Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Activity of KD025 in Subjects With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

A Phase 2a, Dose-Escalation, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Activity of KD025 in Subjects With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02841995
Enrollment
54
Registered
2016-07-22
Start date
2016-09-15
Completion date
2022-05-12
Last updated
2023-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Graft vs Host Disease

Keywords

cGVHD, Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Immune System Diseases, Steroid refractory chronic graft vs host disease (cGVHD), Bone Marrow Transplantation, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Glucocorticoids, Corticosteroids

Brief summary

This study was been conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and activity of belumosudil (formerly known as KD025) in adult participants with chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD).

Detailed description

Fifty four (54) participants were enrolled to receive orally administered belumosudil 200 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD), belumosudil 200 mg twice daily (BID), or belumosudil 400 mg QD. Study drug was administered in 28-day cycles until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. Participants received study drug in the inpatient or outpatient setting.

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: Capsules or Tablets Route of administration: Oral

Sponsors

Kadmon, a Sanofi Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male and female participants at least 18 years of age who had allogenic bone marrow transplant (BMT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). * Received glucocorticoid therapy and calcineurin therapy or glucocorticoid therapy alone for cGVHD at study entry. Participants on calcineurin therapy only, without glucocorticoid therapy, were not eligible. Participants also received other therapies thought not to be immunosuppressive (such as extracorporeal photopheresis; ECP), were considered for enrollment in this study on a case-by-case basis. * Had persistent active cGVHD manifestations, as defined by 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical trials in cGVHD, after at least 2 months of steroid therapy. * No more than 3 prior lines of treatment for cGVHD. * Karnofsky Performance Scale of greater than (\>) 40. * Adequate organ and bone marrow functions evaluated during the 14 days prior to enrollment as follows: * Absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to (\>=) 1.5\*10\^9/L (without myeloid growth factors within 1 week of study entry) * Platelet count \>=50\*10\^9/L (without transfusion or thrombopoietin or thrombopoietin analogues within 2 weeks of study entry) * Adequate safety laboratory values: * Total bilirubin less than or equal to (\<=) 1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN) * Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase \<=3\*ULN * Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \>= 30 milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73 m\^2) using the 4-Variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease variable formula * Female participants of childbearing potential have a negative pregnancy test at screening. Females of childbearing potential were defined as sexually mature women without prior hysterectomy or who had any evidence of menses in the past 12 months. However, women who had been amenorrheic for 12 or more months were still considered to be of childbearing potential if the amenorrhea was possibly due to prior chemotherapy, anti estrogens, or ovarian suppression. * Women of childbearing potential (i.e., menstruating women) must had a negative urine pregnancy test (positive urine tests were to be confirmed by serum test) documented within the 24-hour period prior to the first dose of study drug. * Sexually active women of childbearing potential enrolled in the study must agree to use two forms of accepted methods of contraception during the course of the study and for 3 months after their last dose of study drug. Effective birth control includes: * Intrauterine device plus one barrier method; * Stable doses of hormonal contraception for at least 3 months (e.g., oral, injectable, implant, transdermal) plus one barrier method; * 2 barrier methods. Effective barrier methods are male or female condoms, diaphragms, and spermicides (creams or gels that contain a chemical to kill sperm); or * A vasectomized partner * For male participants who were sexually active and who were partners of premenopausal women: agreement to use two forms of contraception as in criterion 10 above during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug. * Able to provide written informed consent prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Female participant who was pregnant or breastfeeding. * Received an investigational GVHD treatment within 28 days of study entry. * Had acute GVHD. * Taken any medication known to be a moderate or strong inhibitor of the cytochrome (CY) CYP3A4 isozyme or any drugs that are moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers. * History or other evidence of severe illness or any other conditions that would make the participant, in the opinion of the investigator, unsuitable for the study (such as poorly controlled psychiatric disease or coronary artery disease). * Regular and excessive use of alcohol within the 6 months prior to study entry defined as alcohol intake \>14 drinks per week in a man or \>7 drinks per week in a woman. Approximately 10 grams of alcohol equals one drink unit. One unit equals 1 ounce of distilled spirits, one 12-ounce beer, or one 4-ounce glass of wine. * Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV). * Diagnosed with another malignancy (other than malignancy for which transplant was performed) within 3 years of enrollment, with the exception of completely resected basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, resected in situ cervical malignancy, resected breast ductal carcinoma in situ, or low-risk prostate cancer after curative resection. * Relapse of the underlying cancer or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease at the time of screening. * Had previous exposure to belumosudil or known allergy/sensitivity to belumosudil or any other Rho-associated protein kinase-2 inhibitor. * Taken other immunosuppressant drugs for GVHD, including mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (Note: Only steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and ECP are acceptable). * Corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula \>450 milliseconds. * Female participant who was pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR)From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The OR determination of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) was based on cGVHD response assessment performed by clinicians as per the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria. CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site. PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site; and cGVHD progression was defined as the clinically meaningful worsening in 1 or more organs regardless of improvement in other organs.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug). TEAEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-ReportFrom Baseline up to end of treatment (i.e., up to 64.2 months)cGVHD symptom severity was self-reported by participants. Participants were asked to rate their disease symptom severity over the last week on the following questions: skin itching at its worst, moth dryness at its worst, mouth pain at its worst, mouth sensitivity at its worst, main compliant on eyes, symptom severity on eyes. Severity rating was done on a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scare, where score 0 indicated 'not at all severe cGVHD symptoms' and score 10 indicated 'most severe cGVHD symptoms possible'. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. Maximal improvement from Baseline was calculated as the lowest symptom severity score on scheduled visits minus the symptom severity score at Baseline with possible ranges from -10 to 10. The lower the number means the better improvement in cGVHD symptoms.
Failure-free Survival (FFS)From first dose of study drug to either start of another new systemic treatment for cGVHD, relapse of the underlying disease or death or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)Failure-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from first dose of study drug to either the start of another new systemic treatment for cGVHD, relapse of the underlying disease or death. If no such events happened, FFS was censored by last response assessment or long term follow up assessment, whichever was the latest and available. Kaplan-Meier survival method was used for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Corticosteroids DoseBaseline up to end of treatment (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) UsageBaseline up to end of treatment (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)Calcineurin inhibitors included systemic tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Number of participants who took CNI at Baseline and had reduction and discontinuation in CNI use as compared to Baseline during the study are reported in this outcome measure. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication.
Duration of Response (DOR)From the date of first response until documented disease progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)The DOR was defined as the time (in weeks) from first documentation of response to the time of first documentation of deterioration from best response (e.g., CR to PR, or PR to LR). LOR included the response status of unchanged (LOR-U), mixed (LOR-M), or progression (LOR-P). Per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria; CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site; PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site; LOR-M was defined as CR or PR in at least one organ accompanied by progression in another organ, LOR-U was defined as outcomes that did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, progression or mixed response, LOR-P was defined as progression in at least one organ or site without a response in any other organ or site. Kaplan-Meier was used for the analysis.
Time-to-Response (TTR)From first dose of study drug treatment to the time of first documentation of response or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)Time-to-response was measured as the time (in weeks) from first dose of study drug to the time of first documentation of response. Response was defined as the participants achieving a PR or CR at any post-baseline response assessment. Per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria; CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site and PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site.
Percentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganFrom date of randomization until disease progression or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)Best response was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR. Response was assessed per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria; CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site; PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site. Organ response assessment was performed on 9 individual organs: skin, eyes, mouth, esophagus, upper gastrointestinal (GI), lower GI, liver, lungs, and joints and fascia and is reported in this outcome measure.
Overall Survival (OS)From first dose of study drug to date of death from any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from first dose of study drug to the death due to any reason. If there was no death, OS was censored by last visit, last long-term follow-up, or study cut-off date, whichever occurred first. Kaplan-Meier survival method was used for the analysis.
Time to Next Therapy (TTNT)From time of first treatment to the time of new systemic cGVHD treatment or long term follow-up assessment, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)The TTNT was defined as the time (in months) from first treatment to the time of new systemic cGVHD treatment. TTNT was censored by last response assessment or long term follow up assessment, whichever was earlier. Kaplan-Meier survival method was used for the analysis.
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)BOR was defined as the participants with either a CR or PR or lack of response (LOR), where LOR included the response status of unchanged (LOR-U), mixed (LOR-M), or progression (LOR-P). BOR was assessed per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria. CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site; PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site; LOR-M was defined as CR or PR in at least one organ accompanied by progression in another organ, LOR-U was defined as outcomes that did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, progression or mixed response, LOR-P was defined as progression in at least one organ or site without a response in any other organ or site.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsBaseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, 39,40,41,43, 47,48,49,51,52,53, 54, 55,56, 57,58,60,61,62,63,67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsBaseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3,4, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26, 27,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,47, 48,49, 51,52,53,54, 55, 56,57,58,60,61, 62, 63,67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)FVC was the total amount of air (in liters) exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsBaseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, 29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,39,40,41,43,47,49,51,53,55, 61, 62, 63, 67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 Months)DLco is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Change from baseline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (percent predicted hemoglobin level corrected) was reported for this measure. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsBaseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3, 4, 5,6,7, 8, 9, 10,11,12,13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,21, 22,23,24, 25, 26, 27,29, 30, 31,32, 33, 34, 35,36, 37, 38,39, 40,41,43,47, 48, 49,51,52,53, 54,55,56,57,58, 60,61,62, 63, 67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 Months)TLC is the volume of air in the lungs upon the maximum effort of inspiration. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsBaseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4,5, 6,7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, 13, 14,15, 16,17, 18, 19,20, 21,22,23, 24, 25, 26,27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,34, 35,36, 37,38, 39, 40,41, 43,47, 48, 49,51,52,53, 54, 55,56,57, 58,60,61,62,63,67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 Months)RV is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Cycles 1 and 2: pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1Cmax was the maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained by a non-compartmental analysis. Cmax data for Belumosudil and its metabolites KD025m1 and KD025m2 are reported in this outcome measure.
Pharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Cycles 1 and 2: pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1Tmax was defined as time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained by a non-compartmental analysis. Tmax data for Belumosudil and its metabolites KD025m1 and KD025m2 are reported in this outcome measure.
Pharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Cycles 1 and 2: pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1AUC0-6hr was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 6 hours post-dose, obtained by a non-compartmental analysis from the concentration-time data. AUC0-6hr data for Belumosudil and its metabolites KD025m1 and KD025m2 are reported in this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsBaseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37, 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48, 49, 50,51,52,53, 54,55, 56, 57,58,59,60,61,62,63,67 and EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)Lee cGVHD symptom scale, a patient-reported symptom scale used to measure symptom burden and has 7 subscales (Skin, Eyes and Mouth, Breathing, Eating and Digestion, Muscles and Joints, Energy, and Mental and Emotional) with ratings as follows: 0-Not at all, 1-Slightly, 2-Moderately, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Extremely, with lower values representing better outcome. Score for each subscale was normalized to a score ranged from 0 to 100, where higher score=worse symptoms. An overall Lee cGvHD score was calculated as average of these 7 subscales and it ranged from 0 to 100, where a higher score = worse symptoms. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication.
Number of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD AssessmentFrom Baseline up to end of treatment (i.e., up to 64.2 months)The GSR assessment was performed by asking the participants to rate their disease severity of cGVHD symptoms on a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale, where score 0 indicated 'not at all severe cGVHD symptoms' and score 10 indicated 'most severe cGVHD symptoms possible'. The response was defined using scores from 9 organs: skin, eyes, mouth, esophagus, upper gastrointestinal (GI) track, lower GI tract, liver, lungs, and joints and fascia plus GSR. End of treatment (EOT) visit was performed within 3 days after participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. Maximal improvement from Baseline was calculated as lowest GSR score on scheduled visits minus GSR score at Baseline with possible ranges from -10 to 10. The lower the number means the better improvement in cGVHD symptoms. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 7 active sites in the United States. A total of 64 participants were screened between 15 September 2016 and 08 March 2018, of which 10 participants were screen failures due to not meeting eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 54 participants were enrolled and treated with belumosudil in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QD
Participants received belumosudil 200 mg orally QD in each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 64.2 months).
17
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BID
Participants received belumosudil 200 mg orally BID in each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 45.9 months).
16
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QD
Participants received belumosudil 400 mg orally QD in each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 49.2 months).
21
Total54

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event201
Overall StudyDeath002
Overall StudyDisease progression5118
Overall StudyInvestigator decision201
Overall StudyNoncompliance to protocol100
Overall StudyOther415
Overall StudySponsor decision100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject244

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDCohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDCohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDTotal
Age, Continuous50.0 years55.0 years46.0 years51.5 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants14 Participants19 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants7 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants9 Participants12 Participants34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 175 / 169 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 1716 / 1619 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 176 / 1613 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug). TEAEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE17 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE5 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE16 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE6 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE13 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE20 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR)

OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The OR determination of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) was based on cGVHD response assessment performed by clinicians as per the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria. CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site. PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site; and cGVHD progression was defined as the clinically meaningful worsening in 1 or more organs regardless of improvement in other organs.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR)64.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR)68.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR)57.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corticosteroids Dose

Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Corticosteroids Dose-0.110 milligrams per kilogram per dayStandard Deviation 0.101
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Corticosteroids Dose-0.111 milligrams per kilogram per dayStandard Deviation 0.147
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Corticosteroids Dose-0.116 milligrams per kilogram per dayStandard Deviation 0.152
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time Points

Lee cGVHD symptom scale, a patient-reported symptom scale used to measure symptom burden and has 7 subscales (Skin, Eyes and Mouth, Breathing, Eating and Digestion, Muscles and Joints, Energy, and Mental and Emotional) with ratings as follows: 0-Not at all, 1-Slightly, 2-Moderately, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Extremely, with lower values representing better outcome. Score for each subscale was normalized to a score ranged from 0 to 100, where higher score=worse symptoms. An overall Lee cGvHD score was calculated as average of these 7 subscales and it ranged from 0 to 100, where a higher score = worse symptoms. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37, 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48, 49, 50,51,52,53, 54,55, 56, 57,58,59,60,61,62,63,67 and EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the analysis at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 42, Day 14.6 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 57, Day 1-17.6 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 1-25.7 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 40, Day 12.7 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 26, Day 11.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsEOT-4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 38, Day 19.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 28, Day 14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 56, Day 11.8 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 17.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 30, Day 19.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 32, Day 110.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 10.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 63, Day 1-18.0 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 34, Day 113.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 55, Day 1-16.8 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 62, Day 14.4 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 53, Day 1-19.2 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 52, Day 16.0 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 51, Day 1-12.0 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 50, Day 14.5 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 61, Day 1-19.3 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 48, Day 12.4 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 67, Day 1-21.9 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 1-6.8 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 60, Day 14.2 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 54, Day 14.9 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 46, Day 14.6 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 59, Day 1-12.7 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 44, Day 14.3 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 58, Day 15.4 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-20.4 score on a scale
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 10.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 1-7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 1-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-6.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-10.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-11.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-9.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-9.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-14.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-18.7 score on a scale
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-13.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-11.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-15.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 1-13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-11.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-13.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-14.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 1-19.3 score on a scale
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-19.9 score on a scale
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 1-16.8 score on a scale
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 1-15.4 score on a scale
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsEOT-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 26, Day 10.2 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 6, Day 1-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-8.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 4, Day 1-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 45, Day 1-12.3 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-6.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsEOT2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 1-14.3 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 11.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 51, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 1-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 2, Day 1-5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 1-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-12.9 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 28, Day 12.6 score on a scale
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Overall Score on Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale at Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time Points

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, 39,40,41,43, 47,48,49,51,52,53, 54, 55,56, 57,58,60,61,62,63,67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the analysis at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 12.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 11.1 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 4.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-3.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-3.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 4.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-1.7 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-4.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-2.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-5.9 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-6.7 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 12.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-5.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-5.2 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-7.4 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 10.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-4.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 14.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 12.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-11.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 15.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 26, Day 10.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-6.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-0.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 30, Day 13.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-3.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 12
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 32, Day 11.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 15.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 34, Day 12.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 15.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 0
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 13.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-1.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 38, Day 11.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 110.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 2.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 40, Day 1-1.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 115.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 116.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 15.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 48, Day 13.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 18.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 51, Day 18.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 52, Day 10.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 53, Day 19.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 54, Day 14.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 55, Day 113.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 56, Day 14.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 57, Day 113.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 58, Day 15.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 60, Day 14.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 61, Day 110.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 62, Day 12.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 63, Day 113.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 67, Day 114.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-1.4 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-21.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-11.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 1.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-19.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 10.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-1.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 117.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-5.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-2.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 14.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-2.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 30.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-18.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 10.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-17.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.9
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-2.6 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-2.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-10.1 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 15.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-23.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-8.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 15.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 11.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 1-1.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 33.9
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-6.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 7.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-12.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 4.9
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-7.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 10.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-22.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-5.9 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-6.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-1.8 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 7.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-8.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 7.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 1-6.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-12.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 3.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 10.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-5.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 10.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 14.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 10.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-7.4 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 14.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-6.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 17
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-4.8 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-19.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-5.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 1-5.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 15.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-10.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 17
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 1-2.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-1.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 4, Day 1-0.2 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 10.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 6, Day 1-0.9 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 10.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 1.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-0.9 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 1-1.1 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-3.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 12.7 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 3.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-4.4 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 15.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 10.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 3.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-10.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 19.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-3.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 13.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 2, Day 1-4.8 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-5.1 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-7.0 percent predicted FEV1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-6.1 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 12.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-4.5 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 7.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-7.9 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 15.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 14.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time Points

FVC was the total amount of air (in liters) exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3,4, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26, 27,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,47, 48,49, 51,52,53,54, 55, 56,57,58,60,61, 62, 63,67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the analysis at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 38, Day 12.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 10.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 3.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-0.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 7.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-2.9 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 10.4 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-1.1 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 7.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 12.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-2.4 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 7.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 111.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-3.7 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 10.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 116.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-3.2 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-2.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-3.2 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 8.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 10.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 14.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-7.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 11.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 26, Day 14.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-2.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 4.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 12.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 4.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 30, Day 14.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 11.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 3.5
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 32, Day 12.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 111.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 34, Day 16.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 111.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 15.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 17.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 60, Day 18.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 112.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 0.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 40, Day 13.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 115.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 117.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 15.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 48, Day 15.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 16.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 51, Day 19.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 52, Day 13.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 53, Day 18.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 54, Day 15.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 55, Day 113.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 56, Day 17.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 57, Day 114.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 58, Day 17.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 61, Day 112.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 62, Day 15.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 63, Day 112.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 67, Day 114.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-2.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 10.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-2.4 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-8.4 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-2.7 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-10.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 3.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-24.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 11.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-4.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-15.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 7.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-3.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 15.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-11.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-15.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 11.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 12.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-11.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-20.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-3.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-1.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-18.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-6.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 19.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 12.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 1-17.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 7.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-3.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 11.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-18.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-7.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-13.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-2.9 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-5.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 4.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-11.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 2.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-10.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 2.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 1-5.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-3.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 14.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 1-2.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 10.8 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-2.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-7.8 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 14.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-6.6 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 17
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-6.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-1.8 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 10.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-3.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-15.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-1.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 11.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 12.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 2, Day 1-5.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 21.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-3.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 4, Day 1-0.2 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 8.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 11.6 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 6, Day 10.8 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 12.3 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 10.4 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 8.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 16.0 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 1.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-0.8 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 14.7 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 4.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-4.4 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 12.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 10.7 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-4.9 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-2.7 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 7.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-4.8 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 11.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-1.0 percent predicted FVC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-6.5 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-5.6 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 12.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time Points

DLco is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. Change from baseline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (percent predicted hemoglobin level corrected) was reported for this measure. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, 29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,39,40,41,43,47,49,51,53,55, 61, 62, 63, 67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 Months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the analysis at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 113.867 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 1.309
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 14.545 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 22.991
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-2.293 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 5.763
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 40, Day 15.586 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 122.884 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 115.213 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 19.901 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 9.954
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-2.778 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 8.187
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 14.635 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 23.989
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-0.625 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 7.262
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 19.660 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 1-3.599 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 10.354 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 1.844
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 51, Day 111.734 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 11.521 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 19.836
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 16.945 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 53, Day 110.292 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 10.531 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-4.461 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 19.865
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 55, Day 116.550 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 61, Day 117.682 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 26, Day 14.715 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-8.047 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 24.788
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 62, Day 14.170 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 63, Day 126.215 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-6.701 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 1.671
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 67, Day 141.384 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-5.548 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 12.175
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 12.343 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 20.988
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-1.962 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 11.426
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 14.166 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 10.228 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 15.731
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 112.916 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 19.306 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 148.465 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 32, Day 15.586 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-4.514 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 7.401
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-1.018 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 9.226
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 114.754 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 0.649
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 34, Day 14.863 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-0.800 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 17.528
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 1-5.962 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 10.55
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-0.426 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 6.677
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-19.228 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-6.813 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 12.81
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 10.358 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 18.775 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 13.554 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT0.985 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 5.919
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 11.125 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 5.927
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-4.462 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 23.621
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-6.618 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 15.443
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 18.458 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 6.229
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 12.570 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 8.902
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 115.543 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 11.753
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 11.824 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 8.539
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 14.343 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 3.144
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-14.692 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-0.638 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 7.059
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-10.661 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 13.347 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 3.56
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 16.582 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 10.695
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-15.184 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 20.181
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-18.095 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 16.289 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 2.469
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 14.076 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-9.914 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 15.387
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 16.184 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 9.436
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-18.814 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 24.96
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 11.882 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 7.522
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-10.371 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 14.208
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-3.928 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 9.492
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 4, Day 10.278 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 9.683
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-4.111 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 9.138
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 6, Day 1-3.143 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 10.385
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-4.275 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 11.464
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 1-3.787 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 11.983
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-2.540 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 11.897
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 11.328 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 8.887
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-2.720 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 10.92
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-1.378 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 6.364
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 12.091 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 13.29
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 10.309 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 11.651
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-5.309 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 11.514
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-6.840 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 15.053
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-10.865 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 13.346
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-3.174 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 3.106
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-2.020 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 2.436
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-13.517 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 5.936
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-12.354 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 12.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-17.222 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 16.947
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-2.219 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 10.614
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-11.430 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-13.392 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-11.154 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 18.613 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 110.833 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 15.088 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 110.372 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 15.902 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 116.351 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLco
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (HGB) Corrected Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 2, Day 1-5.243 Percent Predicted HGB Corrected DLcoStandard Deviation 9.83
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time Points

RV is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4,5, 6,7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, 13, 14,15, 16,17, 18, 19,20, 21,22,23, 24, 25, 26,27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,34, 35,36, 37,38, 39, 40,41, 43,47, 48, 49,51,52,53, 54, 55,56,57, 58,60,61,62,63,67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 Months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the analysis at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 18.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 10
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 67, Day 12.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 40, Day 1-1.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 57, Day 118.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 143.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 89.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 10.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 5.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 63, Day 16.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 38, Day 18.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 56, Day 117.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-54.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 11.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 9.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 122.1 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 29.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 117.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 26, Day 1-3.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 119.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 41.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 15.2 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 24.5
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 13.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 36.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-13.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 42.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 55, Day 153.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 114.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 36.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 30, Day 121.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 115.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 43.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-28.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 32, Day 15.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT6.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 24.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 54, Day 14.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 120.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 19.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 62, Day 1-8.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 53, Day 122.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 178.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 61, Day 1-18.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 52, Day 1-4.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 120.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 27.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 14.9 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 29.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 51, Day 122.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 10.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 10.2 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 22.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 1-14.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 113.6 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 27.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 60, Day 1-20.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 48, Day 1-50.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 34, Day 1-1.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 142.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 15.4 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 28.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 58, Day 14.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 158.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 16.4 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 27.4
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 180.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-42.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-4.6 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 18.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-11.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 26.9
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-9.9 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 17.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 1-28.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-19.9 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 24.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 1-47.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 0.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-10.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 28.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-5.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-27.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 35.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-31.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-0.7 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 18.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-36.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 13.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-47.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 25.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 1-70.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-19.7 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 18
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-7.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 37.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-44.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-33.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 19.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-72.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-17.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-34.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 31.1
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-39.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 20.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-13.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-93.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-34.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 33.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-70.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-43.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 42.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-26.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT10.6 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 34.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-23.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 56
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 1-20.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-78.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 19.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 34.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 11.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 44.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-41.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 46.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 2, Day 1-18.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 30.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 181.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-30.2 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 51.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-22.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 44.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-23.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 18.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-18.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 32.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 175.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-7.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 33.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 187.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-39.1 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 26.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-27.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 31.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 1-5.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-16.7 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 22.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-6.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 36.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 10.3 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 32.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-22.2 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 49.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 15.4 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 38
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 11.4 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 38.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 10.1 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 35.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 12.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 39.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-7.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 33
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 6, Day 1-10.9 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 37.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-3.7 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 29.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 161.0 percent predicted RV
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 117.5 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 40.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-41.0 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 28.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 4, Day 117.8 percent predicted RVStandard Deviation 29
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Residual Volume (RV) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 147.0 percent predicted RV
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time Points

TLC is the volume of air in the lungs upon the maximum effort of inspiration. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2,3, 4, 5,6,7, 8, 9, 10,11,12,13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,21, 22,23,24, 25, 26, 27,29, 30, 31,32, 33, 34, 35,36, 37, 38,39, 40,41,43,47, 48, 49,51,52,53, 54,55,56,57,58, 60,61,62, 63, 67, EOT (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 Months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the analysis at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-0.3 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 7.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 119.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-3.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 7.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-2.9 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 6.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 133.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 26, Day 10.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 15.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 16.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 60, Day 1-3.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 41, Day 138.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-1.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 17
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 123.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 40, Day 10.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 30, Day 17.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 17.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 17.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-2.6 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 16.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 124.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 28.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 32, Day 11.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 114.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 11.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 58, Day 15.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 34, Day 12.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 110.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 7.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-2.8 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 10.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 38, Day 12.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 16.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-7.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 67, Day 112.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 57, Day 118.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-3.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 11.6 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 11.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 56, Day 19.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-3.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 6.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 63, Day 112.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 55, Day 129.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 10.7 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 4.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 54, Day 14.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-4.6 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 6.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-3.7 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 6.6
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 53, Day 115.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 62, Day 1-1.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 52, Day 11.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 10.3 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 9.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-9.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 51, Day 115.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT5.2 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 27.5
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 15.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 10.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 8.7
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 61, Day 15.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 48, Day 1-13.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 10.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-7.2 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 10.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-4.4 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 6.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 1-5.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-6.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 1-18.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 6.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-5.2 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 11.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 10.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-10.3 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 18.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-7.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-1.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 5.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-14.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 12.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-17.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 11.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 1-16.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-7.7 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 10.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-9.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 16.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-18.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-18.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 6.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-21.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 19.8
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-15.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-19.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 13.4
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-24.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 12.7
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 1-27.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 21.9
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 1-36.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 33, Day 1-39.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 1-23.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 16.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 37, Day 1-41.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 1-30.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 21.2
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 1-16.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-2.4 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 15
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 11.9 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 39, Day 123.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 29, Day 112.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 14.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 27, Day 1-14.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 24.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 25, Day 1-6.3 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 24.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 4, Day 13.3 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 14
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 43, Day 121.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 24, Day 1-34.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 47, Day 125.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 23, Day 1-2.8 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 18.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 22, Day 1-21.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 14.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 49, Day 11.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 21, Day 1-14.4 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 24
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 20, Day 1-9.3 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 15.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 19, Day 1-7.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 5.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 18, Day 10.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 13.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 17, Day 1-18.1 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 15.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 16, Day 1-15.5 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 9.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 15, Day 1-7.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 12
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 14, Day 1-5.8 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 16.5
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 13, Day 1-3.3 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 17.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 12, Day 1-8.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 14.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 11, Day 1-3.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 19.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 10, Day 13.6 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 14.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 9, Day 1-0.9 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 15.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 8, Day 1-0.2 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 12.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 6, Day 1-4.4 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 11.6
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsEOT-12.6 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 20.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 2, Day 1-9.0 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 13.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 7, Day 1-2.6 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 13.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 36, Day 1-6.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 5, Day 1-1.7 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 11.2
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 35, Day 113.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 31, Day 117.0 Percent Predicted TLC
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Each Specified Time PointsCycle 3, Day 1-0.6 Percent Predicted TLCStandard Deviation 14.8
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

The DOR was defined as the time (in weeks) from first documentation of response to the time of first documentation of deterioration from best response (e.g., CR to PR, or PR to LR). LOR included the response status of unchanged (LOR-U), mixed (LOR-M), or progression (LOR-P). Per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria; CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site; PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site; LOR-M was defined as CR or PR in at least one organ accompanied by progression in another organ, LOR-U was defined as outcomes that did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, progression or mixed response, LOR-P was defined as progression in at least one organ or site without a response in any other organ or site. Kaplan-Meier was used for the analysis.

Time frame: From the date of first response until documented disease progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on responder population which included participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and achieved a PR or CR response at any post-baseline response assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDDuration of Response (DOR)40.0 weeks
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDDuration of Response (DOR)10.9 weeks
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDDuration of Response (DOR)15.9 weeks
Secondary

Failure-free Survival (FFS)

Failure-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from first dose of study drug to either the start of another new systemic treatment for cGVHD, relapse of the underlying disease or death. If no such events happened, FFS was censored by last response assessment or long term follow up assessment, whichever was the latest and available. Kaplan-Meier survival method was used for the analysis.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to either start of another new systemic treatment for cGVHD, relapse of the underlying disease or death or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDFailure-free Survival (FFS)10.6 months
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDFailure-free Survival (FFS)9.8 months
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDFailure-free Survival (FFS)9.7 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)

BOR was defined as the participants with either a CR or PR or lack of response (LOR), where LOR included the response status of unchanged (LOR-U), mixed (LOR-M), or progression (LOR-P). BOR was assessed per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria. CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site; PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site; LOR-M was defined as CR or PR in at least one organ accompanied by progression in another organ, LOR-U was defined as outcomes that did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, progression or mixed response, LOR-P was defined as progression in at least one organ or site without a response in any other organ or site.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)CR0 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-P2 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-M2 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-U2 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)PR11 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-U3 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-M1 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-P1 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)CR0 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)PR11 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)PR12 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)CR0 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-U4 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-P1 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)LOR-M0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Usage

Calcineurin inhibitors included systemic tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Number of participants who took CNI at Baseline and had reduction and discontinuation in CNI use as compared to Baseline during the study are reported in this outcome measure. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after the participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication.

Time frame: Baseline up to end of treatment (i.e., anytime up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants who had taken CNI at Baseline and with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) UsageParticipants with reduction in CNI dose5 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) UsageParticipants who discontinued CNI0 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) UsageParticipants with reduction in CNI dose5 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) UsageParticipants who discontinued CNI1 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) UsageParticipants with reduction in CNI dose6 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) UsageParticipants who discontinued CNI3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment

The GSR assessment was performed by asking the participants to rate their disease severity of cGVHD symptoms on a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale, where score 0 indicated 'not at all severe cGVHD symptoms' and score 10 indicated 'most severe cGVHD symptoms possible'. The response was defined using scores from 9 organs: skin, eyes, mouth, esophagus, upper gastrointestinal (GI) track, lower GI tract, liver, lungs, and joints and fascia plus GSR. End of treatment (EOT) visit was performed within 3 days after participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. Maximal improvement from Baseline was calculated as lowest GSR score on scheduled visits minus GSR score at Baseline with possible ranges from -10 to 10. The lower the number means the better improvement in cGVHD symptoms. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.

Time frame: From Baseline up to end of treatment (i.e., up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment05 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-34 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment30 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-11 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-22 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-70 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-52 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-60 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment10 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-42 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD AssessmentMissing1 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-24 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-70 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-62 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-52 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-40 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-30 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-12 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment04 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment11 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment31 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD AssessmentMissing0 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment30 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment03 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-50 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-72 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment11 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-60 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-24 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-31 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD AssessmentMissing3 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-14 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) by Clinician-reported cGVHD Assessment-43 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report

cGVHD symptom severity was self-reported by participants. Participants were asked to rate their disease symptom severity over the last week on the following questions: skin itching at its worst, moth dryness at its worst, mouth pain at its worst, mouth sensitivity at its worst, main compliant on eyes, symptom severity on eyes. Severity rating was done on a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scare, where score 0 indicated 'not at all severe cGVHD symptoms' and score 10 indicated 'most severe cGVHD symptoms possible'. EOT visit was performed within 3 days after participant's last dose of study drug. Baseline value was defined as valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving first study medication. Maximal improvement from Baseline was calculated as the lowest symptom severity score on scheduled visits minus the symptom severity score at Baseline with possible ranges from -10 to 10. The lower the number means the better improvement in cGVHD symptoms.

Time frame: From Baseline up to end of treatment (i.e., up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report41 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report01 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-32 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-60 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-12 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-22 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-80 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-73 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report20 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-52 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-ReportMissing2 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report10 Participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-42 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-23 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-80 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-72 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-61 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-50 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-42 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-32 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-12 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report01 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report10 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report21 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report40 Participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-ReportMissing2 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report00 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-52 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report40 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report11 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-64 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-81 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report22 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-22 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-32 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-70 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-12 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-Report-41 Participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDNumber of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Symptom Activity by cGVHD Activity Assessment Participant Self-ReportMissing4 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from first dose of study drug to the death due to any reason. If there was no death, OS was censored by last visit, last long-term follow-up, or study cut-off date, whichever occurred first. Kaplan-Meier survival method was used for the analysis.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to date of death from any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDOverall Survival (OS)NA months
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDOverall Survival (OS)NA months
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDOverall Survival (OS)NA months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual Organ

Best response was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR. Response was assessed per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria; CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site; PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site. Organ response assessment was performed on 9 individual organs: skin, eyes, mouth, esophagus, upper gastrointestinal (GI), lower GI, liver, lungs, and joints and fascia and is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From date of randomization until disease progression or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the analysis at the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganJoints and Fascia54.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganLower GI tract0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganEsophagus50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganUpper GI tract100.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganEyes35.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganSkin23.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganLungs0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganMouth46.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganUpper GI tract100.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganSkin16.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganEyes36.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganMouth45.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganLower GI tract100.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganLiver50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganLungs0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganJoints and Fascia45.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganLower GI tract0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganSkin13.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganEyes23.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganJoints and Fascia41.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganEsophagus25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganUpper GI tract50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganMouth45.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Best Response in Each Individual OrganLungs30.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)

Cmax was the maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained by a non-compartmental analysis. Cmax data for Belumosudil and its metabolites KD025m1 and KD025m2 are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Cycles 1 and 2: pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose PK sample drawn. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 12500 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 12020 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 101
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 144.4 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 67.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 136.2 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 1208 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 93.1
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 1158 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 150
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 1145 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 147
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 11400 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 98.5
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 145.0 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 199.2 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 112
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 11890 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 120
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 134.8 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 13270 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 163.9 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 59.4
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 1265 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 154
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 155.8 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 82.1
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 12960 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 69.7
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 1388 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 82.3
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)

AUC0-6hr was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 6 hours post-dose, obtained by a non-compartmental analysis from the concentration-time data. AUC0-6hr data for Belumosudil and its metabolites KD025m1 and KD025m2 are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Cycles 1 and 2: pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 18350 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 17090 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 95.9
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 1140 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 72.3
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 1123 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.2
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 1565 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 90.8
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 1471 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 145
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 1513 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 122
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 14960 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 108
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 1160 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.3
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 1282 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 125
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 17190 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 115
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 1114 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 112000 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.8
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 1216 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 61.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 1923 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 144
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 1178 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 72.9
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 111500 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 97.3
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: The Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-6hr) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 11150 hours*nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 97.1
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)

Tmax was defined as time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained by a non-compartmental analysis. Tmax data for Belumosudil and its metabolites KD025m1 and KD025m2 are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Cycles 1 and 2: pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 12.12 hours
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 12.53 hours
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 12.50 hours
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 12.98 hours
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 12.82 hours
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 12.98 hours
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 12.00 hours
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 13.43 hours
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 12.05 hours
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 13.00 hours
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 12.47 hours
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 11.75 hours
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 2 Day 12.66 hours
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 1 Day 11.98 hours
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 2 Day 13.03 hours
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m1: Cycle 2 Day 12.17 hours
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)Belumosudil: Cycle 1 Day 13.03 hours
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDPharmacokinetics: Time of the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Belumosudil and Its Metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2)KD025m2: Cycle 1 Day 12.98 hours
Secondary

Time to Next Therapy (TTNT)

The TTNT was defined as the time (in months) from first treatment to the time of new systemic cGVHD treatment. TTNT was censored by last response assessment or long term follow up assessment, whichever was earlier. Kaplan-Meier survival method was used for the analysis.

Time frame: From time of first treatment to the time of new systemic cGVHD treatment or long term follow-up assessment, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDTime to Next Therapy (TTNT)15.2 months
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDTime to Next Therapy (TTNT)9.8 months
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDTime to Next Therapy (TTNT)14.2 months
Secondary

Time-to-Response (TTR)

Time-to-response was measured as the time (in weeks) from first dose of study drug to the time of first documentation of response. Response was defined as the participants achieving a PR or CR at any post-baseline response assessment. Per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria; CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site and PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug treatment to the time of first documentation of response or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

Population: Analysis was performed on responder population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDTime-to-Response (TTR)8.14 weeks
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDTime-to-Response (TTR)8.14 weeks
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDTime-to-Response (TTR)8.07 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026