Skip to content

Comparison of Two Techniques of Renal Pre-transplant Infusion on the Evolution of Renal Function in the Recipient

Comparison of Two Techniques of Renal Pre-transplant Infusion on the Evolution of Renal Function in the Recipient: Multicentre Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02826213
Acronym
RENOMAP
Enrollment
228
Registered
2016-07-07
Start date
2017-11-29
Completion date
2021-09-01
Last updated
2022-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney, Transplantation

Keywords

Renal infusion, Renal infusion device

Brief summary

Comparison of two techniques of renal pre-transplant infusion on the evolution of renal function in the recipient: multicentre randomized trial

Detailed description

Both machines differ in their operation: the LifePort® machine manufactured by the Organ Recovery System (ORS), says renal perfusion by maintaining a continuous perfusion pressure that is adjustable, while the Waves machine company Medical Waters assures infusion maintaining a controlled pulsatile flow. Both machines are now available but the investigators currently have no study of whether an infusion type is superior to the other in terms of results on renal function recipients. Study the impact of both types of infusion on renal function recipients evaluated in the early days of transplantation, at three months and one year after the transplant.

Interventions

DEVICELifePort® perfusion device

Renal Perfusion with LifePort® perfusion device

DEVICEWaves perfusion device

Renal Perfusion with Waves perfusion device

Sponsors

University Hospital, Tours
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

RENAL Donors: Inclusion Criteria: * Deceased donor in brain-dead * Donor presenting the expanded criteria of kidney removal (ECD criteria: elderly over 60 or aged 50 to 59 years and has two of the three following criteria: hypertension, stroke deaths, serum creatinine\> 1.5 mg / dL) * Possibility of both kidneys perfused machines * Sampling of both kidneys, for two distinct recipients

Exclusion criteria

* none RENAL recipients: The grafts are addressed to transplant centers in France according to the distribution rules of the National Center of Distribution of transplants . (Pôle National de Répartition des Greffons (PNRG).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glomerular Filtration Rate3 monthsRate of patients with a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) calculated by the MDRD ≥ 45 ml / min / 1,73m² (considered normal in a renal graft) at 3 months post-transplantation (MDRD: Modification of Diet in Renal the Disease)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Creatinine <250 mg / dL1 weekTime for obtaining a serum creatinine \<250 mg / dL and need for dialysis in recovery during the first seven days post transplant.
RFG1 monthAbsence of a recovery renal function at 1 month.
MDRD1 yearModification of Diet in Renal the Disease at 1 year
GSR1 yeargraft survival rate at 1 year.
Renal Biopsie results3 monthsResults of analyzes of kidney biopsies punctures to 3 months.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026