Skip to content

Specific Manual Approach to the Suboccipital Area on Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain

Effectiveness of a Manual Specific Approach to the Suboccipital Area on Pain, Range of Motion, Disability and Clinical Significance of Changes on Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain and Rotation Deficit of the Upper Cervical Spine

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02832232
Enrollment
78
Registered
2016-07-14
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2017-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

Physiotherapy, Manual Therapy, Neck Pain

Brief summary

There are different inhibition suboccipital techniques, usually adjuvant of physiotherapy, for treatment of patients with chronic neck pain. In our clinical practice, a favorable effect is observed on patients with chronic neck pain, but there are no published studies evaluating the results of this techniques on pain, mobility and disability. The objective of this trial is to evaluate if the suboccipital manual techniques, provides further improvement in pain intensity, neck disability, range of motion, on patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and rotation deficit of the upper cervical spine, being treated with physiotherapy. For this purpose, investigators conduct a double-blind (patient and evaluator) randomized controlled trial, in a Public Primary Care Center. Seventy four subjects will be randomized (computer application) into three groups: Mobilization Group, Maintained pressure Group and Control Group. All the three groups receive the same protocolized physiotherapeutic treatment during three weeks and, additionally, the Mobilization Group receives six sessions (two sessions in a week during three weeks) of translational dorsal glide mobilization technique grade III of the atlanto-occipital joint and the Maintained pressure Group receives six sessions (two sessions in a week during three weeks) of pressure maintained suboccipital Inhibition technique. The Control Group receives the protocolized physiotherapeutic treatment only. Pain intensity (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Range of motion (CROM), will be measured at baseline, after treatment period, and three months after discharge from treatment. After discharge for treatment the patient subjective opinion about their evolution will be collected through a Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale, and evaluation of headache disability (HIT-6).

Interventions

OTHERtranslational dorsal glide mobilization technique grade III

Translational dorsal glide mobilization technique grade III of the atlanto-occipital joint, it is a mobilization technique of Orthopedic Manual therapy according to Kaltenborn-Evjenth concept. The aim is to produce a dorsal glide of the occipital on the atlas, which will be held back by the therapist's hand, producing a stretch component of the suboccipital muscles. And Protocolized physiotherapeutic treatment: Three weeks of daily sessions (five a week) of stretching exercises, thermotherapy and postural education.

OTHERpressure maintained suboccipital Inhibition technique

Pressure maintained suboccipital Inhibition technique is aimed to inhibit the tone of the suboccipital muscles. Although some dorsal occipital glide is produced by the weight of the head itself, the main effect is on the muscles due to dorsally pressure is not added to the occipital. And Protocolized physiotherapeutic treatment: Three weeks of daily sessions (five a week) of stretching exercises, thermotherapy and postural education.

OTHERControl Group

Protocolized physiotherapeutic treatment: Three weeks of daily sessions (five a week) of stretching exercises, thermotherapy and postural education.

Sponsors

Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of chronic mechanical neck pain. * Flexion-rotation test positive (less of 32 degrees or 10 degrees difference between the two sides) * Sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Presenting one or more positive safety cervical test . * Carriers of pacemaker or defibrillators. * Previous history of severe trauma to the cervical region of the spine. * Inflammatory arthritis. * Inability to maintain supine position. * Inability to tolerate flexion-rotation test * Poor Language and communication skills making difficult to understand the informed consent. * Pending litigation or legal claim.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Pain intensityBaseline -3 weeks - 3 monthsChanges from Baseline in Pain intensity at 3 weeks and 3 months. Measure instrument: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Range of motionBaseline -3 weeks - 3 monthsChanges from Baseline in Range of Motion at 3 weeks and 3 months. Measure instrument: Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device.
Patient perception of change at short term3 weeks after recruitmentMeasure instrument: Global Rating of Change scale (GROC-scale)
Changes in Neck disabilityBaseline -3 weeks - 3 monthsChanges from Baseline in Neck disability at 3 weeks and 3 months. Measure instrument: Neck disability index questionnaire (NDI)
Headache disability at short term3 weeks after recruitmentMeasure instrument: Headache impact test (HIT-6)
Headache disability at middle term3 weeks after dischargeMeasure instrument: Headache impact test (HIT-6)
Patient perception of change at middle term3 weeks after dischargeMeasure instrument: Global Rating of Change scale (GROC-scale)

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactVanessa González, M.Sc.
vgr1980@gmail.com646619704

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026