Skip to content

Perampanel as Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatrics With Partial Onset Seizures or Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures

An Open-Label, Multicenter Study With an Extension Phase to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Exposure-Efficacy Relationship of Perampanel Oral Suspension When Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Subjects (Age 4 to Less Than 12 Years) With Inadequately Controlled Partial-Onset Seizures or Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02849626
Enrollment
180
Registered
2016-07-29
Start date
2016-11-16
Completion date
2021-12-06
Last updated
2022-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partial-Onset or Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

Keywords

Partial-Onset Seizures, Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures, Adjunctive Therapy, Epilepsy

Brief summary

This is an open-label, multicenter study with an Extension Phase to evaluate the safety and tolerability of perampanel oral suspension when administered as an adjunctive therapy in children (ages 4 to less than \[\<\] 12 years) with inadequately controlled partial onset seizures (POS) or primary generalized tonic clonic (PGTC) seizures.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in children (age 4 to \<12 years) with inadequately controlled POS or PGTC seizures. The study will consist of a Core Phase and two Extension Phases (Extension Phase A \[for all countries in the study\], and Extension Phase B \[available for participants enrolled in Japan and in countries where an extended access program {EAP} cannot be implemented, after completion of Extension Phase A\]). The Core Phase will consist of the following 2 phases: Pretreatment and Treatment Phase. The Pretreatment Phase, during which participants will be assessed for eligibility, will consist of up to a 4-weeks +/- 3 days Screening/Baseline Period. The Treatment Phase will consist of 3 periods: Titration Period (up to an 11-weeks: dose titration on the basis of individual clinical response and tolerability), Maintenance Period (up to a 12-weeks: continuation of perampanel oral suspension once daily at the dose level achieved at the end of the Titration Period), and Follow-up Period (up to 4-weeks +/- 7 days: only for those participants not entering into Extension Phase A or those who prematurely discontinue from the study). Extension Phase A will consist of up to 29-weeks Maintenance Period and up to 4-weeks +/- 7 days Follow-up Period after the last dose of perampanel only for participants who did not enter into Extension Phase B. All participants who complete all scheduled visits up to and including Visit 9 in the Treatment Phase will be eligible to participate in Extension Phase A of the study. During the Maintenance Period of Extension Phase A, all participants will continue with their optimal perampanel dose (that is, dose level that they complete on during the Core Phase). After completing Extension Phase A, participants in Japan and in countries where EAP cannot be implemented, participants will be eligible to participate in Extension Phase B. In Japan, treatment will continue as long as clinically appropriate according to the judgment of the investigator. However, treatment of participants in Extension B will be completed when the participant reaches 12 years of age or when perampanel is commercially available in Japan for treatment of POS in pediatric participants (4 to less than 12 years of age). In countries where an EAP cannot be implemented, participation in Extension B will continue as long as clinically appropriate according to the judgment of the investigator, until the participants reaches 12 years of age or perampanel oral suspension is commercially available.

Interventions

DRUGPerampanel

E2007

Sponsors

Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of epilepsy with POS with or without secondarily generalized (SG) seizures or PGTC seizures according to the International League Against Epilepsy's (ILAE) Classification of Epileptic Seizures (1981). A diagnosis should have been established at least 6 months prior to Visit 1 by clinical history and an electroencephalogram (EEG) that is consistent with the diagnosis; normal interictal EEGs will be allowed provided that the participant meets the other diagnosis criterion (that is, clinical history) * Male or female participant, from age 4 to \<12 years at the time of informed consent/assent * Have a minimum weight of 16 kilograms (kg) (35 pounds \[lb\]) * Have had a brain imaging (example, magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] scan or computed tomography \[CT\] before Visit 1 that ruled out a progressive cause of epilepsy) * During the 12 weeks +/- 3 days (4 weeks +/- 3 days in Japan only) prior to Visit 2, participants must have equal or greater than (=\>) one POS or one PGTC seizure. Only simple POS with motor signs, complex POS, and complex POS with secondary generalization are counted toward this inclusion for POS * Are currently being treated with stable doses of 1 to a maximum of 3 approved antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Doses must be stable for at least 4 weeks before to Visit 1; in the case where a new AED regimen has been initiated for a participant, the dose must be stable for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1. Only one EIAED (defined as carbamazepine, phenytoin, oxcarbazepine, or eslicarbazepine) out of the maximum of three AEDs is allowed (A vagal nerve stimulator \[VNS\] will be counted as one of the 3 allowed AEDs)

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are breastfeeding or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive beta human chorionic gonadotropin \[β-hCG\] or human chorionic gonadotropin \[hCG\] test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 International Units per liter \[IU/L\] or equivalent units of β-hCG or hCG). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug * Females of childbearing potential who: * Had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and who do not agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (example, total abstinence, an intrauterine device, a contraceptive implant, an oral contraceptive, or have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia) throughout the entire study period or for 28 days after study drug discontinuation. If a highly effective method is not appropriate or acceptable for the participant, then the participant may use a medically effective method (example, a double barrier method such as condom plus diaphragm with spermicide) * Are currently abstinent, and do not agree to use a double-barrier method (as described above) or refrain from being sexually active during the study period or for 28 days after study drug discontinuation * Are using hormonal contraceptives but are not on a stable dose of the same hormonal contraceptive product for at least 4 weeks before dosing and who do not agree to use the same contraceptive during the study or for 28 days after study drug discontinuation * Current or history of pseudo-seizures (psychogenic nonepileptic seizures) within approximately 5 years before Visit 1 * Have a history of status epilepticus that required hospitalization during the 6 months before Visit 1 * Have an unstable psychiatric diagnosis that may confound participants' ability to participate in the study or that may prevent completion of the protocol-specified tests (example, significant suicide risk, including suicidal behavior and ideation within 6 months before Visit 1, current psychotic disorder, acute mania) * Any suicidal ideation with intent with or without a plan within 6 months before Visit 2 (that is, answering Yes to questions 4 or 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale \[C-SSRS\]) in participants aged 6 and above * Are scheduled and/or confirmed to have epilepsy surgery within 6 months after Visit 1; however, those who have previously documented failed epilepsy surgery will be allowed * Evidence of clinically significant disease (example, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal disease) that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments * Evidence of moderate or severe renal insufficiency as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) of 31 to \<60 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and \<30 mL/min, respectively * Evidence of significant active hepatic disease. Stable elevation of liver enzymes, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) due to concomitant medication(s), will be allowed if they are less than 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) * Evidence of significant active hematological disease; white blood cell (WBC) count equal or less than (=\<) 2500 per (/) microliter (µL) (2.50 1 constant \[E\]+09/liter \[L\]) or an absolute neutrophil count =\<1000/µL (1.00 1E+09/L) * Clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) defined as greater than (\>) 450 milliseconds (msec) * Have a progressive central nervous system (CNS) disease, including degenerative CNS diseases and progressive tumors * Multiple drug allergies or a severe drug reaction to an AED(s), including dermatological (example, Stevens Johnson syndrome), hematological, or organ toxicity reactions. * Concomitant use of felbamate as an AED for \<2 years or where the dose has not been stable for at least 8 weeks before Visit 1. Participants must not have a history of WBC count =\<2500/µL, platelets below 100,000, liver function tests (LFTs) above 3 times the ULN, or other indication of hepatic or bone marrow dysfunction while receiving felbamate. If participants received felbamate in the past, it must have been discontinued 8 weeks before Visit 1 to be eligible for study participation * Concomitant use of vigabatrin: participants who took vigabatrin in the past must be off vigabatrin for at least 5 months before Visit 1 and with documentation showing no evidence of a vigabatrin-associated clinically significant abnormality in a visual perimetry test * Concomitant use of cannabinoids * Used benzodiazepines for epilepsy during which the dose has not been stable for \>4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Benzodiazepines use as rescue medication for seizure control is allowed; however, intermittent use of benzodiazepines for any other indication (example, anxiety/sleep disorders) is prohibited * A VNS implanted \<5 months before Visit 1 or changes in parameter \<4 weeks before Visit 1 (or thereafter during the study) * On a ketogenic diet for which the diet is not a stable regimen for at least 4 weeks before Visit 1 * History of or a concomitant medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator(s) would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study or compromise the participant's ability to safely complete the study * Have previously been exposed to perampanel in a clinical trial or by prescription for more than 2 months or discontinued for Adverse Events (AEs) * Have participated in a study involving administration of an investigational drug or device within 4 weeks before Visit 1, or within approximately 5 half-lives of the previous investigational compound, whichever is longer * Participants with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) for Total Group of Participants - Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline up to 4 weeks (follow up in Extension Phase A) after last dose of study drug in Extension Phase A at Week 52 (up to 56 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline up to 52 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline up to 52 weeksPre-defined criteria of vital signs abnormalities: maximum (max.) increase or decrease from baseline in sitting/supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) of greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 or 40 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); maximum increase or decrease from baseline in sitting/supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>=10 or 20 mmHg; increase or decrease from baseline in pulse rate (number of heart beats per minute \[bpm\]) of \>=15 or 30 bpm. Data for this outcome measure has been assessed and reported till Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline up to 52 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelBaseline up to Week 23The ABNAS assessment measured 5 aspects of cognitive function such as fatigue, memory, concentration, motor speed, and reading. The assessment was a measure of participant-perceived cognitive effects of AEDs. This instrument was aimed at assessing participant perceived drug-related cognitive impairment. Total score ranged from 0-72. Higher scores indicate a worsening of these cognitive functions. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in ABNAS could be discerned.
Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Participants Aged 4 to 5 Years) During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelBaseline up to Week 23The CBCL for participants with age 4 to 5 years is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints, internalizing, attention problems, aggressive behavior, externalizing, sleep problems. CBCL total score for participants with age 4 to 5 years ranged from 0 to 200, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in CBCL score (participants aged 4 to 5 years) could be discerned.
Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Participants Aged Greater Than [>] 5 to <12 Years) During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelBaseline up to Week 23The CBCL for participants with age \>5 to \<12 years is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: activity, social, school, total competence, anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, internalizing, rule-breaking behavior, aggressive behavior, externalizing, social problems, thought problems, attention problems. CBCL total score for participants with age \>5 to \<12 years ranged from 0 to 240, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in CBCL score (participants aged \>5 to \<12 years) could be discerned.
Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Dominant Hand in Core Phase of This Study for All Participants Aged 4 to <12 Years: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanellBaseline up to Week 23The Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) measures visuomotor skills. This test is a manipulative dexterity test that consist of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Participants require to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task is timed and the scores are the time taken for the participant to complete all 10 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds are recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicate worsening of visuomotor skills. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Dominant Hand could be discerned.
Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Non-dominant Hand in Core Phase of This Study for All Participants Aged 4 to <12 Years: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelBaseline up to Week 23The Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) measures visuomotor skills. This test is a manipulative dexterity test that consist of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Participants require to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task is timed and the scores are the time taken for the participant to complete all 10 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds are recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicate worsening of visuomotor skills. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Non-dominant Hand could be discerned.
Percentage of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) for Total Group of Participants That Were Considered Related to Perampanel- Core Phase of This StudyBaseline up to 23 weeks
Change From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52The ABNAS assessment measured 5 aspects of cognitive function such as fatigue, memory, concentration, motor speed, and reading. The assessment was a measure of participant-perceived cognitive effects of AEDs. This instrument was aimed at assessing participant perceived drug-related cognitive impairment. Total score ranged from 0-72. Higher scores indicate a worsening of these cognitive functions.
Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52The CBCL for participants (age group 1.5 to 5 years) is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints, internalizing, attention problems, aggressive behavior, externalizing, sleep problems. CBCL total score for participants (age group 1.5 to 5 years) ranged from 0 to 200, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior.
Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52The CBCL for participants (age group 6 to 18 years) is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: activity, social, school, total competence, anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, internalizing, rule-breaking behavior, aggressive behavior, externalizing, social problems, thought problems, attention problems. CBCL total score for participants (age group 6 to 18 years) ranged from 0 to 240, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior.
Change From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52The LGPT test measured visuomotor skills. This test was a manipulative dexterity test that consisted of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. The participant was required to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes. The task was completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task was timed and the scores were the time taken for the participant to complete all 10 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds were recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicated worsening of visuomotor skills. The time to complete test is presented as mean seconds plus/minus (+/-) SD.
Change From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52The LGPT test measured visuomotor skills. This test was a manipulative dexterity test that consisted of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. The participant was required to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes. The task was completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task was timed and the scores were the time taken for the participant to complete all 25 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds were recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicated worsening of visuomotor skills. The time to complete test is presented as mean seconds +/- SD.
Change From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52
Model Predicted Percent Change in Average Seizure Frequency Over 28 Days During Maintenance Period in Core Phase of This Study From Baseline- Assessed as Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel (518 ng/mL)Baseline, Week 23Seizure frequency derived from information (seizure count and type) recorded in participant diary. Seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as number of seizures divided by number of days in interval; multiplied by 28. Due to sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling in study, data of endpoint was analyzed by pooling data from other Phase II and III studies of perampanel along with data of this current study, including participants with POS or PGTC. Only data for participants taking perampanel 8 mg/day (corresponding to Cav, ss of 518 ng/mL) were reported. Participants taking perampanel 12 mg/day in studies from which data were pooled, were not included in analysis for this measure. Here, ng/mL= nanogram per milliliter. Data for this measure was calculated through model prediction; reported as percent change with measure type as number and measure dispersion as Not applicable, NA.
Change From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Markedly Abnormal Encephalogram (EEG) Parameter Values During Awake and Sleep State for Total Group of Participant: Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline up to 52 weeks
Number of Encephalogram (EEG) Abnormalities During Awake and Sleep State for Total Group of Participant: Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline up to 52 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyUp to 52 weeksC-SSRS: interview-based instrument to systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior, to assess whether participant experienced any of following: completed suicide, suicide attempt (response of yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (yes on preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt or interrupted attempt), suicidal ideation (yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active SI with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without or with specific plan and intent), any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent (yes on has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior).Here, percentage of participants with \>=1 positive behavior, participants with \>=1 positive ideations; suicidality were reported.An assessment of SI and behavior with C-SSRS performed for participants \>=6 years at time of consent.
Percentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyUp to 52 weeksThe C-SSRS: interview-based instrument to systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior, to assess whether participant experienced any of the following: completed suicide, suicide attempt (response of yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (yes on preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt or interrupted attempt), suicidal ideation (yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active SI with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent (yes on has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior). w/ refers to with, W refers to Week and & refers to and.
Median Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52Seizure frequency was based on number of seizures per 28 days, calculated as number of seizures over entire time interval divided by number of days in interval and multiplied by 28. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with secondary generalization (SG). Data for this measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.
Percentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52A 25% responder was a participant who experienced a 25% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.
Percentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52A 50% responder was a participant who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.
Percentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52A 75% responder was a participant who experienced a 75% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52Participants were considered seizure free if participants completed a 13-week time period and were seizure-free for that entire time period. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52Assessment of disease severity utilized the CGIC scale at end of treatment to evaluate participant's change in disease status from baseline. The CGIC is a 7-point scale that measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition. Scale ranged from 1 to 7 with lower score indicated improvement (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved), higher score indicated worsening (5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, 7=very much worse), and a score of 4 indicated no change.
Change From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline, Week 23, Week 52Thyrotropin level was measured in milli-international units per liter (mIU/L).
Overall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of PerampanelBaseline up to 23 weeksFor this outcome measure, responders were those who experienced a 50 percent (%) or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Due to the sparse PK sampling in this study, the data of this outcome measure were pooled with data from other Phase III studies of perampanel conducted in participants with POS. AEDs not affecting PK refers to AEDs not affecting PK of perampanel. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for only non-Asian participants with POS per age groups. Responder probability has been reported for Cav,ss of perampanel when given along with different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
Overall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of PerampanelBaseline up to 23 weeksFor this outcome measure, responders were those who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Due to the sparse PK sampling in this study, the data of this outcome measure were analyzed by pooling the data from other Phase II and III studies of perampanel along with data of this current study, including participants with PGTC seizures. In this outcome measure, responder probability at different concentration values of perampanel when given with or without topiramate (an antiepileptic) has been reported.
Number of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of PerampanelBaseline up to Week 23Due to the sparse PK sampling in this study, the data of this outcome measure were analyzed by pooling data from other Phase II and III studies of perampanel along with this current study, including participants with POS or PGTC. Data for this outcome measure have been reported in relationship with different ranges of Cav, ss of Perampanel as number of observations those were seizure free for up to 3 visits. The reason for using number of observations for analysis of this outcome measure was because data were available as up to 3 visits per participant and not necessarily that the participant was seizure-free on all three visits.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Poland, South Korea, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part at 58 investigative sites in the United States, European Union and Asia Pacific from 16 November 2016 to 06 December 2021.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 208 participants were screened; of which 28 were screen failures; 180 received study treatment in Core Phase. Of 146 participants who completed the Core Phase, 136 entered Extension Phase A. Of 122 who completed Extension Phase A, 42 received treatment in Extension B. Study has a Core Phase and two Extension Phases (Phase A and Phase B). In Extension Phase B only safety data was collected for participants who could not enroll in an extended access program (EAP).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Core Study + Extension Part A: Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: POS
Core Phase: Participants with partial onset-seizures (POS) received perampanel 0.5 mg/mL oral suspension titrated beyond 8 mg/day up to 12 mg/day, if 8 mg/day was tolerable and were deemed likely to be benefitted by higher dose (for participants who are not taking any EIAED, or titrated beyond 12 mg/day up to 16 mg/day, if 12 mg/day was tolerable and were deemed likely to be benefitted by higher dose (for participants who are taking any EIAED). Dose titration- up to 11 weeks to identify each participant's optimum dose. Participants then continued to take perampanel once daily at optimal dose level as a maintenance dose for up to 12 weeks. Extension Phase A: Participants who completed Core Phase, entered Extension Phase A, and continued with their optimal perampanel dose from Core Phase for up to 29 weeks. Total duration of treatment for Core Phase and Extension Phase A was up to 52 weeks.
149
Core Study + Extension Part A: Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: PGTC Seizures
Core Phase: Participants with primary generalized tonic clonic (PGTC) seizures received perampanel 0.5 mg/mL oral suspension titrated beyond 8 mg/day up to 12 mg/day, if 8 mg/day was tolerable and were deemed likely to be benefitted by higher dose (for participants who are not taking any other EIAED), or titrated beyond 12 mg/day up to 16 mg/day, if 12 mg/day was tolerable and were deemed likely to be benefitted by higher dose (for participants who are taking any EIAED). Dose titration- up to 11 weeks to identify each participant's optimum dose. Participants then continued to take perampanel oral suspension once daily at the optimal dose level as a maintenance dose for up to 12 weeks. Extension Phase A: Participants who completed the Core Phase, entered the Extension Phase A, and continued with their optimal perampanel dose from Core Phase for up to 29 weeks. Total duration of treatment for Core Phase and Extension Phase A was up to 52 weeks.
31
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Core Phase (up to 23 Weeks)Adverse Event11300
Core Phase (up to 23 Weeks)Inadequate Therapeutic Effect6200
Core Phase (up to 23 Weeks)Non-specified3000
Core Phase (up to 23 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject7200
Extension Phase A (up to 29 Weeks)Adverse Event3200
Extension Phase A (up to 29 Weeks)Inadequate Therapeutic Effect3100
Extension Phase A (up to 29 Weeks)Non-specified1000
Extension Phase A (up to 29 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject4000
Extension Phase B (up to 89 Weeks)Inadequate Therapeutic Effect0030
Extension Phase B (up to 89 Weeks)Other0010
Extension Phase B (up to 89 Weeks)Participant choice0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCore Study + Extension Part A: Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: POSTotalCore Study + Extension Part A: Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: PGTC Seizures
Age, Continuous8.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
8.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.09
8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.03
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants10 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
141 Participants160 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
65 Participants65 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other Asian
5 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
70 Participants93 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
77 Participants88 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants92 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1490 / 310 / 410 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
135 / 14925 / 3134 / 411 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
29 / 1497 / 318 / 410 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Pre-defined criteria of vital signs abnormalities: maximum (max.) increase or decrease from baseline in sitting/supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) of greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 or 40 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); maximum increase or decrease from baseline in sitting/supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>=10 or 20 mmHg; increase or decrease from baseline in pulse rate (number of heart beats per minute \[bpm\]) of \>=15 or 30 bpm. Data for this outcome measure has been assessed and reported till Week 52.

Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudySystolic Blood Pressure: Increment >=20 mmHg24.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudySystolic Blood Pressure: Increment >=40 mmHg2.2 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudySystolic Blood Pressure: Decrement >=20 mmHg20.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudySystolic Blood Pressure: Decrement >=40 mmHg0.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyDiastolic Blood Pressure: Increment >=10 mmHg48.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyDiastolic Blood Pressure: Increment >=20 mmHg26.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyDiastolic Blood Pressure: Decrement >=10 mmHg38.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyDiastolic Blood Pressure: Decrement >=20 mmHg16.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPulse: Increment >=15 bpm35.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPulse: Increment >=30 bpm11.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPulse: Decrement >=15 bpm39.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Sign Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPulse: Decrement >=30 bpm13.4 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Fridericia: >480 msec0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Bazett: Increase of >30 millisecond (msec)8.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Bazett: Increase of >60 msec0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Bazett: >450 msec4.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Bazett: >480 msec0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Bazett: >500 msec0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Fridericia: Increase of >30 msec5.2 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Fridericia: Increase of >60 msec0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Fridericia: >450 msec0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyQTc Fridericia: >500 msec0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) for Total Group of Participants - Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Time frame: Baseline up to 4 weeks (follow up in Extension Phase A) after last dose of study drug in Extension Phase A at Week 52 (up to 56 weeks)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) for Total Group of Participants - Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTreatment Emergent AEs90.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) for Total Group of Participants - Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTreatment Emergent SAEs20.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPotassium: Markedly Abnormal High0.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudySodium: Markedly Abnormal Low1.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyAlanine Aminotransferase: Abnormal High1.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyHemoglobin: Abnormal Low1.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyLeukocytes: Abnormal Low0.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyCalcium: Abnormal Low0.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyGamma Glutamyl Transferase: Abnormal High2.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values for Total Group of Participants- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyNeutrophils: Abnormal Low9.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

The ABNAS assessment measured 5 aspects of cognitive function such as fatigue, memory, concentration, motor speed, and reading. The assessment was a measure of participant-perceived cognitive effects of AEDs. This instrument was aimed at assessing participant perceived drug-related cognitive impairment. Total score ranged from 0-72. Higher scores indicate a worsening of these cognitive functions.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline17.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.96
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 52-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.91
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 23-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.77
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline28.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.01
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 52-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.67
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 233.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.42
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline126.65 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 14.293
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 232.57 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 1.926
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 525.97 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 2.58
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline131.08 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 13.311
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 231.84 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 1.111
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Height (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 525.82 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 2.544
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline24.2 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 14.83
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 231.6 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 8.96
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 526.5 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 9.01
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline25.9 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 13.91
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 230.6 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 7.25
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Values (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline Week 525.1 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Standard Deviation 8.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

Thyrotropin level was measured in milli-international units per liter (mIU/L).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline2.682 mIU/LStandard Deviation 1.5897
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 230.141 mIU/LStandard Deviation 1.0523
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 520.112 mIU/LStandard Deviation 1.2559
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline3.080 mIU/LStandard Deviation 2.2919
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 23-0.519 mIU/LStandard Deviation 1.4828
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyrotropin Value (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 52-0.632 mIU/LStandard Deviation 1.5632
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyTriiodothyronine, free: Change at Week 520.04 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.987
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyTriiodothyronine, free: Baseline5.96 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.061
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyThyroxine, free: Baseline15.29 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.993
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyThyroxine, free: Change at Week 520.10 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.868
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyThyroxine, free: Change at Week 23-0.07 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 4.107
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyTriiodothyronine, free: Change at Week 230.06 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.915
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyTriiodothyronine, free: Change at Week 23-0.16 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.699
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyThyroxine, free: Change at Week 520.08 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.968
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyTriiodothyronine, free: Baseline6.10 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.812
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyTriiodothyronine, free: Change at Week 52-0.04 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.107
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyThyroxine, free: Baseline15.37 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.16
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Thyroxine, Free and Triiodothyronine, Free Values (Growth and Development Parameters) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyThyroxine, free: Change at Week 23-0.38 picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.088
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

The LGPT test measured visuomotor skills. This test was a manipulative dexterity test that consisted of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. The participant was required to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes. The task was completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task was timed and the scores were the time taken for the participant to complete all 10 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds were recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicated worsening of visuomotor skills. The time to complete test is presented as mean seconds plus/minus (+/-) SD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 233.3 secondsStandard Deviation 39.59
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Baseline196.4 secondsStandard Deviation 113.12
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Baseline224.3 secondsStandard Deviation 108.19
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 523.9 secondsStandard Deviation 50.5
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 522.6 secondsStandard Deviation 46.88
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 2312.8 secondsStandard Deviation 49.37
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Baseline169.6 secondsStandard Deviation 106.49
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Baseline155.0 secondsStandard Deviation 108.1
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 23-4.3 secondsStandard Deviation 14.98
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 523.4 secondsStandard Deviation 29.35
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 23-4.3 secondsStandard Deviation 3.79
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores for 8 Years and Under as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 5213.4 secondsStandard Deviation 33.72
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

The LGPT test measured visuomotor skills. This test was a manipulative dexterity test that consisted of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. The participant was required to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes. The task was completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task was timed and the scores were the time taken for the participant to complete all 25 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds were recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicated worsening of visuomotor skills. The time to complete test is presented as mean seconds +/- SD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 522.7 secondsStandard Deviation 23.75
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Baseline189.8 secondsStandard Deviation 103.58
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 230.1 secondsStandard Deviation 21.77
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 523.0 secondsStandard Deviation 21.24
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 237.8 secondsStandard Deviation 36.03
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Baseline197.4 secondsStandard Deviation 100.01
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 23-7.0 secondsStandard Deviation 21.98
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 23-11.8 secondsStandard Deviation 35.05
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 52-28.7 secondsStandard Deviation 36.15
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyNon Dominant Hand: Baseline159.9 secondsStandard Deviation 84.66
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Change from Baseline at Week 52-15.4 secondsStandard Deviation 30.43
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Time to Complete Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) Scores Over 8 Years as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyDominant Hand: Baseline150.7 secondsStandard Deviation 99.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

The CBCL for participants (age group 1.5 to 5 years) is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints, internalizing, attention problems, aggressive behavior, externalizing, sleep problems. CBCL total score for participants (age group 1.5 to 5 years) ranged from 0 to 200, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 23-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.71
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 52-5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.36
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline35.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline54.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.21
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 23-13.0 score on a scale
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 1.5 to 5 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 52-11.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

The CBCL for participants (age group 6 to 18 years) is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: activity, social, school, total competence, anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, internalizing, rule-breaking behavior, aggressive behavior, externalizing, social problems, thought problems, attention problems. CBCL total score for participants (age group 6 to 18 years) ranged from 0 to 240, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.66
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 23-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.26
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 52-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.51
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline44.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.16
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 23-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.84
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Age Group 6 to 18 Years) as Per Seizure Type at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 52-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This Study

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 523.75 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 4.421
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline28.09 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 10.649
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 231.86 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.57
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyBaseline30.43 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 11.299
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 231.70 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 3.149
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresChange From Baseline in Weight (a Growth and Development Parameter) at Week 23 (Core Phase) and at Week 52 (Extension Phase A) of This StudyChange from Baseline at Week 523.74 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 4.204
Secondary

Median Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Seizure frequency was based on number of seizures per 28 days, calculated as number of seizures over entire time interval divided by number of days in interval and multiplied by 28. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with secondary generalization (SG). Data for this measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose primary efficacy measurement. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 1-13-100.00 percent change
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 27-39-52.53 percent change
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 14-26-100.00 percent change
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 1-13-47.99 percent change
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 27-39-80.77 percent change
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 40-52-58.92 percent change
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 40-52-100.00 percent change
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 14-26-38.93 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 40-52-96.54 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 1-13-40.97 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 27-39-67.30 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 40-52-70.33 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 1-13-70.33 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 14-26-70.70 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures:Weeks 27-39-65.43 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresMedian Percent Change in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Treatment Phase Relative to the Pretreatment Phase (Baseline)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPOS Seizures:Weeks 14-26-50.77 percent change
Secondary

Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of Perampanel

The ABNAS assessment measured 5 aspects of cognitive function such as fatigue, memory, concentration, motor speed, and reading. The assessment was a measure of participant-perceived cognitive effects of AEDs. This instrument was aimed at assessing participant perceived drug-related cognitive impairment. Total score ranged from 0-72. Higher scores indicate a worsening of these cognitive functions. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in ABNAS could be discerned.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 23

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsModel Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) Score During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelNA score on a scale
Secondary

Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Participants Aged 4 to 5 Years) During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of Perampanel

The CBCL for participants with age 4 to 5 years is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints, internalizing, attention problems, aggressive behavior, externalizing, sleep problems. CBCL total score for participants with age 4 to 5 years ranged from 0 to 200, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in CBCL score (participants aged 4 to 5 years) could be discerned.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 23

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsModel Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Participants Aged 4 to 5 Years) During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelNA score on a scale
Secondary

Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Participants Aged Greater Than [>] 5 to <12 Years) During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of Perampanel

The CBCL for participants with age \>5 to \<12 years is a questionnaire to assess behavioral and emotional problems in children as reported by the primary caregiver for the following domains activities: activity, social, school, total competence, anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, internalizing, rule-breaking behavior, aggressive behavior, externalizing, social problems, thought problems, attention problems. CBCL total score for participants with age \>5 to \<12 years ranged from 0 to 240, was calculated by adding individual score of each domain. Higher scores indicate greater problems in child behavior. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in CBCL score (participants aged \>5 to \<12 years) could be discerned.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 23

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsModel Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) Score (Participants Aged Greater Than [>] 5 to <12 Years) During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelNA score on a scale
Secondary

Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Dominant Hand in Core Phase of This Study for All Participants Aged 4 to <12 Years: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of Perampanell

The Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) measures visuomotor skills. This test is a manipulative dexterity test that consist of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Participants require to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task is timed and the scores are the time taken for the participant to complete all 10 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds are recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicate worsening of visuomotor skills. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Dominant Hand could be discerned.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 23

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsModel Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Dominant Hand in Core Phase of This Study for All Participants Aged 4 to <12 Years: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanellNA seconds
Secondary

Model Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Non-dominant Hand in Core Phase of This Study for All Participants Aged 4 to <12 Years: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of Perampanel

The Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) measures visuomotor skills. This test is a manipulative dexterity test that consist of a metal matrix of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Participants require to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. The task is timed and the scores are the time taken for the participant to complete all 10 pegs for each hand. If the test cannot be completed within 300 seconds, 300 seconds are recorded for the time. An increase in score (longer time) indicate worsening of visuomotor skills. Analysis for this outcome measure was planned to be performed via PK/PD modelling only if a graphical relationship between perampanel exposure and change from baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Non-dominant Hand could be discerned.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 23

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsModel Predicted Change From Baseline in Total Time to Complete LGPT Score for Non-dominant Hand in Core Phase of This Study for All Participants Aged 4 to <12 Years: Assessment Based on Relationship With Plasma Levels of PerampanelNA seconds
Secondary

Model Predicted Percent Change in Average Seizure Frequency Over 28 Days During Maintenance Period in Core Phase of This Study From Baseline- Assessed as Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel (518 ng/mL)

Seizure frequency derived from information (seizure count and type) recorded in participant diary. Seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as number of seizures divided by number of days in interval; multiplied by 28. Due to sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling in study, data of endpoint was analyzed by pooling data from other Phase II and III studies of perampanel along with data of this current study, including participants with POS or PGTC. Only data for participants taking perampanel 8 mg/day (corresponding to Cav, ss of 518 ng/mL) were reported. Participants taking perampanel 12 mg/day in studies from which data were pooled, were not included in analysis for this measure. Here, ng/mL= nanogram per milliliter. Data for this measure was calculated through model prediction; reported as percent change with measure type as number and measure dispersion as Not applicable, NA.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Population for this measure included participants from other studies as well participants from this current study. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsModel Predicted Percent Change in Average Seizure Frequency Over 28 Days During Maintenance Period in Core Phase of This Study From Baseline- Assessed as Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel (518 ng/mL)-43.1 percent change
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresModel Predicted Percent Change in Average Seizure Frequency Over 28 Days During Maintenance Period in Core Phase of This Study From Baseline- Assessed as Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel (518 ng/mL)-63.6 percent change
Secondary

Number of Encephalogram (EEG) Abnormalities During Awake and Sleep State for Total Group of Participant: Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsNumber of Encephalogram (EEG) Abnormalities During Awake and Sleep State for Total Group of Participant: Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study0 EEG abnormality
Secondary

Number of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel

Due to the sparse PK sampling in this study, the data of this outcome measure were analyzed by pooling data from other Phase II and III studies of perampanel along with this current study, including participants with POS or PGTC. Data for this outcome measure have been reported in relationship with different ranges of Cav, ss of Perampanel as number of observations those were seizure free for up to 3 visits. The reason for using number of observations for analysis of this outcome measure was because data were available as up to 3 visits per participant and not necessarily that the participant was seizure-free on all three visits.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 23

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Population for this measure included participants from other studies as well participants from this current study. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel500 to <1000 ng/mL103 Seizure free observations
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1000 to <1500 ng/mL33 Seizure free observations
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1500 to 2000 ng/mL7 Seizure free observations
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel>2000 ng/mL0 Seizure free observations
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel>0 to <500 ng/mL275 Seizure free observations
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel>0 to <500 ng/mL57 Seizure free observations
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel>2000 ng/mL3 Seizure free observations
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1000 to <1500 ng/mL11 Seizure free observations
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel500 to <1000 ng/mL67 Seizure free observations
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresNumber of Seizure Free Observations During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1500 to 2000 ng/mL4 Seizure free observations
Secondary

Overall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel

For this outcome measure, responders were those who experienced a 50 percent (%) or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Due to the sparse PK sampling in this study, the data of this outcome measure were pooled with data from other Phase III studies of perampanel conducted in participants with POS. AEDs not affecting PK refers to AEDs not affecting PK of perampanel. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for only non-Asian participants with POS per age groups. Responder probability has been reported for Cav,ss of perampanel when given along with different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

Time frame: Baseline up to 23 weeks

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Population for this measure included participants from other studies as well participants from this current study. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel8 mg/day+ AEDs not affecting PK:Cav ss 518 ng/mL0.605 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel12 mg/day+ AEDs not affecting PK:Cav ss 778 ng/mL0.669 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel8 mg/day+ Oxcarbazepine/Phenytoin:Cav ss 258 ng/mL0.520 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel12 mg/day+Oxcarbazepine/Phenytoin:Cav ss 387 ng/mL0.565 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel8 mg/day+ Carbamazepine:Cav ss 175 ng/mL0.485 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel12 mg/day+ Carbamazepine:Cav ss 263 ng/mL0.522 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel8 mg/day+ Carbamazepine:Cav ss 175 ng/mL0.350 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel8 mg/day+ AEDs not affecting PK:Cav ss 518 ng/mL0.466 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel12 mg/day+Oxcarbazepine/Phenytoin:Cav ss 387 ng/mL0.426 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel12 mg/day+ AEDs not affecting PK:Cav ss 778 ng/mL0.535 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel12 mg/day+ Carbamazepine:Cav ss 263 ng/mL0.384 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Non-Asian Participants With POS During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel8 mg/day+ Oxcarbazepine/Phenytoin:Cav ss 258 ng/mL0.382 Responder probability
Secondary

Overall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel

For this outcome measure, responders were those who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Due to the sparse PK sampling in this study, the data of this outcome measure were analyzed by pooling the data from other Phase II and III studies of perampanel along with data of this current study, including participants with PGTC seizures. In this outcome measure, responder probability at different concentration values of perampanel when given with or without topiramate (an antiepileptic) has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to 23 weeks

Population: All participants who received perampanel who have seizure frequency, cognition, or AE data with documented dosing history. Population for this measure included participants from other studies as well participants from this current study. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel300 ng/mL0.76 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel800 ng/mL0.80 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel100 ng/mL0.71 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel900 ng/mL0.80 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel400 ng/mL0.77 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1000 ng/mL0.81 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel0 ng/mL0.46 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1200 ng/mL0.82 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel500 ng/mL0.78 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1400 ng/mL0.82 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel200 ng/mL0.74 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1600 ng/mL0.82 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel600 ng/mL0.79 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1800 ng/mL0.83 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel2400 ng/mL0.84 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel2000 ng/mL0.83 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel700 ng/mL0.80 Responder probability
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel2200 ng/mL0.84 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel700 ng/mL0.61 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel2400 ng/mL0.68 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel0 ng/mL0.26 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel100 ng/mL0.50 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel200 ng/mL0.54 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel300 ng/mL0.57 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel400 ng/mL0.58 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel500 ng/mL0.59 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel600 ng/mL0.60 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel2200 ng/mL0.67 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel800 ng/mL0.62 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel900 ng/mL0.63 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1000 ng/mL0.63 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1200 ng/mL0.64 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1400 ng/mL0.65 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1600 ng/mL0.66 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel1800 ng/mL0.66 Responder probability
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresOverall Responder Probability For Participants With PGTC Seizures During Core Phase of This Study: Assessment Based on Relationship With Average Steady State Plasma Concentration (Cav, ss) of Perampanel2000 ng/mL0.67 Responder probability
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

A 25% responder was a participant who experienced a 25% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52

Population: FAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose primary efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-1367.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-2657.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3971.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5271.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1366.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2666.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-39100.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-52100.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-5263.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-1361.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1373.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-2671.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-3969.2 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3978.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2673.3 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 25% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5281.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

A 50% responder was a participant who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52

Population: FAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose primary efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1366.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3953.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2666.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-2644.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-39100.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5261.3 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-52100.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-1347.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-5254.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-2650.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3965.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5262.3 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1357.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2660.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-3961.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 50% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-1345.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

A 75% responder was a participant who experienced a 75% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52

Population: FAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose primary efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-1317.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-2618.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3931.3 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5238.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1366.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2666.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-3950.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-52100.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-5254.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-1325.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1347.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-2634.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-3946.2 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3946.3 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2646.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Based on 75% Responder Rate- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5241.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Participants were considered seizure free if participants completed a 13-week time period and were seizure-free for that entire time period. Total POS: sum of all POS including simple partial seizures without motor signs, simple partial seizures with motor signs, complex partial seizures, and complex partial seizures with SG. Data for this outcome measure has been reported for 13 week time periods as per age groups.

Time frame: Weeks 1-13, Weeks 14-26, Weeks 27-39, Weeks 40-52

Population: FAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose primary efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-137.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-269.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3912.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5215.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1366.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2650.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-3950.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-52100.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 40-5257.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 1-139.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 1-1340.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 14-2615.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 27-3945.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 27-3924.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyPGTC Seizures: Weeks 14-2646.2 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants Who Were Seizure-free- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyTotal POS Seizures: Weeks 40-5220.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

C-SSRS: interview-based instrument to systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior, to assess whether participant experienced any of following: completed suicide, suicide attempt (response of yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (yes on preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt or interrupted attempt), suicidal ideation (yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active SI with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without or with specific plan and intent), any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent (yes on has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior).Here, percentage of participants with \>=1 positive behavior, participants with \>=1 positive ideations; suicidality were reported.An assessment of SI and behavior with C-SSRS performed for participants \>=6 years at time of consent.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyParticipants with >= Positive Ideations1.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudySuicidality1.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyParticipants with >=1 Positive Behavior0.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyParticipants with >=1 Positive Behavior0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyParticipants with >= Positive Ideations7.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudySuicidality7.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Markedly Abnormal Encephalogram (EEG) Parameter Values During Awake and Sleep State for Total Group of Participant: Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Markedly Abnormal Encephalogram (EEG) Parameter Values During Awake and Sleep State for Total Group of Participant: Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This Study

Assessment of disease severity utilized the CGIC scale at end of treatment to evaluate participant's change in disease status from baseline. The CGIC is a 7-point scale that measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition. Scale ranged from 1 to 7 with lower score indicated improvement (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved), higher score indicated worsening (5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, 7=very much worse), and a score of 4 indicated no change.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 23, Week 52

Population: FAS included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose primary efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Very much improved11.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Much improved31.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Minimally improved38.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: No change14.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Minimally worse3.3 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Much worse0.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Very much improved14.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Much improved39.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Minimally improved35.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: No change7.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Minimally worse1.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Much worse1.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Minimally worse5.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Very much improved8.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Very much improved5.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Much improved26.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: No change17.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Minimally improved26.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Much improved41.2 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: No change26.1 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Much worse0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Minimally worse13.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 52: Minimally improved29.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change Scores (CGIC)- Core Phase and Extension Phase A of This StudyWeek 23: Much worse0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) for Total Group of Participants That Were Considered Related to Perampanel- Core Phase of This Study

Time frame: Baseline up to 23 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) for Total Group of Participants That Were Considered Related to Perampanel- Core Phase of This StudyInfluenza6.4 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) for Total Group of Participants That Were Considered Related to Perampanel- Core Phase of This StudyPyrexia9.0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) for Total Group of Participants That Were Considered Related to Perampanel- Core Phase of This StudySomnolence13.5 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) for Total Group of Participants That Were Considered Related to Perampanel- Core Phase of This StudyIrritability/Aggression/Agitation12.8 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) for Total Group of Participants That Were Considered Related to Perampanel- Core Phase of This StudyNasopharyngitis14.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This Study

The C-SSRS: interview-based instrument to systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior, to assess whether participant experienced any of the following: completed suicide, suicide attempt (response of yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (yes on preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt or interrupted attempt), suicidal ideation (yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active SI with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent (yes on has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior). w/ refers to with, W refers to Week and & refers to and.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Here overall number of participants analyzed 'N' signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation (Baseline) to No Ideation(Week 52)96.6 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyWish to be Dead(Baseline) to No ideation(Week 52)0.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyActive w/ Method(Baseline) to No Ideation(Week 52)0.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation(Baseline)to Active Nonspecific(Week52)0 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation(Baseline) to Active w/ Method(Week 520.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel 0.5 mg/mL: All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation(Baseline)to Active w/ Intent&Plan(W52)0.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation(Baseline) to Active w/ Method(Week 523.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation (Baseline) to No Ideation(Week 52)88.9 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation(Baseline)to Active Nonspecific(Week52)3.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyWish to be Dead(Baseline) to No ideation(Week 52)3.7 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyNo Ideation(Baseline)to Active w/ Intent&Plan(W52)0 percentage of participants
Perampanel: PGTC SeizuresPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed Using C-SSRS Scores to Extension Phase A (Week 52) of This StudyActive w/ Method(Baseline) to No Ideation(Week 52)0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026