Skip to content

The Accuracy of Optic Biopsies Versus Conventional Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Superficial Bladder Neoplasia

The Accuracy of Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopic Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Superficial Bladder Neoplasia.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02841904
Enrollment
189
Registered
2016-07-22
Start date
2018-06-30
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2018-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer

Brief summary

This study evaluates the accuracy of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) in the diagnostic of non-invasive flat and exophytic bladder neoplasia. CLE results are compared to histopathology results.

Detailed description

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) is a technique which during endoscopic examination of the bladder (cystoscopy) gives magnified, microscopic-like images of tissues and cells, by inserting a laser fiber through the cystoscope. CLE aims to target biopsies during cystoscopy and reduce the number of biopsies, and the need for additional cystoscopies i general anesthesia. This study evaluates the ability of CLE to assess tissue in the bladder. The ability to diagnose normal mucosa, inflammation and tumors of the bladder by the CLE is compared to the histopathological examination of selected tissues (biopsies). Patients scheduled for cystoscopy with biopsies in general anesthesia are recruited for the study. After standard cystoscopy where suspicious mucosal areas are located and marked, A contrast agent (Fluorescein) is administrated intravenously. CLE fiber is introduced through the cystoscope and the marked mucosal areas are examined by direct contact with the laser fiber. The pathologist assesses the CLE video and registers the results. Biopsies are then taken from the selected, suspicious areas. The results of CLE assessment are compared with the histopathological results.

Interventions

DEVICEConfocal LASER Endomicroscopy

Patients scheduled for bladder endoscopic surgery under general anesthesia are offered to be included in our study. The suspicious mucosal areas are marked then examined with CLE. Tissue samples are taken based on the usual standard criterias. The samples are evaluated microscopically and compared with the results of the CLE technique. A single surgeon performs all surgeries. Biopsies are anlysed by a pathologist from Herlev and Gentofte Hospital's Pathology Department, which is affiliated CLE- study.

Sponsors

Herlev Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First time Transurethral Resection of Bladder (TURB) for bladder tumors under 3 cm * Suspicious mucosa / Carcinoma in situ * Recurrent pTa * Positive cytology with normal flexible cystoscopy * Control after Bacille Calmette Guérin (BCG) treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to fluorescein * Pregnant and lactating women. * Renal failure (eGFR \<20 ml / min)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
accordance between CLE and histology in flat bladder tumorsAn average of 18 monthsAccordance between confocal laser endoscopy and conventional biopsy according to the evaluation of the pathologist in flat bladder neoplasia
Accordance between CLE and histology in exophytic bladder tumorsAn average of 18 monthsAccordance between confocal laser endoscopy and conventional biopsy according to the evaluation of the pathologist in exophytic bladder neoplasia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accordance between CLE assessed by the surgeon and histology.An average of 18 monthsAccordance between confocal laser endoscopy and conventional biopsy according to the evaluation of the surgeon in both flat and exophytic bladder neoplasia
Accordance between the per-operative evaluation of CLE of the pathologist and the surgeonAn average of 18 monthsAccordance between the per-operative evaluation of CLE of the pathologist and the surgeon

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactSami Beji, MD
sami.beji.01@regionh.dk53720546
Backup ContactMette Ladefoged Kopp Schmidt
Mette.Ladefoged.Kopp.Schmidt@regionh.dk3868 1100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026