Skip to content

Safety Study of RMJH-111b to Treat Essential Hypertension

A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b in Adult Subjects With Essential Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02822222
Enrollment
22
Registered
2016-07-04
Start date
2016-06-10
Completion date
2016-07-07
Last updated
2020-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Hypertension

Keywords

essential hypertension, hypertension, high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, RMJH-111b, magnesium, magnesium citrate, calcium channel blocker, vasodilator, antihypertensive, anti-hypertensive

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of RMJH-111b, including how well it is tolerated, and the effect of RMJH-111b on blood pressure in subjects with hypertension. The study also measured the amount of magnesium in the blood and urine before and after RMJH-111b administration to evaluate what the body does to RMJH-111b (pharmacokinetics).

Detailed description

This was a phase 1/2, single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and tolerability of RMJH-111b in adult subjects with essential hypertension. Assessments of pharmacokinetics and efficacy were secondary objectives. RMJ Holdings LLC (doing business as RMJH Rx) is developing RMJH-111b (magnesium citrate, tribasic anhydrous) soft gelatin capsules for the treatment of essential hypertension. The rationale for developing RMJH-111b for essential hypertension is based on reported calcium channel blocker and vasodilator effects of magnesium cation (Mg++). Given this hypothesized mechanism of action, RMJH-111b may not be effective for subjects with other causes or forms of hypertension, and thus the diagnosis of essential hypertension was a key inclusion criterion for this trial. In order to avoid confounding the results of the trial, subjects who were already taking anti-hypertensive medications to manage their hypertension were taken off of those medications and underwent a 7-day washout period. Subjects that met the specified blood pressure criteria after the washout \[systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 150 and ≤ 200 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 95 and ≤ 115 mmHg\] received placebo orally twice a day (bid) for a 3-day run-in period (Days 1-3). Subjects that were recently diagnosed or previously diagnosed and off treatment for \> 1 week before starting the study and who met the blood pressure criteria proceeded directly to the 3-day run-in period (i.e., without the 7-day washout period). During the 3-day run-in period, the subjects remained in the clinical research unit (CRU) on a low salt (2.5 g/24 hours) diet. Subjects that remained eligible after the run-in period were randomized to receive either 440 mg of RMJH-111b or placebo orally bid (i.e., total daily dose of 880 and 0 mg elemental magnesium, respectively) for a 7-day treatment period (Days 4-10). A total of 21 subjects randomized 15:6 to RMJH-111b or placebo was planned. Subjects were randomized on either June 10th or 23rd of 2016. Based on the screen failure rate of the 1st cohort, the number of subjects needed for the 2nd cohort was projected. The actual number of subjects eligible for randomization at the end of the run-in period in the 2nd cohort exceeded the projection by 1 and all eligible subjects were randomized. Thus, the actual number of subjects randomized was 22, with 16 subjects in the RMJH-111b group and 6 subjects in the placebo group (i.e., 16:6 rather than 15:6). Subjects remained in the CRU on a low salt (2.5 g/24 hours) diet for the entire 7-day treatment period and through the 24-hour post treatment assessments (Day 11). Subjects returned to the clinic 8 days (±3 days) after the last dose of Study Drug (active or placebo) for their Final Study Visit. Protocol-specified reasons for discontinuing a subject from the study included, but were not limited to: 1) subject's blood pressure was too elevated for them to safely continue in the study (subjects who experienced SBP \>200 mmHg or DBP \>115 mmHg had to have these measurements repeated approximately 1 hour later, and if the SBP or DBP remained elevated, the subject was to be removed from the study and treated accordingly), 2) subject experienced a sharp drop in blood pressure (SBP \< 110 mmHg or DBP \< 60 mmHg); 3) subject's patellar reflex (knee jerk) disappeared, and 4) subject's total serum magnesium levels increased to ≥ 5 mg/dL (twice the upper limit of normal). As a conservative measure for this first trial of RMJH-111b, the criterion regarding drop in blood pressure did not require any associated clinical symptoms. For the pivotal trial, RMJH Rx will incorporate orthostatic hypotension monitoring and refine the discontinuation criterion regarding drop in blood pressure to allow for continued Study Drug treatment in the absence of clinical symptoms, so as to avoid unnecessarily removing a subject that is experiencing therapeutic benefit. All measurements used for the safety assessments in this study are widely used, and generally recognized as reliable, accurate, and relevant. Further, they included standard parameters used in the evaluation of drugs with the potential for anti-hypertensive and magnesium toxicity effects. Because blood pressure varies at daytime compared to nighttime, mean daytime (8 AM to 4 PM), nighttime (10 PM to 6 AM), and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) parameters were used to assess the efficacy effects of RMJH-111b on blood pressure in this trial. While 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is considered as a more precise method for the evaluation of drug effects on blood pressure than clinic visit (seated) blood pressures, this trial also included efficacy evaluations of seated SBP and DBP parameters for informational purposes and in particular to facilitate the design of the larger pivotal trial where ABPM monitoring will not be practical. The pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of magnesium is complicated by pre-existing endogenous levels of magnesium, other ingested sources of magnesium (daily diet and supplements; supplements with total daily dose of magnesium ≤ 150 mg were allowed in this study), and the tight regulation of magnesium in the body (magnesium homeostasis) with relatively high levels of magnesium in bones and soft tissues compared to approximately 1% in the blood. Thus, the total serum magnesium exposure was anticipated to be minimally effected with RMJH-111b intake, but evidence of urinary magnesium excretion coupled with maintained total serum magnesium exposure was expected to provide an indication of intake rather than magnesium wasting.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo soft gelatin capsule

0 mg elemental magnesium/capsule

DRUGMagnesium citrate, tribasic anhydrous soft gelatin capsule

110 mg elemental magnesium/capsule

Sponsors

RMJ Holdings, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Investigational Site pharmacist was not blinded and was responsible for dispensing the appropriate study drug based upon the randomization schedule and ensuring that the remaining Investigational Site personnel were blinded to the drug. Total serum magnesium was used to monitor for magnesium toxicity and subjects with levels ≥ 5 mg/dL were to be discontinued. Thus, there was the potential for these measurements to unblind the Principal Investigator. Due to the pre-existing endogenous levels of total serum magnesium and urine magnesium and the relatively large variability in values between subjects, review of these numbers would not necessarily have suggested one treatment arm over the other. To minimize the impact of such potential unblinding on the ABPM endpoints, a centralized ABPM reader was used and the reader was blinded to the total serum magnesium and urine magnesium values.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 18-80 years old * Diagnosed with essential hypertension * SBP ≥ 150 & ≤ 200 mmHg & DBP ≥ 95 and ≤ 115 mmHg after resting for 5 minutes in the seated position at Day 1 & baseline (pre-dose Day 4) * Both males & women of child bearing potential (WCBP) agree to use adequate contraceptive methods while on study * Willing and able to sign informed consent form (ICF) * Suitable for participation in the study in the opinion of the Investigator

Exclusion criteria

* History of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or stroke within 6 months of Screening, or evidence of greater than 1st degree heart block or myocardial damage * History of chronic hepatitis * Uncontrolled diabetes (hemoglobin A1C ≥ 6.5%) at Screening or Day 1 * Glomerular filtration rate \< 60 mL/min at Screening or Day 1 * Serum hypo- or hyper-natremia (≤ 133 & ≥145 meq/L) at Screening or Day 1 * Low serum potassium (≤ 3.3 meq/L) at Screening or Day 1 * Low total serum magnesium (≤ 1.3 mg/dL) or total serum magnesium greater than the upper limit of normal (2.5 mg/dL) at Screening or Day 1 * Serum uric acid \> 6.5 mg/dL for females or \>7.5 mg/dL for males at Screening or Day 1 * Absence of patellar reflex (knee jerk) at Day 1-3, or pre-dose Day 4 * Evidence of clinically significant findings at Screening, during the run-in period (Days 1-3), or at baseline (pre-dose Day 4) which, in the opinion of the Investigator would pose a safety risk or interfere with appropriate interpretation of safety data * Malignancy within 5 years of the Screening Visit (with the exception of basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma) * Major surgery within four weeks prior to Screening * Presence of a malabsorption syndrome possibly affecting drug absorption (e.g., Crohn's disease or chronic pancreatitis) * Presence of irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, or chronic diarrhea * History of psychotic disorder * History of alcoholism or drug addiction or current alcohol or drug use that, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the dosing schedule & study evaluations * History of any illicit drug use within one year prior to Screening * Positive drug screen at Screening or at Day 1, except subjects on prescription drugs that in the opinion of the Investigator will not influence the outcome of the study * Positive breathalyzer test for blood alcohol content at Screening or at Day 1 * Consumption of more than five cups of caffeinated beverages per day * Current treatment or treatment within 30 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug (active or placebo; Day 4) with another investigational drug, or current enrollment in another clinical trial * Current treatment or treatment within 10 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug (active or placebo; Day 4) with any anti-hypertension medication (other than Study Drug during the treatment period) * Current treatment or treatment within 30 days prior to the first dose of Study Drug (active or placebo; Day 4) with magnesium-containing antacids or laxatives, dietary supplement(s) where the total daily dose of magnesium is greater than 150 mg, central nervous system depressants, neuromuscular blocking agents, or cardiac glycosides, lithium-containing drugs, bisphosphonates, sodium polystyrene sulfonate, or tetracycline/quinolone antibiotics, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha drugs, or phytotherapeutic/herbal/ plant derived preparations * Known hypersensitivity to magnesium * Known hypersensitivity to the inactive ingredients in the Study Drug (placebo and active) * Positive pregnancy test at Screening or at Day 1, or lactating * Arm circumference greater than 42 centimeters

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex Score14 days +/- 3 daysChanges in patellar reflex score from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) to interim time points during the randomized treatment period (prior to each morning dose on Days 5 through 10) and to post-dose time points (Day 11 & Day 18 ± 3 days). The scoring values included 0, 1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+, where 2+ means normal patellar reflex and lower scores indicate a worsened outcome (1+ means reflex present only with reinforcement and 0 means loss of reflex). The patellar reflex assessment was made with the subject in the seated position, with legs hanging freely from the exam table. Loss of patellar reflex is an early sign of magnesium toxicity, and thus the test serves as an assessment for functional magnesium status. A clinical indication of a safe magnesium dosage regimen included the presence of the patellar reflex (knee jerk).
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)14 days +/- 3 daysSafety & tolerability were primarily assessed based on the incidence of reported TEAEs by system organ class & preferred term, as well as by categories: TEAE, severe TEAE, serious TEAE, drug-related TEAE, drug-related severe TEAE, drug-related serious TEAE, TEAE leading to discontinuation, & TEAE with outcome of death. Drug-related TEAEs were defined as TEAEs assigned a Study Drug (active or placebo) relationship of adverse reaction or suspected adverse reaction. TEAEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 19.0. The severity of TEAEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. TEAEs were defined as any adverse event that started or increased in severity after the first randomized dose of Study Drug on Day 4 through the Final Study Visit (8 +/-3 days after last randomized dose).
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 24-hour Urinary Magnesium Excretion8 daysChange in the mean value of 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion from baseline (Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4) to end of treatment (Day 10 to Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Seated SBP and DBP7 daysChanges in the mean values for seated SBP & DBP from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) to end of treatment (Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Body Weight10 daysChange in mean body weight from baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment (Day 11). The weight measurements were made using a calibrated scale with the subject wearing light clothes and no shoes. Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Up to 6 daysChange in mean 12-lead ECG ventricular rate from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to 3 hours after the first randomized dose (Day 4). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (After Last Dose)Up to 13 daysChange in mean 12-lead ECG ventricular rate from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to after the last randomized dose (Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Up to 6 daysChange in mean 12-lead ECG intervals (RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, corrected QT interval based on Fridericia formula) from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to 3 hours after the first randomized dose (Day 4). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Up to 13 daysChange in mean 12-lead ECG intervals (RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, corrected QT interval based on Fridericia formula) from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to after the last randomized dose (Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Up to 6 daysChange in 12-lead ECG diagnosis \[i.e., normal to abnormal not clinically significant (NCS); normal to abnormal clinically significant (CS); abnormal NCS to abnormal CS; remained abnormal NCS; remained normal\] from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to 3 hours after the first randomized dose (Day 4). The ECG was recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.
Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Up to 13 daysChange in 12-lead ECG diagnosis \[i.e., normal to abnormal not clinically significant (NCS); normal to abnormal clinically significant (CS); abnormal NCS to abnormal CS; remained abnormal NCS; remained normal\] from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to after the last randomized dose (Day 11). The ECG was recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUC8 daysVenous blood samples were collected within 1 hour prior to & 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, & 12 hours following the morning dose of Study Drug on Days 3 (run-in placebo) and 4, & within 1 hour prior to & 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, & 24 hours following the morning dose of Study Drug on Day 10. Blood samples were processed to serum & assayed for total serum magnesium by a central laboratory. The LLOQ was 0.06 mEq/L. Individual PK parameters for Days 4 & 10 were to be calculated using corrected concentration-time curves (with individual's baseline assessments of endogenous total serum magnesium at Day 3 subtracted); however, due to small numerical values after correction, the planned PK parameters could not be derived. The analyses were reattempted using the observed values (that include the endogenous levels of magnesium), which allowed AUC0-24 to be derived.
Pharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration Ratio6 daysVenous blood samples were collected within 1 hour prior to the morning dose of Study Drug (active or placebo) on Days 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Blood samples were processed to serum & assayed for total serum magnesium by a central laboratory (LLOQ = 0.06 mEq/L). Ratios of the individual total serum magnesium trough concentrations at Days 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 relative to baseline (pre-dose Day 4) were calculated. Observed concentrations (including the endogenous levels of magnesium) were used for this purpose.
Pharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary Excretion8 daysUrinary excretion of magnesium was assessed over three 24-hour periods. The first urine collection started immediately after the morning dose of run-in placebo on Day 3, and the second and third collections started immediately after the morning dose of Study Drug on Days 4 and 10, respectively. Observed 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion values at Days 3, 4, and 10 (i.e., without subtraction of the Day 3 values to correct for the individual's baseline assessment of endogenous urinary magnesium excretion) were used for comparisons with the total serum magnesium data (as only the observed serum values allowed for PK parameter derivation).
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPday After 7 Days of Treatment8 daysSBPday = mean daytime (8 AM to 4 PM) ABPM SBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. SBPday was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment8 daysSBPnight = mean daytime (10 PM to 6 AM) ABPM SBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. SBPnight was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment8 daysSBP24hr = mean 24-hour ABPM SBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. SBP24hr was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPday After 7 Days of Treatment8 daysDBPday = mean daytime (8 AM to 4 PM) ABPM DBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. DBPday was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment8 daysDBPnight = mean nighttime (10 PM to 6 AM) ABPM DBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. DBPnight was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment8 daysDBP24hr = mean 24-hour ABPM DBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. DBP24hr was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated SBP After 7 Days of Treatment7 daysChange from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) in seated SBP after 7 days of treatment (Day 11) with RMJH-111b compared to placebo was a secondary efficacy variable (i.e., seated SBP served dual functions as safety and efficacy variables, with the safety population used for the safety analyses described in outcome 3 and the efficacy population used for the efficacy analyses described here). Note, mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.
Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated DBP After 7 Days of Treatment7 daysChange from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) in seated DBP after 7 days of treatment (Day 11) with RMJH-111b compared to placebo was a secondary efficacy variable (i.e., seated DBP served dual functions as safety and efficacy variables, with the safety population used for the safety analyses described in outcome 3 and the efficacy population used for the efficacy analyses described here). Note, mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This trial was conducted at a single Investigational Site (Orange County Research Center) in Tustin, CA. All subject recruitment procedures and materials were reviewed & approved by a central IRB prior to their use. The 1st screening visit was May 31, 2016, the 1st subject was enrolled on June 10, 2016, & the last subject visit was July 7, 2016.

Pre-assignment details

Randomization to treatment took place on Day 4, following the 7-day washout period & the 3-day run-in placebo period. Only subjects that continued to meet eligibility criteria following the Day 4 baseline procedures were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RMJH-111b
Four (4) RMJH-111b (magnesium citrate, tribasic anhydrous) soft gelatin capsules (110 mg elemental magnesium/capsule) orally bid for 7 days
16
Placebo
Four (4) placebo soft gelatin capsules (0 mg elemental magnesium/capsule) orally bid for 7 days
6
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol requirement SBP<110 mmHg10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRMJH-111bPlacebo
12-Lead ECG Diagnosis
Abnormal CS
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
12-Lead ECG Diagnosis
Abnormal NCS
10 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
12-Lead ECG Diagnosis
Normal
12 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
12-Lead ECG Intervals
Corrected QT Interval
418.36 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.875
416.25 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.592
424.00 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.639
12-Lead ECG Intervals
PR Interval
164.91 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.246
168.38 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.143
155.67 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.985
12-Lead ECG Intervals
QRS Interval
92.09 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.566
90.00 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.033
97.67 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.159
12-Lead ECG Intervals
QT Interval
403.32 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.566
398.56 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.916
416.00 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.233
12-Lead ECG Intervals
RR Interval
885.36 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 141.635
863.31 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 113.781
944.17 msec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 199.272
12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate69.09 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.258
70.31 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.904
65.83 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.851
24-hour urinary magnesium excretion7.2 mEq/24 hrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.05
7.3 mEq/24 hrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59
7.0 mEq/24 hrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants14 Participants4 Participants
Age, Continuous58.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.175
58.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.882
61.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.889
DBP24hr88.7 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.69
88.6 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.91
88.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.04
DBPday92.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61
92.6 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
93.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81
DBPnight82.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.38
82.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.14
82.6 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.23
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants15 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Heart rate70.82 beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.18
72.50 beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.572
66.33 beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.71
Height171.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.16
170.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.79
174.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
Patellar Reflex Score
1+
5 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Patellar Reflex Score
2+
17 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants16 participants6 participants
Respiration rate12.64 breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.953
12.75 breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
12.33 breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.816
SBP24hr144.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62
145.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.02
141.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07
SBPday149.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.22
149.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.27
147.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61
SBPnight136.7 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.48
138.0 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.34
133.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.31
Seated DBP101.6 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.06
101.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.18
102.0 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.18
Seated SBP160.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.69
160.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58
162.0 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.06
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants8 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Temperature36.60 degrees Celsius
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.179
36.59 degrees Celsius
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.208
36.60 degrees Celsius
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.063
Total Serum Magnesium AUC41.8 mEq*24hr/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.53
41.4 mEq*24hr/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.42
42.8 mEq*24hr/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.76
Total Serum Magnesium Concentration1.76 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.105
1.75 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.103
1.78 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.117
Weight90.21 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.401
90.54 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.865
89.35 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.492

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 161 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)

Change in 12-lead ECG diagnosis \[i.e., normal to abnormal not clinically significant (NCS); normal to abnormal clinically significant (CS); abnormal NCS to abnormal CS; remained abnormal NCS; remained normal\] from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to 3 hours after the first randomized dose (Day 4). The ECG was recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.

Time frame: Up to 6 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal CS0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Remained Abnormal NCS7 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Changed from Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Remained Normal8 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Remained Normal2 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Changed from Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Remained Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)

Change in 12-lead ECG diagnosis \[i.e., normal to abnormal not clinically significant (NCS); normal to abnormal clinically significant (CS); abnormal NCS to abnormal CS; remained abnormal NCS; remained normal\] from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to after the last randomized dose (Day 11). The ECG was recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.

Time frame: Up to 13 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; the SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore missing Day 11 assessment (i.e., n=15).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal NCS1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal CS0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Remained Abnormal NCS6 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Remained Normal7 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Abnormal NCS to Normal1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Remained Normal3 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Remained Abnormal NCS2 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Normal to Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Abnormal NCS to Normal1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Diagnosis (After Last Dose)Changed from Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)

Change in mean 12-lead ECG intervals (RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, corrected QT interval based on Fridericia formula) from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to 3 hours after the first randomized dose (Day 4). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.

Time frame: Up to 6 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in PR Interval0.75 msecStandard Deviation 13.364
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in QT Interval-5.06 msecStandard Deviation 26.727
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in QRS Interval-2.63 msecStandard Deviation 4.113
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in Corrected QT Interval-5.06 msecStandard Deviation 16.097
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in RR Interval8.06 msecStandard Deviation 102.179
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in Corrected QT Interval-9.17 msecStandard Deviation 16.005
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in RR Interval55.33 msecStandard Deviation 96.804
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in PR Interval8.67 msecStandard Deviation 4.502
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in QRS Interval2.33 msecStandard Deviation 4.274
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (3 Hours After 1st Dose)Change in QT Interval-0.33 msecStandard Deviation 23.372
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)

Change in mean 12-lead ECG intervals (RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, corrected QT interval based on Fridericia formula) from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to after the last randomized dose (Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.

Time frame: Up to 13 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; the SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore missing Day 11 assessment (i.e., n=15).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in PR Interval-4.00 msecStandard Deviation 12.806
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in QT Interval-11.67 msecStandard Deviation 24.732
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in QRS Interval-1.33 msecStandard Deviation 3.677
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in Corrected QT Interval-1.47 msecStandard Deviation 11.332
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in RR Interval-57.00 msecStandard Deviation 122.412
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in Corrected QT Interval-0.33 msecStandard Deviation 12.307
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in RR Interval29.67 msecStandard Deviation 82.921
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in PR Interval8.33 msecStandard Deviation 13.53
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in QRS Interval-0.67 msecStandard Deviation 5.317
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Intervals (After Last Dose)Change in QT Interval5.67 msecStandard Deviation 22.393
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (3 Hours After 1st Dose)

Change in mean 12-lead ECG ventricular rate from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to 3 hours after the first randomized dose (Day 4). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.

Time frame: Up to 6 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (3 Hours After 1st Dose)-0.31 bpmStandard Deviation 8.554
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (3 Hours After 1st Dose)-5.17 bpmStandard Deviation 6.735
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (After Last Dose)

Change in mean 12-lead ECG ventricular rate from baseline (Screening or Day 1) to after the last randomized dose (Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. The ECG assessments were recorded after the subject was resting at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment.

Time frame: Up to 13 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; the SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore missing Day 11 assessment (i.e., n=15).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (After Last Dose)4.73 bpmStandard Deviation 10.579
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 12-lead ECG Ventricular Rate (After Last Dose)-3.83 bpmStandard Deviation 8.519
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 24-hour Urinary Magnesium Excretion

Change in the mean value of 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion from baseline (Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4) to end of treatment (Day 10 to Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; the SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore missing Day 10-11 assessment (i.e., n=15).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 24-hour Urinary Magnesium Excretion9.1 mEq/24 hoursStandard Deviation 5.44
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in 24-hour Urinary Magnesium Excretion-1.3 mEq/24 hoursStandard Deviation 5.57
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Body Weight

Change in mean body weight from baseline (Day 1) to end of treatment (Day 11). The weight measurements were made using a calibrated scale with the subject wearing light clothes and no shoes. Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.

Time frame: 10 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; the SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore missing Day 11 assessment (i.e., n=15).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Body Weight-1.09 kgStandard Deviation 2.372
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Body Weight-0.79 kgStandard Deviation 1.421
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex Score

Changes in patellar reflex score from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) to interim time points during the randomized treatment period (prior to each morning dose on Days 5 through 10) and to post-dose time points (Day 11 & Day 18 ± 3 days). The scoring values included 0, 1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+, where 2+ means normal patellar reflex and lower scores indicate a worsened outcome (1+ means reflex present only with reinforcement and 0 means loss of reflex). The patellar reflex assessment was made with the subject in the seated position, with legs hanging freely from the exam table. Loss of patellar reflex is an early sign of magnesium toxicity, and thus the test serves as an assessment for functional magnesium status. A clinical indication of a safe magnesium dosage regimen included the presence of the patellar reflex (knee jerk).

Time frame: 14 days +/- 3 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug. 1 RMJH-111b subject was discontinued on Day 9 due to protocol requirement \[SBP\<110 mmHg; SBPs (102-109 mmHg) not associated with clinical symptoms \& not assigned as TEAEs\] \& lacked Day 10-11 assessments (i.e., n=15). Subject was at 2+ for Day 4-9 \& Final Visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 2+9 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 1+2 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 2+ except Day 9 (1+)1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 1+ except Day 5 & 8 (2+)1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 1+ except Day 18 (2+)1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained 1+ except Days 6, 10, & 11 (2+)1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 1+ except Day 18 (2+)0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 2+6 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 1+ except Day 5 & 8 (2+)0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 1+0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained 1+ except Days 6, 10, & 11 (2+)0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Patellar Reflex ScoreRemained at 2+ except Day 9 (1+)0 Participants
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Seated SBP and DBP

Changes in the mean values for seated SBP & DBP from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) to end of treatment (Day 11). Mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.

Time frame: 7 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; the SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore missing Day 11 assessments (i.e., n=15).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Seated SBP and DBPChange in seated SBP-14.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.58
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Seated SBP and DBPChange in seated DBP-6.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.08
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Seated SBP and DBPChange in seated DBP-2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.25
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change in Seated SBP and DBPChange in seated SBP-7.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.36
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Safety & tolerability were primarily assessed based on the incidence of reported TEAEs by system organ class & preferred term, as well as by categories: TEAE, severe TEAE, serious TEAE, drug-related TEAE, drug-related severe TEAE, drug-related serious TEAE, TEAE leading to discontinuation, & TEAE with outcome of death. Drug-related TEAEs were defined as TEAEs assigned a Study Drug (active or placebo) relationship of adverse reaction or suspected adverse reaction. TEAEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 19.0. The severity of TEAEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. TEAEs were defined as any adverse event that started or increased in severity after the first randomized dose of Study Drug on Day 4 through the Final Study Visit (8 +/-3 days after last randomized dose).

Time frame: 14 days +/- 3 days

Population: Safety population = all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of Study Drug (active or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE5 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAE0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAE2 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related severe TEAE0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAE0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to discontinuation from study0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE with outcome of death0 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild abdominal pain upper1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Moderate constipation1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild diarrhoea2 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild flatulence1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild headache1 Participants
RMJH-111bSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild cough2 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild diarrhoea0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE with outcome of death0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severe TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild headache1 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild abdominal pain upper0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild flatulence0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related severe TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Moderate constipation0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related serious TEAE0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Mild cough0 Participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAE leading to discontinuation from study0 Participants
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment

DBP24hr = mean 24-hour ABPM DBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. DBP24hr was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& the Day 3-Day 4 and Day 10-Day 11 ABPM assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to meeting protocol-specified criterion (SBP \< 110 mmHg). The SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment-2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.97
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment0.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.53
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPday After 7 Days of Treatment

DBPday = mean daytime (8 AM to 4 PM) ABPM DBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. DBPday was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& the Day 3-Day 4 and Day 10-Day 11 ABPM assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to meeting protocol-specified criterion (SBP \< 110 mmHg). The SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPday After 7 Days of Treatment-3.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.88
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPday After 7 Days of Treatment-1.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.12
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment

DBPnight = mean nighttime (10 PM to 6 AM) ABPM DBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. DBPnight was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& the Day 3-Day 4 and Day 10-Day 11 ABPM assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to meeting protocol-specified criterion (SBP \< 110 mmHg). The SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment-1.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.76
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in DBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment-0.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.46
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment

SBP24hr = mean 24-hour ABPM SBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. SBP24hr was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& the Day 3-Day 4 and Day 10-Day 11 ABPM assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to meeting protocol-specified criterion (SBP \< 110 mmHg). The SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment-3.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.72
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBP24hr After 7 Days of Treatment2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.61
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPday After 7 Days of Treatment

SBPday = mean daytime (8 AM to 4 PM) ABPM SBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. SBPday was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& the Day 3-Day 4 and Day 10-Day 11 ABPM assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to meeting protocol-specified criterion (SBP \< 110 mmHg). The SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPday After 7 Days of Treatment-4.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.72
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPday After 7 Days of Treatment1.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.36
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment

SBPnight = mean daytime (10 PM to 6 AM) ABPM SBP. Note, mean values of change that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase. SBPnight was measured twice during the subject's stay at the CRU: baseline measurements were collected from Day 3 to pre-dose Day 4 & post-dose measurements were collected from Day 10 to Day 11. An Investigational Site staff member placed the cuff on the subject's non-dominant arm & connected the ABPM at approximately 7 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 3 & 10. A pre-dose ABPM reading was recorded immediately prior to the morning dose of run-in period placebo on Day 3 & the morning dose of treatment period Study Drug (active or placebo) on Day 10. The ABPM was started again immediately after dosing. The ABPM was removed at approximately 8 AM (± 60 minutes) on Days 4 and 11, respectively, but no sooner than 24 hours after the continuous monitoring was initiated.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& the Day 3-Day 4 and Day 10-Day 11 ABPM assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 due to meeting protocol-specified criterion (SBP \< 110 mmHg). The SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& were not assigned as TEAEs.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment-4.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.54
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in SBPnight After 7 Days of Treatment0.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.13
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated DBP After 7 Days of Treatment

Change from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) in seated DBP after 7 days of treatment (Day 11) with RMJH-111b compared to placebo was a secondary efficacy variable (i.e., seated DBP served dual functions as safety and efficacy variables, with the safety population used for the safety analyses described in outcome 3 and the efficacy population used for the efficacy analyses described here). Note, mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.

Time frame: 7 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& pre-dose Day 4 \& Day 11 assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 for meeting protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated DBP After 7 Days of Treatment-6.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.08
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated DBP After 7 Days of Treatment-2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.25
Secondary

Efficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated SBP After 7 Days of Treatment

Change from baseline (pre-dose Day 4) in seated SBP after 7 days of treatment (Day 11) with RMJH-111b compared to placebo was a secondary efficacy variable (i.e., seated SBP served dual functions as safety and efficacy variables, with the safety population used for the safety analyses described in outcome 3 and the efficacy population used for the efficacy analyses described here). Note, mean values that are negative represent a decrease in that value from baseline, whereas values that are positive represent an increase.

Time frame: 7 days

Population: Efficacy population = all randomized subjects who completed 7 days of treatment \& pre-dose Day 4 \& Day 11 assessments. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was discontinued on Day 9 for meeting protocol-specified criterion \[SBP\<110 mmHg; SBPs (102-109 mmHg) were not associated with clinical symptoms \& not assigned as TEAEs\] \& is therefore excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated SBP After 7 Days of Treatment-14.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.58
PlaceboEfficacy of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Change From Baseline in Seated SBP After 7 Days of Treatment-7.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.36
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUC

Venous blood samples were collected within 1 hour prior to & 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, & 12 hours following the morning dose of Study Drug on Days 3 (run-in placebo) and 4, & within 1 hour prior to & 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, & 24 hours following the morning dose of Study Drug on Day 10. Blood samples were processed to serum & assayed for total serum magnesium by a central laboratory. The LLOQ was 0.06 mEq/L. Individual PK parameters for Days 4 & 10 were to be calculated using corrected concentration-time curves (with individual's baseline assessments of endogenous total serum magnesium at Day 3 subtracted); however, due to small numerical values after correction, the planned PK parameters could not be derived. The analyses were reattempted using the observed values (that include the endogenous levels of magnesium), which allowed AUC0-24 to be derived.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: PK population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug with valid data for at least 1 pre- \& post-dose assessment. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was missing PK assessments beyond Day 8, \& thus is only included in the analyses for Days 3 \& 4 and not for Day 10 (i.e., n = 16 for Days 3 \& 4, but n = 15 for Day 10).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUCDay 3 (pre-dose)41.4 mEq*24hr/LStandard Deviation 2.42
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUCDay 4 (1st day of dosing)43.9 mEq*24hr/LStandard Deviation 2.53
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUCDay 10 (7th day of dosing)43.9 mEq*24hr/LStandard Deviation 1.87
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUCDay 3 (pre-dose)42.8 mEq*24hr/LStandard Deviation 2.76
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUCDay 4 (1st day of dosing)42.4 mEq*24hr/LStandard Deviation 3.03
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on AUCDay 10 (7th day of dosing)41.7 mEq*24hr/LStandard Deviation 2.52
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration Ratio

Venous blood samples were collected within 1 hour prior to the morning dose of Study Drug (active or placebo) on Days 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Blood samples were processed to serum & assayed for total serum magnesium by a central laboratory (LLOQ = 0.06 mEq/L). Ratios of the individual total serum magnesium trough concentrations at Days 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 relative to baseline (pre-dose Day 4) were calculated. Observed concentrations (including the endogenous levels of magnesium) were used for this purpose.

Time frame: 6 days

Population: PK population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug with valid data for at least 1 pre- \& post-dose assessment. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was missing PK assessments beyond Day 8, \& thus is only included in the analyses for Days 5-8 and not for Days 9-10 (i.e., n = 16 for Days 5-8, but n = 15 for Days 9-10).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 5/Day 4 trough concentrations1.09 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.059
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 6/Day 4 trough concentrations1.10 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.071
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 7/Day 4 trough concentrations1.08 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.097
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 8/Day 4 trough concentrations1.09 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.087
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 9/Day 4 trough concentrations1.06 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.063
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 10/Day 4 trough concentrations1.02 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.08
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 9/Day 4 trough concentrations1.02 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.058
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 5/Day 4 trough concentrations1.00 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.034
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 8/Day 4 trough concentrations1.01 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.043
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 6/Day 4 trough concentrations0.99 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.041
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 10/Day 4 trough concentrations0.96 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.028
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Total Serum Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on Trough Concentration RatioDay 7/Day 4 trough concentrations0.98 unitless (i.e., ratio of mEq/L to mEq/L)Standard Deviation 0.045
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary Excretion

Urinary excretion of magnesium was assessed over three 24-hour periods. The first urine collection started immediately after the morning dose of run-in placebo on Day 3, and the second and third collections started immediately after the morning dose of Study Drug on Days 4 and 10, respectively. Observed 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion values at Days 3, 4, and 10 (i.e., without subtraction of the Day 3 values to correct for the individual's baseline assessment of endogenous urinary magnesium excretion) were used for comparisons with the total serum magnesium data (as only the observed serum values allowed for PK parameter derivation).

Time frame: 8 days

Population: PK population = all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of Study Drug with valid data for at least 1 pre- \& post-dose assessment. 1 subject in RMJH-111b arm was missing PK assessments beyond Day 8, \& thus is only included in the analyses for Days 3 \& 4 and not for Day 10 (i.e., n = 16 for Days 3 and 4, but n = 15 for Day 10).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary ExcretionDay 10 (7th day of dosing)16.5 mEq/24 hrsStandard Deviation 6.23
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary ExcretionDay 3 (pre-dose)7.3 mEq/24 hrsStandard Deviation 2.59
RMJH-111bPharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary ExcretionDay 4 (1st day of dosing)9.8 mEq/24 hrsStandard Deviation 3.9
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary ExcretionDay 3 (pre-dose)7.0 mEq/24 hrsStandard Deviation 4.34
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary ExcretionDay 4 (1st day of dosing)5.7 mEq/24 hrsStandard Deviation 1.97
PlaceboPharmacokinetics of Urine Magnesium After Single and Repeated Oral Administrations of RMJH-111b Compared to Placebo Based on 24-hour Urinary ExcretionDay 10 (7th day of dosing)5.7 mEq/24 hrsStandard Deviation 1.63

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026