Skip to content

Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Treatment of Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B (China)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) 25 mg QD Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300 mg QD for the Treatment of HBeAg Positive, Chronic Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02836249
Enrollment
181
Registered
2016-07-18
Start date
2015-06-19
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2024-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HBV, Chronic HBV Infection

Keywords

Hepatitis, Tenofovir, Viread

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in China.

Detailed description

This study GS-US-320-0110 is an international study planned to enroll participants in global countries, including China. However, due to the review timeline difference in China, full enrollment was reached in the main study (NCT01940471) before China was able to participate. Therefore, this registration only includes the China cohorts as they were not part of the main study analysis. Data for China cohorts were analyzed separately after the main study analysis was completed.

Interventions

DRUGTAF

TAF 25 mg tablet administered orally once daily

DRUGTDF

TDF 300 mg tablet administered orally once daily

TAF placebo tablet administered orally once daily

TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of study procedures * Adult males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females * Documented evidence of chronic HBV infection * HBeAg-positive, chronic hepatitis B with all of the following: * HBeAg-positive at screening * Screening HBV DNA ≥ 2 x 10\^4 IU/mL * Screening serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level \> 60 U/L (males) or \> 38 U/L (females) and ≤ 10 x the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) * Treatment-naive participants (defined as \< 12 weeks of oral antiviral treatment with any nucleoside or nucleotide analogue) OR treatment-experienced participants (defined as participants meeting all entry criteria \[including HBV DNA and serum ALT criteria\] and with ≥ 12 weeks of previous treatment with any nucleoside or nucleotide analogue) * Previous treatment with interferon (pegylated or non-pegylated) must have ended at least 6 months prior to the baseline visit * Adequate renal function * Normal ECG Key

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are breastfeeding * Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to use an effective, protocol specified method(s) of contraception during the study * Co-infection with hepatitis C virus, HIV, or hepatitis D virus * Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma * Any history of, or current evidence of, clinical hepatic decompensation * Abnormal hematological and biochemical parameters, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 10 x ULN * Received solid organ or bone marrow transplant * History of malignancy within the past 5 years, with the exception of specific cancers that are cured by surgical resection; individuals under evaluation for possible malignancy are not eligible * Currently receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents capable of modifying renal excretion * Individuals receiving ongoing therapy with drugs not to be used with tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or individuals with a known hypersensitivity to study drugs, metabolites, or formulation excipients * Current alcohol or substance abuse judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with participant compliance * Any other clinical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the participant unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with dosing requirements Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 48Week 48

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 48Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48Baseline; Week 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum CreatinineBaseline; Week 48

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Up to 48 weeksGrades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in China.

Pre-assignment details

226 participants were screened in China.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mg
Tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy®; TAF) 25 mg tablet + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread®; TDF) placebo tablet once daily for up to 144 weeks (per amendment 3.1).
123
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mg
TDF 300 mg tablet + TAF placebo tablet once daily for up to 144 weeks (per amendment 3.1).
57
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseInvestigator's discretion0100
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up0100
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseNon-compliance with study drug1000
Double-Blind Treatment PhasePregnancy3100
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseRandomized but Never Treated0100
Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWithdrew Consent5200
Open-Label TAF Treatment PhaseDeath0010
Open-Label TAF Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy0010
Open-Label TAF Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up0061
Open-Label TAF Treatment PhasePregnancy0010
Open-Label TAF Treatment PhaseWithdrew consent0043

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDouble-Blind: TAF 25 mgDouble-Blind: TDF 300 mgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
121 Participants57 Participants178 Participants
Age, Continuous34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
123 Participants57 Participants180 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
HBV DNA7.2 log10 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65
7.2 log10 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.48
7.2 log10 IU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
IL28b Status
CC
109 Participants52 Participants161 Participants
IL28b Status
CT
12 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
IL28b Status
TT
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Oral antiviral (OAV) Treatment Status
Treatment Experienced
45 Participants18 Participants63 Participants
Oral antiviral (OAV) Treatment Status
Treatment Naive
78 Participants39 Participants117 Participants
Plasma HBV DNA Level
< 8 log10 IU/mL
74 Participants36 Participants110 Participants
Plasma HBV DNA Level
≥ 8 log10 IU/mL
49 Participants21 Participants70 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 0
117 Participants54 Participants171 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 1
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 2
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Proteinuria by Urinalysis (dipstick)
Grade 3
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
123 Participants57 Participants180 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants13 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants44 Participants132 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1230 / 571 / 1130 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
85 / 12343 / 5784 / 11342 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 1233 / 577 / 1134 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who were randomized into the study and received at least 1 dose of study drugs. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 4861.0 percentage of participants
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA < 29 IU/mL at Week 4868.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Missing data were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum Creatinine-0.003 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.0701
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Serum Creatinine0.016 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.092
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Serologically Evaluable Full Analysis Set: participants who were randomized, had received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were HBeAg positive and anti-HBe negative or had a value missing value at baseline. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment group. All missing data were treated as no HBeAg seroconversion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 4811.0 percentage of participants
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Seroconversion to Antibody Against Hepatitis B e Antigen (Anti-HBe) at Week 488.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Hip Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis Set (participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drugs, and had nonmissing baseline hip BMD values) with available data were analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Missing data were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 480.624 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.2731
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48-1.507 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.4193
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Spine DXA Analysis Set (participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drugs, and had nonmissing baseline spine BMD values) with available data were analyzed. Dual-energy x ray absorptiometry scans were performed only at sites in China with capability. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Missing data were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 480.683 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.3281
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48-2.169 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.4503
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48

Grades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method.

Time frame: Up to 48 weeks

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with at least 1 postbaseline urine protein value were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 124.4 percentage of participants
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 20.8 percentage of participants
Double-Blind: TAF 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 30 percentage of participants
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 122.8 percentage of participants
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 23.5 percentage of participants
Double-Blind: TDF 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria by Urinalysis (Dipstick) Through Week 48Grade 30 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026