Skip to content

Efficacy CompariSon of Pre-stenting Atherectomy Versus Scoring ballooN for calcifieD Coronary Lesions Coronary Lesions

A Single Center, Randomized Trial of Treatment Strategies for Obstructive Calcified Coronary Lesions: Efficacy CompariSon of Pre-stenting Atherectomy Versus Scoring ballooN for calcifieD Coronary Lesions Coronary Lesions (ECSPAND)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02819531
Acronym
ECSPAND
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-06-30
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis, Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Atherectomy, percutaneous coronary intervention

Brief summary

Design: The proposed study is a randomized study comparing the relative effectiveness of three lesion modification strategies (RA, SBS, or OAS) in the treatment of obstructive CCLs using the change in lumen size measurements (MLA, RLA, MSA and the ratio of MSA/MLA) obtained with IVUS or OCT. Patients will be blinded to treatment assignment for the duration of the study. Treatment: Patients who are randomized to RA will undergo coronary wiring of the CCL and subsequent advancement of the RA burr. The RA system is performed using standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. The atherectomy burr size will be determined by the operator. Patients who are randomized to OAS will undergo coronary wiring of the CCL and subsequent advancement of the OAS according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Control: Patients who are randomized to SBS will undergo coronary wiring and balloon inflation with SBS performed by standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. SBS will be used according to the AngioSculpt manufacturer's guidelines. Duration: 30 days follow-up. The primary trial objective is to determine which of the three treatment strategies for treating calcified coronary lesions (RA, SBS, or OA) is superior for obtaining higher ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen area/reference lumen area, as determined by IVUS or OCT (primary study endpoint). The secondary objectives are to compare the following: 1. Difference in pre- vs. post-treatment minimum lumen area (MLA, lumen area gain), as determined by IVUS or OCT (secondary endpoint) 2. Mean final minimal stent area (MSA), as assessed by IVUS or OCT (secondary endpoint) 3. Ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen diameter/reference lumen diameter, as determined by quantitative coronary angiography (secondary endpoint) 4. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) during 30 days of follow-up (secondary endpoints) 5. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume (secondary endpoints)

Interventions

Pre-stenting lesion modification using the rotational atherectomy device using standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. Burr size will be selected by the operator according to vessel size. IVUS images will be obtained before lesion modification and after stenting.

Pre-stenting lesion modification using the orbital atherectomy device according the manufacturer's guidelines. IVUS images will be obtained before lesion modification and after stenting.

DEVICEScoring balloon system

Pre-stenting lesion modification using the scoring balloon system according the manufacturer's guidelines. IVUS images will be obtained before lesion modification and after stenting.

Sponsors

North Texas Veterans Healthcare System
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years of age or older 2. Clinical indication for coronary intervention such as ischemic symptoms and/or a positive functional study 3. Found to have a de novo severe calcification (radio opacities noted without cardiac motion on contrast injection, lesion length \>15 mm, or presence of \>270° calcification on one cross-sectional view of IVUS) in a native coronary artery on fluoroscopy or IVUS

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject is currently participating in an investigational device or pharmaceutical treatment protocol 2. Persistent (\>10 minutes) hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg) 3. Need for revascularization of multiple lesions during the index PCI 4. Unprotected left main (\>50%) or equivalent left main disease 5. Non-calcified lesions 6. Chronic total occlusions, extreme lesion tortuosity including Type B/C lesions 7. Severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction \<25%) 8. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen area/reference lumen areaImmediately after stentingIVUS measurement based determination of ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen area/reference lumen area, as determined by IVUS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean final minimal stent area (MSA)Immediately after stentingIVUS measurement based determination of Mean final minimal stent area (MSA)
Ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen diameter/reference lumen diameterImmediately after stentingQuantitative coronary angiography based determination of ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen diameter/reference lumen diameter
Lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) during 30 days of follow-up30 days
Difference in pre- vs. post-treatment minimum lumen area (MLA, lumen area gain)Immediately after stentingIVUS measurement based determination of difference in pre- vs. post-treatment minimum lumen area (MLA, lumen area gain)
Fluoroscopy timeImmediately after the end of the interventional procedure
Contrast volumeImmediately after the end of the interventional procedure
Procedure timeImmediately after the end of the interventional procedure

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026