Skip to content

OHI--Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate Efficacy, Acceptability, and Perception of Benefit of an Innovative Custom AFO

OHI--Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate Efficacy, Acceptability, and Perception of Benefit of an Innovative Custom AFO

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02819011
Enrollment
44
Registered
2016-06-30
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2019-04-04
Last updated
2020-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accidental Falls, Arthritis, Cancer, Diabetes, End Stage Renal Failure on Dialysis, Fall Due to Loss of Equilibrium, High Risk of Falls Due to Mobility Limitation, Parkinson's Disease, Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

Ankle Foot Orthoses, falls, Fall Prevention, Frailty, Concern for falls, Footwear, Mobility

Brief summary

The investigators propose a randomized control trial to evaluate long term effects and effectiveness of Moore Balance Brace (MBB) ankle foot orthoses (AFO) in reducing risk of falling in older adults. Primary Endpoints • Characterize the impact of MBB AFO on balance, gait, risk of falling, frailty status, and adverse events Secondary Endpoints • Characterize the Impact of MBB AFO on spontaneous daily physical activities • Characterize the feasibility of the MBB AFO device on patient adherence, acceptability, user-friendliness, and perception of benefit for daily usage

Interventions

OTHERControl

Subjects will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes

DEVICEMBB AFO

Subjects will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes plus a custom made MBB AFO

Sponsors

Orthotic Holdings, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bijan Najafi, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 65 or older * High concerns or high risk of fall * Ambulatory

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of an active wound infection on either of the foot and ankle * Use of medication or a medical condition that may have unstable (fluctuate over time) or temporary (less than one month) impact on gait and balance * Acute fractures on the foot * Participant of an interventional study within the last 30 days * Non-ambulatory or unable to stand without help or walk a distance of at least 1.8 m (\ six feet) without assistance * Major foot amputation * Unable or unwilling to participate in all procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hip Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Monthsbaseline to 6 monthsHip sway (motion of hip joints in three dimensions) measured by wearable sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Ankle Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Monthsbaseline to 6 monthsAnkle sway (motion of ankle joint in three dimensions) measured by wearable inertial sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Center of Mass (COM) Sway Change Baseline to 6 Monthsbaseline to 6 monthsCenter of Mass (COM) sway measured by wearable inertial sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Activity Levelbaseline to 6 monthsPhysical activity level for 24 hours while wearing their own shoes compared to the walking shoes and compared to walking shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO). To quantify physical activity, number of taken steps per day was monitored using a pendant wearable sensor called, PAMSys (Biosensics, MA, USA).
Number of Participants With Adverse Eventsassessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, month 12 reportedNumber of participants with adverse events reported during the study. Adverse events was inquired at 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after the baseline, and summed at 12 months. If the participant has at least one adverse event reported in any assessed time frame, the participant will be categorized as the participant with adverse event.
Percentage of Participants Who Found the Device Useful and Easy to Use6 monthsThe participants perceived usefulness of ease of use of wearing Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) based on questionnaires of A technology acceptance model (TAM). Perceived usefulness was assessed using two questions (i.e., I feel more stable when standing, and I feel more stable when walking). Perceived ease of use was assessed using two questions (i.e., Was easy to take on and off, and Was comfortable to wear). The Likert scale (6-point scale from 0-5) was used to quantify how much they disagreed with each statement, including strongly disagree, disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, agree, and strongly agree, respectively. In this paper, responses were only categorized as positive (3-5 points) or negative (0-2 points) attitudes towards the use of AFO plus walking shoes.
Adherence (Hours Per Day to Wear Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO))6 monthsThe adherence of participants to the prescribed Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) plus walking shoes was quantified using the response to a self-reported question (How many hours per day did you wear the prescribed footwear?).
Stride Timebaseline, 6 monthsstride time measured in single task walking with normal speed
Stride Lengthbaseline, 6 monthsstride length measured in single-task walking with normal speed
Stride Velocitybaseline, 6 monthsstride velocity measured in single-task walking with normal speed
Fall IncidentsBaseline, 12 monthsFall incidents during the study
Concern for Falling Change Form Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline, 6 monthsConcern for falling is quantified by Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I) questionnaire. Scores range from minimum 16 (no concern about falling) to maximum 64 (severe concern about falling). Higher score indicate worse performance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) Group
This group will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes plus a custom made Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) for the duration of the study. Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO): Subjects will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes plus a custom made Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
22
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) Group
This group will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes for the duration of the study. Control: Subjects will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes
22
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMoore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupNo Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupTotal
Age, Continuous73.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
75.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
74.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants22 participants44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants14 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Ankle Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months

Ankle sway (motion of ankle joint in three dimensions) measured by wearable inertial sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupAnkle Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months@6Month1.03 degree^2Standard Deviation 0.69
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupAnkle Sway Change From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.50 degree^2Standard Deviation 3.74
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupAnkle Sway Change From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.21 degree^2Standard Deviation 2.43
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupAnkle Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months@6Month3.56 degree^2Standard Deviation 2.54
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes in both groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.005Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Center of Mass (COM) Sway Change Baseline to 6 Months

Center of Mass (COM) sway measured by wearable inertial sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupCenter of Mass (COM) Sway Change Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline0.71 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.5
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupCenter of Mass (COM) Sway Change Baseline to 6 Months@6Month0.32 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.18
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupCenter of Mass (COM) Sway Change Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline0.85 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.65
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupCenter of Mass (COM) Sway Change Baseline to 6 Months@6Month0.76 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.54
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes in both groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.019Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Hip Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months

Hip sway (motion of hip joints in three dimensions) measured by wearable sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupHip Sway Change From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.65 degree^2Standard Deviation 3.22
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupHip Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months@6Month2.15 degree^2Standard Deviation 1.24
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupHip Sway Change From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.75 degree^2Standard Deviation 3.63
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupHip Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months@6Month3.89 degree^2Standard Deviation 2.15
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare changes in two groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.04Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Adherence (Hours Per Day to Wear Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO))

The adherence of participants to the prescribed Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) plus walking shoes was quantified using the response to a self-reported question (How many hours per day did you wear the prescribed footwear?).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupAdherence (Hours Per Day to Wear Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO))5.4 hours per dayStandard Deviation 3.3
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupAdherence (Hours Per Day to Wear Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO))5.6 hours per dayStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Concern for Falling Change Form Baseline to 6 Months

Concern for falling is quantified by Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I) questionnaire. Scores range from minimum 16 (no concern about falling) to maximum 64 (severe concern about falling). Higher score indicate worse performance.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupConcern for Falling Change Form Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline32.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupConcern for Falling Change Form Baseline to 6 Months@6Month27.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupConcern for Falling Change Form Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupConcern for Falling Change Form Baseline to 6 Months@6Month30.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes between groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.65Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Fall Incidents

Fall incidents during the study

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 and 12 months. Generalized Estimating Equation Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupFall IncidentsBaseline2.27 falls per year precedentStandard Deviation 4.17
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupFall Incidents@12Month0.80 falls per year precedentStandard Deviation 1.27
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupFall IncidentsBaseline1.82 falls per year precedentStandard Deviation 4.19
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupFall Incidents@12Month0.94 falls per year precedentStandard Deviation 1.25
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes of both groups from pre-intervention to post-intervention year.p-value: 0.572Generalized Estimating Equations
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of participants with adverse events reported during the study. Adverse events was inquired at 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after the baseline, and summed at 12 months. If the participant has at least one adverse event reported in any assessed time frame, the participant will be categorized as the participant with adverse event.

Time frame: assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, month 12 reported

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupNumber of Participants With Adverse Events0 Participants
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupNumber of Participants With Adverse Events0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Found the Device Useful and Easy to Use

The participants perceived usefulness of ease of use of wearing Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) based on questionnaires of A technology acceptance model (TAM). Perceived usefulness was assessed using two questions (i.e., I feel more stable when standing, and I feel more stable when walking). Perceived ease of use was assessed using two questions (i.e., Was easy to take on and off, and Was comfortable to wear). The Likert scale (6-point scale from 0-5) was used to quantify how much they disagreed with each statement, including strongly disagree, disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, agree, and strongly agree, respectively. In this paper, responses were only categorized as positive (3-5 points) or negative (0-2 points) attitudes towards the use of AFO plus walking shoes.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupPercentage of Participants Who Found the Device Useful and Easy to Useperceived usefulness79 percentage of participants
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupPercentage of Participants Who Found the Device Useful and Easy to Useperceived ease of use93 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physical Activity Level

Physical activity level for 24 hours while wearing their own shoes compared to the walking shoes and compared to walking shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO). To quantify physical activity, number of taken steps per day was monitored using a pendant wearable sensor called, PAMSys (Biosensics, MA, USA).

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupPhysical Activity LevelBaseline4017 number of steps per dayStandard Deviation 2008
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupPhysical Activity Level@6Month4872 number of steps per dayStandard Deviation 2657
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupPhysical Activity LevelBaseline3847 number of steps per dayStandard Deviation 3645
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupPhysical Activity Level@6Month4297 number of steps per dayStandard Deviation 2735
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes between groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.756Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Stride Length

stride length measured in single-task walking with normal speed

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride LengthBaseline0.98 metersStandard Deviation 0.17
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride Length6 months1.05 metersStandard Deviation 0.22
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride LengthBaseline0.96 metersStandard Deviation 0.22
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride Length6 months1.01 metersStandard Deviation 0.27
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes between groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.829Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Stride Time

stride time measured in single task walking with normal speed

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride TimeBaseline1.27 secondsStandard Deviation 0.18
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride Time6 months1.25 secondsStandard Deviation 0.23
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride TimeBaseline1.24 secondsStandard Deviation 0.21
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride Time6 months1.21 secondsStandard Deviation 0.18
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes between groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.857Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Stride Velocity

stride velocity measured in single-task walking with normal speed

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Population: Some participants in AFO and No AFO groups withdrew from study in 6 months. Mixed Model Analysis can handle such missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride VelocityBaseline0.80 m/secStandard Deviation 0.23
Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride Velocity6 months0.88 m/secStandard Deviation 0.27
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride VelocityBaseline0.81 m/secStandard Deviation 0.27
No Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) GroupStride Velocity6 months0.88 m/secStandard Deviation 0.3
Comparison: Repeated measures to compare the changes between groups from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.769Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026