Skip to content

Impact of Child Positioning on Pain During a Lumbar Puncture

Impact Assessment of Positioning on Pain Sensitivity During a Lumbar Puncture in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02834156
Acronym
PHIPA-PEPL
Enrollment
28
Registered
2016-07-15
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2017-08-23
Last updated
2018-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematological Malignancies

Brief summary

This protocol is a pilot study on standard care. The main goal is to assess the impact of positioning on lumbar puncture process especially on pain sensitivity in children. It's a prospective, monocentric, randomized, open-label, cross-over study. Inclusion period is one year, and number of inclusions forecasted is about 30. Each patient will have one LP in a seated position and one in a lying position.

Detailed description

In Pediatric Oncology Hematology, invasive procedures such lumbar punctures or myelograms are essential to diseases diagnosis and treatment. In hematological malignancies, lumbar punctures are particularly frequent as the therapy processes. Despite a good analgesia, this repeated procedure can generate pain, anxiety, apprehension leading to an increasing difficulty in the procedure realization. Two positions are possible to carry out lumbar puncture: seated or lying position. The main goal of this study is to assess the impact of the child positioning during the lumbar puncture process in term of pain, anxiety and stress. This study is a prospective, monocentric, randomized, open-label, cross-over study. Inclusion period is 1 year, 30 patients will be included from 2 to 18 years old. Each patient will have 2 LP one in seated and one in lying position in a specific order determined by randomization. All data regarding pain and anxiety will be collected the day of LP. Patients will be re contacted 48 hours and 15 days after LP procedure in order to evaluate complications such post-lumbar puncture syndrome or hematoma. The main analysis will be done on intent-to-treat-analysis basis and will compare pain intensity between the two groups.

Interventions

OTHERLP in a seated position then LP in a lying position
OTHERLP in a lying position then LP in a seated position

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 2 and 18 years old * Patients requiring at least 2 therapeutic lumbar punctures * Patients able to receive analgesic procedure according to 20005 good practices recommendation * Presence of one parent during LP procedure * Child able to use assessment scales * LP realized with a 20 G needle * Platelets \> 50000 * Child with prior clinical examination * Affiliated to a health care insurance regimen

Exclusion criteria

* Seated or lying position impossible * Lumbar puncture contraindication * Patient or parent opposition to second LP realization in the required position * Clotting trouble on LP day not allowing the LP procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain sensitivity during the lumbar puncture procedure.duration of the procedureIt will be evaluated throw specific pain assessment scales according to patient age

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Anxiety during the lumbar puncture procedure on a scale of one to tenduration of the procedure
Time of the lumbar puncture procedureduration of the procedure

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026