Skip to content

The Impact of Alcohol Consumption on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes

The Impact of Alcohol Consumption on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02840877
Enrollment
303
Registered
2016-07-21
Start date
2017-05-16
Completion date
2023-10-12
Last updated
2024-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Consumption, Treatment Adverse Effect, Tuberculosis

Keywords

tuberculosis culture, alcohol use

Brief summary

After HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis (TB) remains the second leading cause of death due to an infectious disease globally. Retrospective studies from many countries, including the United States and South Africa, have consistently reported that in addition to having a higher burden of TB disease, patients with problem alcohol use have worse TB treatment outcomes. This prospective study will attempt to clarify both behavioral and biologic causal mechanisms underlying the deleterious effects of problem alcohol use on TB treatment response.

Detailed description

A major knowledge gap is the degree to which poor treatment outcomes in alcohol-abusing patients are due to noncompliance alone. Problem alcohol use impacts on retention in care and adherence to daily TB treatment. Poor medication adherence and increased default from TB care have been documented for patients consuming alcohol regularly in several countries. Yet there has been no research to identify reasons (beyond adherence) for these poorer outcomes among patients with problem alcohol use. A key barrier to understanding the persistent biologic effect of alcohol on TB disease is inadequate data on adherence, including detailed data on daily adherence (or number of missed doses of medication). Research combining better approaches to alcohol ascertainment and adherence monitoring is needed to advance understanding of the pathways by which alcohol use and TB disease interact. Aim 1: To (i) examine the associations between problem alcohol use and TB treatment outcomes, and (ii) demonstrate that these associations persist independent of adherence to TB treatment. Aim 2: To evaluate the effect of problem alcohol use on the pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) of TB drugs. Aim 3: We will use existing samples and data and continue to collect samples and data to (A) evaluate Mtb diversity in host, its dynamics overtime and in a specific set of drug resistance, drug tolerance, virulence and immune regulator genes, for evidence of directional and diversifying selection. We will (B) also evaluate how Mtb diversity and genes under selection associate with time-to culture conversion (three consecutive weeks of negative growth) and negative treatment outcomes, adherence, HIV, diabetes mellitus (DM), and substance use. We will (C) leverage MIC and sequence data from TRUST. We will combine these with a large public Mtb MIC and WGS dataset enriched for high-level antibiotic resistance generated by studies that include the NIAID funded Harvard TB Centers of Excellence for Translational Research (CETR). We will train an in silico MIC predictor and probe interactions between mutations and the Mtb lineage on a genome-wide scale. The current TRUST investigators, as well as Dr. Maha Farhat, Harvard Medical School will oversee this aim. Aim 4: A) To compare rates of dysglycemia (both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia) in people living with HIV (PLWH) and HIV-uninfected persons receiving TB treatment in order to assess changes in blood glucose levels from study enrollment by HIV status and how alcohol use mediates the relationship; and B) to assess the role stress, inflammation and alcohol consumption play in relation to blood sugar levels in PLWH and HIV-uninfected individuals and to assess epigenetic modifications at DNA sites known to be involved in TB risk and neutrophil, monocyte, T and B cell function. Culture-positive, pulmonary TB patients will be recruited in Worcester, South Africa, and followed over an 18-month period. Patients will complete an interviewer-administered questionnaire on their alcohol use and other health-related behaviors, and their recent alcohol use will be confirmed using a biomarker (phosphatidylethanol). Chest radiographs, sputum smears and culture, and blood samples will be collected to compare the biology of treatment response in patients with and without problem alcohol use. During the 6-month treatment period, smart mobile-phone technology will be used to document daily drug adherence by trained community workers. Serial measures of alcohol intake and serial sputa isolates will be collected to assess treatment response and TB drug side effects will be recorded. In addition, intensive PK/PD studies of isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide will be performed in 200 HIV-seronegative patients. The full cohort will be followed for 12 months post-treatment to examine long-term TB outcomes, including relapse and death.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDOT Adherence Monitoring

Study participants will meet with a study-employed DOT worker daily during weekdays throughout the course of their TB treatment

Sponsors

Medical Research Council, South Africa
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cape Town
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Stellenbosch
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. at least 15 years old 2. initiating TB treatment in South Africa 3. expect to remain in the local area for the next 2 years 4. agree to comply with all study requirements, including provision of contact information and attendance at all study appointments 5. provide written, informed consent to participate in the study if ≥18 years of age or written assent and parental consent if \<18 years.

Exclusion criteria

1. they have multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB (RIF resistance will be known at screening from Xpert MTB/RIF) 2. they have a contra-indication to start on standard 4-drug therapy 3. they are pregnant at study enrollment 4. they are HIV seropositive for aim 2 only

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Culture Conversion12 weeksTime to sterilization/culture conversion during the first twelve weeks of treatment in patients with problem alcohol use compared to those without
Cmax4 weeksPeak concentrations (Cmax) of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol in patients with problem alcohol use compared to those without
Area Under Curve (AUC)4 weeksIndividual patient steady state 24-hour area under curve (AUC) of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Poor Treatment Outcome18 monthsNumber and percent of participants that had favorable (defined as cured, treatment completed) and unfavorable (defined as treatmentfailure, death, relapse) TB outcomes. The 'other' category is defined as the treatment defaulted, was extended, participant moved or was transferred).
Side Effects to TB Drugs6 monthsNember and percentage of patients who develop side effects to the TB drugs in patients with problem alcohol use compared to those without

Countries

South Africa

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TRUST Cohort
TRUST Study Cohort
303
Total303

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
12 Weeks to 6 MonthsDeath1
12 Weeks to 6 MonthsLost to Follow-up4
12 Weeks to 6 MonthsMoved/transferred out1
12 Weeks to 6 MonthsTreatment failure1
12 Weeks to 6 MonthsWithdrawal by Subject4
6 Months to 18 MonthsDeath4
6 Months to 18 MonthsDiagnosed with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.1
6 Months to 18 MonthsLost to Follow-up24
6 Months to 18 MonthsMoved/transferred out6
6 Months to 18 MonthsRelapse/recurrence of TB8
6 Months to 18 MonthsStill in study.14
6 Months to 18 MonthsTreatment failure7
6 Months to 18 MonthsTreatment stopped due to liver injury.1
6 Months to 18 MonthsWithdrawal by Subject1
Baseline to 12 WeeksChanged treatment regimen, no longer on first line drugs.1
Baseline to 12 WeeksDeath1
Baseline to 12 WeeksLost to Follow-up2
Baseline to 12 WeeksMoved/Transferred out5
Baseline to 12 WeeksTreatment extended due to bacterial meningitis.1
Baseline to 12 WeeksWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTRUST Cohort
Age, Continuous37 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black African
16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Coloured/Mixed Ancestry
284 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indian/Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
303 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
182 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 303
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 303
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 303

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under Curve (AUC)

Individual patient steady state 24-hour area under curve (AUC) of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: AUC outcome measure data was collected for 104 study participants who were enrolled into Aim 2 for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. This measure was collected for 4 first-line TB medications: rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TRUST CohortArea Under Curve (AUC)Rifampin22.2 mg x h/L
TRUST CohortArea Under Curve (AUC)Isoniazid6.32 mg x h/L
TRUST CohortArea Under Curve (AUC)Pyrazinamide259 mg x h/L
TRUST CohortArea Under Curve (AUC)Ethambutol13.2 mg x h/L
Primary

Cmax

Peak concentrations (Cmax) of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol in patients with problem alcohol use compared to those without

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Cmax outcome measure data was collected for 104 study participants who were enrolled into Aim 2 for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. This measure was collected for 4 first-line TB medications: rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TRUST CohortCmaxRifampicin5.29 mg/L
TRUST CohortCmaxIsoniazid1.63 mg/L
TRUST CohortCmaxPyrazinamide28.5 mg/L
TRUST CohortCmaxEthambutol1.98 mg/L
Primary

Time to Culture Conversion

Time to sterilization/culture conversion during the first twelve weeks of treatment in patients with problem alcohol use compared to those without

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Individuals newly diagnosed with tuberculosis and initiating treatment were classified at baseline into either Low Alcohol Use (n=102), Moderate Alcohol Use (n=133), and High Alcohol Use (n=65). 3 participants were missing data on alcohol use as their baseline PEth tests were water damaged. Therefore the overall number of participants analyzed was 300 and the respective number of participants for each of the 3 levels of alcohol use are provided as just described.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TRUST CohortTime to Culture ConversionLow Alcohol Use5.6 weeksStandard Deviation 2.5
TRUST CohortTime to Culture ConversionModerate Alcohol Use5.4 weeksStandard Deviation 2.5
TRUST CohortTime to Culture ConversionHigh Alcohol Use5.5 weeksStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Poor Treatment Outcome

Number and percent of participants that had favorable (defined as cured, treatment completed) and unfavorable (defined as treatmentfailure, death, relapse) TB outcomes. The 'other' category is defined as the treatment defaulted, was extended, participant moved or was transferred).

Time frame: 18 months

Population: 3 individuals were excluded from overall numbers (total N=303) because they didn't have baseline Peth collected, so there did not have alcohol use data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TRUST CohortPoor Treatment OutcomeFavorable246 Participants
TRUST CohortPoor Treatment OutcomeUnfavorable24 Participants
TRUST CohortPoor Treatment OutcomeOther19 Participants
TRUST CohortPoor Treatment OutcomeMissing11 Participants
Secondary

Side Effects to TB Drugs

Nember and percentage of patients who develop side effects to the TB drugs in patients with problem alcohol use compared to those without

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 3 individuals were excluded from overall numbers (total N=303) because they didn't have baseline Peth collected, so they did not have alcohol use data

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TRUST CohortSide Effects to TB DrugsSide effects154 Participants
TRUST CohortSide Effects to TB DrugsNo side effects146 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026