Skip to content

Mobile Messages Affects Adherence of Stent Removal or Exchange in Patients With Benign Pancreaticobiliary Diseases

Mobile Phone Reminder Messages Improves the Adherence of Stent Removal or Exchange in Patients With Benign Pancreaticobiliary Diseases

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02831127
Enrollment
48
Registered
2016-07-13
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2016-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

short message service; adherence; stent exchange; ERCP

Brief summary

Plastic and covered metal stents need to be removed or exchanged within appropriate time in case of undesirable complications. However, it is not uncommon that patients does not follow the recommendation for further stent management after ERCP. we hopothesized that short message service (SMS) intervention monthly could improve the adherence in patients with benign pancreaticobiliary after ERCP.

Interventions

OTHERshort message service group

Each month after stent implantation, the investigator sent a text message by SMS to inform patients the necessity of regular stent removal/exchange and the disadvantage of delayed management, and to remind them the appropriate date to come back to the hospital for stent management. Patients were requested to respond by SMS and were encouraged to contact the investigator if they had any questions about stent management. Besides, patients received conventional reminder:After stent implantation, all patients received oral and written instructions about further management. If single or multiple plastic stents were inserted, patients were informed to come back to the hospital at 3 months for stent removal/exchange; if FCSEMS was inserted, they were informed to come back to the hospital at 6 months after ERCP.

OTHERconventional group

After stent implantation, all patients received oral and written instructions about further management. If single or multiple plastic stents were inserted, patients were informed to come back to the hospital at 3 months for stent removal/exchange; if FCSEMS was inserted, they were informed to come back to the hospital at 6 months after ERCP.

Sponsors

Air Force Military Medical University, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* be able to communicate via SMS by mobile phones of themselves or relatives living together

Exclusion criteria

* primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) * malignant or suspected malignant stricture of biliary or pancreatic duct * implantation of pancreatic duct (PD) stent for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis * expected survival time less than 6 months * plan of surgery within 6 months * pregnant or lactating women * patients who could not give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence rate of biliary stent removal/exchangeup to 1 yearPercentage of patients adherence to stent removal/exchange within appropriate time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stent-associated adverse event1 yearPercentage of patients with stent-related adverse events, including cholangitis, stent migration and abdominal pain

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026