Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Conditions
Keywords
Botulinum toxin type A, Urinary Incontinence, Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity
Brief summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSK1358820 in Japanese patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) with urinary incontinence, whose symptoms have not been adequately managed with medications for urinary incontinence due to NDO. This study consists of a screening phase up to 28 days followed by a double-blind Treatment phase 1 of 12 to 48 weeks wherein subjects will receive a single treatment of either GSK1358820 200 Units (U) injection or placebo injection. After the first treatment, subjects who meet the re-treatment criteria between 12 to 36 weeks can enter an open-label Treatment phase 2 to receive a second treatment with GSK1358820 200 U. Subjects will be permitted to receive re-treatment up to 2 times, and there should be a gap of minimum of 12 weeks since the previous treatment. The duration of overall treatment phases is 48 weeks. The total duration of participation for any subject will not exceed 52 weeks, including screening.
Interventions
GSK1358820 injection contains botulinum toxin type A (100 U), sodium chloride (0.9 milligrams \[mg\]), and human serum albumin (0.5 mg). The 30 mL of study drug will be administered as 30 injections each of 1.0 mL, evenly distributed at 30 sites in the detrusor muscle, spaced approximately 1 centimeter (cm) apart. The injection will be administered using cystoscopy and under local anesthesia. General anesthesia may be used excluding neuromuscular blocking agents.
Placebo injection contains sodium chloride (0.9 milligrams \[mg\]); 30 mL of the injection will be injected at 30 sites in the detrusor muscle, spaced approximately 1 centimeter (cm) apart. The injection will be administered using cystoscopy and under local anesthesia. General anesthesia may be used excluding neuromuscular blocking agents
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged \>=20 years at the time of signing the informed consent * Subject has urinary incontinence as a result of neurogenic detrusor overactivity for a period of at least 3 months prior to screening as a result of spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis, determined by documented subject history. In addition: 1. Spinal cord injury subjects must have a stable neurological injury level C5 or below occurring \>=6 months prior to screening. 2. Multiple sclerosis subjects must be clinically stable in the investigator's opinion, for \>=3 months prior to screening and have an Expanded Disability Status Scale score \<=6.5 * Subject has NDO for a period of at least 3 months prior to screening, determined by documented subject history. The presence of an involuntary detrusor contractions (IDC) must also be demonstrated during the urodynamic assessment during the screening period or Day 1 (prior to randomization). * Subject has not been adequately managed with one or more medications (i.e., anticholinergics or beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonist) for treatment of urinary incontinence due to NDO . Not adequately managed is defined as: An inadequate response after at least a 4-week period of medication(s) for urinary incontinence due to NDO on an optimized dose(s), i.e., subject is still incontinent despite medication(s) for urinary incontinence due to NDO, or Limiting side effects (i.e., condition that subject reduced dosage or discontinued the medication due to side effect) after at least a 2-week period of medication(s) for urinary incontinence due to NDO on an optimized dose(s) * Subject has \>=6 episodes of urinary incontinence, with no more than one urgency incontinence-free day in the 3-day subject bladder diary completed during the screening phase * Subject currently uses or is willing to use clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) to empty the bladder (indwelling catheter is not permitted). Subjects currently on CIC should be willing to maintain a CIC schedule of at least 3 times per day throughout the study. Caregiver may perform CIC. * Body weight \>=40 kilogram (kg) at screening * Males or females: 1. Male subjects with female partners of child bearing potential must comply with the following contraception requirements from the time of first dose of study medication until the study exit: * Vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia. * Male condom plus partner use of one of following the contraceptive options:Intrauterine device or intrauterine system that meets the standard operating procedure (SOP) effectiveness criteria including a \<1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; or oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone These allowed methods of contraception are only effective when used consistently, correctly and in accordance with the product label. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that subjects understand how to properly use these methods of contraception 2. Female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative urine or serum human chorionic gonadotrophin \[hCG\] test), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: • Non-reproductive potential defined as: Pre-menopausal females with one of the following: Documented tubal ligation, Documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion, Hysterectomy, Documented Bilateral Oophorectomy. Postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrollment. • Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed below in the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Modified List of Highly Effective Methods for Avoiding Pregnancy in Females of Reproductive Potential (FRP) requirements from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and until the study exit. This list of highly effective methods (approved in Japan) is provided below, and it does not apply to FRP with same sex partners, when this is their preferred and usual lifestyle or for subjects who are and will continue to be abstinent from penile-vaginal intercourse on a long term and persistent basis: Intrauterine device or intrauterine system that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria including a \<1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Oral Contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone; Male partner sterilization with documentation of azoospermia prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject. These allowed methods of contraception are only effective when used consistently, correctly and in accordance with the product label. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that subjects understand how to properly use these methods of contraception. * Subject has given signed informed consent, including compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and in this protocol (e.g., complete bladder diaries and questionnaires, is able to collect volume voided per micturition measurements over a 24-hour period, and attend all study visits in the opinion of the investigator(or subinvestigator).
Exclusion criteria
* Subject has a history or evidence of any diseases, functional abnormalities or bladder surgery, other than NDO, that may have affected bladder function including but not limited to: 1. Bladder stones (including bladder stone surgery) within 6 months prior to screening or confirmed occurrence of bladder stones at the screening phase 2. Surgery (including minimally invasive surgery) within 1 year of screening for stress incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse 3. Current use of an electrostimulation/neuromodulation device for treatment of urinary incontinence. Note: Use of any implantable device is prohibited within 4 weeks prior to initiation of Screening phase and throughout the study period. Use of any external device is discontinued at least 7 days prior to the start of the screening phase 4. Current use of a baclofen pump 5. History of interstitial cystitis, in the opinion of the investigator (or subinvestigator) 6. Past or current evidence of hematuria due to urological/renal pathology or uninvestigated hematuria. Subjects with investigated hematuria may enter the study if urological/renal pathology has been ruled out to the satisfaction by the investigator (or subinvestigator) 7. Past or current history of bladder cancer or other urothelial malignancy, positive result of urine cytology or uninvestigated suspicious urine cytology results at the Screening phase. Suspicious urine cytology abnormalities require that bladder cancer or other urothelial malignancy has been ruled out to the satisfaction of the investigator according to local site practice. 8. An active genital infection, other than genital warts, either concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to Screening 9. Male with previous or current diagnosis of prostate cancer or a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of \>10 nanogram (ng)/milliliter (mL) at Screening. Subjects with a PSA level of \>= 4 ng/mL but \<= 10 ng/mL must have prostate cancer ruled out to the satisfaction of the investigator (or subinvestigator) according to local site practice. 10. Evidence of urethral and/or bladder outlet obstruction, in the opinion of the investigator (or subinvestigator) * Subject has a serum creatinine level \>2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2×ULN; and bilirubin \> 1.5×ULN (isolated bilirubin \>1.5×ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin \<35%) at screening * Subject has current active liver or biliary disease (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones or otherwise stable chronic liver disease per investigator assessment). Notes: 1. Stable chronic liver disease should generally be defined by the absence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis 2. Chronic stable hepatitis B and C (example, presence of hepatitis B surface antigen \[HBsAg\] or positive hepatitis C antibody \[HCVAb\] test result within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment) are acceptable if subject otherwise meets entry criteria * QTc \>450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc \>480 msec in subjects with Bundle Branch Block from the result of ECG at screening. Notes: 1. The QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Bazett's formula (QTcB), Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and/or another method, machine-read or manually over-read 2. The specific formula that will be used to determine eligibility and discontinuation for an individual subject should be determined prior to initiation of the study. In other words, several different formulae cannot be used to calculate the QTc for an individual subject and then the lowest QTc value used to include or discontinue the subject from the trial * Subject has hemophilia or other clotting factor deficiencies or disorders that cause bleeding diathesis * Subject changes or initiates or discontinues anticholinergic, beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonist or any other medications or therapies to treat urinary incontinence due to NDO, within 6 days prior to the start of the screening phase * Subject has been treated with any intravesical pharmacologic agent (e.g., capsaicin, resiniferatoxin) for urinary incontinence due to NDO within 12 months prior to initiation of Treatment phase 1 (Week 0) * Subject has previous or current use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for the treatment of any urological condition * Subject has previous use within 12 weeks prior to initiation of Treatment phase 1 (Week 0) or current use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any non-urological condition or beauty care * Subject has been immunized for botulinum toxin of any serotype * Subject cannot withhold any antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy or medications with anticoagulative effects for 3 days prior to initiation of Treatment phase 1 (Week 0). Some medications may need to be withheld for \> 3 days, per clinical judgment of the investigator (or subinvestigator). * Subject without a urinary tract infection (UTI) as determined from the urinalysis or urine culture and/or investigator opinion, has not initiated prophylactic antibiotic medication 1 to 3 days prior to the initiation of Treatment phase 1 (Week 0). Subject with a UTI as determined from the urinalysis or urine culture and/or investigator opinion, has not initiated antibiotic medication at least 5 days prior to the initiation of Treatment phase 1 (Week 0) * Subject is symptomatic for UTI on day of treatment * Subject has a history of sensitivity to any of the study medications, medications used in the study (including anesthesia), or their components or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation * Subject has any medical condition that may put them at increased risk with exposure to GSK1358820 including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis * Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the study * Subject has a post void residual urine volume above 200 mL for subjects who micturate or have a mixed catheterization/spontaneous micturition pattern. The post void residual measurement can be repeated once; the subject is to be excluded if the repeated measure is above 200 mL. * Subject has a 24-hour total volume of urine voided \>3000 mL of urine collected over 24 consecutive hours during the 3-day bladder diary collection period in the Screening phase * Subject is currently participating in or has previously participated in another therapeutic study within 30 days prior to the start of the Screening phase * Subject has any condition or situation which, in the investigator's (or sub-investigator's) opinion, puts the subject at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes at Week 6 | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean has been reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) (PmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | PmaxIDC was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to ICS standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Volume at First IDC (VPmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | VPmaxIDC was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to ICS standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the Storage Phase (PdetMax) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | PdetMax was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to ICS standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. FAS2 comprised all randomized participants who had at least 1 post-second treatment efficacy assessment after the second treatment. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. FAS3 comprised all randomized participants who had at least 1 post-third treatment efficacy assessment after the third treatment. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Participants were instructed to enter data on the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3 | The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3 | The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Percentage of participants attaining 100%, \>=75% and \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average of urinary incontinence episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Percentage of participants attaining 100%, \>=75% and \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average of urinary incontinence episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3 | Participants were instructed to enter data on the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Percentage of participants attaining 100%, \>=75% and \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average of urinary incontinence episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Qualification for Retreatment After First Treatment | Up to 36 Weeks in Treatment Cycle 1 | Participants can be considered for re-treatment beginning at the week 12 visit following the initial treatment or the week 12 visit following any re-treatment. Qualification criteria was; participants must have initiated request for re-treatment, participants experienced at least 4 episodes of urinary incontinence, with no more than one incontinence-free day, post-void residual (PVR) urine volume must have been \<200 mL for participants who micturated or had a mixed catheterization / spontaneous micturition pattern, body weight \>=40 kilogram; investigator deemed re-treatment appropriate. Time to the participant's first qualification for 2nd treatment from the day of 1st treatment was calculated as the earliest date when participants gave Yes response to the question of participants qualification for retreatment minus the day of first treatment plus 1. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Request for Retreatment After First Treatment | Up to 36 Weeks in Treatment Cycle 1 | The time taken by the participants to request re-treatment was reported. Time to the participant's first request for 2nd treatment from the day of 1st treatment was calculated as the earliest date when participants provided Yes response to the question of participants request for retreatment minus the day of first treatment plus 1. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | KHQ is a 21 item questionnaire, consisting of 9 domains:General health (GH) (1\[Very good\] to 5\[Very poor\]), Incontinence impact (Int Imp) (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), Role Limitations (RL) (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), Physical limitations (PL) (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), Social limitations (SL) (0\[not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Personal relationships (PR) (0\[Not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Emotions (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[Very much\]), Sleep or energy (S or E) (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]) and Severity or Coping (S or C) (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]). Domain score for GH was calculated as score of one item minus 1/4x100; Int Imp: score of one item minus 1/3x100; RL, PL, PR, S or E: summed scores of 2 items minus 2/6x100; SL, Emotions: summed scores of 3 items minus 3/9x100; S or C: summed scores of 5 items minus 5/15x100. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was any visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | KHQ is a 21 item questionnaire, consisting of 9 domains: GH (1\[Very good\] to 5\[Very poor\]), Int Imp (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), RL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), PL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), SL (0\[not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), PR (0\[Not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Emotions (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[Very much\]), S or E (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]) and S or C (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]). Domain score for GH was calculated as score of one item minus 1/4x100; Int Imp: score of one item minus 1/3x100; RL, PL, PR, S or E: summed scores of 2 items minus 2/6x100; SL, Emotions: summed scores of 3 items minus 3/9x100; S or C: summed scores of 5 items minus 5/15x100. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was any visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 24 in Treatment Cycle 3 | KHQ is a 21 item questionnaire, consisting of 9 domains: GH (1\[Very good\] to 5\[Very poor\]), Int Imp (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), RL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), PL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), SL (0\[not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), PR (0\[Not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Emotions (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[Very much\]), S or E (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]) and S or C (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]). Domain score for GH was calculated as score of one item minus 1/4x100; Int Imp: score of one item minus 1/3x100; RL, PL, PR, S or E: summed scores of 2 items minus 2/6x100; SL, Emotions: summed scores of 3 items minus 3/9x100; S or C: summed scores of 5 items minus 5/15x100. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was any visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 2, Week 6 , Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | TBS consisted of 4 answers to 1 question, to which participants had to answer considering their current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared to their condition before receiving any study treatment in the trial. Responses for questions were coded as 1 to 4 where 1 - Greatly improved, 2 - Improved, 3 - Not changed and 4 - Worsened. The answers of 1 - Greatly improved or 2 - Improved were regarded as positive response. Other answers including missing data were regarded as NO positive response. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2 | TBS consisted of 4 answers to 1 question, to which participants had to answer considering their current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared to their condition before receiving any study treatment in the trial. Responses for questions were coded as 1 to 4 where 1 - Greatly improved, 2 - Improved, 3 - Not changed and 4 - Worsened. The answers of 1 - Greatly improved or 2 - Improved were regarded as positive response. Other answers including missing data were regarded as NO positive response. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 24 in Treatment Cycle 3 | TBS consisted of 4 answers to 1 question, to which participants had to answer considering their current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared to their condition before receiving any study treatment in the trial. Responses for questions were coded as 1 to 4 where 1 - Greatly improved, 2 - Improved, 3 - Not changed and 4 - Worsened. The answers of 1 - Greatly improved or 2 - Improved were regarded as positive response. Other answers including missing data were regarded as NO positive response. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAE | Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety for double blind phase (SPDB) Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety population 1 comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of GSK1358820. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety Population 2 comprised of all participants who received at least two doses of GSK1358820. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety Population 3 comprised of all participants who received three doses of GSK1358820. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Vital sign parameter SBP and DBP were measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2 | Vital sign parameter SBP and DBP were measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | Vital sign parameter SBP and DBP were measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2 | Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Vital sign parameter temperature was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2 | Vital sign parameter temperature was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | Vital sign parameter temperature was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12, and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 1 | Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of following hematology parameters; Basophils, Eosinophils, Hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit (Hct), Lymphocytes (Lympho), Monocytes, Neutrophil bands (N bands), Total Neutrophils (T neutro), Platelet count (PC), Red Blood Cell (RBC) count, and White Blood Cell count (WBC). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2 | Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of following hematology parameters; Basophils, Eosinophils, Hb, Hct, Lympho, Monocytes, N bands, T neutro, PC, RBC count, and WBC. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of following hematology parameters; Basophils, Eosinophils, Hb, Hct, Lympho, Monocytes, N bands, T neutro, PC, RBC count, and WBC. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 1 | Blood samples were collected for analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters; Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase (Alk Phosp), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Direct Bilirubin (Bil), Total Bil, Calcium, Chloride, Creatinine, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Total Protein (T Protein), Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and Uric acid. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2 | Blood samples were collected for analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters; Albumin, Alk Phosp, ALT, AST, Direct Bil, Total Bil, Calcium, Chloride, Creatinine, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, T Protein, Urea/BUN and Uric acid. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | Blood samples were collected for analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters; Albumin, Alk Phosp, ALT, AST, Direct Bil, Total Bil, Calcium, Chloride, Creatinine, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, T Protein, Urea/BUN and Uric acid. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood and protein in urine samples was recorded as negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1) and up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood and protein in urine samples was recorded as negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1) and up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood and protein in urine samples was recorded as negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) | Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 Colony Forming Unit per milliliter (CFU/mL) and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With UTI: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U | Up to Week 48 after 1st treatment | A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With UTI: GSK1358820 200 U/GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With UTI: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With UTI: GSK1358820 200 U/GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 1 | PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both clean intermittent catheterization \[CIC\] and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. For participants who had a PVR urine volume measurement repeated, only the repeat value was recorded. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12 (Study exit, Week 48 of Treatment Cycle 1) in Treatment Cycle 2 | PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12 (Study exit, Week 48 of Treatment Cycle 1) in Treatment Cycle 2 | PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Individual participant data has been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Individual participant data has been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Individual participant data has been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR | Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1 | MCC was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to International Continence Society (ICS) standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination | Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented. |
| Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 12 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1 | Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each timepoint during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, and QT intervals. The findings from ECG were classified as A-NCS and A-CS. Number of participants with A-NCS and A-CS findings have been reported. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12 and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2 | Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each timepoint during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, and QT. The findings from ECG were classified as A-NCS and A-CS. Number of participants with A-NCS and A-CS findings have been reported. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12 and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3 | Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each timepoint during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, and QT. The findings from ECG were classified as A-NCS and A-CS. Number of participants with A-NCS and A-CS findings have been reported. |
| Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment | CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented. |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of GSK1358820 (botulinum toxin type A) in participants with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity. This was a multicenter study conducted at 7 centers in Japan.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 30 participants were screened of which 21 participants were randomized (11 participants in the GSK1358820 200 Unit \[U\] group and 10 participants in the placebo group).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received a single (double-blind) treatment with Placebo (30 injections of 1.0 mL each) injected into the detrusor muscle of the bladder, using cystoscopy, and under local anesthesia in Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1). Participants who met retreatment criteria between 12 and 36 weeks after the first treatment received re-treatment with GSK1358820 200 U (open-label) in Treatment Phase 2 until Week 36 after the first treatment and up to 2 times with an interval of at least 12 weeks between treatments. | 10 |
| GSK1358820 200U Participants received a single (double-blind) dose of GSK1358820 (30 injections of 1.0 mL each) injected into the detrusor muscle of the bladder, using cystoscopy, and under local anesthesia in Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1). Participants who met retreatment criteria between 12 and 36 weeks after the first treatment received re-treatment with GSK1358820 200 U (open-label) in Treatment Phase 2 until Week 36 after the first treatment and up to 2 times with an interval of at least 12 weeks between treatments. | 11 |
| Total | 21 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | GSK1358820 200U | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 47.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.29 | 50.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.12 | 49.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.93 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - Japanese/East Asian (EA)/South EA Heritage | 10 Participants | 11 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 17 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 10 | 0 / 11 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 3 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 5 / 10 | 8 / 11 | 5 / 10 | 5 / 6 | 4 / 5 | 3 / 3 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 10 | 1 / 11 | 1 / 10 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 3 |
Outcome results
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes at Week 6
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean has been reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes at Week 6 | -0.18 Episodes | Standard Error 0.957 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes at Week 6 | -3.20 Episodes | Standard Error 0.911 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition
The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 6.85 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 77.905 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 30 | 165.22 Milliliter | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 0.98 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 86.368 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 55.19 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 44.989 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 53.65 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 72.444 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | -3.68 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 55.395 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 30 | 66.37 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 48.478 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 36 | 70.07 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 26.988 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 42 | 80.47 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 42.477 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 48 | 59.98 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 6.616 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 61.12 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 50.47 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 69.98 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 64.01 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 84.11 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 74.478 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 107.53 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 79.483 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 82.77 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 61.992 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Vital sign parameter temperature was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 24 | 0.30 Degree Celsius | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 12 | 0.14 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 6 | 0.05 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.375 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 2 | 0.29 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.438 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 24 | -0.22 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.471 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 36 | -0.25 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 48 | -0.20 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 2 | -0.06 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.391 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 6 | -0.15 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.401 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 12 | 0.03 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.535 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 24 | -10.0 Beats per minute | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 2 | -1.3 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 14.28 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 6 | 1.7 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 12.64 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 12 | -1.4 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 9.96 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 2 | -1.0 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 12 | 3.1 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 6.01 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 6 | 4.5 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 15.21 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 36 | 0.2 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 12.86 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 48 | -13.0 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 7.48 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 24 | -9.3 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 9.79 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score
KHQ is a 21 item questionnaire, consisting of 9 domains:General health (GH) (1\[Very good\] to 5\[Very poor\]), Incontinence impact (Int Imp) (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), Role Limitations (RL) (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), Physical limitations (PL) (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), Social limitations (SL) (0\[not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Personal relationships (PR) (0\[Not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Emotions (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[Very much\]), Sleep or energy (S or E) (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]) and Severity or Coping (S or C) (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]). Domain score for GH was calculated as score of one item minus 1/4x100; Int Imp: score of one item minus 1/3x100; RL, PL, PR, S or E: summed scores of 2 items minus 2/6x100; SL, Emotions: summed scores of 3 items minus 3/9x100; S or C: summed scores of 5 items minus 5/15x100. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was any visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 36 | 25.0 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 24 | -25.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 58.926 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 6 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.981 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 6 | 3.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.242 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 12 | -24.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.739 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 6 | -6.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.082 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 24 | -22.22 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.713 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 36 | -83.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 36 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 12 | -3.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.148 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 6 | -10.42 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.708 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 12 | -3.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.595 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 24 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.57 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 6 | -9.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.999 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 36 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 12 | -14.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.854 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 24 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.427 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 12 | 4.17 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 45.207 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 36 | 11.11 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 6 | -21.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.861 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 6 | 12.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.18 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 6 | -10.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.831 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 12 | -13.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.187 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 12 | -11.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.861 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 24 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 24 | 8.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.785 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 24 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.57 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 36 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 12 | 2.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.45 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 36 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 36 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 24 | 12.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.68 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 24 | -6.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.856 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 36 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 6 | -20.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.922 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 12 | -20.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.595 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 6 | -7.58 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.027 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 12 | -9.09 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.248 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 24 | -18.75 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.003 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 36 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.889 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Sleep/energy, Week 48 | -0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.57 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 6 | -10.30 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.519 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 12 | -14.55 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.355 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 36 | -15.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.213 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 24 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.36 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 48 | -6.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.333 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 6 | -4.55 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 44.778 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 12 | -15.15 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.605 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 36 | -22.22 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.773 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 48 | -0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.217 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 36 | 6.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.907 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 6 | -9.09 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.672 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Severity/Coping measures, Week 24 | -15.83 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.077 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 6 | 6.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.23 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 12 | 9.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.61 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 36 | 16.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.91 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 48 | 15.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.69 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 6 | -30.30 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 43.345 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 12 | -30.30 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.701 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 24 | -29.17 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.034 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 36 | -38.89 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.968 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Incontinence impact, Week 48 | -26.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.515 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 6 | -12.12 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.979 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 12 | -12.12 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.979 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 24 | -25.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.861 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 36 | -27.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.092 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Role Limitations, Week 48 | -10.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.907 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 24 | -27.08 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.431 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Physical Limitations, Week 48 | -6.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.129 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 6 | -7.07 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 47.212 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 12 | -2.02 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 41.52 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 24 | -25.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 43.946 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Social Limitations, Week 36 | -11.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 54.433 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 6 | 12.50 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.576 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 12 | -4.17 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.416 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 24 | 2.38 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.817 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Personal Relationships, Week 48 | 8.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.868 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 12 | -8.08 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.89 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 24 | -19.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.57 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 36 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.606 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Score | Emotions, Week 48 | -17.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.592 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6
MCC was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to International Continence Society (ICS) standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | 62.05 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 104.783 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Capacity (MCC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | 157.09 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 161.159 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) (PmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6
PmaxIDC was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to ICS standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time point were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) (PmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | -0.005 Centimeter of water (cmH2O) | Standard Deviation 15.1414 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) (PmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | -21.000 Centimeter of water (cmH2O) | Standard Deviation 27.7705 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the Storage Phase (PdetMax) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6
PdetMax was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to ICS standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the Storage Phase (PdetMax) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | -13.72 cmH2O | Standard Deviation 29.141 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Maximum Detrusor Pressure During the Storage Phase (PdetMax) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | -31.18 cmH2O | Standard Deviation 28.067 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume
PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both clean intermittent catheterization \[CIC\] and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. For participants who had a PVR urine volume measurement repeated, only the repeat value was recorded. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 2 | 6.25 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 8.839 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 6 | 25.33 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.143 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 12 | -30.73 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 47.963 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 24 | 24.00 Milliliter | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 12 | 177.03 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 245.67 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 2 | 166.50 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 244.34 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 24 | 208.85 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 45.891 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 36 | 206.65 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 196.081 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 6 | 87.00 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 175.997 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume | Week 48 | 207.10 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 231.648 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Vital sign parameter SBP and DBP were measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 24 | -15.0 Millimeters of mercury | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 6 | 1.7 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.78 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 6 | 1.9 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 11.87 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 12 | -0.4 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 24 | -9.0 Millimeters of mercury | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 2 | 0.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 16.31 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 12 | 1.4 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 13.94 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 2 | -1.8 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 9.15 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 6 | 4.6 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 24 | 3.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 36 | 3.2 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 5.15 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 12 | 6.2 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 20.76 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 48 | 1.6 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 6.91 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 12 | 1.7 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 12.45 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 2 | 7.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 11.24 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 6 | 7.4 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 24 | 11.6 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 12.87 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 36 | 2.7 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 9.71 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | SBP, Week 48 | 7.4 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 16.58 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | DBP, Week 2 | 1.5 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 9.77 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -2.50 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.593 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -0.90 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.658 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -0.27 Episodes | Standard Deviation 3.321 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -0.40 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.459 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -2.33 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.943 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30 | -3.33 Episodes | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -2.82 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.518 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 42 | -3.47 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.181 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -3.46 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.513 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -3.79 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.295 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 48 | -3.80 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.008 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -2.67 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.53 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30 | -3.42 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.195 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -3.12 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.469 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36 | -3.94 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.832 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | -1.83 Voids | Standard Deviation 0.707 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | 0.37 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.869 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 30 | -3.00 Voids | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | 0.10 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.406 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | -0.83 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.65 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -0.15 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.253 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 36 | -2.83 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.698 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 42 | -2.20 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.024 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 30 | -2.54 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.616 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 48 | -2.47 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.548 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -0.79 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.905 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -2.15 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.354 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | -2.24 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.742 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | -3.04 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.827 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | -2.88 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.788 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Volume at First IDC (VPmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6
VPmaxIDC was calculated by urodynamic assessment according to ICS standard guidelines. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Volume at First IDC (VPmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | 67.7 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 68.28 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Change From Baseline in Volume at First IDC (VPmaxIDC) by Urodynamic Assessment at Week 6 | 188.9 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 157.43 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR
CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR | 1 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination
The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each timepoint during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, and QT intervals. The findings from ECG were classified as A-NCS and A-CS. Number of participants with A-NCS and A-CS findings have been reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 12 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Week 12: A-NCS | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Week 12: ACS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Baseline: A-NCS | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Baseline: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Week 48: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Baseline: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Baseline: A-NCS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Week 12: A-NCS | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Week 12: ACS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Not Clinically Significant (A-NCS) and Abnormal Clinically Significant (A-CS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Week 48: A-NCS | 1 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAE
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety for double blind phase (SPDB) Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAE | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAE | Non-SAEs | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAE | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAE | Non-SAEs | 8 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Blood samples were collected for analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters; Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase (Alk Phosp), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Direct Bilirubin (Bil), Total Bil, Calcium, Chloride, Creatinine, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Total Protein (T Protein), Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and Uric acid. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, Normal or no change | 8 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, High | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Potassium, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Albumin, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Sodium, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Albumin, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Albumin, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Albumin, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Albumin, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:ALT, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Calcium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Chloride, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, Normal or no change | 7 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, High | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Potassium, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Potassium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Sodium, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Sodium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein, Low | 1 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of following hematology parameters; Basophils, Eosinophils, Hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit (Hct), Lymphocytes (Lympho), Monocytes, Neutrophil bands (N bands), Total Neutrophils (T neutro), Platelet count (PC), Red Blood Cell (RBC) count, and White Blood Cell count (WBC). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented.
Time frame: Week 12, and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Hct, Normal or No change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Basophils, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:RBC count, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:WBC count, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Normal to no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: Hb,Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: N bands, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:RBC count, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:RBC count, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Normal to no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hb, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hct, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48:T neutro, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:WBC count, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:WBC count, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Basophils, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Basophils, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: Hb,Normal or no change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Hct, Normal or No change | 11 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Normal or no change | 10 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Lympho, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 Colony Forming Unit per milliliter (CFU/mL) and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) | 2 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood and protein in urine samples was recorded as negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and up to Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: SPDB Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Any Increase | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to 1+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to Trace | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 1+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 3+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to Trace | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Any Increase | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to 1+ | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Any Increase | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to Trace | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 3+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Any Increase | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to Trace | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 1+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Percentage of participants attaining 100%, \>=75% and \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average of urinary incontinence episodes in Treatment Cycle 1 have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=50% | 50 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=50% | 30 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=50% | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=75% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=50% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=50% | 50 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; >=50% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 48; >=75% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=75% | 36 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=50% | 73 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; >=75% | 75 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 48; >=50% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=75% | 64 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; >=50% | 88 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=50% | 73 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36; 100% | 50 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36; >=75% | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, 100% | 36 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=75% | 64 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36; >=50% | 83 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=50% | 91 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=50% | 88 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, 100% | 27 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 42; >=50% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, 100% | 38 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=75% | 63 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24, 100% | 38 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=50% | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 48; 100% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; 100% | 13 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 42; 100% | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 42; >=75% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=75% | 88 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100 Percent (%), >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, 100% | 18 Percentage of participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)
TBS consisted of 4 answers to 1 question, to which participants had to answer considering their current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared to their condition before receiving any study treatment in the trial. Responses for questions were coded as 1 to 4 where 1 - Greatly improved, 2 - Improved, 3 - Not changed and 4 - Worsened. The answers of 1 - Greatly improved or 2 - Improved were regarded as positive response. Other answers including missing data were regarded as NO positive response.
Time frame: Week 2, Week 6 , Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 24 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 12 | 30 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 36 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 6 | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 2 | 10 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 36 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 48 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 2 | 55 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 6 | 91 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 12 | 73 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) | Week 24 | 100 Percentage of participants |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition
The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 40.43 Percent change | Standard Deviation 55.177 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 10.88 Percent change | Standard Deviation 53.306 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 12.56 Percent change | Standard Deviation 49.011 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 4.14 Percent change | Standard Deviation 28.531 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 39.79 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.933 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 30 | 125.17 Percent change | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 36 | 61.77 Percent change | Standard Deviation 46.781 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 42 | 64.19 Percent change | Standard Deviation 34.387 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 76.99 Percent change | Standard Deviation 58.964 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 48 | 50.60 Percent change | Standard Deviation 24.805 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 45.29 Percent change | Standard Deviation 38.91 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 53.75 Percent change | Standard Deviation 53.789 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 71.03 Percent change | Standard Deviation 66.792 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 68.36 Percent change | Standard Deviation 54.836 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 30 | 58.16 Percent change | Standard Deviation 51.203 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data on the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -35.00 Percent change | Standard Deviation 21.213 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -10.58 Percent change | Standard Deviation 61.416 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30 | -38.46 Percent change | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -4.77 Percent change | Standard Deviation 60.523 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -24.07 Percent change | Standard Deviation 38.593 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -42.31 Percent change | Standard Deviation 10.879 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -59.07 Percent change | Standard Deviation 35.043 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -74.71 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.316 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -67.64 Percent change | Standard Deviation 38.644 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 48 | -80.67 Percent change | Standard Deviation 26.39 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -91.07 Percent change | Standard Deviation 11.453 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30 | -79.99 Percent change | Standard Deviation 20.033 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36 | -78.83 Percent change | Standard Deviation 34.519 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 42 | -78.70 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.029 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -79.82 Percent change | Standard Deviation 24.361 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, Week 36, Week 42 and Week 48 in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | 1.10 Percent change | Standard Deviation 16.719 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 30 | -27.27 Percent change | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -0.40 Percent change | Standard Deviation 14.219 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | 6.71 Percent change | Standard Deviation 20.18 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | -7.01 Percent change | Standard Deviation 15.803 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | -18.94 Percent change | Standard Deviation 3.214 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 36 | -20.61 Percent change | Standard Deviation 29.216 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 42 | -14.15 Percent change | Standard Deviation 26.549 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | -19.59 Percent change | Standard Deviation 29.442 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 48 | -16.20 Percent change | Standard Deviation 27.755 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -5.62 Percent change | Standard Deviation 20.907 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -19.57 Percent change | Standard Deviation 26.762 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | -26.61 Percent change | Standard Deviation 27.085 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | -24.02 Percent change | Standard Deviation 26.58 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 30 | -19.61 Percent change | Standard Deviation 28.811 |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Qualification for Retreatment After First Treatment
Participants can be considered for re-treatment beginning at the week 12 visit following the initial treatment or the week 12 visit following any re-treatment. Qualification criteria was; participants must have initiated request for re-treatment, participants experienced at least 4 episodes of urinary incontinence, with no more than one incontinence-free day, post-void residual (PVR) urine volume must have been \<200 mL for participants who micturated or had a mixed catheterization / spontaneous micturition pattern, body weight \>=40 kilogram; investigator deemed re-treatment appropriate. Time to the participant's first qualification for 2nd treatment from the day of 1st treatment was calculated as the earliest date when participants gave Yes response to the question of participants qualification for retreatment minus the day of first treatment plus 1.
Time frame: Up to 36 Weeks in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Qualification for Retreatment After First Treatment | 85.0 Days |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Qualification for Retreatment After First Treatment | 246.0 Days |
Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Request for Retreatment After First Treatment
The time taken by the participants to request re-treatment was reported. Time to the participant's first request for 2nd treatment from the day of 1st treatment was calculated as the earliest date when participants provided Yes response to the question of participants request for retreatment minus the day of first treatment plus 1.
Time frame: Up to 36 Weeks in Treatment Cycle 1
Population: FAS1 Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Request for Retreatment After First Treatment | 84.5 Days |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 1 (Treatment Cycle 1)- Time to Request for Retreatment After First Treatment | 246.0 Days |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition
The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 30 | 65.55 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 196.119 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 36 | -42.23 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 114.691 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | 7.83 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 84.215 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 37.32 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 78.467 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 54.67 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 68.852 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 51.28 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 76.675 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | -10.38 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 60.659 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 78.17 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 96.434 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 77.25 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 68.182 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | 21.59 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 38.13 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 57.00 Milliliter | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 60.33 Milliliter | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 66.35 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 76.721 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 76.01 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 71.37 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Vital sign parameter temperature was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 0 | 0.16 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 2 | 0.05 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.536 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 6 | 0.15 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.387 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 12 | -0.02 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.315 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 24 | 0.53 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.629 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 48 | 0.26 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.559 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 24 | 0.10 Degree Celsius | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 0 | -0.23 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.186 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 12 | 0.02 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.264 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 2 | -0.07 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.388 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 48 | -0.10 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.173 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 6 | 0.03 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.344 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 0 | 3.7 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 12.57 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 2 | 0.1 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 15.21 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 6 | 0.7 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 16.75 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 12 | -2.9 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 16.59 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 24 | -5.3 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 14.86 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 48 | -8.6 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 7.83 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 24 | 26.0 Beats per minute | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 0 | -3.5 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 13.47 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 12 | -1.8 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 14.86 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 2 | 0.5 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 13.87 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 48 | 1.3 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 6 | 2.2 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 11.97 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score
KHQ is a 21 item questionnaire, consisting of 9 domains: GH (1\[Very good\] to 5\[Very poor\]), Int Imp (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), RL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), PL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), SL (0\[not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), PR (0\[Not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Emotions (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[Very much\]), S or E (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]) and S or C (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]). Domain score for GH was calculated as score of one item minus 1/4x100; Int Imp: score of one item minus 1/3x100; RL, PL, PR, S or E: summed scores of 2 items minus 2/6x100; SL, Emotions: summed scores of 3 items minus 3/9x100; S or C: summed scores of 5 items minus 5/15x100. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was any visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 12 | -9.88 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.765 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 12 | -25.93 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.778 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 24 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.825 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 36 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.333 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 0 | -13.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.187 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 6 | -36.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.683 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 12 | -37.04 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.635 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 24 | -43.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.561 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 36 | -27.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.459 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 6 | -38.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.45 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 12 | -40.74 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.43 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 24 | -26.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.277 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 36 | -38.89 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.459 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 0 | -21.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.209 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 6 | -35.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.058 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 12 | -44.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.845 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 24 | -44.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.328 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 36 | -37.04 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 46.259 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 0 | 4.17 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 45.207 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 6 | -20.83 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 50.198 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 12 | -14.29 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 45.571 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 24 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 59.317 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 36 | -22.22 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.49 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 0 | -3.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.253 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 6 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.234 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 0 | 2.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.45 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 24 | -24.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 39.597 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 36 | -3.70 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 39.021 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 0 | -10.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.082 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 6 | -23.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.082 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 12 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.667 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 24 | -20.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.386 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 36 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.667 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 0 | -15.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.717 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 6 | -25.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.476 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 12 | -25.93 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.483 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 36 | -24.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.367 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 0 | -21.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.382 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 24 | -32.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.807 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 6 | 5.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.81 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 12 | 5.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.83 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 24 | 10.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.69 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 36 | 8.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.43 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 0 | -6.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.427 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 6 | -26.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.976 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 6 | 4.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.82 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 0 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.96 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 6 | -5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.515 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 12 | -5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 51.28 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 0 | 3.70 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 58.654 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 6 | -2.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 57.922 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 24 | 33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 24 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 0 | -0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.515 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 0 | 12.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.92 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 24 | 16.67 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 24 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 12 | 12.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.46 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 0 | -3.70 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.01 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 24 | -25.0 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 6 | -5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.187 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 6 | -5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.968 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 12 | -8.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 57.494 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 6 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 47.14 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 0 | -12.22 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.513 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 12 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 47.14 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 12 | -7.41 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.915 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 24 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 12 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.96 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 0 | 5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.459 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 0 | 2.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.616 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 24 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 6 | 27.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 63.099 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 12 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.006 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 12 | -11.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.965 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 24 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 12 | 22.22 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 67.358 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 0 | 2.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 41.388 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 6 | -11.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.178 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 6 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 55.777 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 24 | 66.67 Scores on a scale | — |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Individual participant data has been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12 (Study exit, Week 48 of Treatment Cycle 1) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 2. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 2 | -129.8 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 6 | -129.8 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 12 | -144.8 Milliliter |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U
PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12 (Study exit, Week 48 of Treatment Cycle 1) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Week 2 | 46.5 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Week 6 | 42 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Week 12 | 1 Milliliter |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP
Vital sign parameter SBP and DBP were measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 0 | 3.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 9.57 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 2 | -2.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 16.64 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 12 | -1.2 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 12.71 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 24 | 4.5 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 9.95 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 48 | 3.8 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 10.38 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 6 | 2.6 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 12.52 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 24 | 3.5 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 15.26 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 48 | -0.2 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 13.85 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 0 | -0.4 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 2 | -3.5 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 12.55 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 6 | 1.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.25 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 12 | -4.6 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 7.73 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 12 | 6.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 2.76 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 0 | 0.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.19 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 0 | -1.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 7.26 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 6 | 12.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.09 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 24 | -1.0 Millimeters of mercury | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 12 | 5.2 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 7.44 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 6 | 4.2 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 10.76 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 24 | 6.0 Millimeters of mercury | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 48 | 16.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 12.17 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 48 | 11.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 10.07 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 2 | 8.2 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.95 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 2 | 4.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 10.61 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. FAS2 comprised all randomized participants who had at least 1 post-second treatment efficacy assessment after the second treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -0.33 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.439 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -3.17 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.602 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -2.56 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.939 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -2.67 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.041 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -2.27 Episodes | Standard Deviation 3.157 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30 | -1.11 Episodes | Standard Deviation 3.657 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36 | 0.33 Episodes | Standard Deviation 4.243 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -2.77 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.735 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -0.89 Episodes | Standard Deviation 1.026 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -1.50 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.983 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -1.06 Episodes | Standard Deviation 1.124 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -1.33 Episodes | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -1.67 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.919 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -1.00 Episodes | — |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | 0.10 Voids | Standard Deviation 2.091 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -1.33 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.305 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | -0.96 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.679 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | 0.80 Voids | Standard Deviation 0.869 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | 0.67 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.247 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 30 | 1.33 Voids | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 36 | 2.17 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.65 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -0.90 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.343 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | -0.22 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.601 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | 0.06 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.902 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -0.72 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.652 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | 0.33 Voids | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -1.28 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.819 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | 2.67 Voids | — |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U
CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 1
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U
The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 1
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings
Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each timepoint during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, and QT. The findings from ECG were classified as A-NCS and A-CS. Number of participants with A-NCS and A-CS findings have been reported.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-NCS | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-NCS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-NCS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-NCS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-CS | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety Population 2 comprised of all participants who received at least two doses of GSK1358820.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | SAEs | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Non-SAEs | 5 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety population 1 comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of GSK1358820.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 1
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U | Non-SAEs | 5 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Blood samples were collected for analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters; Albumin, Alk Phosp, ALT, AST, Direct Bil, Total Bil, Calcium, Chloride, Creatinine, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, T Protein, Urea/BUN and Uric acid. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:ALT, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Chloride, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 8 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Calcium, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, Normal or no change | 8 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Alk phosp, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Potassium, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Potassium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12: Albumin, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Sodium, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Sodium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Calcium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 7 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, High | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Albumin, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Uric acid, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Uric acid, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Calcium, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12: Albumin, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Albumin, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Alk phosp, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:ALT, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Calcium, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Chloride, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, High | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Potassium, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Potassium, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Sodium, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Sodium, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of following hematology parameters; Basophils, Eosinophils, Hb, Hct, Lympho, Monocytes, N bands, T neutro, PC, RBC count, and WBC. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Hb,Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hb, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 8 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Basophils, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Basophils, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: Hb,Normal or no change | 8 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Hct, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hct, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Normal or no change | 8 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Lympho, Normal or No change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: N bands, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, Normal or no change | 7 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, High | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48:T neutro, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Normal or no change | 8 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, Normal or No change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, High | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:RBC count, Normal or no change | 9 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:RBC count, Normal or No Change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Normal to no change | 7 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, High | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:WBC count, Normal to no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: Hb,Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Normal to no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:RBC count, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: N bands, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Basophils, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:RBC count, Normal or No Change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Basophils, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Hb,Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, Normal or No change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hb, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Hct, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:WBC count, Normal to no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hct, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48:T neutro, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Normal or no change | 6 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Lympho, Normal or No change | 3 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With UTI: GSK1358820 200 U/GSK1358820 200 U
A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With UTI: GSK1358820 200 U/GSK1358820 200 U | 1 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With UTI: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U
A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 1
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With UTI: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U | 3 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood and protein in urine samples was recorded as negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1) and up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 1
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Any Increase | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to Trace | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to 1+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 1+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Any Increase | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 2+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to Trace | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to Trace | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to 1+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Any Increase | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to Trace | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 1+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Any Increase | 2 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Percentage of participants attaining 100%, \>=75% and \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average of urinary incontinence episodes in Treatment Cycle 2 have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36; >=50% | 50 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=75% | 60 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=75% | 60 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=50% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, 100% | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=75% | 60 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=50% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, 100% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=75% | 44 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=50% | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=75% | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=50% | 60 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24, 100% | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=50% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; >=75% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30; >=50% | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36; 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36; >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=50% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, 100% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, 100% | 17 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=75% | 17 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=50% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=75% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, 100% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=50% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=75% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=50% | 50 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=50% | 50 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=50% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, 100% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=75% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=50% | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS
TBS consisted of 4 answers to 1 question, to which participants had to answer considering their current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared to their condition before receiving any study treatment in the trial. Responses for questions were coded as 1 to 4 where 1 - Greatly improved, 2 - Improved, 3 - Not changed and 4 - Worsened. The answers of 1 - Greatly improved or 2 - Improved were regarded as positive response. Other answers including missing data were regarded as NO positive response.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 36 | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 12 | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 0 | 30 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 2 | 70 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 6 | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 24 | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 6 | 83 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 12 | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 0 | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 2 | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 24 | 100 Percentage of participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition
The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | -0.52 Percent change | Standard Deviation 25.276 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 25.73 Percent change | Standard Deviation 51.374 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 60.12 Percent change | Standard Deviation 78.234 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | 13.72 Percent change | Standard Deviation 54.613 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 30 | 68.58 Percent change | Standard Deviation 141.433 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 36 | -6.52 Percent change | Standard Deviation 52.333 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 30.25 Percent change | Standard Deviation 41.977 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 37.32 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.603 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 49.41 Percent change | Standard Deviation 50.11 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | 13.97 Percent change | Standard Deviation 26.244 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 42.20 Percent change | Standard Deviation 50.162 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 48.31 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.054 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 42.19 Percent change | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 24 | 39.86 Percent change | — |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -2.77 Percent change | Standard Deviation 59.552 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -67.47 Percent change | Standard Deviation 43.984 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -43.22 Percent change | Standard Deviation 65.093 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -57.56 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.509 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -33.05 Percent change | Standard Deviation 113.201 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 30 | 1.28 Percent change | Standard Deviation 130.221 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 36 | 52.56 Percent change | Standard Deviation 161.365 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -61.89 Percent change | Standard Deviation 45.317 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -33.80 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.522 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -53.24 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.701 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -46.30 Percent change | Standard Deviation 48.39 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 24 | -44.44 Percent change | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -60.53 Percent change | Standard Deviation 32.686 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -33.33 Percent change | — |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 30, and Week 36 in Treatment Cycle 2
Population: FAS2 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 36 | 28.33 Percent change | Standard Deviation 18.856 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | 3.72 Percent change | Standard Deviation 22.732 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -8.40 Percent change | Standard Deviation 13.821 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -13.12 Percent change | Standard Deviation 11.015 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | -8.49 Percent change | Standard Deviation 16.813 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | 10.33 Percent change | Standard Deviation 10.827 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 30 | 17.53 Percent change | Standard Deviation 25.469 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | 8.18 Percent change | Standard Deviation 15.795 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | -1.67 Percent change | Standard Deviation 18.046 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | 1.97 Percent change | Standard Deviation 22.031 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -7.31 Percent change | Standard Deviation 18.173 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 24 | 3.13 Percent change | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -16.44 Percent change | Standard Deviation 25.83 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 2)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | 25.00 Percent change | — |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition
The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | -17.78 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 114.257 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | -0.96 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 77.369 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | -1.29 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 116.143 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | -0.72 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 3.02 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | -3.56 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 78.698 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 49.03 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 21.572 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | 68.62 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 58.163 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 71.52 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 51.555 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 59.27 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 85.777 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 79.73 Milliliter | Standard Deviation 26.835 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Vital sign parameter temperature was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 12 | 0.15 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 0 | 0.06 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.114 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 6 | 0.20 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.485 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 48 | 0.08 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.476 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 2 | 0.24 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 48 | 0.13 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.666 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 2 | 0.23 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.577 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 6 | 0.17 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.351 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 12 | 0.10 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.283 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Week 0 | -0.03 Degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.153 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 6 | 10.8 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 19.07 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 2 | 5.4 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 15.71 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 12 | 8.5 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 10.63 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 48 | 13.8 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 12.62 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 0 | 8.4 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 48 | 2.7 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 0 | -5.0 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 8.89 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 2 | -3.7 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 23.71 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 6 | -7.0 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 10.54 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Week 12 | -4.0 Beats per minute | Standard Deviation 8.49 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score
KHQ is a 21 item questionnaire, consisting of 9 domains: GH (1\[Very good\] to 5\[Very poor\]), Int Imp (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), RL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), PL (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[A lot\]), SL (0\[not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), PR (0\[Not applicable\] to 4\[A lot\]), Emotions (1\[Not at all\] to 4\[Very much\]), S or E (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]) and S or C (1\[Never\] to 4\[All the time\]). Domain score for GH was calculated as score of one item minus 1/4x100; Int Imp: score of one item minus 1/3x100; RL, PL, PR, S or E: summed scores of 2 items minus 2/6x100; SL, Emotions: summed scores of 3 items minus 3/9x100; S or C: summed scores of 5 items minus 5/15x100. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was any visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 24 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 24 | -11.11 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 0 | -12.50 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 45.896 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 0 | -30.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.814 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 6 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 66.667 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 0 | -20.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.814 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 12 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 43.033 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 6 | -50.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.355 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 24 | 33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 0 | -8.89 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.832 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 6 | 5.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.92 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 12 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.333 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 6 | -20.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.832 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 12 | -15.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.759 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 12 | -20.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.814 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 24 | 22.22 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 0 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.667 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 24 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 6 | -30.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.944 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 0 | -30.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.731 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 24 | 25.0 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 24 | 33.33 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 0 | -22.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.111 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 6 | -22.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.824 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 6 | -43.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.489 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 12 | -24.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.996 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 12 | -20.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.944 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 24 | -26.67 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 12 | -36.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.386 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 6 | -40.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.889 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 24 | -16.67 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 0 | -37.78 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.04 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 12 | 10.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.69 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 6 | -46.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.088 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 0 | 5.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.92 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 12 | -40.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.66 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 24 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 0 | 66.67 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 0 | -4.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.943 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 0 | -16.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.43 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health Perception, Week 12 | -8.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.43 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 0 | -33.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 6 | -11.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.49 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Incontinence Impact; Week 12 | -22.22 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.245 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 0 | 5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.623 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 6 | -5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.459 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Role Limitations; Week 12 | 5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 41.944 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 0 | 16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 6 | 11.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.623 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Physical Limitations; Week 12 | 16.67 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.333 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 0 | 9.26 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.051 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 6 | 7.41 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 39.021 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Social Limitations; Week 12 | 18.52 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 51.62 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | General Health perception, Week 6 | -8.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.43 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 6 | 66.67 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Personal Relationships; Week 12 | 100.00 Scores on a scale | — |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 6 | 7.41 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.973 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 0 | 7.41 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 39.021 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Emotions; Week 12 | 7.41 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.973 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 0 | -5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.459 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 6 | -5.56 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.459 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Sleep/Energy; Week 12 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.667 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 6 | 4.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.777 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in KHQ Domain Score | Severity/Coping Measures; Week 12 | 0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.547 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Individual participant data has been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 3. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 2 | -129.8 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 6 | -134.8 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 12 | -12.5 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 48 | -90.8 Milliliter |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U
PVR was measured in non-catheterizing participants, or those with mixed patterns (ie, they do both CIC and spontaneous voiding). PVR urine volume was assessed by ultrasound, bladder scan or catheterization after participants performed a voluntary void according to the study schedule. PVR urine volume could be assessed at any other time depending on clinical need. In case PVR urine volume indicated a clinically meaningful elevation, participants were asked to void once again (allowing the participants sufficient time to void) and the PVR urine volume was then reassessed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Individual participant data has been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 48 (study exit or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 2. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 2 | 47 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 6 | 84 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 12 | 0 Milliliter |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in PVR Urine Volume: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Participant 1: Week 48 | 0 Milliliter |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP
Vital sign parameter SBP and DBP were measured in seated position after 5 minutes rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 12 | -4.5 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 5 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 0 | -5.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 5.87 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 2 | 2.6 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 13.22 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 6 | 1.8 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 9.55 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 12 | 4.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 11.98 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 48 | 6.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 3.74 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 0 | -1.4 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 4.22 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 2 | -1.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 11.25 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 6 | -0.6 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.32 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 48 | -2.4 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 5.86 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 2 | 2.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 12.49 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 12 | 3.5 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 48 | 5.7 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 0 | 14.7 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 48 | 4.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 15.52 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 2 | 8.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 6.66 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 0 | 1.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 3.21 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 6 | 5.0 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 6.08 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | DBP, Week 6 | 6.3 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 6.66 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP | SBP, Week 12 | 2.5 Millimeters of mercury | Standard Deviation 3.54 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. FAS3 comprised all randomized participants who had at least 1 post-third treatment efficacy assessment after the third treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -3.50 Episodes | Standard Deviation 1.732 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -2.87 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.219 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -3.87 Episodes | Standard Deviation 1.865 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -1.67 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.943 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -1.47 Episodes | Standard Deviation 2.168 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -1.50 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.236 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -1.00 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.577 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -1.44 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.509 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -1.11 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.839 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -1.56 Episodes | Standard Deviation 0.385 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -0.50 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.908 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | -1.33 Voids | Standard Deviation 2.789 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -0.47 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.626 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | -1.83 Voids | Standard Deviation 3.064 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | 0.27 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.722 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | 0.17 Voids | Standard Deviation 0.707 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | 0.56 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.018 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | 0.22 Voids | Standard Deviation 0.509 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | 1.00 Voids | Standard Deviation 1.155 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | 0.11 Voids | Standard Deviation 0.509 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 3
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U
CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants Using CIC for Urinary Retention or Elevated PVR: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
CIC was used to drain the bladder and manage urinary incontinence in participants who were not able to spontaneously void. Participants who had used CIC at least once after the first treatment with the reason for urinary retention or elevated PVR have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 3
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U
The kidney and bladder ultrasound study was performed according to the study schedule. In order to assess the presence of stones in the kidneys and bladder, an ultrasound of these structures (with the bladder at least half full) was performed. Participants were excluded from this study if the screening ultrasound demonstrated the presence of bladder stones. In the case of unclear findings in an ultrasound study, other diagnostic measures (e.g., x-ray) was required in order to confirm the presence of bladder stones. If a stone was detected in participants after the injection of the investigational product, the event was recorded as an adverse event.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Kidney and Bladder Ultrasound Examination: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings
Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each timepoint during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, and QT. The findings from ECG were classified as A-NCS and A-CS. Number of participants with A-NCS and A-CS findings have been reported.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48 (48 weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-NCS | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-NCS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 12: A-NCS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-CS | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With A-NCS and A-CS ECG Findings | Week 48: A-NCS | 1 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Safety Population 3 comprised of all participants who received three doses of GSK1358820.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 3
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | SAEs | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: GSK1358820 200 U / GSK1358820 200 U | Non-SAEs | 3 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | SAEs | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs: Placebo / GSK1358820 200 U | Non-SAEs | 4 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Blood samples were collected for analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters; Albumin, Alk Phosp, ALT, AST, Direct Bil, Total Bil, Calcium, Chloride, Creatinine, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, T Protein, Urea/BUN and Uric acid. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, are recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:ALT, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Albumin, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Albumin, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:ALT, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Calcium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Chloride, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Chloride, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Creatinine, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Potassium, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Potassium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Sodium, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Sodium, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Sodium, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:ALT, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:ALT, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Chloride, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Sodium, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Chloride, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Albumin, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Albumin, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Creatinine, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Creatinine, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:ALT, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Alk phosp, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:T protein, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Glucose, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:AST, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Uric acid, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:AST, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Glucose, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Direct Bil, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Potassium, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Total Bil, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Urea/BUN, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Calcium, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Potassium, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:Calcium, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 48:T protein | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Week 12:Chloride, Low | 0 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected from participants for analysis of following hematology parameters; Basophils, Eosinophils, Hb, Hct, Lympho, Monocytes, N bands, T neutro, PC, RBC count, and WBC. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (Low, Normal or High), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g. High to High) or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages may not add to 100 percent. Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Only categories with non-zero values have been presented.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48 (48 Weeks after 1st treatment or withdrawal visit) in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: Safety Population 1. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: N bands, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Hct, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Normal to no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: Hb,Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Basophils, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, Normal or No change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hb, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48:T neutro, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:RBC count, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Basophils, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:RBC count, Normal or No Change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hct, Normal or no change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: WBC count, Low | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:RBC count, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: WBC count, Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Lympho, Normal or No change | 5 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:WBC count, High | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: Hb,Normal or no change | 4 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:WBC count, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hct, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:RBC count, Normal or No Change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Basophils, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Basophils, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Eosinophils, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: Hb,Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: Hb,Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48: Hb, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Hct, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:Lympho, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:Lympho, Normal or No change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:Monocytes, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 12:N bands, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: N bands, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:T neutro, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week 48:T neutro, Normal or no change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:PC, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, Normal or No change | 3 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:PC, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12:RBC count, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48:RBC count, High | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week12: WBC count, Normal to no change | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: WBC count, Low | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters | Week48: WBC count, Normal or no change | 2 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With UTI: GSK1358820 200 U/GSK1358820 200 U
A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 3
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With UTI: GSK1358820 200 U/GSK1358820 200 U | 2 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With UTI: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U
A urine culture and sensitivity test were performed when urinalysis results with a urine reagent strip are suggestive of a UTI (positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase). UTI was recorded as an AE, irrespective of symptoms when the result of urine culture was positive (with the presence of bacteriuria with \>=10\^5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia with \>5 per high power field was noted. Number of participants with UTI undergoing urine culture and sensitivity analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With UTI: Placebo/GSK1358820 200 U | 2 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood and protein in urine samples was recorded as negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Baseline is the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1) and up to 48 weeks after 1st treatment
Population: Safety Population 1
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Any Increase | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to Trace | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to 1+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 3+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Any Increase | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to Trace | 2 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 1+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 3+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Any Increase | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to Trace | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to Trace | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Occult blood, Increase to 1+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 1+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 4+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 3+ | 1 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Increase to 2+ | 0 Participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis | Protein, Any Increase | 1 Participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data on the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Percentage of participants attaining 100%, \>=75% and \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the daily average of urinary incontinence episodes in Treatment Cycle 3 have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=50% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=75% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=50% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=50% | 60 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, 100% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=75% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=50% | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, 100% | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, 100% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=75% | 20 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=50% | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=75% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=50% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, >=50% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, 100% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=75% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6, >=50% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=50% | 50 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, >=50% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12, 100% | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2, 100% | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants Attaining 100%, >=75% and >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Daily Average of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18, >=75% | 0 Percentage of participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS
TBS consisted of 4 answers to 1 question, to which participants had to answer considering their current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared to their condition before receiving any study treatment in the trial. Responses for questions were coded as 1 to 4 where 1 - Greatly improved, 2 - Improved, 3 - Not changed and 4 - Worsened. The answers of 1 - Greatly improved or 2 - Improved were regarded as positive response. Other answers including missing data were regarded as NO positive response.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 24 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 24 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 2 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 6 | 80 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 12 | 60 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 0 | 40 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 0 | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 6 | 67 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 2 | 33 Percentage of participants |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on TBS | Week 12 | 67 Percentage of participants |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition
The total volume voided was measured and recorded by participants over one 24-hour period during the 3-day bladder diary collection period. To perform this measurement, urine collection containers provided by the sponsor were used. The volume voided per void was determined by the sponsor from the total urine volume measured by the participants divided by the number of voids (excluding urinary incontinence episode). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 3.41 Percent change | Standard Deviation 53.078 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 3.29 Percent change | Standard Deviation 33.79 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | 1.72 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.379 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | -3.15 Percent change | Standard Deviation 50.796 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | -0.27 Percent change | Standard Deviation 1.97 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 18 | 30.61 Percent change | Standard Deviation 23.706 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 6 | 27.90 Percent change | Standard Deviation 39.969 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 2 | 43.15 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.74 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 12 | 46.12 Percent change | Standard Deviation 7.004 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in Average Volume Voided Per Micturition | Week 0 | 35.49 Percent change | Standard Deviation 21.018 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of urinary incontinence episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 urinary incontinence episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which has at least one valid diary day. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -73.55 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.601 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -51.18 Percent change | Standard Deviation 31.93 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -76.76 Percent change | Standard Deviation 33.447 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -21.29 Percent change | Standard Deviation 1.825 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -25.47 Percent change | Standard Deviation 47.584 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 18 | -48.96 Percent change | Standard Deviation 25.043 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 0 | -28.70 Percent change | Standard Deviation 14.254 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 2 | -45.83 Percent change | Standard Deviation 18.162 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 6 | -43.29 Percent change | Standard Deviation 49.263 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes | Week 12 | -56.48 Percent change | Standard Deviation 38.922 |
Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids
Participants were instructed to enter data in the bladder diary over 3 consecutive days. For Baseline and post-treatment visits, analysis was based on the diary data collected during a 3-day interval for each visit. Each 3-day interval consisted of 3 consecutive 24-hour periods, with the first period starting from the time of the first urinary episode on the first of the 3 days. A valid diary day was defined as any of the three 24-hour periods with 2 or more any type of void episodes. Data collected from a 24-hour period with less than 2 void episodes (i.e., an invalid diary day) were set to missing. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose 3-day diary which had at least one valid diary day assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline, divided by Baseline and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose of Treatment Cycle 1), Week 0, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 18 in Treatment Cycle 3
Population: FAS3 Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | 7.42 Percent change | Standard Deviation 15.64 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | -0.38 Percent change | Standard Deviation 12.695 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | -7.14 Percent change | Standard Deviation 16.624 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | -6.82 Percent change | Standard Deviation 16.071 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: Placebo | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | -2.36 Percent change | Standard Deviation 16.615 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 18 | 3.28 Percent change | Standard Deviation 11.071 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 2 | 2.42 Percent change | Standard Deviation 6.042 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 6 | 12.95 Percent change | Standard Deviation 16.327 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 12 | 2.19 Percent change | Standard Deviation 8.054 |
| Treatment Cycle 1: GSK1358820 200U | Treatment Phase 2 (Treatment Cycle 3)- Percent Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Voids | Week 0 | 8.79 Percent change | Standard Deviation 16.889 |