Skip to content

A Multi-center, Randomized, Subject Blind, Active Controlled Design Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Volus as Compared to PowerFill® for Temporary Penile Enhancement

A Multi-center, Randomized, Subject Blind, Active Controlled Design Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Volus as Compared to PowerFill® for Temporary Penile Enhancement

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02833532
Enrollment
68
Registered
2016-07-14
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Penile Enhancement

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate non-inferial study of the after using Volus application, compared to the powerfill.

Interventions

DEVICEVolus/Powerfill

Maximum: 22ml

Sponsors

Associacio catalana per a la recerca oncologica i les seves implicacions sanitaries i socials
CollaboratorOTHER
Hugel
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male subjects aged above 20 and below 65. (20≤male≥65) 2. be rating himself, when screening, as Small or Very Small on Self-Questioned Questionnaire ( SQQ) including the question: How do you rate your penile size? // Very small, Small, Normal, Big, Very Big? 3. During the study period, subjects will not received any treatments associated with penile enhancement. 4. Subjects will sign an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior treatment for penile enhancement (e.g. fat, dermal graft). 2. Subjects who have penile malformation (e.g. Peyronie's disease), which can make impossible to perform the intervention 3. Allergic to hyalluronic acid. 4. Inflammatory or/and infectious disease on penis that can affect on this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the Penile Circumference difference at 24 weeks from Baseline value after using Volus application, compared to the Control.baseline, 24 weeksPenile Circumference: The average of Distal-, Mid-, and Proximal-penis measurements when relaxed by tape measurement. Baseline value: Measured baseline length before the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Difference in Penile Circumference (each to be measured) at 4, 12 weeks (post last treatment) from Baseline value after using Volus application, compared to the Control.baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
The Difference in 5-point scale of penile appearance (each to be measured) at 4, 12, 24 weeks (post last treatment) from Baseline value after using Volus application, compared to the Control.baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
The Difference in 5-point scale of sexual satisfaction (each to be measured) at 12, 24 weeks (post last treatment)from Baseline value after using Volus application, compared to the Control.baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
The Difference in penile length† (each to be measured) at 4, 12, 24 weeks (post last treatment) from ‡B after using Volus application, compared to the Control.baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks† penile length: A length of penile distribution measured from the ventral side of pubo-penile skin junction to the apex of prepuce when relaxed using a tape( or stick)- measure.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026