Sjögren's Syndrome
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with either lulizumab or BMS-986142 versus placebo in subjects with moderate to severe primary Sjögren's syndrome as measured by the change from baseline in ESSDAI at Week 12 between active treatment arms (lulizumab or BMS-986142, respectively) and the placebo arm.
Interventions
Specified dose on specified days
Specified dose on specified days
Specified dose on specified days
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
For more information regarding Bristol-Myers Squibb Clinical Trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects diagnosed or classified as having moderate to severe primary Sjögren's Syndrome based on the 2016 ACR-EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Classification Criteria for at least 16 weeks prior to screening * ESSDAI ≥ 5 including disease activity (any score \> 0) in at least one of the following domains: Glandular, Articular, Hematological, Biological, Lymphadenopathy * Positive anti-SS-A/Ro and/or anti-SS-B/La autoantibody * Unstimulated whole saliva secretion \> 0.01 ml/min * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of study drug and must not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Male and female subjects must be willing to adhere to protocol-mandated highly effective contraception for the duration of the study and for the protocol-specified follow up period. Hormone-based contraceptive methods are not permitted
Exclusion criteria
* Secondary Sjögren's syndrome or the presence of any other systemic autoimmune disease (eg, RA, SLE, multiple sclerosis, vasculitis) * Very severe primary Sjögren's syndrome or severe complications of primary Sjögren's syndrome at the time of the screening visit * Active systemic or latent bacterial (including tuberculosis), viral or fungal infection, evidence of current or chronic Hepatitis B or C infection, or HIV infection * Any significant concurrent medical condition at the time of screening or baseline visit * Use of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or leflunomide within 12 weeks of screening visit * Previous treatment with biologics therapies either marketed or in development within 6 months prior to screening visit * Treatment started or an unstable dose of hydroxychloroquine within 8 weeks of screening visit * Oral corticosteroids \> 10 mg/day within 14 days of dosing (Day 1), corticosteroid therapy ≥ 1 mg/kg during the 4 weeks preceding enrollment, or intravenous, intramuscular or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks of screening visit Other protocol defined inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI | At baseline and week 12 | The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in ESSPRI Score at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains. |
| Proportion of Subjects With a > = 3 Point Improvement From Baseline in ESSDAI at Week 12 | At week 12 | The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening |
| Proportion of Subjects With Both >= 3 Points Improvement in ESSDAI and >= 1 Point Improvement in ESSPRI From Baseline at Week 12 | At week 12 | The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening |
| Proportions of Subjects With >=1 Point of Improvement From Baseline in ESSPRI | At week 12 | ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains |
| Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Dryness | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains |
| Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Fatigue | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains |
| Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Pain | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Stimulated Salivary Flow Rate | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Scores at Week 4 and Week 8 | At baseline, week 4 and week 8 | The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Schrimer's Test | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | The test (without anaesthesia) was performed by placing a narrow calibrated filter-paper strip in the inferior cul-de-sac of each eye. Aqueous tear production was measured by the length in millimeters that the strip wets during the 5 minute test period |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Tear Break-up Time Test | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | Determined by instilling fluorescein dye and evaluating the stability of the pre-corneal tear film. After several blinks, the tear film is examined using a broad beam of the slit-lamp (biomicroscope) with a cobalt blue filter. The TBUT, defined as the time in seconds between the subjects's last blink and the first appearance of a random dry spot on the corneal surface, is measured 3 times and the mean value is recorded. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | At baseline, at week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18 | The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. 0 = No Pain, 1-3 = Mild Pain(nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 = Moderate Pain (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 = Severe Pain (disabling; unable to perform ADLs) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18 | The subjects overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease |
| Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18 | The investigator's or physician's overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) | At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18 | First, precoded numeric values are recoded per the scoring key given in Table 1. Note that all items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. In addition, each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Table 2 lists the items averaged together to create each scale. Items that are left blank(missing data) are not taken into account when calculating the scale scores. Hence, scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) | At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18 | The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a 19-item questionnaire, has been developed as a brief, multidimensional self-report instrument for assessing the key dimensions of sexual function in women |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) | At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18 | Affords calculation of 4 scales to measure the impact of IBD on different domains of impairment in work or other activities: absenteeism, presenteeism (impairment at work), productivity loss (overall work impairment), activity impairment |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Staining | At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 | The test was performed by instillation of fluorescein dye and either lissamine green or Rose bengal dye to stain the cornea and conjunctiva, respectively. After instilling the dye, the ocular surface was examined through a slit lamp (biomicroscope). |
Countries
Australia, Chile, Colombia, Italy, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Puerto Rico, Russia, South Africa, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
45 subjects enrolled, 18 subjects were randomized/treated. 15 subjects didn't complete the treatment period. The study was terminated and the remaining 15 randomized subjects who had not yet completed the double-blind period entered the follow-up period. Of the 15 subjects who entered the follow-up period, 12 did not complete the follow-up period
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| BMS-931699/Lulizumab Injection (12.5mg/vial, 12.5mg/mL) for subcutaneous (SC) | 5 |
| BMS-986142 50 mg Tablet (Round) or 150 mg Tablet (Oval) For oral administration, 350 mg | 6 |
| Placebo For BMS-986142 50 mg tablet (round) or 150 mg tablet | 7 |
| Total | 18 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Administrative Reason by Sponsor | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Subject Withdrew Consent | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | BMS-931699/Lulizumab Injection | BMS-986142 50 mg Tablet (Round) or 150 mg Tablet (Oval) | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.34 | 51.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.77 | 52.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 | 51.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.41 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants | 3 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 4 participants | 4 participants | 7 participants | 15 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 7 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 6 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 7 | 4 / 5 | 4 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 5 | 1 / 6 |
Outcome results
Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI
The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening
Time frame: At baseline and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA)
The investigator's or physician's overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease.
Time frame: At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | Week 2 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | Week 6 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | Week 10 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | Week 12 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA) | Week 18 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Scores at Week 4 and Week 8
The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening
Time frame: At baseline, week 4 and week 8
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Scores at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Scores at Week 4 and Week 8 | Week 8 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in ESSPRI Score at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.
ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains.
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in ESSPRI Score at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in ESSPRI Score at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in ESSPRI Score at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a 19-item questionnaire, has been developed as a brief, multidimensional self-report instrument for assessing the key dimensions of sexual function in women
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) | Week 12 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) | Week 18 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. 0 = No Pain, 1-3 = Mild Pain(nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 = Moderate Pain (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 = Severe Pain (disabling; unable to perform ADLs)
Time frame: At baseline, at week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | Week 2 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | Week 6 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | Week 10 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | Week 12 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness | Week 18 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Staining
The test was performed by instillation of fluorescein dye and either lissamine green or Rose bengal dye to stain the cornea and conjunctiva, respectively. After instilling the dye, the ocular surface was examined through a slit lamp (biomicroscope).
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Staining | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Staining | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Staining | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Schrimer's Test
The test (without anaesthesia) was performed by placing a narrow calibrated filter-paper strip in the inferior cul-de-sac of each eye. Aqueous tear production was measured by the length in millimeters that the strip wets during the 5 minute test period
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Schrimer's Test | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Schrimer's Test | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Schrimer's Test | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36)
First, precoded numeric values are recoded per the scoring key given in Table 1. Note that all items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. In addition, each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Table 2 lists the items averaged together to create each scale. Items that are left blank(missing data) are not taken into account when calculating the scale scores. Hence, scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) | Week 12 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) | Week 18 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Stimulated Salivary Flow Rate
Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling.
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Stimulated Salivary Flow Rate | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Stimulated Salivary Flow Rate | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Stimulated Salivary Flow Rate | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA)
The subjects overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease
Time frame: At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | Week 2 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | Week 6 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | Week 10 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | Week 12 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA) | Week 18 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Tear Break-up Time Test
Determined by instilling fluorescein dye and evaluating the stability of the pre-corneal tear film. After several blinks, the tear film is examined using a broad beam of the slit-lamp (biomicroscope) with a cobalt blue filter. The TBUT, defined as the time in seconds between the subjects's last blink and the first appearance of a random dry spot on the corneal surface, is measured 3 times and the mean value is recorded.
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in the Tear Break-up Time Test | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in the Tear Break-up Time Test | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in the Tear Break-up Time Test | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate
Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling.
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)
Affords calculation of 4 scales to measure the impact of IBD on different domains of impairment in work or other activities: absenteeism, presenteeism (impairment at work), productivity loss (overall work impairment), activity impairment
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) | Week 12 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) | Week 18 | — |
Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Dryness
ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Dryness | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Dryness | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Dryness | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Fatigue
ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Fatigue | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Fatigue | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Fatigue | Week 12 | — |
Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Pain
ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains
Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Pain | Week 4 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Pain | Week 8 | — |
| Unknown | Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Pain | Week 12 | — |
Proportion of Subjects With a > = 3 Point Improvement From Baseline in ESSDAI at Week 12
The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening
Time frame: At week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
Proportion of Subjects With Both >= 3 Points Improvement in ESSDAI and >= 1 Point Improvement in ESSPRI From Baseline at Week 12
The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening
Time frame: At week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons
Proportions of Subjects With >=1 Point of Improvement From Baseline in ESSPRI
ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains
Time frame: At week 12
Population: The study was terminated and data is not reported for privacy reasons