Skip to content

Frail Elderly Subjects - Evaluation and Follow-Up

Frail Elderly Subjects: Inhospital Pathways and Adverse Outcome After Hospitalisation Via Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02834728
Acronym
SAFES Cohort
Enrollment
1306
Registered
2016-07-15
Start date
2001-03-31
Completion date
2005-12-31
Last updated
2016-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frail Elderly People

Brief summary

This was a prospective multicenter cohort study of elderly people admitted to medical wards via emergency departments. Subjects were followed up to 36 months. It aimed to study the inhospital pathways and adverse geriatric outcomes. In all, 1306 subjects were included : 85+/-5 years, and mainly women (65%).

Detailed description

The SAFES cohort was formed within a National Research Program (funded by the French Ministry of health) into the recruitment of emergency units in nine teaching hospitals. All nine centres had a geriatric ward. The inclusion of subjects ran from March 1st 2001 to January 17th 2002. To be eligible, patients were to be 75 or over, to have been hospitalised in a medical ward in the same hospital as the emergency unit to which they were initially admitted. Subjects were not eligible if hospitalisation was into intensive care or surgery, or if admission did not occur after admission to the emergency unit. Every day in each centre, patients admitted to the emergency unit were registered. From the list thus obtained, patients were selected by random draw stratified at two levels: in each week, 5 days were selected randomly, and for each of these days, two patients were chosen randomly. Next, each patient was visited by a specialist in geriatrics familiar with the survey procedures. In the course of this interview, patients were informed about the study, prior to signing the consent form. If the clinical status and/or the cognitive status of the patient did not enable informed consent, the interviewer referred to the subject's representative. Follow-up was by telephone interview after the 1st, 8th and 21st month and by face-to-face interviews after the 5th, 12th, 18th, and 24th month following the initial hospitalisation. Several outcome have been studied.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALtelephone interview

Sponsors

CHU de Reims
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 75 years or over * Admitted to medical ward via emergency department * Consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Not hospitalised after emergency department stay * Admitted to surgery or intensive car unit * Died before signing informed consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mortalityup to 36 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026