Skip to content

Prevena™ vs Dermabond in Groin Wound Infections in Vascular Surgery

Prevena™ Incision Management System Versus Dermabond in the Prevention of Groin Wound Infections in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02836990
Enrollment
105
Registered
2016-07-19
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2020-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound Infection

Brief summary

This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of Prevena Incision Management System versus Dermabond in preventing groin wound infections in patients who undergo vascular surgery requiring a groin wound. Half of the patients will receive Dermabond and the other half will receive the Prevena Incision Management System for their groin wounds.

Detailed description

Dermabond and the Prevena Incision Management System are both FDA approved wound care products. Prevena is a negative pressure system which holds the wound together and removes exudate and debris from the site to prevent infection. Dermabond is a surgical glue which holds the wound together to prevents infection. Prevena is more expensive to apply. However, the hypothesis is that the Prevena System will decrease infection rates and therefore, decrease the ultimate cost of the health care needed after surgery.

Interventions

A negative pressure system which holds incision edges together and removes exudate and debris from site to prevent surgical wound infections

DEVICEDermabond

A surgical skin adhesive used to prevent surgical wound infections

Sponsors

KCI USA, Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
State University of New York at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. In need of elective vascular procedure requiring ≥8 cm groin incision. 2. Able to provide consent 3. Able to care for wound or have support person to complete wound care 4. Willing to comply with follow-up

Exclusion criteria

None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Healing of Groin Wounds Between Patients Treated With Prevena vs Dermabond30 daysThe primary effectiveness endpoint is 30 day healing of the randomized groin incision, with any wound infection or failure to heal. Szilagyi wound infection grade quantified on an ordinal scale will be used to assess the healing (None, Grade I: Infection contained to the dermis, Grade II: Infection extending into the subcutaneous tissue but the arterial graft is not involved, Grade III: Infection of the arterial graft or native vessel underlying the incision). Healing is assessed by complete sealing of the incision with no residual separation or drainage. All of the incisions were primarily closed, so a healed incision would have no gaps between the skin edges. This is a visual inspection. Szilagi is an assessment of the grade of wound infection for those that did not heal. It is well recognized and published, and noted as above for patients with vascular exposure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of Care30 daysComparison of cost of treatment between the two arms
Number of Visiting Nurses Home Visits and Physician Office Visits to Assess/Treat Wound Infection30 daysPhysician office visits for diagnosis of Infection or visiting nurse visits for diagnosis of infection ONLY were assessed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from UBMD Vascular Surgery Office and were consented at the time of surgery at Buffalo General Medical Center between 2016 and 2019.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prevena
Prevena Incision Management System for vascular surgical groin wounds Prevena Incision Management System: A negative pressure system which holds incision edges together and removes exudate and debris from site to prevent surgical wound infections
46
Dermabond
Dermabond for vascular surgical groin wounds Dermabond: A surgical skin adhesive used to prevent surgical wound infections
55
Total101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDermabondTotalPrevena
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
35 Participants65 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants36 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants14 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
51 Participants87 Participants36 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
55 participants101 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants36 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants65 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 460 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 460 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 462 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Healing of Groin Wounds Between Patients Treated With Prevena vs Dermabond

The primary effectiveness endpoint is 30 day healing of the randomized groin incision, with any wound infection or failure to heal. Szilagyi wound infection grade quantified on an ordinal scale will be used to assess the healing (None, Grade I: Infection contained to the dermis, Grade II: Infection extending into the subcutaneous tissue but the arterial graft is not involved, Grade III: Infection of the arterial graft or native vessel underlying the incision). Healing is assessed by complete sealing of the incision with no residual separation or drainage. All of the incisions were primarily closed, so a healed incision would have no gaps between the skin edges. This is a visual inspection. Szilagi is an assessment of the grade of wound infection for those that did not heal. It is well recognized and published, and noted as above for patients with vascular exposure.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PrevenaComparison of Healing of Groin Wounds Between Patients Treated With Prevena vs Dermabond41 Participants
DermabondComparison of Healing of Groin Wounds Between Patients Treated With Prevena vs Dermabond54 Participants
Secondary

Cost of Care

Comparison of cost of treatment between the two arms

Time frame: 30 days

Population: not analyzed as the primary outcome did not demonstrate improved outcomes, and the device being tested, wound vacuum, was more expensive. Had outcomes clinically been improved, financial assessment would have determined whether cost of infection outweighed cost of device.

Secondary

Number of Visiting Nurses Home Visits and Physician Office Visits to Assess/Treat Wound Infection

Physician office visits for diagnosis of Infection or visiting nurse visits for diagnosis of infection ONLY were assessed.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PrevenaNumber of Visiting Nurses Home Visits and Physician Office Visits to Assess/Treat Wound Infection7 Participants
DermabondNumber of Visiting Nurses Home Visits and Physician Office Visits to Assess/Treat Wound Infection7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026