Skip to content

Using Biomarkers to Predict TB Treatment Duration

Using Biomarkers to Predict TB Treatment Duration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02821832
Enrollment
946
Registered
2016-07-04
Start date
2017-06-21
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2024-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Keywords

Drug-Resistance, Heteroresistance, Relapse-markers, Medical Imaging, Treatment-shortening

Brief summary

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a bacterial lung infection. Typical treatment using anti-TB drugs lasts about 6 months. Some people with less severe TB might not need to take the drugs that long. Researchers think a PET/CT lung scan along with estimating how much TB is in the lungs might show who will be cured after only 4 months of treatment. Objective: To demonstrate that 4 months of treatment is not inferior to 6 months of treatment for people with less severe TB. Eligibility: People 18-75 years old who have TB treatable with standard TB drugs Design: Participants will be screened with: Medical history Physical exam Blood and urine tests HIV test Sputum sample: Participants will be asked to cough sputum into a cup. Chest x-ray Participants will start TB drugs. They will have visits at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and about 6 more times during the 18-month study. Visits include: Sputum samples Physical exam Blood tests PET/CT scans at 2-3 visits: Participants fast for about 6 hours before the scan. Participants get FDG, a type of sugar that gives off a small amount of radiation, through an arm vein. They lie on a table in a machine that takes pictures of the body. Chest x-rays at 1-2 visits Participants who we believe are likely to be cured at 4 months will be randomly assigned to get either 6 months of treatment or 4 months of treatment. Participants may be asked to join a substudy using their sputum samples or additional blood tests.

Detailed description

Shortening the duration of treatment for patients with drug sensitive tuberculosis from 6 to 4 months has been attempted many times in clinical trials but thus far all have failed. These failures reveal our incomplete understanding of factors driving the need for such extensive treatments. Consistently, trials have demonstrated that 80-85% of patients are successfully cured after 4 months of therapy, including the extensive set of studies from the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) in the 1970s and 1980, the Tuberculosis Research Unit (TBRU) treatment shortening study in non-cavitary patients who achieve early culture conversion, and the more recent treatment shortening trials using fluoroquinolones like REMoxTB. The current standard of care is to over-treat all patients for a total of 6-months to avoid relapse in a small subset of patients at higher risk for incompletely understood reasons. For decades, clinical investigators have attempted to establish culture conversion as a predictor of treatment success. Despite the appealing logic, the real correlation of culture conversion as a surrogate endpoint has been consistently disappointing. In the REMoxTB trial, in particular, the intensive microbiological data collected revealed unambiguously that clearance of bacteria from the sputum did not sufficiently correlate with relapse risk to be a useful surrogate for durable cure. An important subset of patients, despite clearing their sputum of TB quickly and complying with all of their medications, still remained at high risk of relapsing with active disease after stopping treatment. Likewise there are patients who clear their sputum of bacteria slowly that nonetheless go on to achieve durable cure. Intuitively this makes sense: only those bacteria at the surface of a cavity are directly open to the airways to seed the sputum. Yet this is not the full story as there are also heterogeneous lesions within each individual patient which respond differently to treatment with chemotherapy. This protocol builds upon the historical trials and several successful small studies that suggest that directly monitoring lung pathology using (18F)- FDG PET/CT correlates better with treatment outcome than culture status. We will prospectively identify patients at low risk based on their baseline radiographic extent of disease, and further refine this risk score by evaluating the rate of resolution of the lung pathology (CT) and inflammation (PET) at one month as well as checking an end-of-treatment GeneXpert test for the sustained presence of bacteria. Patients classified as low risk will be randomized to receive a shortened 4- month or a full 6-month course of therapy. If successful, this trial will both offer a badly needed alternative to culture status as a trial-level surrogate marker for outcome as well as provide critical information for preclinical and early clinical efforts to identify new agents and combinations with the potential to shorten therapy. Hypothesis: A combination of radiographic characteristics at baseline, the rate of change of these features at one month, and markers of residual bacterial load at the end of treatment will identify patients with tuberculosis who are cured with 4 months (16 weeks) of standard treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDURESaliva collection

For biomarker assessments

PROCEDUREUrine collection

For biomarker assessments

For primary endpoint assessments and other biomarker assessments

PROCEDUREBlood Collection

For biomarker and eligibility assessments

RADIATIONPET/CT Scan

Imaging of the lungs to establish disease extent and severity

DRUGIsoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol

Treatment-standard of care

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Age 18 to 75 years with body weight from 35 kg to 90 kg 2. Has not been treated for active TB within the past 3 years 3. Not yet on TB treatment 4. Xpert positive for M.tb 5. Rifampin-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis as indicated by Xpert 6. Laboratory parameters within previous 14 days before enrollment: 1. Serum AST and ALT \<3x upper limit of normal (ULN) 2. Creatinine \<2x ULN 3. Hemoglobin \>7.0 g/dL 4. Platelet count \>50 x10(9) cells/L 7. Able and willing to return for follow-up visits 8. Able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study 9. Willing to undergo an HIV test 10. At sites with sufficient SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity and personal protective equipment for study staff, willing to undergo COVID-19 testing: viral RNA PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 to determine active infection and antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2 to determine prior infection 11. Willing to have samples, including DNA, stored 12. Willing to consistently practice a highly reliable, non-hormonal method of pregnancy prevention (e.g., condoms) during treatment if participant is a premenopausal female unless she has had a hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation or her male partner has had a vasectomy. If hormonal contraception is used an additional method of pregnancy prevention (as above) should be used.

Exclusion criteria

1. Clinical suspicion of or confirmed extrapulmonary TB, including pleural TB 2. Pregnant or desiring/trying to become pregnant in the next 6 months or breastfeeding. 3. HIV infected 4. Currently COVID-19 infected 5. Unable to take oral medications 6. Diabetes as defined by point of care HbA1c greater than 6.5%, random glucose greater than 200 mg/dL (or 11.1 mmol/L), fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 126 mg/dL (or 7.0 mmol/L), or the presence of any antidiabetic agent (including traditional medicines) as a concomitant medicine 7. Disease complications or concomitant illnesses that may compromise safety or interpretation of trial endpoints, such as known diagnosis of chronic inflammatory condition (e.g. sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue disorder) 8. Use of immunosuppressive medications, such as TNF-alpha inhibitors or systemic or inhaled corticosteroids, within the past 2 weeks 9. Use of any investigational drug in the previous 3 months 10. Substance or alcohol abuse that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the participant's adherence to study procedures. 11. Any person for whom the physician feels this study is not appropriate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and C18 monthsEstimation of the lower bound of a one-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in success rates between arms B and C. If the lower bound is greater than -7%, this will be evidence that the treatment-shortening arm is not inferior to the standard duration arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiologic, Immunologic and Microbiologic Measures18 monthsThe difference (and 95% confidence interval) in treatment success rates between a combined A+B Arm (with Arm A participants selected to represent a true 6-month standard of care population) and a combined Arm A+C (with the remaining Arm A participants selected to represent a treatment shortening strategy arm, and no overlap in Arm A participants assigned to B and C).

Countries

South Africa

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from clinics in and around Cape Town, South Africa (RSA) and Henan Province, China. Recruitment in RSA began on 21Jun2017 and on 17Oct2017 in China. The final participant was recruited for this protocol on 31Mar2021.

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled participants may have been excluded from participation for the following reasons: identification of baseline drug-resistant TB, withdrawn consent, sputum culture negative on Lowenstein-Jensen medium at baseline, poorly adherent to treatment, developed extrapulmonary TB, or had a significant incidental finding on baseline PET/CT requiring study withdrawal.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A
Expected high risk of relapse based on radiographic criteria, bacterial load criterion, and/or adherence criterion standard of care treatment for 6 months: 2 months Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol + 4 months Isoniazid, Rifampicin
251
Arm B
Expected low risk of relapse based on radiographic criteria, bacterial load criterion, and/or adherence criterion standard of care treatment for 6 months: 2 months Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol + 4 months Isoniazid, Rifampicin
154
Arm C
Expected low risk of relapse based on radiographic criteria, bacterial load criterion, and/or adherence criterion shortened treatment: 2 months Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol + 2 months Isoniazid, Rifampicin
141
Total546

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm BTotalArm CArm A
Age, Continuous35.5 years35.8 years33.4 years37.5 years
BMI19.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
19.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
20.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
19.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
55 Participants180 Participants53 Participants72 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
99 Participants366 Participants88 Participants179 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
55 participants180 participants53 participants72 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
99 participants366 participants88 participants179 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants150 Participants46 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
108 Participants396 Participants95 Participants193 Participants
Weight55.0 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
55.7 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
57.1 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
55.3 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 2513 / 1540 / 141
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2510 / 1540 / 141
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 2515 / 1543 / 141

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and C

Estimation of the lower bound of a one-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in success rates between arms B and C. If the lower bound is greater than -7%, this will be evidence that the treatment-shortening arm is not inferior to the standard duration arm.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm AComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CProbable relapses1 Participants
Arm AComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CLate withdrawal, lost to follow-up13 Participants
Arm AComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CCured217 Participants
Arm AComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CConfirmed relapses5 Participants
Arm AComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CTreatment Failure1 Participants
Arm BComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CLate withdrawal, lost to follow-up9 Participants
Arm BComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CCured121 Participants
Arm BComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CConfirmed relapses1 Participants
Arm BComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CProbable relapses1 Participants
Arm BComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CTreatment Failure0 Participants
Arm CComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CTreatment Failure4 Participants
Arm CComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CProbable relapses3 Participants
Arm CComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CCured117 Participants
Arm CComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CLate withdrawal, lost to follow-up6 Participants
Arm CComparison of the Rate of Treatment Success at 18 Months (After Treatment Initiation) Between Arms B and CConfirmed relapses9 Participants
Secondary

Radiologic, Immunologic and Microbiologic Measures

The difference (and 95% confidence interval) in treatment success rates between a combined A+B Arm (with Arm A participants selected to represent a true 6-month standard of care population) and a combined Arm A+C (with the remaining Arm A participants selected to represent a treatment shortening strategy arm, and no overlap in Arm A participants assigned to B and C).

Time frame: 18 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026