Skip to content

Evaluation of Medical Practice in the Management of Bone Metastases After Injectable Bone Antiresorptive Treatment, and Its Influence on Quality of Life

Evaluation of Medical Practice in the Management of Bone Metastases After Injectable Bone Antiresorptive Treatment, and Its Influence on Quality of Life

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02839291
Acronym
PRISM
Enrollment
148
Registered
2016-07-20
Start date
2016-06-14
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tumor With Bone Metastasis

Brief summary

To evaluate the current medical practice and its influence on health-related quality of life, in patients who are treated with injectable bone antiresorptive drugs (biphosphonates or denosumab) for at least one year.

Detailed description

This protocol will evaluate the pursuit of injectable bone antiresorptive treatments or their switch to oral biphosphonates, or treatment stop, in the contexte of medical practice. The primary end-point is the health-related quality of life (QoL). Secondary endpoints are safety, overall survial, the impact of toxicities of the treatment on QoL, and the description of supportive care.

Interventions

DRUGintravenous or oral bone antiresorptive treatments

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with histologically proven tumor with bone metastasis, single or multiple (with or without metastasis extra-osseous) * Patients treated with injectable bone antiresorptive therapy for 12 months or more * Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* patient with any medical or psychiatric condition or disease which would make the patient inappropriate to complete quality of life questionaries * patient under guardianship, curator or under the protection of justice, pregnant or breast-feeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
evaluation of 4 targeted dimensions of the EORTC-QLQ-BM22 quality of life questionarieto 6 monthsevaluation of 4 parameters: painful sites characteristics of pain, functional impairment, psychosocial aspect

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026