Skip to content

Pilot Testing of a Behavioral Intervention for Chronic Pain in Individuals With HIV

Development of a Behavioral Intervention for Chronic Pain in Individuals With HIV

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02824562
Enrollment
44
Registered
2016-07-06
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2017-08-22
Last updated
2018-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

Due to its specific pathophysiology and impact on health outcomes, the Institute of Medicine has described chronic pain as a complex chronic disease and a national public health crisis. The unique neurobiological basis and psychosocial context of chronic pain in HIV-infected patients underscores the importance of developing and testing a behavioral intervention specifically tailored to this population. This study will pilot test a newly-developed behavioral intervention for chronic pain tailored to individuals with HIV.

Detailed description

Chronic pain is a chronic condition with a unique neurobiologic basis, which has a substantial impact on physical and emotional function. Chronic pain in HIV-infected patients is common, and associated with serious health consequences, including up to 10 times greater odds of impaired physical function. Many pharmacologic therapies, including opioids, often do not lead to improved pain and function, and carry significant risk. Evidence-based behavioral interventions are among the most effective and safe non-pharmacologic chronic pain treatments investigated in the general medical population. Therefore, behavioral interventions to improve pain, physical, and emotional function in HIV-infected patients are needed. There is much to be learned from existing interventions. However, the success of a behavioral intervention is heavily influenced by how well it is tailored to the target population's biological, psychological, and social environment. Therefore, in this study investigators will conduct a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial of a recently-developed behavioral intervention compared to routine HIV and pain care, to determine feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIntervention

The intervention group will receive treatment as usual plus a chronic pain self-management program which includes six one-on-one sessions facilitated by a trained interventionist and six group sessions facilitated by a trained interventionist and a peer. A peer is an HIV-infected patient living with chronic pain, who has completed all ten of the one-on-one sessions offered, received training to co-facilitate the six group sessions with the interventionist, and is successfully self-managing his/her chronic pain.

BEHAVIORALControl

The control group will receive treatment as usual. The treatment as usual or control group refers to the standard of care that patients receive for their chronic pain. This standard of care allows patients to discuss chronic pain with their providers at their discretion. Although highly variable, providers can recommend and prescribe pharmacologic (e.g., opioid and other pain medication), non-pharmacologic (e.g., physical therapy, referral to psychology) approaches for pain. This study will not interfere in any way with usual care. No additional treatment will be provided to participants allocated to the control group.

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Enrolled in the Center for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) cohort 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. Chronic pain (Brief Chronic Pain Screening Questionnaire (BCPQ) = at least moderate pain for at least 3 months) 4. Moderately severe and impairing chronic pain (PEG pain questionnaire = average of all three times is 4 or greater)

Exclusion criteria

1. Do not speak or understand English 2. Are planning a new pain treatment like surgery 3. Cannot attend the group sessions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention Feasibility: Median Number of Study Intervention Sessions Attended by ParticipantsFrom baseline throughout the entire 16 week intervention periodParticipants are expected to attend 6 one-on-one sessions and 6 group sessions. Maximum sessions if all attended per participant would be 12 sessions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Outcome Assessment Feasibility: Number (Percentage) of Participants Who Complete Outcome Assessments Within One MonthFrom the conclusion of the intervention through 30 days (Intervention Group). From the last group session through 30 days (Control Group).Outcome assessments are administered to participants by study staff.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
The intervention group will receive treatment as usual plus a chronic pain self-management program which includes six one-on-one sessions facilitated by a trained interventionist and six group sessions facilitated by a trained interventionist and a peer. A peer is an HIV-infected patient living with chronic pain, who has completed all ten of the one-on-one sessions offered, received training to co-facilitate the six group sessions with the interventionist, and is successfully self-managing his/her chronic pain.
22
Control
The control group will receive treatment as usual. The treatment as usual or control group refers to the standard of care that patients receive for their chronic pain. This standard of care allows patients to discuss chronic pain with their providers at their discretion. Although highly variable, providers can recommend and prescribe pharmacologic (e.g., opioid and other pain medication), non-pharmacologic (e.g., physical therapy, referral to psychology) approaches for pain. This study will not interfere in any way with usual care. No additional treatment will be provided to participants allocated to the control group.
22
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous51 years51 years51 years
Number of participants with undetectable viral load (blood test, measured in copies/mL)21 Participants21 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants19 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants14 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 221 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Intervention Feasibility: Median Number of Study Intervention Sessions Attended by Participants

Participants are expected to attend 6 one-on-one sessions and 6 group sessions. Maximum sessions if all attended per participant would be 12 sessions.

Time frame: From baseline throughout the entire 16 week intervention period

Population: All 22 participants were assessed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionIntervention Feasibility: Median Number of Study Intervention Sessions Attended by Participants9 Study Sessions
Secondary

Outcome Assessment Feasibility: Number (Percentage) of Participants Who Complete Outcome Assessments Within One Month

Outcome assessments are administered to participants by study staff.

Time frame: From the conclusion of the intervention through 30 days (Intervention Group). From the last group session through 30 days (Control Group).

Population: All 22 participants in each arm were analyzed.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionOutcome Assessment Feasibility: Number (Percentage) of Participants Who Complete Outcome Assessments Within One MonthCompleted outcome assessment19 Participants
InterventionOutcome Assessment Feasibility: Number (Percentage) of Participants Who Complete Outcome Assessments Within One MonthDid not complete outcome assessment3 Participants
ControlOutcome Assessment Feasibility: Number (Percentage) of Participants Who Complete Outcome Assessments Within One MonthCompleted outcome assessment17 Participants
ControlOutcome Assessment Feasibility: Number (Percentage) of Participants Who Complete Outcome Assessments Within One MonthDid not complete outcome assessment5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026