Skip to content

Comparison of Proton and Photon Radiotherapy of Brain Tumors (ProtoChoice-Hirn)

Comparison of Proton and Photon Radiotherapy of Brain Tumors: Efficiency and Side Effects in Clinical Standard Doses

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02824731
Enrollment
555
Registered
2016-07-07
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2029-10-31
Last updated
2024-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Tumors

Keywords

brain tumors, proton radiotherapy, photon radiotherapy

Brief summary

This protocol compares the toxicity of radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy applied with different radiation modalities - protons or photons. Patients with different kinds of brain tumours and foreseen high-dose radiotherapy can be included. The hypothesis of the trial is that the rate of chronic toxicity 1 year after the end of radiotherapy is 15% lower after proton compared to photon treatment.

Detailed description

Non-randomised 2-arm phase II trial on comparison of proton versus photon radiotherapy in brain tumours using standard doses and standard combined chemotherapy protocols. Patients are assigned to the treatment groups by their own choice or availability of the treatment. Patients are stratified into 4 groups, (1) supratentorial grad III/ IV tumours without pre-irradiation; (2) supratentorial grade I/II tumours without pre-irradiation; (3) infratentorial tumours without pre-irradiation; (4) patients with pre-irradiation \>40 Gy in the tumour area. Radiotherapy doses of 54-60 Gy(RBE) are applied in group 1-3 using normal fractionated schedules. In group 4, 30 Gy(RBE)/ 5 Gy(RBE) per fraction or 36 Gy(RBE) with 2 Gy(RBE) per fraction are allowed. Primary endpoint is chronic toxicity and quality of life. The hypothesis of the trial is that the rate of chronic toxicity 1 year after the end of radiotherapy is 15% lower after proton compared to photon treatment. Events for chronic toxicity are toxicities observed later than 3 months after end of radiotherapy and scored CTC-AE4.0 \>grade 2 or a decrease in Quality of life by \>10% (EORTC-QLQ C30 and BN20) or a decrease in neuropsychological functioning by \>10% (MoCa test). All statistical calculations apply to group (1), i.e. supratentorial grade II/IV tumours without pre-irradiation, all other arms are closed when group (1) is closed.

Interventions

RADIATIONRadiation with protons
RADIATIONRadiation with photons

Sponsors

German Cancer Research Center
CollaboratorOTHER
National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology Dresden/Heidelberg
CollaboratorOTHER
Technische Universität Dresden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* primary brain tumor: gliomas (low or high grade), intracerebral meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, craniopharyngioma and other rare brain tumors or * brain tumor recurrence without pre-irradiation or * brain tumor recurrence with pre-irradiation \> 40 Gy in the overlap region with the recurrence region * indication for radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy * Both proton and photon therapy are possible from a medical point of view (that is no standard indication for protons or standard indication for example one-time stereotaxy * age \>= 18 years * general condition ECOG ≤ 2, outpatient basis possible * indication for high dose (except group 4) radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy * capacity to consent and present written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* lack of capacity to consent or lack of written consent * cerebral lymphomas * brain metastases * very small tumors (for example acoustic neuromas, very small recurrences) for this is a proton therapy from a medical point of view no alternative to a stereotactic radiotherapy * inability to MRI planning (eg. contraindications to performing MRI) * lack of compliance of the patient * lack of or limited possibility of a reproducible storage (eg by severe restriction of mobility of the patient) * missing or limited possibility of regular follow-up visits in accordance with the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
late toxicity as cumulative measure1 year (or at least 6 months)Events for the endpoint are: 1. any late toxicity CTCAE 4.0 ≥ grade II (except pre-existing conditions) 2. decrease in Quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and BN20) by \>10% 3. decrease in brain function (MOCA test) by more than 10%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival1 year and 2 yearsOverall survival
Acute toxicity3 months after treatmentAcute toxicity according to CTCAE4.0 score \>/= grade II
Local tumour control1 year and 2 yearsLocal tumour control as Regression or stable disease measured in follow-up MRI
late toxicity as cumulative measure2 yearsEvents for the endpoint are: 1. any late toxicity CTCAE 4.0 ≥ grade II (except pre-existing conditions) 2. decrease in Quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and BN20) by \>10% 3. decrease in brain function (MOCA test) by more than 10%

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMechthild Krause, Prof.
mechthild.krause@uniklinikum-dresden.de+49 351 458 5441

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026