Skip to content

Randomised Prospective Trial Comparing Contact Force and Non-contact Force Guided Catheter Ablation for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter

Randomised Prospective Trial Comparing Contact Force and Non-contact Force Guided Catheter Ablation for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02825498
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-07-07
Start date
2016-05-18
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Flutter, Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Brief summary

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment option for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter. We plan to perform a randomized prospective trial comparing the efficacy of contact force (CF) guided CTI ablation against catheter ablation with the operator blinded to contact force parameters.

Detailed description

Subjects will be followed for one year post procedure in order to check for atrial flutter recurrences. This will involve an in-person visit at 3 months post procedure, and records checks at 12 months post procedure.

Interventions

DEVICEContact force guided RFA

Contact force guided RFA during Atrial Flutter ablation procedure.

Sponsors

Victoria Cardiac Arrhythmia Trials
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (over the age of 18) with 12 lead ECG documented paroxysmal or persistent CTI dependent atrial flutter planned to undergo CTI ablation. * Able and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous CTI ablation * Previous non-CTI dependent atrial flutter (ie.patients with previous history of pulmonary vein isolation or left atrial ablation, congenital heart disease, surgical ablation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of RFADetermined during RFA procedureTotal RFA time required to achieve bidirectional block

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average total CF achievedDetermined during RFA procedureAverage total CF per ablation per segment (third) of the CTI.
Average axial CF achievedDetermined during RFA procedureAverage axial CF per ablation per segment (third) of the CTI.
Average FTI achievedDetermined during RFA procedureAverage FTI per ablation per segment (third) of the CTI.
Average lateral CF achievedDetermined during RFA procedureAverage lateral CF per ablation per segment (third) of the CTI.
Average lesion size index (LSI) achievedDetermined during RFA procedureAverage lesion size index (LSI) per ablation per segment (third) of the CTI.
Procedural complication rateDetermined during RFA procedure and at 12 weeks post RFA procedureIncidence of procedural complications: stroke, cardiac perforation, steam pops, access site bleeding.
Recurrence of atrial flutterAssessed at 12 weeks and 12 months post CTI RFA procedureDocumented recurrence of atrial flutter
Average lateral CF of segment of acute and delayed reconnectionDetermined during index and repeat RFA procedureAverage lateral CF per ablation in segment (third) of acute or delayed reconnection.
Average axial CF of segment of acute and delayed reconnectionDetermined during index and repeat RFA procedureAverage axial CF per ablation in segment (third) of acute or delayed reconnection.
Average FTI of segment of acute and delayed reconnectionDetermined during index and repeat RFA procedureAverage FTI per ablation in segment (third) of acute or delayed reconnection.
Average lesion size index (LSI) of segment of acute and delayed reconnectionDetermined during index and repeat RFA procedureAverage lesion size index (LSI) per ablation in segment (third) of acute or delayed reconnection.
Procedural efficacy of RFADetermined during RFA procedureTotal procedural time required to achieve bidirectional block
Average total CF of segment of acute and delayed reconnectionDetermined during index and repeat RFA procedureAverage total CF per ablation in segment (third) of acute or delayed reconnection.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026