Skip to content

Comparative Analysis of the Visual Performance After TICL Implantation in Patients With Stable Keratoconus

Comparative Analysis of the Visual Performance in Patients With Stable Keratoconus After Implantation of the Toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL).

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02833649
Acronym
TICL
Enrollment
24
Registered
2016-07-14
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2016-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Keywords

Keratoconus, Crosslinking, Toric ICL

Brief summary

To report on 4-year postoperative safety, efficacy, stability and predictability outcomes(to evaluate the visual, refractive, contrast sensitivity, defocus curve and aberrometric data preoperation, and compare with a similar postoperative outcomes) with the Toric Implantable Contact Lens (TICL) for Stable keratoconus. Investigators will study the four-year follow-up from this standardized, multi-center clinical investigation, support from clinical and optical viewpoints TICL implantation, in stable keratoconus.

Interventions

The toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) is conventionally indicated for the Correcting the refractive error in keratoconus using the TICL is an off label use of the lens.

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 38 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age (25-38). * Stable refraction was distinctive by 6 subjective refractions within ± 0.50 diopters(D) of spherical equivalent during 6 months after CXL. * best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of +0.4 LogMAR (20/40) or better, -clear central cornea. * normal anterior chamber depth at least 3 mm to endothelium . * intraocular pressure (IOP)\<20 mm Hg and preoperative endothelial cell count related to age and the anterior chamber depth with regard to Food and Drug Administration recommendations. * Width of Angle greater than 30°, a pupil diameter of less than 6.25 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with central corneal thickness of less than 450 μm. * endothelial cell count of less than 2,000 cells/mm2 . * anterior chamber depth of \<3 mm from endothelium to anterior capsule . * Corneal opacification or scars, cataract, retinal detachment, glaucoma, retinopathy, macular degeneration, neuro ophthalmic diseases or ocular inflammation, history of keratitis (any form), peripheral marginal degeneration, previous corneal and/or intraocular surgeries, and autoimmune and/or connective tissue disease. The central corneal thickness limit of 450 μm would account for around 400 μm of remaining stromal thickness after removal of the epithelium, which is considered as the safety thickness for the residual stroma to avoid endothelial cell damage during the CXL procedure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual acuity (UCVA,BCVA) by Snellen chartUp to 4 years after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Refractive error by Auto Kerato-RefractometerUntil 4 years after surgery
Defocus curve by PhoropterUp to 4 years after surgery
Patient satisfaction to measure the patients' subjective assessment of visual improvement by a validated questionnaireup to 4 years after surgery
Contrast sensitivity by MediWorks C901 Acuity Chart (Shanghai MediWorks Precision Instruments Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.up to 4 years after surgery
Aberrometry by Ray TracingUp to 4 years after surgery

Countries

Iran

Contacts

Primary ContactFarideh Doroodgar, MD
farinaz_144@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026