Skip to content

Taiwan ACE Beads for Hepatoma Embolization Therapy

Radiopaque Microsphere (Hydrophilic Series) for Hepatoma Embolization Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02825550
Enrollment
13
Registered
2016-07-07
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2018-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer of Liver

Keywords

Hepatoma, Transcatheter Arterial chemo-embolization, Microsphere

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Radiopaque Microsphere (T-ACE Beads) interventional therapy for patients with liver cancer

Detailed description

The study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of Taiwan ACE Beads used for chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The investigators will study the overall response rates of lesions with Taiwan ACE Beads. The procedure is similar with conventional TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization). At the target vessels, radiologists will inject lipiodol with doxorubicin first, then Taiwan ACE Beads instead of Gelfoam or PVA (polyvinyl alcohol). The end point of injection is also similar with conventional TACE. Determine the complication rates, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following Taiwan ACE Beads embolization.

Interventions

Similar with conventional TACE, radiologist inject lipiodol with doxorubicin first, then use Taiwan ACE Beads instead of Gelfoam or polyvinyl alcohol.

Sponsors

The Industrial Technology Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cheng Kung University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Research Program for Biopharmaceuticals, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria in order to be entered into the study: A. Both genders of patients age 18 or older. B. Patients diagnosed of liver cancer (MUST meet at least ONE of the following criteria:) 1. Diagnosed via tumor biopsy by Pathologists, and confirmed by on-service physician. 2. High risk patients (Viral hepatitis B or C or cirrhotics) with typical liver cancer image appeared on more than two radiographic examinations (Ultrasound, MRI, CT scan or Angiography). 3. High risk patients (Viral hepatitis B or C cirrhotics) with evidence of enlarging image of liver cancer via more than two follow-up records. C. In intermediate stage by BCLC staging, tumor size between 3 to 6 centimeters, with liver function at Child-Pugh class\<9, and is either difficult to accept an operation or reluctant to accept any operation. D. Disease can be treated by transarterial chemoembolization, and can be evaluated by Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or computed tomography (CT). E. Performance status ECOG 2 or less. Patient has a life expectancy of at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

If patients meet any of the following criteria they may not be entered into the study: A. major branch of portal vein has been invaded already; extrahepatic metastasis or the the other malignant tumors. B. Evidences of decompensation: Total Bilirubin\>2, PT prolong\>3 seconds, AST \> 500U/L, ALT\> 500U/L, Child-Pugh class≧9, refractory ascites, active bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and severe infection. C. Tumor size (diameter) larger than 6 centimeters or smaller than 3 centimeters. D. Cr\>2.0 mg/dL and eGFR\<50%. E. Allergic to iodine or other injections. F. Other main organ failure (Heart, Lung, or Kidney) G. WBC\<3000, ANC\<1500. H. Performance status ECOG of 3 or more. I. Unable to follow-up by ultrasound or CT scan. J. Unwilling to sign a written informed consent form. K. Pregnant women and breath feeding women. L. Patients whose blood vessel are too difficult to do Taiwan ACE Beads procedure. M. Prominent AV shunt. N. Severe atherosclerosis. O. Vasospasm or possible major vascular injury. P. Arteriovenous shunt patients, diameter larger than the size of microsphere available. Q. Collateral vascular exists and may endanger non-targeted area during arterial chemoembolization. R. Contraindications for doxorubicin. S. Number of tumors more than 3 and locate at different lobes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients Survival (Safety)An average of 12 weeks.Survival rate was evaluated since treatment day until the date of death or final observation.
Tumor Response (Efficacy)Before treatment, one month and three month after T-ACE using CT scan and MRImRECIST criteria was used to evaluate tumor response in patients with hepatoma who received Taiwan ACE beads (T-ACE) microspheres embolization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum Level of AFPBaseline serum AFP levels compared with one or three months of serum levels of AFP after Taiwan ACE Beads procedureSerum Level of AFP \[Time Frame: Baseline serum AFP levels (168±383) compared with one or three months of serum levels of AFP (144±256) after Taiwan ACE Beads procedure\]

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment started in April, 2016. The location was all taken place in National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Patients who met inclusion criteria were recruited.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE Beads
Clinical information of T-ACE beads H-series: Gender Male/Female 7/5, Age 71±8. The initial number of participants in the study was 13. However, one patient's blood test did not meet the standard before the operation, which led to his/her withdrawal from the clinical trial. Consequently, the total number of participants analyzed was 12.
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE Beads
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Age, Continuous71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Patients Survival (Safety)

Survival rate was evaluated since treatment day until the date of death or final observation.

Time frame: An average of 12 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsPatients Survival (Safety)12 Participants
Primary

Tumor Response (Efficacy)

mRECIST criteria was used to evaluate tumor response in patients with hepatoma who received Taiwan ACE beads (T-ACE) microspheres embolization.

Time frame: Before treatment, one month and three month after T-ACE using CT scan and MRI

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Target LesionsComplete Remission (CR)3 Participants
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Target LesionsPartial Response (PR)4 Participants
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Target LesionsStable Disease (SD)3 Participants
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Target LesionsProgressive Disease (PD)2 Participants
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Overall ResponseComplete Remission (CR)2 Participants
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Overall ResponsePartial Response (PR)3 Participants
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Overall ResponseStable Disease (SD)3 Participants
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsTumor Response (Efficacy)Overall ResponseProgressive Disease (PD)4 Participants
Secondary

Serum Level of AFP

Serum Level of AFP \[Time Frame: Baseline serum AFP levels (168±383) compared with one or three months of serum levels of AFP (144±256) after Taiwan ACE Beads procedure\]

Time frame: Baseline serum AFP levels compared with one or three months of serum levels of AFP after Taiwan ACE Beads procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsSerum Level of AFPBaseline serum AFP levels168 ng/mLStandard Deviation 383
Hepatoma Treated Using Taiwan ACE BeadsSerum Level of AFPone or three months of serum levels of AFP144 ng/mLStandard Deviation 256

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026