Skip to content

TRANscatheter or SurgIcal Aortic Valve ReplacemenT in All-Comers With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Prospective, Open Label, Multicenter, Dual Arm, Randomized Trial of TRANscatheter or SurgIcal Aortic Valve ReplacemenT in All-Comers With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02838199
Acronym
TRANSIT
Enrollment
0
Registered
2016-07-20
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2016-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, TAVR, TAVI, SAVR

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine that Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with SAPIEN 3 is superior to traditional surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR) with bio-prosthesis regarding the rate of all-cause mortality at 1 year in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis.

Interventions

DEVICESAPIEN 3
PROCEDURESAVR

Sponsors

CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Seung-Jung Park
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age must be at least 19 and less than 75 years old * Severe aortic valve stenosis with echocardiographically derived criteria: mean gradient \> 40mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s AND an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤ 0.8 cm2. Echocardiogram must be within 3 months of the date of the procedure * Patient is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA class II or greater. * The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

* Life expectancy \<1 year due to medical illness * Suspected Malignancy * Inoperability evaluated by surgeon * Concomitant severe coronary artery disease not amenable for percutaneous coronary intervention * Concomitant severe mitral valve or significant aorta disease requiring surgery * Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months of procedure * Leukopenia (WBC\<3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb\<8g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelet \< 50000 cell/mL) * Intracardiac thrombus * A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure. * Native aortic annulus size \< 18 mm or \> 25 mm as measured by echocardiogram. * Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of aortic stenosis * Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
event rate of all-cause mortality1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
event rate of myocardial Infarction30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
event rate of all Stroke and transient ischemic attack30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
event rate of bleeding30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
event rate of vascular access site and access-related complication30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
event rate of acute kidney injury30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
event rate of permanent pacemaker insertion30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
event rate of cardiovascular mortality30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
event rate of prosthetic valve dysfunction30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longerProsthetic aortic valve stenosis Prosthesis-patient mismatch Prosthetic aortic valve regurgitation
event rate of composite event for device success, early safety, clinical efficacy30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longerNumber of cases with following events ; A. Device success or B. Early safety (At 30 days): All-cause mortality, all stroke, life threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary obstruction requiring intervention, major vascular complication, valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure. or C. Clinical efficacy (After 30 days): All-cause mortality, all stroke, requiring hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure, NYHA class III or IV, valve related dysfunction.
event rate of structural valve deterioration30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longer
NYHA (New York Heart Association Functional Classification)30days and 1 year
Valve area30days and 1 yearAortic valve area (AVA) measured by 2D-transthoracic echocardiography using the continuity equation.
event rate of free from atrial fibrillation30days and 1 year
event rate of other TAVR-related complication30 days or hospital discharge, whichever is longerConversion to open surgery Coronary obstruction Mitral valve apparatus damage or dysfunction Cardiac tamponade Endocarditis Valve thrombosis Valve malpositioning TAV-in-TAV deployment

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026