Skip to content

Investigating the Efficacy of an Occluding Dentifrice in Providing Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of an Occluding Dentifrice in Providing Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02832375
Enrollment
242
Registered
2016-07-14
Start date
2016-03-01
Completion date
2016-05-12
Last updated
2017-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Brief summary

This single center, comparative design study will be used to investigate the efficacy of an experimental stannous fluoride containing dentifrice in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after short term use compared with a standard fluoride dentifrice.

Detailed description

This will be a single center, three day, randomized, examiner blind, two treatment arm, parallel design, stratified (by maximum baseline Schiff sensitivity score of the two selected test teeth), controlled study, in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the screening and baseline (pre-treatment) visits. DH will be assessed at baseline (pre-treatment), post-treatment and after 3 days twice daily brushing.

Interventions

DRUGstannous fluoride

0.454% w/w stannous fluoride containing 1100ppm of fluoride

0.76% w/w sodium monofluorophosphate containing 1000ppm fluoride

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form. * Aged 18-65 years inclusive * Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions * Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee: No clinically significant, relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral examination and Absence of any condition that would impact on the participant's safety or wellbeing or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements * Self-reported history of DH lasting more than six months but not more than 10 years at screening * Minimum of 20 natural teeth at screening * Minimum of 2 accessible non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), preferably in different quadrants that meet all of the following criteria: Signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR) Tooth with MGI score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only and a clinical mobility of less than or equal to (≤)1 and Tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by qualifying evaporative air assessment (Y\[Yes\]/N\[No\] response) screening * Minimum of two, non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars),that meet all of the following criteria at Baseline: Tooth with signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤ 20g) and evaporative air assessment (Schiff sensitivity score ≥ 2)

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are known to be pregnant. Females of child bearing potential who have a positive urine pregnancy test or who are breast feeding * Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients * Previous participation in this study or participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit * Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse * An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family * Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes or Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes xerostomia * Dental prophylaxis within 4 weeks of Screening, tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants, gross periodontal disease, treatment of periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of Screening, scaling or root planning within 3 months of Screening and teeth bleaching within 8 weeks of Screening * Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay within 12 months of Screening * Tooth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine * Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the Investigator * Use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity within 8 weeks of screening * Daily doses of medication/treatments which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the perception of pain. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquilizers, anti-depressants, mood-altering and anti-inflammatory drugs. * Currently taking antibiotics or has taken antibiotics within 2 weeks of Baseline, Daily dose of a medication which, in the opinion of the investigator, is causing xerostomia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 3Baseline, Day 3Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by examiner as participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of each individual tooth. Response of participant was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale range of 0-3; 0=Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3= Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicates improvement in sensitivity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score After Single UseBaseline, after single use (after 5 minutes)Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by examiner as participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of each individual tooth. Response of participant was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale range of 0-3; 0=Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3= Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicates improvement in sensitivity.
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Immediately After Single Use and on Day 3Baseline, after single use (after 5 minutes) and on Day 3Tactile threshold was assessed by examiner using a constant pressure probe (Yeaple probe) which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface from 10 g to an upper threshold of 80g in increments of 10 g. The tactile threshold is the maximum pressure applied at which participant do not report any pain or discomfort. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited at one center in United States.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 266 participants were screened, out of which 242 participants were randomized. 24 participants were not randomized because 14 participants did not met the study criteria, 1 participant was lost to follow up and 9 participants withdrew consent from the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental: Stannous Fluoride(SnF)
Participants were instructed to dose a dry toothbrush containing 0.454% w/w of SnF (1100ppm fluoride) with a full strip (1 inch) of toothpaste. Participants then brushed each of the two selected sensitive test teeth first followed by the whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute. Participants were permitted to rinse with tap water after brushing.
121
Control: Sodium Monofluorophosphate(SMFP)
Participants were instructed to dose a dry toothbrush containing 0.76% w/w SMFP (1000ppm fluoride) with a full strip (1 inch) of toothpaste. Participants then brushed their whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute. Participants were permitted to rinse with tap water after brushing.
121
Total242

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal of Consent10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl: Sodium Monofluorophosphate(SMFP)TotalExperimental: Stannous Fluoride(SnF)
Age, Continuous37.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.01
37.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.15
38.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.32
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants46 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
102 Participants196 Participants94 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
27 Participants52 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
72 Participants146 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
78 Participants154 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants88 Participants45 Participants
Shiff Sensitivity Score at Baseline2.55 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.397
2.54 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.392
2.53 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.389
Tactile Threshold at Baseline10.00 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
10.00 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
10.00 gram (g)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1210 / 121
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1212 / 121
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1210 / 121

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 3

Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by examiner as participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of each individual tooth. Response of participant was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale range of 0-3; 0=Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3= Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicates improvement in sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 3

Population: Analysis for this outcome was conducted on ITT population, defined as all participants who were randomized, received study treatment at least once \& provided at least one post-baseline (post treatment) assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed is number of participants from ITT population evaluated on Day 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Stannous Fluoride(SnF)Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 3-0.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.644
Control: Sodium Monofluorophosphate(SMFP)Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 3-0.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.426
Comparison: H0= no difference between experimental dentifrice and control dentifrice H1= a difference between experimental dentifrice and control dentifricep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.577, -0.319]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score After Single Use

Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by examiner as participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of each individual tooth. Response of participant was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale range of 0-3; 0=Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3= Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicates improvement in sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline, after single use (after 5 minutes)

Population: Analysis for this outcome was conducted on ITT population, defined as all participants who were randomized, received the study treatment at least once and provided at least one post-baseline (post treatment) assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed is the ITT Population evaluated post treatment single usage for each treatment arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Stannous Fluoride(SnF)Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score After Single Use-0.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.507
Control: Sodium Monofluorophosphate(SMFP)Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score After Single Use-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.465
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Immediately After Single Use and on Day 3

Tactile threshold was assessed by examiner using a constant pressure probe (Yeaple probe) which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface from 10 g to an upper threshold of 80g in increments of 10 g. The tactile threshold is the maximum pressure applied at which participant do not report any pain or discomfort. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.

Time frame: Baseline, after single use (after 5 minutes) and on Day 3

Population: Analysis for this outcome was conducted on ITT population, defined as all participants who were randomized, received the study treatment at least once and provided at least one post-baseline (post treatment) assessment of efficacy. n=number of participants evaluated at specific time points for each treatment arms respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Stannous Fluoride(SnF)Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Immediately After Single Use and on Day 3Change from baseline post treatment4.01 gStandard Deviation 7.545
Experimental: Stannous Fluoride(SnF)Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Immediately After Single Use and on Day 3Change from baseline on Day 315.25 gStandard Deviation 17.766
Control: Sodium Monofluorophosphate(SMFP)Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Immediately After Single Use and on Day 3Change from baseline post treatment3.60 gStandard Deviation 7.252
Control: Sodium Monofluorophosphate(SMFP)Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold Immediately After Single Use and on Day 3Change from baseline on Day 33.88 gStandard Deviation 6.785

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026