Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis
Conditions
Keywords
exercise, osteoarthritis, knee, patellofemoral pain
Brief summary
The purpose of this research is to develop and test the feasibility of an exercise intervention for persons with painful knee osteoarthritis involving the patella (kneecap). Participants in the patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) group will be treated with a 6-week supervised exercise program that targets strengthening the hip and trunk core muscles. Painfree control participants will attend one session to gather biomechanical, strength, and function data for use in comparison to the patellofemoral osteoarthritis group. Feasibility outcomes include adherence to the treatment program, recruitment, and retention. It is hypothesized that PFOA group participants will change score on a knee pain and function questionnaire by the minimum clinically important difference score for positive improvement at the end of the 6-week intervention program.
Detailed description
The investigators propose to develop and test the feasibility of a 6-week supervised hip and core muscle exercise intervention for persons with painful patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA), a common condition for middle-aged and older adults. Currently there is limited evidence regarding effective conservative interventions for PFOA, a chronic condition that is painful and limits function and quality of life. Exercise is recommended as a first-line treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but the optimal type of exercise for PFOA is unknown. This intervention is based upon similar programs shown to improve pain and function in younger persons with patellofemoral pain, a condition that may lead to PFOA. Feasibility outcomes include adherence to the treatment program, recruitment, retention, and the impact of the intervention on participants' pain and function at 6-weeks and 6 months after finishing the program. The investigators will also compare PFOA participants to a matched pain-free volunteer control group to explore the differences in their biomechanics, muscle strength, pain report, and function at baseline. Data from this feasibility study will be used to design a future randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of conservative exercise interventions for PFOA. The investigators' overarching goal is to develop a conservative exercise intervention that improves the symptoms, function, and quality of life of persons with PFOA.
Interventions
Sponsors
University of Pennsylvania
Thomas Jefferson University
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis group: 1) age 35-70 years, 2) have been diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis in one or both knees with symptoms primarily in the anterior knee, 3) radiographic evidence of ≥ Grade 1 osteophytes or joint space narrowing at the patellofemoral joint according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grading scale (0 = none, 1 = mild/possible, 2 = moderate/definite, 3 = severe), 4) pain produced by ≥ 2 of the following: descending steps, ascending steps, sit-to-stand, squatting, kneeling, prolonged knee flexion, increased activity (e.g., hiking), morning stiffness \< 30 minutes, stiffness after sitting ≥ 30 minutes, history of patellar subluxation or dislocation in the past. Control group: 1) age 35-70 years, 2) no known diagnosis by a physician of knee osteoarthritis, 3) pain free in the lower extremities at the time of enrollment into the study and for 1 week prior to enrollment.
Exclusion criteria
Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis (PFOA) group: 1) the presence of other conditions that may cause knee pain (e.g., patellar tendonitis, rheumatoid arthritis), 2) neurologic or musculoskeletal conditions that may alter lower extremity kinematics (e.g., multiple sclerosis, hip arthritis/arthroplasty), 3) history of a fracture of the knee, 4) pregnancy, 5) knee injections within the past 3 months, 6) inability to understand English. Control group: 1) all previously listed
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility (adherence) | 6 weeks | Adherence to supervised program (≥ 80% complete 10 supervised exercise sessions and 2 data collection sessions): Percentage adherence. |
| Feasibility (establish viability of underlying treatment model): activity of daily living rating | 6 weeks | Response to participation in intervention program in terms of activity of daily living rating (≥ 80% will change score on KOOS activity of daily living (ADL) subscale by the minimum clinically important difference score for positive improvement \[positive change of 10 points\] - at the end of the 6-week intervention program). |
| Feasibility (establish viability of underlying treatment model): pain rating | 6 weeks | Response to participation in intervention program in terms of pain rating (≥ 80% will change score on KOOS pain subscale by the minimum clinically important difference score for positive improvement \[positive change of 10 points\] - at the end of the 6-week intervention program). |
| Feasibility (follow-up response): exercise diary | 6 months | Response to 6-month follow-up - return exercise diary (≥ 80% complete and return exercise diary): Percentage completion and return for diary. |
| Feasibility (establish viability of underlying treatment model): global rating of change | 6 weeks | Response to participation in intervention program in terms of overall rating of change (≥ 80% will achieve Global Rating of Change score ≥ 3 \[scale -5 to 5\] - positive numbers indicate positive change). |
| Feasibility (recruitment rates) | 4 years | Total number enrolled and total number screened out. |
| Feasibility (follow-up response): questionnaire | 6 months | Response to 6-month follow-up - return Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire (≥ 80% complete and return KOOS): Percentage completion and return for KOOS. |
| Feasibility (retention rates) | 6 weeks | Completion of baseline and 6-week evaluation sessions. Percentage completion for both data collection sessions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Determine long-term benefits of intervention: pain rating | 6 months | Change in score of KOOS pain subscale score for positive improvement: 6-month follow-up KOOS versus baseline KOOS scores (more positive scores equals lower pain level) |
| Establish impact of intervention on physical performance | 6 weeks | Change in score on Timed-Up-and-Go test. |
| Determine long-term benefits of intervention: activity of daily living rating | 6 months | Change in score of KOOS ADL subscale score for positive improvement: 6-month follow-up KOOS versus baseline KOOS scores (more positive scores equals better function in activities of daily living) |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in peak isometric muscle torque: hip abductors, hip extensors, hip external rotators, and knee extensors | 6 weeks | — |
| Examine differences between patellofemoral osteoarthritis group and painfree control group in terms of symptoms on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) questionnaire | 6 weeks | Responses to the KOOS questionnaire will be gathered and the score calculated. |
| Examine differences between patellofemoral osteoarthritis group and painfree control group in terms of physical performance on the Timed-Up-and Go test | 6 weeks | Time to perform the Timed-Up-and-Go test of walking ability will be measured with a stop watch. |
| Examine differences between patellofemoral osteoarthritis group and painfree control group in terms of lower extremity muscle torque | 6 weeks | Lower extremity peak isometric torque will be measured with a dynamometer (force gauge). |
| Examine differences between patellofemoral osteoarthritis group and painfree control group in terms of lower extremity biomechanics (joint angles) | 6 weeks | Lower extremity peak joint angles will be measured with a motion capture system during functional activities. |
| Change in KOOS sport/recreation subscale | 6 weeks | — |
| Change in KOOS symptoms subscale | 6 weeks | — |
| Change in hip and knee joint biomechanics during step-down and sit-to-stand tasks | 6 weeks | — |
| Change in KOOS quality of life subscale | 6 weeks | — |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed