Skip to content

Reasoning Training in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder

Brain & Cognitive Changes After Reasoning Training in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02843282
Enrollment
27
Registered
2016-07-25
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder, Cognitive Ability, General

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine cognitive and brain changes in individuals with bipolar disorder as a result of a cognitive training intervention.

Detailed description

Participants will only include people who are fluent speakers of English, as not all of the standardized and experimental cognitive tests have been normed for non-English speakers. Participants will be screened for significant medical, neurological, or psychiatric illness other than bipolar disorder. Participants will complete baseline cognitive testing. Reasoning training will take place in small groups, once a week for 2hr/session. After the training, participants will complete the cognitive testing again. A subset of participants who qualify for the brain imaging component will also complete a pre-post resting state brain scan. Training effects will be measured behaviorally in trained areas (reasoning & physical) and untrained cognitive areas. Additionally, structural and functional brain imaging will measure changes in cerebral blood flow, global and regional brain volume, white matter tracts, efficiency, activation patterns, and blood oxygenation with a particular focus on changes to frontal regions. Screening Session: A research assistant will conduct screening procedures over the phone including a brief medical questionnaire covering their history, current medications and any pre-existing conditions. Prior diagnosis of bipolar disorder and euthymic state will be confirmed with participant's psychiatrist or treating physician. Neurocognitive Testing Session: A clinician will administer a group of standardized and experimental tests to each participant for each of the cognitive testing sessions. This session may last up to 3 hours, depending on the pace of the participant's response times. The intent of the tasks is to assess higher level thinking skills, working memory, and selective learning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Participants will have fMRI, at each aforementioned time point in the study, during which they will lie in the scanner while images of their brain will be recorded. Each session will take up to 90 minutes. During the fMRI and during the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) the patient will be asked just to lie still. Cognitive reasoning training: The gist-based reasoning training will be delivered in one, two hour session each week over 4 weeks. It is strategy-based rather than content-based so that the focus is not content specific or situation-dependent. Gist-based reasoning has been linked to frontal lobe activation and to measures of executive function. Post Intervention: Following the intervention, patients will repeat the cognitive neuropsychological assessment and fMRI identical to the pre-training assessment. Participants are not paid for any of these tests or training sessions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAdvanced Reasoning Training

This is a strategy-based intervention to enhance frontal lobe function. Strategies equip participants to improve their strategic attention, integrated reasoning, and innovation abilities.

Sponsors

University of Texas
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas at Dallas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have physician or psychiatrist authorization form confirming participant fulfills 4 criteria: 1. has diagnosis of Bipolar I or II 2. has been stable and consistent with medication for last 3 months 3. is in a euthymic, rather than manic or depressive, state 4. is appropriate for a group-based intervention

Exclusion criteria

* Not a native English speaker * Less than 12 years education * Additional psychiatric diagnosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline: Test of Strategic LearningPre and within 2 weeks post interventionComplex abstraction subtest: After reading a complex text, participants generate a high-level synthesis of abstracted ideas (versus recall of concrete details). \[raw scores, min value = 0, max value = 10, higher indicates better performance\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Card SortingPre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants must sort a set of cards into as many groups as possible, based on certain parameters. This score reflects the correct number of sorts generated. \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Working Memory (Digits Backwards)Pre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants must recite number sequences in reverse order; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Color-Word, Inhibition & Switching SubtestPre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants must either state color of word or read the word presented; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Divided AttentionPre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants connect letters and numbers in ascending order as quickly as they can; \[raw score in seconds, min value = 0, max value = 200, lower indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Verbal FluencyPre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants had to generate as many words as possible in one minute that fit task parameters; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), Similarities SubtestPre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants are provided with two words/concepts and must state how they are alike; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Logical MemoryPre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants are asked to recall the details of a story they were read 20 minutes earlier; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD)Pre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants fill out a self-report questionnaire assessing different domains of quality of life; \[raw score; min value = 0, max value = 280, higher score indicates higher reported quality of life\]
Resting State Relative Cerebral Brain Blood Flow (rCBF)Pre (from baseline) and within 2 weeks post interventionMean-level change in resting state relative cerebral brain blood flow (rCBF) in left Inferior frontal gyrus (min value = 0, max value = 2, lower value indicates decreased cerebral blood flow and higher indicates increased cerebral blood flow)
Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Description of SortsPre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants must sort a set of cards into as many groups as possible, based on certain parameters, and state why it is an accurate sort. This score reflects the accuracy of the sort description. \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Recognition of SortsPre and within 2 weeks post interventionAfter proctor has sorted cards, participants must state why sort is accurate/how cards are alike. \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]
Change From Baseline: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)Pre and within 2 weeks post interventionParticipants are asked to recall a list of words they heard 20 minutes earlier; \[raw scores, min value = 0, max value = 15, higher indicates better performance\]

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

No enrolled participants were excluded from the training

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive Training
Advanced reasoning training Advanced Reasoning Training: This is a strategy-based intervention to enhance frontal lobe function. Strategies equip participants to improve their strategic attention, integrated reasoning, and innovation abilities.
27
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCognitive Training
Age, Continuous45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline: Test of Strategic Learning

Complex abstraction subtest: After reading a complex text, participants generate a high-level synthesis of abstracted ideas (versus recall of concrete details). \[raw scores, min value = 0, max value = 10, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Test of Strategic Learningpre2.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Test of Strategic Learningpost3.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
p-value: 0.04Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Description of Sorts

Participants must sort a set of cards into as many groups as possible, based on certain parameters, and state why it is an accurate sort. This score reflects the accuracy of the sort description. \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Description of Sortspre11.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Description of Sortspost12.96 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
p-value: 0.001Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Recognition of Sorts

After proctor has sorted cards, participants must state why sort is accurate/how cards are alike. \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Recognition of Sortspre11.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Accurate Recognition of Sortspost12.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
p-value: 0.007Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Card Sorting

Participants must sort a set of cards into as many groups as possible, based on certain parameters. This score reflects the correct number of sorts generated. \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Card Sortingpre11.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Card Sortingpost13.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Color-Word, Inhibition & Switching Subtest

Participants must either state color of word or read the word presented; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Color-Word, Inhibition & Switching Subtestpre11.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Color-Word, Inhibition & Switching Subtestpost11.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
p-value: 0.092Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Divided Attention

Participants connect letters and numbers in ascending order as quickly as they can; \[raw score in seconds, min value = 0, max value = 200, lower indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Divided Attentionpre73.44 secondsStandard Error 5.43
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Divided Attentionpost66.86 secondsStandard Error 5.48
p-value: 0.052Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Logical Memory

Participants are asked to recall the details of a story they were read 20 minutes earlier; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Logical Memorypre11.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Logical Memorypost12.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
p-value: 0.278Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD)

Participants fill out a self-report questionnaire assessing different domains of quality of life; \[raw score; min value = 0, max value = 280, higher score indicates higher reported quality of life\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD)pre176.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 6.9
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD)post183.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 7
p-value: 0.095Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

Participants are asked to recall a list of words they heard 20 minutes earlier; \[raw scores, min value = 0, max value = 15, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)pre9.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)post10.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
p-value: 0.019Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Verbal Fluency

Participants had to generate as many words as possible in one minute that fit task parameters; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Verbal Fluencypre11.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Verbal Fluencypost11.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
p-value: 0.121Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), Similarities Subtest

Participants are provided with two words/concepts and must state how they are alike; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), Similarities Subtestpre12.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), Similarities Subtestpost13.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
p-value: 0.004Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline: Working Memory (Digits Backwards)

Participants must recite number sequences in reverse order; \[scaled scores, min value = 0, max value = 19, higher indicates better performance\]

Time frame: Pre and within 2 weeks post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Working Memory (Digits Backwards)pre6.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Cognitive TrainingChange From Baseline: Working Memory (Digits Backwards)post7.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
p-value: 0.039Regression, Linear
Secondary

Resting State Relative Cerebral Brain Blood Flow (rCBF)

Mean-level change in resting state relative cerebral brain blood flow (rCBF) in left Inferior frontal gyrus (min value = 0, max value = 2, lower value indicates decreased cerebral blood flow and higher indicates increased cerebral blood flow)

Time frame: Pre (from baseline) and within 2 weeks post intervention

Population: Only for participants who participated in brain imaging portion of study (only for participants that were eligible for MRI)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive TrainingResting State Relative Cerebral Brain Blood Flow (rCBF)pre0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.11
Cognitive TrainingResting State Relative Cerebral Brain Blood Flow (rCBF)post0.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
p-value: <0.01Whole brain voxel-wise correlation analy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026