Skip to content

Information Improvement for Surgical Patients Through Portable Video Media

Comparison of Understanding of Informed Consent Between Portable Video Media Versus Written Consent at Urological Surgeries.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02846467
Enrollment
193
Registered
2016-07-27
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Hyperplasia, Bladder Cancer

Keywords

Informed consent, Patient Education, Mobile applications

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the comprehension of the Informed consent with the Standard Verbal Communication (SVC) versus Portable Video Media (PVM).

Detailed description

The informed consent (IC) is a fully ethical and legal consolidated requirement. IC is the voluntary authorization by a patient for surgical treatment (MeSH). The IC has to include: 1. What is and for what is it, 2. How is it made, 3. What effect will produce, 4. which patients will benefit, 5. Alternatives, 6. Risks and special situations. The standard IC is based in written and verbal information, but the information provided is insufficient, leading to misunderstanding and even litigation. Technology plays an important role in the improvement of IC: the portable video media, tablet, with the application (app) iURO assists the procedure through videos and illustrations. To evaluate and measure the comprehension of the information that patients received, we elaborated and validated a Questionnaire to evaluate the comprehension of IC (the process was mounted as Questionnaire for urology IC validation in the poster session at the 17th International European Association of Urology Nurses (EAUN) Meeting, Munich-Germany). The patients undergoing to bladder or prostate transurethral resection were selected. Afterwards they were randomized previous the interview, into two groups: patients informed by PVM with the app iUro (experimental group) versus patients with an SVC (control group). The questionnaire was used to compare the comprehension of the surgery immediately and 15 days after the surgery. The items regarding questionnaire were: information, utility of the intervention, side effects, complications, comorbidity, usefulness of information, anxiety and risks.

Interventions

OTHERInformed consent trough a portable video media

Information provided to patients using the mobile application (iURO app)

Information provided to patient trough the traditional informed consent (written IC) for transurethral resection of bladder or prostate.

Sponsors

University of Cadiz
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Puerto Real
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are going to receive transurethral resection of bladder or prostate * Patients, women and men, older than 18 years without any mental disability

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who refuse to participate in the study * Patients who have inability to communicate in spanish. * Several visual problems that limit the ability to read written material

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comprehension of informed consentPrior to surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comprehension of informed consent15 days after surgery

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026