Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis, Osteoarthritis, Parkinson's Disease, Sjögren's Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Neuromusculoskeletal condition
Brief summary
Maintaining a healthy diet and engaging in routine physical activity may help decrease severity of symptoms, prevent secondary conditions, and slow functional decline in people with disabling neuromusculoskeletal conditions. However, people with these conditions face many health barriers to engaging in healthy behaviors. With the advent of portable technologies, such as smart phones, tablets and PDAs, there is a need to explore whether these technologies can help people with disabling conditions to stay motivated and overcome barriers to engaging in healthy behaviors.
Detailed description
The overarching goal of this mixed methods, comparative effectiveness randomized controlled pilot study is to evaluate whether goal setting, self-monitoring, and barrier management using a computer tablet can increase physical activity behavior, improve nutritional habits, and promote health-related quality of life in people with disabling neuromusculoskeletal conditions. Our hypothesis is that, in comparison to the standard care contact control group, participants in both the tablet group and the paper and pencil group will yield significant improvements in healthy behaviors,with the tablet group yielding significantly larger increases.
Interventions
A computer tablet application to set goals,self-monitor healthy behaviors, record condition-related symptom impact, and self-manage a problematic symptom.
Use of paper and pencil diaries and worksheets to set goals, record condition-related symptom impact, and self-monitor behaviors.
Participants are prescribed an exercise program and given information on healthy eating.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Physician-confirmed diagnosis of a neuro-musculoskeletal condition or disease of the nerves, muscles, and/or bones that results in functional limitations * Physician consent to engage in home exercise/physical activity program * Regularly inactive (i.e., engaging in 90 minutes or less of purposeful physical activity each week) * Scoring ≤17 mental composite and ≤16 physical composite on the Global Health Questionnaire. * Have internet access (i.e., home, library or other WiFi location)
Exclusion criteria
* If the only disabling condition reported is not considered a neuro-musculoskeletal disease * Have hand-motor function impairments that would limit use of the tablet * Often engage in healthy eating habits * Are frequent fallers (i.e., more than 3 falls per month) * Have a diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, serious mental health disorder, chronic heart failure, myocardial infarction, and other unstable/severe cardiovascular conditions, and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (e.g., admission to the hospital within the past 6 months for uncontrolled diabetes) * Have severe cognitive deficits * Reports consistently tracking and monitoring health behaviors * Unable to effectively use the tablet technology during the pre-intervention usability demonstration
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity | Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later | Physical Activity and Disability Survey-Revised was administered to assess physical activity behavior. Scores can range from -2.7493 to 3.3671. Higher scores on the Physical Activity and Disability Survey-Revised indicates increased physical activity levels. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function | Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) was used to measure self-report physical function. Measures are scored on a T-score metric. High scores indicate more of the concept being measured. A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. |
| Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test | Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later | — |
| Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy | Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later | Exercise Confidence Survey was used to measure self-efficacy. The survey asks about confidence in sticking to an exercise program and making time for exercise. This is a 12 item questionnaire and scores ranges from 1 to 60. A higher score indicates increased confidence to engage in exercise. |
| Changes From Baseline in Weight | Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later | — |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Computer Tablet Group A computer tablet application to set goals,self-monitor healthy behaviors, record condition-related symptom impact, and self-manage a problematic symptom.
Computer Tablet Group: Participants will first meet once with a trained health education specialist. During this meeting the health education specialist will work with the participant in setting constructive and manageable goals and how to achieve them safely. Participants will then receive weekly follow-up phone calls to discuss progression and/or possible trouble-shooting strategies. Participants will be asked to set goals related to increasing self managing health behaviors. Participants will be encouraged to self-monitor goals, behaviors and symptoms using a computer tablet. | 15 |
| Paper and Pencil Group Use of paper and pencil diaries and worksheets to set goals, record condition-related symptom impact, and self-monitor behaviors.
Paper and Pencil Group: Participants will first meet once with a trained health education specialist. During this meeting the health education specialist will work with the participant in setting constructive and manageable goals and how to achieve them safely. Participants will then receive weekly follow-up phone calls to discuss progression and/or possible trouble-shooting strategies. Participants will be asked to set goals related to increasing self managing health behaviors. Participants will be encouraged to self-monitor goals, behaviors and symptoms using a paper-pencil diary. | 16 |
| Standard Treatment Control Group Participants are prescribed an exercise program and given information on healthy eating.
Standard Treatment Control Group: Participants will first meet once with a health education specialist. During this meeting the health education specialist will provide general information about engaging in healthy behaviors. Information will primarily focus on the benefits of engaging in healthy behaviors and safety precautions. Participants will then receive weekly follow-up phone calls to discuss various health topics. | 15 |
| Total | 46 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Paper and Pencil Group | Standard Treatment Control Group | Computer Tablet Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 14 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 59.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 | 55 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.58 | 58.93 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.52 | 57.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.48 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 16 participants | 15 participants | 15 participants | 46 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 13 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 16 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 15 | 3 / 16 | 1 / 15 |
Outcome results
Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity
Physical Activity and Disability Survey-Revised was administered to assess physical activity behavior. Scores can range from -2.7493 to 3.3671. Higher scores on the Physical Activity and Disability Survey-Revised indicates increased physical activity levels.
Time frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity | Pretest | 0.36 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity | Posttest | 0.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity | Pretest | 0.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity | Posttest | 0.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity | Pretest | 0.43 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Physical Activity | Posttest | 0.36 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test
Time frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test | Pretest | 303.69 meters | Standard Deviation 87.23 |
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test | Posttest | 327.46 meters | Standard Deviation 68.32 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test | Pretest | 316.32 meters | Standard Deviation 117.58 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test | Posttest | 320.61 meters | Standard Deviation 122.02 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test | Pretest | 362.32 meters | Standard Deviation 91.01 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test | Posttest | 385.23 meters | Standard Deviation 82.26 |
Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy
Exercise Confidence Survey was used to measure self-efficacy. The survey asks about confidence in sticking to an exercise program and making time for exercise. This is a 12 item questionnaire and scores ranges from 1 to 60. A higher score indicates increased confidence to engage in exercise.
Time frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy | Pretest | 3.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy | Posttest | 3.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy | Pretest | 3.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy | Posttest | 3.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy | Pretest | 3.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Efficacy | Posttest | 2.97 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) was used to measure self-report physical function. Measures are scored on a T-score metric. High scores indicate more of the concept being measured. A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.
Time frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function | Pretest | 39.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.87 |
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function | Posttest | 38.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.54 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function | Pretest | 38.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.14 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function | Posttest | 37.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.52 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function | Pretest | 42.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.45 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Self-Report Physical Function | Posttest | 41.51 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.96 |
Changes From Baseline in Weight
Time frame: Outcomes were administered immediately before the intervention and again 6-weeks later
Population: 3 participants (2 in the computer tablet group and 1 in the paper and pencil group) were missing weight data for posttest timepoint. These participants were removed from analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Weight | Posttest | 91.32 kg | Standard Deviation 27.97 |
| Computer Tablet Group | Changes From Baseline in Weight | Pretest | 91.78 kg | Standard Deviation 28.5 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Weight | Pretest | 88.80 kg | Standard Deviation 22.12 |
| Paper and Pencil Group | Changes From Baseline in Weight | Posttest | 87.58 kg | Standard Deviation 20.12 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Weight | Pretest | 81.71 kg | Standard Deviation 22.64 |
| Contact Control Group | Changes From Baseline in Weight | Posttest | 81.56 kg | Standard Deviation 23.05 |