Skip to content

Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy With Integrated-boost in Patients With Spinal Bone Metastases

Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy With Integrated-boost in Patients With Spinal Bone Metastases

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02832765
Acronym
IRON-2
Enrollment
120
Registered
2016-07-14
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2016-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vertebral Bony Metastases

Keywords

Palliative radiotherapy, Bone metastases

Brief summary

The primary goal of the study is to determine the local control-rate after radiotherapy (RT) with and without simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) concepts in patients with bone metastases of the spine. Further study objectives are survival, and clinical parameters such as pain, quality of life (QoL) and fatigue. We expect an improvement in local control and consecutively an increased re-sclerotization of the bone metastasis due to a higher biological dose in the tumor area. Therefore patients could benefit in quality-of-life, pain relief and mobility.

Detailed description

The vertebral column is the main localization of bone metastases and is where they frequently indicate an advanced stage of a malignant primary disease \[1, 2\]. Two thirds of all patients with tumors are estimated to develop bone metastases in the course of their disease \[3\]. Spinal bone metastases are of central impact for patients in a palliative setting. The clinical symptoms include pain at rest and under exercise but also impaired activity of daily life, the risk of pathological fractures, and neurological deficits. Local control is the essential factor for stability of the vertebral body of patients with spinal bone metastases. In regard to re-calcification of former osteolytic lesions, palliative radiotherapy (RT) represents an effective treatment option \[4\]. The most common schedule was specified as 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can be a safe modality for treating spinal metastasis with enhanced targeting accuracy \[5\]. Secondly, IMRT to the spine was well tolerated (especially in the spinal cord), had no significant late toxicities, and spared other organs at risk simultaneously \[6\]. The main problem of the standard schedule is the limited dose application to the metastasis due to organ at risk myelon. Therefore, the aims of this study is to apply a high biological dose in the tumor region and to achieve an improved result related to local control for palliative patients with painful spinal bone metastases. Secondly, the aim is to evaluate QoL, fatigue, and survival of three different RT-techniques. To the best of our knowledge, no comparable randomized study has been described in the literature so far.

Interventions

RADIATIONA

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions of the involved spinal bone metastases

RADIATIONB

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions with an SIB with 40 Gy in 10 fractions to the metastasis of the involved spinal bone metastases

RADIATIONC

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions of the involved spinal bone metastases

RADIATIOND

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB with 30 Gy in 5 fractions to the metastasis of the involved spinal bone metastases

Sponsors

Heidelberg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a histologically confirmed tumor diagnosis, with secondarily diagnosed solitary/multiple metastatic spinal bone metastases * Indication for RT of the bone metastasis * Age: between 18 and 80 years * Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 * Signed Declaration of Informed Consent * Bisphosphonate therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, including dementia and epileptic seizures * Lacking or diminished legal capacity * foregoing radiotherapy in the planned RT area * Any medical of psychological condition that the study director considers a preventive factor for the patient's ability to complete the study or to adequately understand the scope of the study and to give his/her consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
local control3 months after RTlocal control as bone density is assessed 12 weeks post completion of radiotherapy using follow-up CT scan of the spine

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
progression-free survival (PFS)2 years post completion of radiotherapyPFS is assessed 2 years post completion of radiotherapy
pain reductionend of treatment, 12 and 24 weeks post completion of radiotherapypain is evaluated using the VAS pain scale (0-100 points) at completion and 12/ 24 weeks post completion of radiation
Quality of life12 and 24 weeks post completion of therapyQuality of life is assessed using the EORTC BM22 questionnaire at 12 and 24 weeks post completion of treatment
Fatigue12 and 24 weeks post completion of therapyFatigue is assessed using the EORTC FA13 questionnaire

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactHarald Rief, MD, PhD
harald.rief@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Backup ContactJürgen Debus, MD, PhD
juergen.debus@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026