Skip to content

An Open-Label, Phase 1 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Elamipretide in Subjects With Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration

An Open-Label, Phase 1 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Elamipretide in Subjects With Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02848313
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-07-28
Start date
2016-10-28
Completion date
2018-04-10
Last updated
2020-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Brief summary

This is an open-label, Phase 1 single-center study in approximately 40 subjects who have 1 eye with intermediate AMD, including a high-risk drusen without geographic atrophy (GA) subgroup and a noncentral GA subgroup. Eligible subjects will receive 40 mg of elamipretide administered as a once daily 1.0 mL subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks.

Interventions

40 mg dose of elamipretide administered once daily as a 1.0mL SC injection.

Sponsors

Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Both arms received 40 mg dose of elamipretide administered once daily as a 1.0mL SC injection.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For this study, only 1 eye of an eligible subject will be included and designated as the study eye. However, all specified ophthalmic testing will be performed on both eyes at each time point. A potential subject must meet the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: Intermediate AMD - noncentral GA disease group: 1. Adults ≥ 55 years of age with 1 eye with intermediate AMD - noncentral GA. 2. No evidence of choroidal neovascularization (active or prior history) in the study eye. 3. Geographic atrophy may be multifocal, but the cumulative GA lesion size must be: 1. ≥ 1.27 mm2 (approximately ≥ 0.5 DA) and ≤ 10.16 mm2 (approximately ≤ 4 DA). 2. Must reside completely within the FAF imaging field (field 2 to 30-degree image centered on the fovea). 4. Presence of measurable hyperautofluorescence adjacent to the discrete foci of GA. OR Intermediate AMD - high-risk drusen without GA disease group: 5. ≥ 55 years of age with one eye with intermediate AMD - high-risk drusen without GA. 6. High-risk drusen is defined as presence of either at least 1 large (≥ 125 µm) druse or multiple medium-size (between 63 and 124 µm) drusen. General (both disease groups): 7. Able to provide informed consent and willing to comply with all study visits and examinations. 8. Women of childbearing potential who are not pregnant or nursing and have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening. 9. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed by ETDRS letters ≥ 55 letters (Snellen equivalent ≥ 20/70). 10. Low-luminance visual acuity deficit (defined as difference between BCVA and LL visual acuity) \> 5 letters. 11. Has at least two Low-Luminance Questionnaire sub scale results, in which one of the abnormal subscales is either general dim light vision or dim light reading. 12. The fellow eye may have intermediate AMD without noncentral GA (i.e., high-risk drusen), intermediate AMD with noncentral GA, NV AMD, or central GA. Ongoing treatment with antiangiogenic therapies in the fellow eye is allowable. 13. No evidence of visually significant cataract OR pseudophakia without evidence of posterior capsular opacity. 14. Sufficiently clear ocular media, adequate pupillary dilation, fixation to permit quality fundus imaging, and able to cooperate sufficiently for adequate ophthalmic visual function testing and anatomic assessment. 15. Able to administer SC study drug solution as demonstrated at screening or able to have a care provider or appropriate designee who can administer the study drug (i.e., a capable family member or home health nursing aide). 16. If of childbearing potential or in a relationship with a partner of childbearing potential, are able to abstain from sex or use acceptable contraception during the study and for 3 months after dosing. 1. For men: Abstinence is only acceptable if it is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. The subject also agrees to use an acceptable method of contraception should they become sexually active. Subjects must use a condom with spermicide from the date of informed consent until at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug. Periodic abstinence (e.g.calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception. 2. For women: abstinence is only acceptable when it is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. The subject agrees to use an acceptable method of contraception should they become sexually active. Maintenance of a monogamous relationship with a male partner who has been surgically sterilized by vasectomy (the vasectomy procedure must have been conducted at least 60 days before the Screening visit or confirmed via sperm analysis), barrier method (e.g., condom or occlusive cap) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream AND either hormonal contraception (oral, implanted, or injectable) or an intrauterine device or system are acceptable methods. 17. Ability and willingness to undertake all scheduled visits and assessments.

Exclusion criteria

A subject with study eye who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: Ocular conditions - study eye 1. Age-related macular degeneration with any evidence of central GA (i.e., involving the fovea). 2. Atrophic retinal disease because of causes other than AMD. 3. Presence or diagnosis of exudative AMD or choroidal neovascularization in the study eye. 4. History of diabetic retinopathy (a history of diabetes mellitus without retinopathy is not a criterion for exclusion). 5. Presence of vitreous hemorrhage. 6. History of retinal detachment or macular hole (stage 3 or 4) in the study eye. 7. Presence of macular pucker. 8. History of uncontrolled glaucoma, defined as advanced cup-to-disc ratio \> 0.7 and IOP \> 25, with or without topical antihypertensive eye drops; treatment of ocular hypertension or controlled glaucoma are not criteria for exclusion. 9. History of advanced guttae indicative of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. 10. Presence of visually significant cataract OR presence of significant posterior capsular opacity in the setting of Pseudophakia. 11. Presence of significant keratopathy that would cause scattering of light or alter visual function, especially in LL conditions. 12. Ocular incisional surgery (including cataract surgery) in the study eye within 3 months (i.e. 90 days) before Day 1. 13. Aphakia. 14. History of vitrectomy surgery, submacular surgery, or any vitreoretinal surgery. 15. Prior treatment with Visudyne ® (verteporfin), external-beam radiation therapy (for intraocular conditions), or transpupillary thermotherapy. 16. History of prophylactic subthreshold laser treatment for retinal disease. 17. Previous intravitreal drug delivery (e.g., intravitreal corticosteroid injection, anti-angiogenic drugs, or device implantation) in the study eye. Ocular conditions - either eye 18. Active uveitis and/or vitritis (grade trace or above) in either eye. 19. History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye. 20. Active, infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye. Systemic conditions 21. Known to be immunocompromised or receiving systemic immunosuppression. 22. Any disease or medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would prevent the subject from participating in the study or might confound study results. 23. Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/minute, by MDRD. 24. Presence or history of clinically significant allergy disease requiring treatment, as judged by the Investigator. Hay fever is allowed unless it is active. General 25. Participation in other investigational drug or device clinical trials within 30 days before enrollment, or planning to participate in any other investigational drug or device clinical trials within 30 days of study completion. 26. History of allergy to fluorescein that is not amenable to treatment. 27. Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures. 28. Inability to obtain color fundus photograph, FAF, and fluorescein angiography of sufficient quality to be analyzed and interpreted. 29. History of allergic reaction to the investigational drug or any of its components. 30. Current use of or likely need for any excluded medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Day 0 (Baseline to Day 7, and to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28.Change from Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at 4 meters, letters from Baseline to Day 7, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Dark AdaptometryBaseline (Day 0) and Week 24Change from Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry from Baseline to Week 24- at 0% 25%, 50%, 75% Bleach Level. Dark adaptometry, used to evaluate night blindness by measuring the absolute thresholds of rod sensitivity, was performed within 14 days before Day 0 and at all in-person visits except for Day 7. Dark adaptation is the delayed recovery of light sensitivity in darkness following prior light exposure (photobleaching). The observed and change from baseline recovery scores (in minutes) for each bleach level (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75%) were summarized descriptively for each eye at each visit and were presented in a listing. Shorter recovery times are better than longer recovery times.
Mean Treatment Compliance (%) of Administration of Subcutaneous ElamipretideBaseline through Week 28Mean percentage of treatment compliance of administration of subcutaneous elamipretide. The number of injections (diary) and vials used was used to compute % compliance over the duration of the subject's participation in the trial. Percentage can range from 0-100%, where 0% means the participant followed the correct dosing 0% of the time, and 100% compliance means the participant followed the correct dosing 100% of the time, with a higher % meaning a better outcome.
Mean Number of Home Health Visits to Administer ElamipretideBaseline (Day 0) through Week 24Mean Number of Home Health Visits Necessary for Participant or Caregiver to Learn How to Administer Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy by Fundus AutofluorescenceBaseline (Day 0) to Week 24Change from Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy (GA) by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Week 24. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was used to examine the circulation of the retina and choroid using fluorescein dye and a specialized camera to trace the dye. Fundus autofluorescence imaging of the retinal pigment epithelium and neurosensory retina was performed within 14 days of Day 0 and at every visit with the exception of Day 0 and Day 7. Atrophy is characterized by loss of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), overlying photoreceptors and underlying choriocapillaris. Greater area affected means a worse outcome than smaller area affected.
Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy by Sector as measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 24
Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 20, 24 and 28Change from Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Mean Critical Print Size with Standard Luminance in Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28 as measured by the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution LogMAR chart. Scores range from -0.3 to 1.0, where higher number means worse acuity/worse outcome, a lower number means better acuity/better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Baseline to Day 7, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28.Change from Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA) from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 7, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28.
Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceAssessed at baseline (Day 0), Week 12, Week 24 and Week 28Change from baseline (Day 0) at Week 12, 24 and 28. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreBaseline (Day 0), Week 12, and Week 24 and Week 28Change from baseline (Day 0) at Week 12, Week 24, and Week 28 in LLQ score. The LLQ is a 32-item questionnaire with six subscales related to low luminance settings: driving, mobility, extreme lighting, general dim lighting, and peripheral vision. Each question is scored on a scale ranging from 0, or maximal difficulty, to 100, or no difficulty in low luminance settings. Higher scores mean better functioning. The questions are assigned to different subscales and are averaged to generate one score per subscale. After weighting each subscale for the number of questions, the weighted subscales are averaged to generate a composite LLQ score.
Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityBaseline (Day 0) and Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,and 24Change from baseline in mean mesopic light sensitivity for Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 as assessed by microperimetry for number of loci \<25dB and \<14dB. Mesopic microperimetry, used to measure retinal sensitivity, was performed within 14 days before Day 0 and at all in-person visits except for Day 7.
Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTBaseline (Day 0) and Week 24Change from baseline in mean retinal pigment epithelium - drusen complex (RPEDC) thickness as Measured by SD-OCT by sector at Week 24
Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeBaseline (Day 0) to Week 24Change from baseline in mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex volume at Week 24 by sector
Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceAssessed at screening, baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28Change from Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Mean Critical Print Size with Low Luminance in Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28 as measured by the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution LogMAR chart. Scores range from -0.3 to 1.0, where higher number means worse acuity/worse outcome, a lower number means better acuity/better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High-Risk Drusen (HRD)
The HRD cohort was defined as the presence of either at least 1 large (≥125 μm) druse or multiple medium-size (63-124 μm) drusen in one eye. Subjects had to have 1 eye with intermediate AMD (high-risk drusen \[HRD\] without geographic atrophy \[GA\]).
21
NCGA (Noncentral GA)
The NCGA cohort was defined as evidence of GA with cumulative area ≥1.27 mm2 (approximately 0.5 disc area) by fundus autofluorescence (FAF) that spared the fovea (defined as retinal pigment epithelium and outer retina intact by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography \[SD-OCT\]). Subjects had to have 1 eye with intermediate AMD with noncentral GA \[NCGA\]
19
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to follow up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNCGA (Noncentral GA)TotalHigh-Risk Drusen (HRD)
Age, Continuous76.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22
73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.67
70.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants38 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants40 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants24 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Smoking Status
Current smoker
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking Status
Former smoker
11 Participants19 Participants8 Participants
Smoking Status
Never smoker
8 Participants21 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 2119 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 211 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

Change from Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at 4 meters, letters from Baseline to Day 7, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28.

Time frame: Day 0 (Baseline to Day 7, and to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28.

Population: All participants for whom Standard Luminance BCVA was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Day 70.810 lettersStandard Deviation 4.8746
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 281.333 lettersStandard Deviation 10.4881
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 42.762 lettersStandard Deviation 5.5759
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 81.950 lettersStandard Deviation 4.4066
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 121.150 lettersStandard Deviation 5.5845
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 162.789 lettersStandard Deviation 5.8933
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 203.842 lettersStandard Deviation 4.1401
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 243.579 lettersStandard Deviation 6.3972
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 81.556 lettersStandard Deviation 6.2987
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 41.833 lettersStandard Deviation 5.0904
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 244.600 lettersStandard Deviation 5.0681
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 162.813 lettersStandard Deviation 5.5883
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 283.667 lettersStandard Deviation 5.8023
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Day 70.526 lettersStandard Deviation 4.1281
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 121.438 lettersStandard Deviation 5.4156
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Luminance Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Week 201.438 lettersStandard Deviation 5.7847
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

Change from Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy by Sector as measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: All participants for whom geographic atrophy by SD-OCT was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Center Sector0.02 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.048
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Outer Inferior0.05 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.146
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Outer Temporal0.08 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.129
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Inner Superior0.05 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.096
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Inner Nasal0.04 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.059
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Inner Inferior0.02 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.073
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Inner Temporal0.05 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.097
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Outer Superior0.08 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.116
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Outer Nasal0.06 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.114
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy as Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Total ETDRS grid0.45 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.607
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy by Fundus Autofluorescence

Change from Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy (GA) by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Week 24. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was used to examine the circulation of the retina and choroid using fluorescein dye and a specialized camera to trace the dye. Fundus autofluorescence imaging of the retinal pigment epithelium and neurosensory retina was performed within 14 days of Day 0 and at every visit with the exception of Day 0 and Day 7. Atrophy is characterized by loss of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), overlying photoreceptors and underlying choriocapillaris. Greater area affected means a worse outcome than smaller area affected.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 24

Population: All participants for whom Geographic Atrophy by Fundus Autofluorescence was measured at Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy by Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 120.264 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.1641
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Area of Geographic Atrophy by Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 240.503 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.4914
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry

Change from Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry from Baseline to Week 24- at 0% 25%, 50%, 75% Bleach Level. Dark adaptometry, used to evaluate night blindness by measuring the absolute thresholds of rod sensitivity, was performed within 14 days before Day 0 and at all in-person visits except for Day 7. Dark adaptation is the delayed recovery of light sensitivity in darkness following prior light exposure (photobleaching). The observed and change from baseline recovery scores (in minutes) for each bleach level (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75%) were summarized descriptively for each eye at each visit and were presented in a listing. Shorter recovery times are better than longer recovery times.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24

Population: All participants for whom Dark Adaptometry was measured at Baseline and Week 24 at 0% 25%, 50%, 75% Bleach Level.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry0% Bleach Level-11.553 minutesStandard Deviation 10.3229
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry25% Bleach Level0.409 minutesStandard Deviation 4.2798
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry50% Bleach Level0.000 minutesStandard Deviation 0
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry75% Bleach Level1.562 minutesStandard Deviation 5.3936
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry75% Bleach Level-3.048 minutesStandard Deviation 9.1675
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry0% Bleach Level3.543 minutesStandard Deviation 5.014
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry50% Bleach Level-3.263 minutesStandard Deviation 7.9935
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Dark Adaptometry25% Bleach Level8.3302 minutesStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)

Change from Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA) from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 7, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 7, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28.

Population: All participants for whom Standard Luminance BCVA was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 122.150 lettersStandard Deviation 6.6986
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Day 72.714 lettersStandard Deviation 5.3399
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 165.158 lettersStandard Deviation 7.3126
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 282.556 lettersStandard Deviation 14.2095
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 205.632 lettersStandard Deviation 7.4923
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 42.762 lettersStandard Deviation 4.8673
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 245.632 lettersStandard Deviation 7.7832
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 82.800 lettersStandard Deviation 6.2205
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 245.400 lettersStandard Deviation 7.854
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 283.733 lettersStandard Deviation 8.1545
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Day 71.105 lettersStandard Deviation 8.4518
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 84.167 lettersStandard Deviation 4.2183
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 124.688 lettersStandard Deviation 4.5858
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 164.875 lettersStandard Deviation 5.9203
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 205.438 lettersStandard Deviation 5.8875
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (LLBCVA)Week 45.000 lettersStandard Deviation 5.5413
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Score

Change from baseline (Day 0) at Week 12, Week 24, and Week 28 in LLQ score. The LLQ is a 32-item questionnaire with six subscales related to low luminance settings: driving, mobility, extreme lighting, general dim lighting, and peripheral vision. Each question is scored on a scale ranging from 0, or maximal difficulty, to 100, or no difficulty in low luminance settings. Higher scores mean better functioning. The questions are assigned to different subscales and are averaged to generate one score per subscale. After weighting each subscale for the number of questions, the weighted subscales are averaged to generate a composite LLQ score.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 12, and Week 24 and Week 28

Population: All participants for whom Low-Luminance visual function by the Visual Function Questionnaire was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Driving or riding in car12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.41
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Dim light reading15.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.34
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Dim light reading12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 General dim light vision15.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.17
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 General dim light vision11.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.26
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Light transitions and glare17.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.98
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Control questions10.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.47
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Mobility9.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.27
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Light transitions and glare9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.07
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)17.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.95
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Control questions7.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.56
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Peripheral vision17.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.12
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Control Questions3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.44
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Mobility6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.66
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Driving or riding in car10.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.85
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 General dim light vision11.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.43
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)11.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.36
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Light transitions and glare15.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.75
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Dim light reading9.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.58
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Mobility7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.02
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Other Activities of Daily Living12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.82
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Peripheral vision16.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.49
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Peripheral Vision13.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.06
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Driving or riding in car16.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.77
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Light transitions and glare6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.71
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Driving or riding in car4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.11
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Peripheral vision5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.03
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Dim light reading7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.47
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Driving or riding in car4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.34
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Mobility-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.39
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Control questions-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.86
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Dim light reading4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.05
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Driving or riding in car3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.92
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 General dim light vision6.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.62
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Light transitions and glare6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.35
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)10.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.29
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Peripheral vision3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.51
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Control questions0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.47
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Dim light reading7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 General dim light vision7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 12 Mobility6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.32
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Mobility2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.57
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 24 Other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)10.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.82
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Control Questions0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.25
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 General dim light vision3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.73
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Light transitions and glare5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.07
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Other Activities of Daily Living3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.73
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) ScoreWeek 28 Peripheral Vision5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light Sensitivity

Change from baseline in mean mesopic light sensitivity for Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 as assessed by microperimetry for number of loci \<25dB and \<14dB. Mesopic microperimetry, used to measure retinal sensitivity, was performed within 14 days before Day 0 and at all in-person visits except for Day 7.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,and 24

Population: All participants for whom mean mesopic light sensitivity was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 40.6 lociStandard Deviation 6.08
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 81.3 lociStandard Deviation 8.21
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 120.5 lociStandard Deviation 7.87
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 160.9 lociStandard Deviation 8.56
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 20-1.2 lociStandard Deviation 5.88
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 24-0.5 lociStandard Deviation 8.27
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 40.3 lociStandard Deviation 0.3
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 8-1.4 lociStandard Deviation 3.65
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 121.3 lociStandard Deviation 10.05
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 16-2.5 lociStandard Deviation 2.38
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 20-0.2 lociStandard Deviation 6.14
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 24-0.3 lociStandard Deviation 8.3
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 201.5 lociStandard Deviation 4.88
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 40.6 lociStandard Deviation 1.79
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 41.7 lociStandard Deviation 1.7
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 80.7 lociStandard Deviation 1.94
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 161.5 lociStandard Deviation 5.01
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 120.1 lociStandard Deviation 3.09
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 81.7 lociStandard Deviation 4.89
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 160.1 lociStandard Deviation 2.35
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 243.3 lociStandard Deviation 5.82
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 20-0.1 lociStandard Deviation 1.44
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <14dB Week 123.2 lociStandard Deviation 5.9
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Mesopic Light SensitivityNumber of loci <25dB Week 24-0.1 lociStandard Deviation 3.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low Luminance

Change from Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Mean Critical Print Size with Low Luminance in Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28 as measured by the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution LogMAR chart. Scores range from -0.3 to 1.0, where higher number means worse acuity/worse outcome, a lower number means better acuity/better outcome.

Time frame: Assessed at screening, baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, and Week 28

Population: All participants for whom Mean Critical Print Size (logMAR) with Low Luminance was measured at baseline and Week 4 through Week 28.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 12-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.177
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 20-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.184
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 8-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.179
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 24-0.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.174
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 16-0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.209
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 28-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.238
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 4-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 28-0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.194
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 4-0.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.088
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 8-0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.253
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 12-0.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.236
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 16-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.232
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 20-0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.171
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Low LuminanceWeek 24-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.209
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard Luminance

Change from Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: Mean Critical Print Size with Standard Luminance in Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28 as measured by the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution LogMAR chart. Scores range from -0.3 to 1.0, where higher number means worse acuity/worse outcome, a lower number means better acuity/better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 20, 24 and 28

Population: All participants for whom Mean Critical Print Size (logMAR) with Standard Luminance was measured

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 12-0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.156
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 16-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.151
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 4-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.121
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 8-0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.111
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 20-0.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.126
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 24-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.152
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 28-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.201
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 20-0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.109
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 12-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.098
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 8-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.115
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 16-0.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.115
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 24-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.126
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 4-0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.091
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Reading Acuity Test: With Standard LuminanceWeek 280.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.173
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCT

Change from baseline in mean retinal pigment epithelium - drusen complex (RPEDC) thickness as Measured by SD-OCT by sector at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24

Population: All participants for whom RPEDC) thickness as Measured by SD-OCT by sector at Baseline and Week 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner Superior1.29 umStandard Deviation 3.699
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner temporal1.00 umStandard Deviation 3.68
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTCenter0.57 umStandard Deviation 5.147
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Superior0.34 umStandard Deviation 2.279
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner Nasal1.43 umStandard Deviation 3.143
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Nasal0.34 umStandard Deviation 2.301
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Temporal0.25 umStandard Deviation 2.672
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Inferior-0.19 umStandard Deviation 2.356
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTTotal ETDRS0.39 umStandard Deviation 1.885
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner Inferior0.72 umStandard Deviation 4.393
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTTotal ETDRS-0.25 umStandard Deviation 1.59
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Temporal-0.04 umStandard Deviation 1.594
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTCenter0.38 umStandard Deviation 4.137
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner Superior-0.85 umStandard Deviation 2.389
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner Nasal-0.83 umStandard Deviation 2.801
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner Inferior-0.82 umStandard Deviation 3.798
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTInner temporal-0.34 umStandard Deviation 2.897
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Superior-0.10 umStandard Deviation 1.58
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Nasal-0.09 umStandard Deviation 1.919
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium - Drusen Complex (RPEDC) Thickness as Measured by SD-OCTOuter Inferior-0.04 umStandard Deviation 2.023
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex Volume

Change from baseline in mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex volume at Week 24 by sector

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 24

Population: All participants for whom the retinal pigment epithelium-drusen complex volume was measured

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner nasal0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.005
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter superior0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.012
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner superior0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.006
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter nasal0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.012
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter inferior-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.012
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner inferior0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.007
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter temporal0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.014
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeCenter0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.004
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeTotal ETDRS0.01 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.054
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner temporal0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.006
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeTotal ETDRS-0.01 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.046
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeCenter0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.003
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner superior-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.004
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner nasal-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.004
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner inferior-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.006
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeInner temporal-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.005
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter superior-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.008
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter inferior-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.011
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter temporal-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.009
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in Mean Retinal Pigment Epithelium-Drusen Complex VolumeOuter nasal-0.00 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard Luminance

Change from baseline (Day 0) at Week 12, 24 and 28. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline (Day 0), Week 12, Week 24 and Week 28

Population: All participants for whom the VFQ-39 was measured at Week 12 and Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Dependency1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.91
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Composite9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.19
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Distance Activities5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.92
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 General Vision8.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.78
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Driving12.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.54
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Color Vision11.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.62
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 General Health4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Mental Health9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.55
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 General Vision8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.25
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Distance Activities7.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Mental Health9.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.84
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Near Activities9.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Near Activities6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.17
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Ocular Pain5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.26
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Ocular Pain7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.17
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Dependency2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.61
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Peripheral Vision15.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.25
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Peripheral Vision17.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.78
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Role Difficulties4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Social Functioning5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.85
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Color Vision8.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.63
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Composite7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.47
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Mental Health9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.79
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Dependency1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.94
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Role Difficulties6.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.58
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Distance Activities8.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.11
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Driving10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.85
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Social Functioning6.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.96
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 General Health1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.98
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Social Functioning7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.51
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 General Vision5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.18
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Color Vision12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.68
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Driving14.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.66
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Near Activities8.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.43
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Composite7.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.04
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Ocular Pain7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.84
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Peripheral Vision12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.02
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 General Health-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.01
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Role Difficulties5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.25
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 General Vision3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Ocular Pain3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.68
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Color Vision11.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.5
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Driving0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.46
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Near Activities5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.84
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Role Difficulties5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.03
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Social Functioning3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.82
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Role Difficulties5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.37
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Social Functioning5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.48
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Composite7.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.38
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Dependency6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.94
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Distance Activities4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.13
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 General Health3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 General Vision6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Mental Health7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Ocular Pain5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.02
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Peripheral Vision15.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.42
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Role Difficulties5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.27
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 24 Social Functioning5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.64
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Color Vision5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.66
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Composite4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.46
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Dependency-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.07
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Distance Activities7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.95
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Driving0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.47
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 General Health4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Color Vision10.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.35
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Mental Health5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Near Activities1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.63
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Ocular Pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.94
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 28 Peripheral Vision13.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.85
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Composite5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Dependency2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.02
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Distance Activities4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.19
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Driving0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.38
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 General Health1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.33
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 General Vision7.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.02
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Mental Health9.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.63
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Near Activities2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.51
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-39 (VFQ-39) Score Standard LuminanceWeek 12 Peripheral Vision7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.83
Secondary

Mean Number of Home Health Visits to Administer Elamipretide

Mean Number of Home Health Visits Necessary for Participant or Caregiver to Learn How to Administer Elamipretide

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) through Week 24

Population: All participants and caregivers whom administered elamipretide injections.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Mean Number of Home Health Visits to Administer Elamipretide2.2 visitsStandard Deviation 0.54
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Mean Number of Home Health Visits to Administer Elamipretide2.5 visitsStandard Deviation 1.02
Secondary

Mean Treatment Compliance (%) of Administration of Subcutaneous Elamipretide

Mean percentage of treatment compliance of administration of subcutaneous elamipretide. The number of injections (diary) and vials used was used to compute % compliance over the duration of the subject's participation in the trial. Percentage can range from 0-100%, where 0% means the participant followed the correct dosing 0% of the time, and 100% compliance means the participant followed the correct dosing 100% of the time, with a higher % meaning a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 28

Population: All participants for whom compliance was measured.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMD-High-Risk Drusen (HRD)Mean Treatment Compliance (%) of Administration of Subcutaneous Elamipretide98.4 % of compliance in study dosingStandard Deviation 4.04
AMD-NCGA (Noncentral GA)Mean Treatment Compliance (%) of Administration of Subcutaneous Elamipretide97.3 % of compliance in study dosingStandard Deviation 6.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026