Skip to content

Antenatal Testing in Obese Woman, is it Really Necessary?

Antenatal Testing in Obese Woman, is it Really Necessary?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02821988
Acronym
ATOWS
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-07-04
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2016-07-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity in Pregnancy

Brief summary

It is well established that obese women are at an increased risk of stillbirth compared to non obese women. This has led many physicians to begin antenatal testing in obese women in the third trimester through either nonstress tests or biophysical profiles. However, there is little evidence that antenatal testing improves fetal outcomes in obese women. The aim of this study is to determine if antenatal testing improves outcomes in obese women and to determine the optimal mode of testing (either nonstress tests or biophysical profiles).

Detailed description

1. Purpose: To determine if antenatal testing improves outcomes in obese pregnant women 2. Rationale: It has been well established that obese pregnant women are at increase risk of stillbirth compared to matched non obese controls. This relative risk is increased not only with increasing gestational age in obese women but with increasing severity of obesity. The increased risk of stillbirth has led some obstetricians to begin antenatal testing in obese women; however, there is little evidence that antenatal fetal surveillance improves outcomes. 3. Study/Project Population: Pregnant women before 32 weeks of gestation with an initial BMI \>30kg/m2 4. Research Design: Randomized Controlled Trial 5. Study/Project Procedures: Patients will be randomized to one of three groups: daily kick counts only, nonstress test, amniotic fluid index, and daily kick counts, and biophysical profile and daily kick counts. These patients will be randomly assigned a group in a 1:1:1 ratio using a random number generator available online. Patients assigned to the daily kick counts only group will be called weekly to ensure they are doing daily kick counts. If they are noncompliant, they will be removed from the study and will undergo nonstress tests if they meet the initial BMI criteria as is the standard practice at our institution. 6. Outcomes Measured: Stillbirth, induction of labor, mode of delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, AGPARs \<7 at 5 minutes of life

Interventions

DEVICEExternal fetal monitor for Nonstress test
DEVICEUltrasonography for Biophysical profile

Sponsors

Regional One Health
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Tennessee
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

less then 32 weeks gestation BMI \> 30kg/m2 English speaking

Exclusion criteria

age \< 18 age \>45 medical comorbidity which requires antenatal testing other than obesity unwilling to consent Non-English speaking not pregnant Gestational age \>32 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stillbirthuntil delivery, up to 41 weeksdemise of infant prior to delivery as verified by ultrasonography
Mode of deliveryat delivery, up to 41 weekswhether the subject undergoes a vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, or operative delivery will be recorded

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Neonatal intensive care unit admission admissionat delivery, up to 41 weeks
Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 minutesat delivery, up to 41 weeks

Contacts

Primary ContactLaura Grese, MD
lgrese@uthsc.edu4235712990
Backup ContactLuis Gomez, MD
lgomez2@uthsc.edu

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026