Skip to content

Rational Approach to a Unilateral Pleural Effusion2

Rational Approach to Unilateral Pleural Effusion in Patients Suspected of Malignancy. Efficacy, Pain, Quality of Life, and Economy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02834455
Acronym
REPEAT
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-07-15
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2020-12-15
Last updated
2020-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Keywords

Thoracoscopy

Brief summary

Recurrent unilateral, non-infectious pleural exudate is suspicious for primary or secondary pleural malignancy. Both conditions are associated with 5-year survival of 10%. Work-up is difficult, as the pleural surface is large and \<33% of pleural malignancies shed malignant cells to the pleural fluid. Even so, additional tissue biopsies are needed for establishing mutation status for targeted therapies. Optimal imaging to guide tissue sampling is pivotal. PET-CT has higher sensitivity than conventional CT for detecting malignant lesions \>10mm. However, no randomised trial has investigated differences in diagnostic accuracy, time-to-diagnosis, or economics. Falsely PET-positive lesions in e.g. colon however, lead to more derived tests than do CT alone. Gold standard for pleural tissue sampling is the surgical (VATS) thoracoscopy, allowing direct visual guiding of tissue sampling from all pleural surfaces. Yet, globally the medical (pleuroscopy) thoracoscopy is more widely used: cheaper, outpatient procedure, but allows only sampling from the parietal pleura. To date, no randomised studies have compared medical and surgical thoracoscopy concerning diagnostic hit rates, adverse events, or economics. The investigators will perform two randomized studies to investigate whether 1. PET/CT is comparable to CT alone 2. VATS is comparable to pleuroscopy concerning hit rate, total investigations performed, time-to-diagnosis.

Interventions

50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a CE-CT

DEVICEPET-CT

50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a PET-CT

Sponsors

Simon Reuter
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with recurrent pleural effusion of unknown origin after a first pleural tap according to BTS guidelines. 2. Indication for thoracoscopy according to BTS guidelines. 3. Patients accept further investigation according to Danish and BTS guidelines. 4. Have received oral and written consent and agreed. 5. At the time of inclusion, above 18 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

1. Female patients: pregnancy or breastfeeding. 2. Lack of language comprehension. 3. Legally incompetent patients. 4. Life expectancy less than 3 month. 5. Contraindications to pleural tissue sampling.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of diagnostic thoracoscopies (either MT or VATS)2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of derived investigations (i.e. gastroscopy, coloscopy)2 years
Number of patients diagnosed with cancer (cancer = an unequivocal diagnosis of neoplastic disease; no cancer = clinically benign cause, and improved imaging at 6 month control)2 years
Patient satisfaction and patient perceived discomfort2 yearsUsing QLQC 30
Total costs calculated as costs patient-related, procedure-related, and overall2 years
Total procedures before cancer-diagnosis (cancer = yes/no)2 years

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026