic personnel and clients over a 4 to 6 week period. Those eligible will complete informed consent and HIPAA forms and a baseline assessment to establish pre-intervention levels on all measures (baseline). After 4-6 weeks, the ATTOC intervention will be implemented over 9 months, from Week 1 to Week 36 (with UC at the control sites). Two mid-intervention assessments (Weeks 12 and 24) will allow for performance feedback and mediational analyses. Week 36 (end-of-treatment; EOT) and 52 (3-months post-EOT) assessments will allow for evaluation of changes on outcomes between groups over time. All measures will be conducted at the respective CMHC (or over the phone if necessary) and 7-day point prevalence smoking cessation will be verified using a breath carbon monoxide (CO) monitor (abstinence = \< 8ppm). This will be the first controlled, randomized trial to evaluate the effects of the ATTOC model on clinician adherence to treatment guidelines, client smoking, and client mental health and QOL. If this approach is shown to be effective and safe, it can serve as a model for the nation's community mental healthcare infrastructure, representing a powerful initiative to address tobacco use in an under-served sub-group of smokers, and support efforts to attain the Healthy People 2020 goals regarding tobacco use.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALATTOC Intervention

ATTOC is implemented in a systematic 3-phase process with 10 steps to guide sites through cultural change and implementation of evidence-based practice.

BEHAVIORALUC Intervention

Sites randomized to UC will not receive an organizational intervention to address TUD treatment. To ensure standardization across UC sites, study personnel will provide a 1-day training seminar that will include written materials describing recommended treatments for TUD to UC personnel consistent with established treatment guidelines.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(clinic client participants): * Must be a client at a participating community mental health clinic * Must be 18 years of age or older * Must report daily average smoking of 5 cigarettes/day for the past 6 months * Must have a documented Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Axis I or II disorder * Must demonstrate the ability to communicate in English and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

(clinic client participants): * Exclusive use of electronic cigarettes (dual use with standard cigarettes will not be exclusionary) Inclusion Criteria (Clinic personnel participants): * Must be 18 years of age or older * Must perform clinical care or supervisory duties * Must demonstrate the ability to communicate in English and provide written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Client Reported Tobacco MedicationsWeek 36 & Week 52Client-reported use of tobacco treatment for nicotine dependence measured via self-report
Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHRWeek 36 & Week 52Frequency of provision of medications for nicotine dependence measured via electronic health record (EHR) data for clients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Smoking Cessation RateWeek 36 & Week 52Change in proportion of smoking from baseline to follow-up time-points for clients
Mental Health FunctioningWeek 36 & Week 52Mental health functioning was measured using the Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R), a 24-item assessment of mental health functioning that yields a total score and subscale scores for: depression, interpersonal relationships, self-harm, emotional liability, psychosis, and substance abuse. The total overall score was used. The 24 questions are scored on a 5-pointscale (from 0 to 4) with higher numbers indicating greater symptom/problem frequency or severity. The overall score can range from a 0 to a 96.
Short-Form Health Survey EmotionalWeek 36 & Week 52The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the emotional section of questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 8-30.
Short-Form Health Survey PhysicalWeek 36 and Week 52The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the physical functioning section of the questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 5-15.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat TobaccoWeek 36 and Week 52The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more barriers to tobacco treatment with the range of scores being 0-13.
S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From StaffWeek 36 and Week 52The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores mean more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 7-35.
S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat TobaccoWeek 36 and Week 52The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective).The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more skills and the range of scores is: 0-26.
S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and PoliciesWeek 36 and Week 52The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items Higher scores equal more tobacco services. The range of scores is: 1-14.
S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment TreatmentWeek 36 and Week 52The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 0-26.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care Clients
Usual Care is the typical guideline based smoking cessation intervention UC Intervention: Sites randomized to UC will not receive an organizational intervention to address TUD treatment. To ensure standardization across UC sites, study personnel will provide a 1-day training seminar that will include written materials describing recommended treatments for TUD to UC personnel consistent with established treatment guidelines.
266
ATTOC Clients
Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change is a multi-phase organizational intervention to promote the treatment of tobacco dependence ATTOC Intervention: ATTOC is implemented in a systematic 3-phase process with 10 steps to guide sites through cultural change and implementation of evidence-based practice.
344
Usual Care Staff
Usual Care is the typical guideline based smoking cessation intervention UC Intervention: Sites randomized to UC will not receive an organizational intervention to address TUD treatment. To ensure standardization across UC sites, study personnel will provide a 1-day training seminar that will include written materials describing recommended treatments for TUD to UC personnel consistent with established treatment guidelines.
91
ATTOC Staff
Addressing Tobacco Through Organizational Change is a multi-phase organizational intervention to promote the treatment of tobacco dependence ATTOC Intervention: ATTOC is implemented in a systematic 3-phase process with 10 steps to guide sites through cultural change and implementation of evidence-based practice.
131
Total832

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1043511622
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10284

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual Care ClientsATTOC ClientsUsual Care StaffATTOC StaffTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
266 Participants344 Participants91 Participants131 Participants832 Participants
Age, Continuous45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
38.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants31 Participants9 Participants8 Participants84 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
222 Participants306 Participants70 Participants93 Participants691 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants7 Participants12 Participants30 Participants57 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants8 Participants1 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
152 Participants205 Participants33 Participants77 Participants467 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants15 Participants4 Participants3 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
27 Participants16 Participants4 Participants7 Participants54 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
78 Participants103 Participants41 Participants42 Participants264 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
266 participants344 participants91 participants131 participants832 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
131 Participants140 Participants75 Participants99 Participants445 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
135 Participants204 Participants16 Participants32 Participants387 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 3446 / 2662 / 1310 / 91
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3440 / 2660 / 1310 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
34 / 34415 / 2660 / 1310 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Client Reported Tobacco Medications

Client-reported use of tobacco treatment for nicotine dependence measured via self-report

Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52

Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ATTOCClient Reported Tobacco MedicationsWeek 3648 Participants
ATTOCClient Reported Tobacco MedicationsWeek 5262 Participants
Usual CareClient Reported Tobacco MedicationsWeek 3628 Participants
Usual CareClient Reported Tobacco MedicationsWeek 5224 Participants
Primary

Rate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHR

Frequency of provision of medications for nicotine dependence measured via electronic health record (EHR) data for clients.

Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52

Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ATTOCRate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHRWeek 3620 Participants
ATTOCRate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHRWeek 5220 Participants
Usual CareRate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHRWeek 3633 Participants
Usual CareRate of Medication to Treat Nicotine Dependence - EHRWeek 5221 Participants
Secondary

Mental Health Functioning

Mental health functioning was measured using the Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R), a 24-item assessment of mental health functioning that yields a total score and subscale scores for: depression, interpersonal relationships, self-harm, emotional liability, psychosis, and substance abuse. The total overall score was used. The 24 questions are scored on a 5-pointscale (from 0 to 4) with higher numbers indicating greater symptom/problem frequency or severity. The overall score can range from a 0 to a 96.

Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52

Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCMental Health FunctioningWeek 3627.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
ATTOCMental Health FunctioningWeek 5228.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
Usual CareMental Health FunctioningWeek 3631.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Usual CareMental Health FunctioningWeek 5230.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Secondary

Short-Form Health Survey Emotional

The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the emotional section of questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 8-30.

Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52

Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCShort-Form Health Survey EmotionalWeek 3618.6 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions)Standard Deviation 3.8
ATTOCShort-Form Health Survey EmotionalWeek 5217.9 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions)Standard Deviation 4.2
Usual CareShort-Form Health Survey EmotionalWeek 3618.5 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions)Standard Deviation 4.3
Usual CareShort-Form Health Survey EmotionalWeek 5218.8 Score from SF-12 (emotion questions)Standard Deviation 4
Secondary

Short-Form Health Survey Physical

The SF-12 (short form health survey) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. For this outcome, the summed scores are from the physical functioning section of the questionnaire. Higher scores signify lower QOL (quality of life) and the range of scores is 5-15.

Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52

Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCShort-Form Health Survey PhysicalWeek 369.5 Score from SF-12 (physical questions)Standard Deviation 2.8
ATTOCShort-Form Health Survey PhysicalWeek 529.6 Score from SF-12 (physical questions)Standard Deviation 2.7
Usual CareShort-Form Health Survey PhysicalWeek 369.8 Score from SF-12 (physical questions)Standard Deviation 2.9
Usual CareShort-Form Health Survey PhysicalWeek 5210.1 Score from SF-12 (physical questions)Standard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Smoking Cessation Rate

Change in proportion of smoking from baseline to follow-up time-points for clients

Time frame: Week 36 & Week 52

Population: Below is it specified the number of participants were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ATTOCSmoking Cessation RateWeek 3611 Participants
ATTOCSmoking Cessation RateWeek 5217 Participants
Usual CareSmoking Cessation RateWeek 529 Participants
Usual CareSmoking Cessation RateWeek 364 Participants
Other Pre-specified

S-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat Tobacco

The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more barriers to tobacco treatment with the range of scores being 0-13.

Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52

Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCS-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat TobaccoWeek 3611.5 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 4.5
ATTOCS-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat TobaccoWeek 5211.6 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 4.6
Usual CareS-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat TobaccoWeek 368.1 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 2.5
Usual CareS-KAP: Staff-Reported Barriers to Treat TobaccoWeek 527.7 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 2.6
Other Pre-specified

S-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat Tobacco

The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective).The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more skills and the range of scores is: 0-26.

Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52

Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCS-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat TobaccoWeek 3614 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 2.6
ATTOCS-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat TobaccoWeek 5214 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 2.7
Usual CareS-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat TobaccoWeek 3612.9 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 3
Usual CareS-KAP: Staff-Reported Skills to Treat Tobacco Treat TobaccoWeek 5213.5 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 2.6
Other Pre-specified

S-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment

The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices instrument is composed of 5 scales that assess system and cultural barriers to providing treatment for smoking (from the healthcare provider perspective). The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores equal more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 0-26.

Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52

Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCS-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment TreatmentWeek 3612.3 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 8.1
ATTOCS-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment TreatmentWeek 5212.8 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 8.6
Usual CareS-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment TreatmentWeek 3610.2 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 7
Usual CareS-KAP: Staff-Reported Tobacco Treatment TreatmentWeek 5211.6 Score from S-KAPStandard Deviation 7.4
Other Pre-specified

S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and Policies

The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items Higher scores equal more tobacco services. The range of scores is: 1-14.

Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52

Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and PoliciesWeek 366.8 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 3.6
ATTOCS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and PoliciesWeek 526.5 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 3.5
Usual CareS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and PoliciesWeek 365.5 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 3.2
Usual CareS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Services and Policies Services and PoliciesWeek 525.6 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 3.6
Other Pre-specified

S-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From Staff

The Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Services (S-KAS) survey assesses barriers to treating nicotine dependence from the client's perspective. The scores are from the summed items. Higher scores mean more tobacco treatment and the range of scores is 7-35.

Time frame: Week 36 and Week 52

Population: Below it is specified the number of participants that were analyzed at each timepoint for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ATTOCS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From StaffWeek 3616.7 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 6.2
ATTOCS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From StaffWeek 5216.3 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 6.5
Usual CareS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From StaffWeek 3615.9 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 5.9
Usual CareS-KAS: Client Reported Tobacco Treatment Treatment From StaffWeek 5215.5 Score from S-KASStandard Deviation 6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026