Skip to content

Post Sustained Virological Response (SVR) Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Screening

Post Sustained Virological Response (SVR) Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Screening

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02833298
Enrollment
25
Registered
2016-07-14
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2018-04-01
Last updated
2018-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HCC, HCV, Hepatitis C, Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

Sustained Virological Response, SVR, patient navigation, screening, HCC, HCV

Brief summary

Approximately half of the patients receiving treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the United States have advanced liver disease. Patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis who achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) to treatment and are clinically cured of HCV continue to have an elevated risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). According to guidelines from several professional societies and from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), in particular, patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis should undergo life-long bi-annual screening for incident HCC whether they achieve an SVR, or not. The number of patients who need post-SVR HCC screening has risen dramatically in recent years due to the confluence of three factors: Increased screening for HCV, which has allowed more people to realize that they have this often silent infection; the availability of safe and highly effective direct acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) for HCV, which has allowed a much higher percentage of treated patients to achieve an SVR; and the long duration of HCV infection in many patients, which has allowed enough time for advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis to develop. To investigate post-SVR patients in the era of DAAs and to promote HCC screening, the objective of this study is to conduct a randomized, unblinded, two-arm prospective intervention trial comparing rates of HCC screening between patients randomized to either personalized patient navigation or automated reminders (e.g. electronic or mailed). Both interventions represent improved care over current standard of care (no patient navigation or automated reminders). There is no evidence to suggest one intervention is better than the other. Healthcare providers who agree to participate in the study will be contacted to confirm the liver disease status of their patients and during the clinical trial the providers of patients in both arms of the trial will be sent reminders about the need to schedule patients for screening visits.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAutomated reminders

At the time consent is obtained, members of the research team will collect data about how a subject prefers to be contacted for automated reminders (i.e. text messages, postcard, email, MyChart)

BEHAVIORALPatient navigation

The patient navigator will attempt to provide a reminder to the subject one to three days before the scheduled imaging and also offer to accompany the subject to the test.

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ≥21 years old * history of HCV infection treated in 2011 or after with direct acting antiviral therapy * achieved ≥SVR-12 as defined as no detectable virus 12 weeks or longer after the cessation of therapy * FIB-4 ≥3.25 * no history of HCC prior to treatment * HCV provider deems a subject eligible for HCC surveillance according to AASLD criteria * able to understand and speak English * willing to sign the informed consent * have a working phone number or e-mail to reach them * no history of liver transplantation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HCC screening ratesevery 6 months until death - average of 5 yearsRatio of Number of on-time screening visits to number of missed screening visits

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to HCC Surveillanceevery 6 months until death - average of 5 yearsPercentage for patients completing timely screening visit
Rates of HCCevery 6 months until death - average of 5 yearsNew incidences of HCC
Incidence of Deathevery 6 months until death - average of 5 yearsIncidence of death
Incidence of liver transplantevery 6 months until death - average of 5 years

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026