Skip to content

Decision to Limit or Withdraw Specific Therapies for Advanced Cancer and Hematological Malignancies.

Decision to Limit or Withdraw Specific Therapies for Advanced Cancer and Hematological Malignancies : Physicians and Patients Points of View and Interactions.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02841124
Acronym
WHATELSE
Enrollment
21
Registered
2016-07-22
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2016-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Cancer, Ethics

Keywords

Decision making

Brief summary

The decision to limit or withdraw specific therapies (DLWT) in patients with advanced cancer is a complex process that is always painful for patients, relatives and professionals. For more than 10 years, shared decision making has been more and more emphasized. However, few data in the literature rely on clinical research. In order to understand their difficulties and issues, this study explores the determinants and modalities of DLWT and analyses the feasibility of different methods for investigating this decision making process.

Detailed description

This study explores the decision-making process for patients with advanced cancer when the question to imit or withdraw specific therapies (DLWT) is raised, with a cross-analysis of physicians and pts points of view. This study took place in 5 oncology and hematology units : 2 university hospitals, 1 general hospital, 1 cancer center and 1 private hospital. The study included two different approaches: an epidemiological section to identify the prevalence of these situations in different institutions and a qualitative study section exploring factors influencing the decision process. The epidemiological analysis included all hospitalized patients identified with advanced cancer for whom the question of DLWT was raised in a given week or during the two weeks preceding the investigation. The qualitative analysis was based on interviews with the referent oncologist (or hematologist) and his patient (conducted by a physician and a psychologist respectively) as well as interviews with other partners involved in the situation (care staff and relatives) depending on the center. Researchers also participated in multidisciplinary meetings and monitored changes in the decision over a three month period.

Interventions

OTHERinterviews

face-to-face interviews with the referent oncologist (or hematologist) and his patient (conducted by a physician and a psychologist respectively) as well as interviews with other partners involved in the situation (care staff and relatives)

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Antoine, Paris
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre les Nancy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier de Colmar
CollaboratorOTHER
Clinique Devron, Dijon
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with advanced cancer * Existence of a questioning about DLWT * Absence of guide lines

Exclusion criteria

* Incapacity of the patient to participate to an interview * Absence of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
interviews with physicians, patients and relatives6 monthsA thematic analysis induces the creation of a set of themes and concepts clustered by relevance into a tree structure. The thematic tree structure constitutes the dataset of interest.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026