Skip to content

Integrated Collaborative Care Teams for Youth With Mental Health and/or Addiction Challenges (YouthCan IMPACT)

Integrated Collaborative Care Teams to Enhance Service Delivery to Youth With Mental Health and Substance Use Challenges: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized-controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02836080
Enrollment
247
Registered
2016-07-18
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2026-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Addiction, Mental Disorders

Keywords

Mental Health, Randomized, Pragmatic, Integrated Collaborative Care, Addiction, Youth

Brief summary

Among youth, the prevalence of mental health and addiction (MHA) disorders is roughly 20%, yet youth are challenged to access services in a timely fashion. To address MHA system gaps, this study will test the benefits of an Integrated Collaborative Care Team (ICCT) model for at-risk youth with MHA challenges. In partnership with community agencies, adolescent psychiatry hospital departments, and family health teams, investigators have developed an innovative model of service provision involving rapid access to MHA services. This model will be implemented and compared to the usual treatment youth receive in hospital-based, outpatient, mental health clinics in Toronto. A rapid, systematic, approach to MHA services geared to need in a youth-friendly environment is expected to result in better MHA outcomes for youth. Moreover, the ICCT approach is expected to decrease service wait-times, be more youth- and family-centred, and be more cost-effective.

Detailed description

This study is a pragmatic randomized control trial (RCT) with random allocation occurring within each hospital site to either treatment as usual (TAU) (4 out-patient hospital sites) or treatment at one of 3 community-based Integrated Collaborative Care Teams (ICCTs). A total of 500 youth aged 14-18 with mental health and/or addictions (MHA) concerns, referred for out-patient services at one of four local hospitals, will be randomized to receive ICCT care versus TAU. For each youth, a primary caregiver will also be recruited into the study, if available. With wide inclusion criteria and a design meant to emulate a "real world" setting, this study will rigorously evaluate a service delivery model composed of multiple interventions for youth presenting with a broad range of MHA problems. The ICCT is expected to result in better MHA outcomes, show better performance indicators, and be more cost-effective than TAU.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIntegrated Collaborative Care Team (ICCT)

An integrated, collaborative pathway of needs-based services. ICCTs will offer a wide variety of services, including Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) on a scheduled and walk-in basis, care navigators, various clinician-guided interventions, psychiatry, nurse practitioner services, access to primary care, and peer support, all co-located in youth-friendly, community-based clinics. For each intervention, standardized intervention protocols will be used.

OTHERTreatment as Usual (TAU)

Standard out-patient treatment provided at each participating hospital site. This typically entails referral to a psychiatrist at the participating hospital, who will provide assessment and treatment, with referral to appropriate services, guided by local treatment protocols.

Sponsors

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Lead SponsorOTHER
East Metro Youth Services
CollaboratorOTHER
Delisle Youth Services
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
LOFT Community Services
CollaboratorOTHER
The Sashbear Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Anne Johnston Health Station
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
South East Toronto Family Health Team
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical Psychiatry Alliance
CollaboratorOTHER
Graham Boeckh Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
The Ontario Spor Support Unit
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Provision of informed consent 2. Aged 14 - 17 years 11 months 3. New referrals to one of the four participating hospitals for out-patient MHA services 4. Among the population regularly accepted for out-patient services at that hospital

Exclusion criteria

1. Referral for specialty forensic or firesetting treatment 2. Moderate to severe intellectual disability or autism without MHA problems 3. Primary diagnosis of an eating disorder 4. Active psychosis or imminent risk of self-harm requiring immediate intervention 5. Inability to read and write English or to consent to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Youth functioningOne yearMeasured using the Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical improvementOne yearMeasured using Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Problematic substance useOne yearAssessed using the GAIN Short Screener and the substance use table of the Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Involvement Scale
Satisfaction with the service modelsOne yearAssessed using the Ontario Perception of Care Tool for Mental Health and Addictions
Goal attainmentOne yearMeasured using a custom form indicating goals established by the youth and caregiver at intake, followed by a rating of goal attainment
Client empowerment and engagementOne yearMeasured using the Family Empowerment Scale for caregivers, and the Youth Efficacy/Empowerment Scale for youth
Caregiver burdenOne yearMeasured using the Burden Assessment Scale
Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)One yearMeasured using the Assessment of Quality of Life-6D (AQOL-6D)
Continuity of careOne yearMeasured using the Continuity of Care in Children's Mental Health questionnaire
Cost-effective analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA)One yearIncremental costs of ICCT compared to TAU (treatment as usual) in improving health outcomes

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJoanna Henderson, Ph.D., C.Psych

Director, Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health; Clinician Scientist, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Associate Professor, Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Toronto

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPeter Szatmari, MD, FRCPC

Chief, Child and Youth Mental Health Collaborative, The Hospital for Sick Children and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Professor and Head of the Division of Child and Youth Mental Health, University of Toronto

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmy Cheung, MD, FRCPC

Associate Scientist, Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute; Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKristin Cleverley, RN, Ph.D.

CAMH Chair in Mental Health Nursing Research; Assistant Professor, University of Toronto; Clinician-Scientist, Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth & Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGloria Chaim, M.S.W.

Associate Director, Child Youth and Family Services; Head, Community Engagement and Partnership, Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health, CAMH; Assistant Professor, Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Toronto

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026