Skip to content

Hemostatic Powder Versus Clinical Management for the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding From Tumor Lesions

Randomized Controlled Trial of Hemostatic Powder Versus Optimal Clinical Management for the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding From Tumor Lesions

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02820077
Enrollment
62
Registered
2016-06-30
Start date
2016-08-06
Completion date
2020-08-27
Last updated
2020-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Keywords

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal

Brief summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of the endoscopic hemostatic powder for the treatment of bleeding from malignant lesions of the upper GI tract. Half of participants will receive hemostatic powder and half will be submitted to standard treatment.

Detailed description

Gastrointestinal tumor bleeding is a challenging clinical condition with a high mortality rate. Several endoscopic hemostasis techniques have been tested, but results were disappointing. Re-bleeding and mortality rates are still high. Hemostatic powder is a promising therapy for tumor bleeding, since it can be applied over large surfaces. Bleeding from a tumor lesion often occurs diffusely on the surface of the tumor rather than from a specific vessel.

Interventions

DEVICEHemospray (Endoscopic treatment with hemostatic powder)

Malignant bleeding lesions will be treated with endoscopic powder and patients will receive optical clinical management afterwards

Sponsors

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any kind of malignancy * Gastrointestinal bleeding in the last 48 hours * Referred to emergency endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* under 18 years old * bleeding from non malignant lesions * previous endoscopic treatment with another method done in the last 48h

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
rebleedinguntil 30 days after endoscopy
mortalityuntil 30 days after endoscopy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Successful initial hemostasisFrom the moment of the procedure until 24 hours after it
Hospital length of stayfrom the moment of the endoscopic procedure until hospital discharge or death, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026