Skip to content

RIVET - Retrospective Cohort Study on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Retrospective Cohort Study on the RIsk of VEnous Thromboembolism Associated With the Use of Combined Oral Contraceptives Containing Chlormadinone Acetate/Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel/Ethinylestradiol

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02828904
Acronym
RIVET-RCS
Enrollment
124000
Registered
2016-07-12
Start date
2022-03-10
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Thromboembolism

Brief summary

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with the use of chlormadinone acetate (CMA) compared to the gold-standard progestin levonorgestrel (LNG) as component of combined oral contraceptives (COC) is currently unknown. The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended a pooled analysis of four prospective cohort studies carried out by the Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research (ZEG Berlin) in order to clarify whether CMA-containing COCs carry a different VTE risk compared to LNG-containing COCs.

Detailed description

This study is designed as a retrospective cohort study. ZEG Berlin conducted several large prospective cohort studies on the risk of VTE associated with the use of hormonal contraceptives. Four of these studies included a substantial number of women using CMA/EE or LNG/EE-containing COCs. For this study, the data on CMA/EE and LNG/EE from the following four prospective cohort studies are combined: 1) EURAS-OC/LASS 2) INAS-OC 3) INAS-SCORE and 4) INAS-FOCUS. Participants will be identified retrospectively from a pooled dataset which comprises four large, controlled, prospective, non-interventional active surveillance studies that focused on the risk of VTE associated with the use of combined oral contraceptives. All data were prospectively collected by ZEG Berlin and follow the EURAS/INAS study design. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, the method of patient recruitment and follow-up as well as research methods were similar across studies. The EURAS-OC/LASS study was conducted in Europe only; the other three studies are transatlantic studies that include subjects from both Europe and the United States of America. This analysis is specifically designed to assess the risk of VTE associated with the use of COCs containing CMA/EE compared to LNG/EE.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
15 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: female, aged 15 to 49 years, participation in one of the 4 observational studies conducted between 2000 and 2019 (LASS/EURAS-OC, INAS-OC, INAS-SCORE, INAS-FOCUS), COC new user (starters, switchers, and re-starters), applied COCs: CMA/EE or LNG/EE. Exclusion of women with a personal history of VTE.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in the cohort of users of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing 2 mg CMA/30 µg EE compared to 0.15 mg LNG/30 µg EE.VTEs will be identified during the follow-up intervals, typically scheduled every 6 - 12 months, with a maximum follow-up of 10 years.VTE risk of users of CMA 2mg / EE 30µg compared to the VTE risk of users of LNG 0.15 mg / EE 30µg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the risk of venous thromboembolic events stratified by: COC user type, age and BMIDuring the follow-up intervals, typically scheduled every 6 - 12 months, with a maximum follow-up of 10 years.
To assess the risk of VTE in the sub-cohort of users of COCs containing CMA compared to LNG both combined with ≤30 µg EE.During the follow-up intervals, typically scheduled every 6 - 12 months, with a maximum follow-up of 10 years.
To characterize the baseline risk of users of the two formulations (lifetime history of co-morbidity, prognostic factors for VTE, co-medication, socio-demographic and life¬style data).During the follow-up intervals, typically scheduled every 6 - 12 months, with a maximum follow-up of 10 years.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026